Stock Analysis on Net

EQT Corp. (NYSE:EQT)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since October 27, 2022.

Economic Value Added (EVA)

Microsoft Excel

EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.

Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.

Paying user area

The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.

This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.


We accept:

Visa Mastercard American Express Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check American Express SafeKey

Economic Profit

EQT Corp., economic profit calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1
Cost of capital2
Invested capital3
 
Economic profit4

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cost of capital. See details »

3 Invested capital. See details »

4 2021 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= × =


The financial performance from 2017 to 2021 is characterized by a consistent failure to generate positive economic profit, indicating that the returns on invested capital remained below the company's cost of capital throughout the entire period. Despite fluctuations in operating profitability and a significant reduction in the capital base, value destruction persisted across all five years.

Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
A sharp transition is observed from a positive NOPAT of $408.1 million in 2017 to substantial operating losses starting in 2018. The most significant deficit occurred in 2018 at approximately $2.3 billion. Although losses narrowed sequentially through 2020, the trend reversed in 2021, with NOPAT falling back to $1.3 billion, signaling volatile operating performance.
Invested Capital Trends
A sustained contraction in the capital base occurred between 2017 and 2020, with invested capital declining from $26.5 billion to $15.6 billion. This represents a significant reduction in the resources employed by the business. A slight increase to $16.5 billion was recorded in 2021, marking the end of the downward trend.
Cost of Capital Volatility
The cost of capital exhibited a V-shaped trajectory, starting at 14.89% in 2017 and reaching a low of 6.42% in 2019. Following this minimum, the rate increased steadily, reaching 12.50% by 2021. This fluctuation impacted the threshold required for the company to achieve positive economic value added.
Economic Profit Analysis
Economic profit remained negative throughout the period, with the most severe value destruction occurring in 2018 at $4.4 billion. While 2019 showed a relative improvement to negative $2.4 billion—driven by both the lowest cost of capital and a reduction in invested capital—the figure deteriorated again to negative $3.4 billion by 2021. The persistent negative values confirm that the operating returns were insufficient to compensate for the opportunity cost of the capital employed.

Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)

EQT Corp., NOPAT calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Net income (loss) attributable to EQT Corporation
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1
Increase (decrease) in provision for doubtful accounts2
Increase (decrease) in equity equivalents3
Interest expense
Interest expense, operating lease liability4
Adjusted interest expense
Tax benefit of interest expense5
Adjusted interest expense, after taxes6
(Income) loss from discontinued operations, net of tax7
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »

2 Addition of increase (decrease) in provision for doubtful accounts.

3 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income (loss) attributable to EQT Corporation.

4 2021 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =

5 2021 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

6 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income (loss) attributable to EQT Corporation.

7 Elimination of discontinued operations.


Net Income (Loss) Attributable to EQT Corporation
Over the five-year period from 2017 to 2021, net income exhibited a significant downward trend. In 2017, net income was positive, amounting to approximately $1.51 billion. However, from 2018 onwards, the company incurred losses each year, with the loss magnitude increasing initially in 2018 (around $2.24 billion), followed by a somewhat reduced loss of roughly $1.22 billion in 2019. The losses remained substantial in 2020 and 2021, with figures close to $967 million and $1.16 billion respectively. This pattern suggests persistent financial challenges beginning in 2018 and continuing through 2021, without a return to profitability within this timeframe.
Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
The NOPAT data reveals a similar trajectory to net income, indicating consistent operating losses from 2018 forward. Starting with a positive NOPAT of about $408 million in 2017, the company faced a steep decline to a negative $2.33 billion in 2018. Subsequent years show ongoing negative NOPAT values, though somewhat less severe than 2018, with losses of approximately $1.34 billion, $908 million, and $1.35 billion in 2019, 2020, and 2021 respectively. The continuous negative NOPAT reflects challenges in the core operations, implying difficulties in generating operating profitability post-2017.
Overall Trend Analysis
The data indicates a critical inflection point between 2017 and 2018, with both net income and operating profit shifting sharply from profitability to significant losses. This negative trend persists without material improvement through to 2021. Despite some fluctuations in the magnitude of losses, the absence of recovery highlights ongoing adverse conditions impacting the company's earnings and operational efficiency over this interval.

Cash Operating Taxes

EQT Corp., cash operating taxes calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Income tax benefit
Less: Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
Add: Tax savings from interest expense
Cash operating taxes

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


The financial data reflects fluctuations and notable trends in the tax-related components over the five-year period ending December 31, 2021.

Income Tax Benefit
This item shows a consistent decrease in the magnitude of the tax benefit from 2017 through 2020, moving from approximately -1,188,416 thousand US dollars in 2017 to -298,858 thousand US dollars in 2020. The decreasing absolute value suggests a diminishing tax benefit over time. However, in 2021, there is a slight reversal with the income tax benefit increasing in magnitude to -434,175 thousand US dollars, indicating a partial rebound in the tax benefits recognized.
Cash Operating Taxes
Cash operating taxes exhibit significant volatility during the period. Notably, there is a sharp increase in the cash operating tax outflow in 2018, with a value of -510,482 thousand US dollars, which markedly exceeds the amounts of the surrounding years. In 2019 and 2020, these operating taxes decreased substantially to -58,336 and -85,720 thousand US dollars respectively. Contrasting with previous years, a positive figure of 64,624 thousand US dollars is observed in 2021, indicating a cash inflow or a tax refund rather than an outflow, which marks a substantial positive shift in this cash flow item.

Overall, the data reveals a general trend of decreasing income tax benefits until 2020 followed by a slight increase in 2021, alongside a volatile pattern in cash operating taxes which includes a significant outflow anomaly in 2018 and a notable positive inflow in 2021. These trends suggest shifts in the tax strategy, tax payments, or recognition of tax benefits, as well as possible changes in underlying tax positions or operational tax circumstances during the analyzed period.


Invested Capital

EQT Corp., invested capital calculation (financing approach)

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Current portion of debt
Credit facility borrowings
Term Loan Facility borrowings
Senior notes
Note payable to EQM Midstream Partners, LP
Operating lease liability1
Total reported debt & leases
Common shareholders’ equity
Net deferred tax (assets) liabilities2
Provision for doubtful accounts3
Equity equivalents4
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax5
Noncontrolling interest in consolidated subsidiaries
Adjusted common shareholders’ equity
Invested capital

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.

2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »

3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.

4 Addition of equity equivalents to common shareholders’ equity.

5 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.


Total reported debt & leases
Over the five-year period, total reported debt and leases exhibited a general downward trend from 6,193,259 thousand USD at the end of 2017 to a low of 4,975,379 thousand USD at the end of 2020. However, this was followed by an increase to 5,537,714 thousand USD at the end of 2021, indicating a partial reversal of the previous declining trend.
Common shareholders’ equity
The common shareholders' equity showed a consistent decline from 13,319,618 thousand USD in 2017 to a low of 9,255,240 thousand USD in 2020. Notably, in 2021 there was a recovery to 10,029,527 thousand USD, suggesting improvement in equity position after several years of decrease.
Invested capital
Invested capital experienced a sharp decline from 26,508,072 thousand USD in 2017 to 15,621,670 thousand USD in 2020. This represents a significant reduction in invested capital over these years. In 2021, there was a modest increase to 16,527,021 thousand USD, signaling a stabilization or slight growth after the downward trajectory.

Cost of Capital

EQT Corp., cost of capital calculations

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »


Economic Spread Ratio

EQT Corp., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
Invested capital2
Performance Ratio
Economic spread ratio3
Benchmarks
Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4
Chevron Corp.
ConocoPhillips
Exxon Mobil Corp.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2021 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial performance from 2017 to 2021 is characterized by a persistent inability to generate positive economic profit, indicating that the returns on invested capital did not exceed the company's cost of capital throughout the analyzed period. Value destruction remained constant, though the magnitude of these losses fluctuated.

Economic Profit Analysis
Economic profit remained negative for all five years, with losses ranging from approximately 2.4 billion to 4.4 billion US dollars. A peak in losses occurred in 2018 at 4,415,501 thousand US dollars, followed by a notable recovery in 2019 where losses narrowed to 2,408,711 thousand US dollars. However, this improvement was not sustained, as losses widened again through 2020 and 2021, ending the period at 3,414,129 thousand US dollars.
Invested Capital Trends
There was a significant overall reduction in invested capital between 2017 and 2020, falling from 26,508,072 thousand US dollars to 15,621,670 thousand US dollars. This represents a contraction of approximately 41% over four years, suggesting a strategic downsizing or a substantial divestment of assets. A slight reversal of this trend occurred in 2021, with invested capital increasing to 16,527,021 thousand US dollars.
Economic Spread Ratio Performance
The economic spread ratio remained negative throughout the period, confirming that the organization failed to create economic value. The ratio experienced significant volatility, dropping sharply from -13.35% in 2017 to a period low of -24.01% in 2018. While the ratio improved to -14.46% in 2019, it deteriorated steadily in the subsequent two years, reaching -20.66% by the end of 2021. The widening negative spread in the final two years, despite the lower capital base compared to 2017, indicates a decline in the efficiency of capital utilization relative to the cost of funding.

Economic Profit Margin

EQT Corp., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
Sales of natural gas, natural gas liquids and oil
Performance Ratio
Economic profit margin2
Benchmarks
Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3
Chevron Corp.
ConocoPhillips
Exxon Mobil Corp.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 2021 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Sales of natural gas, natural gas liquids and oil
= 100 × ÷ =

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of the financial performance from 2017 to 2021 reveals a consistent failure to generate positive economic value. The economic profit remained negative throughout the entire five-year period, indicating that the operating returns were insufficient to cover the cost of capital employed.

Economic Profit Trends
The absolute economic profit exhibited significant volatility. After starting at -3.54 billion USD in 2017, value destruction peaked in 2018 at -4.42 billion USD. A notable recovery occurred in 2019, where the deficit narrowed to -2.41 billion USD, before trending downward again to -3.41 billion USD by the end of 2021.
Revenue Fluctuations
Sales of natural gas, natural gas liquids, and oil showed substantial variance. Revenue grew from 2.65 billion USD in 2017 to a peak of 6.80 billion USD in 2021. The most significant expansion occurred between 2020 and 2021, where sales increased by approximately 156%, shifting from 2.65 billion USD to 6.80 billion USD.
Economic Profit Margin Analysis
The economic profit margin remained negative across all reported years, reflecting a persistent gap between actual returns and the required rate of return. The margin improved from -133.45% in 2017 to -63.53% in 2019, before deteriorating to -103.64% in 2020. By 2021, the margin reached its highest point in the observed period at -50.18%. This improvement in 2021 is primarily attributable to the sharp increase in sales volume, which partially offset the underlying cost of capital, although the entity continued to destroy economic value.

The correlation between revenue growth and the economic profit margin suggests that the organization's ability to approach an economic break-even point is heavily dependent on top-line scaling. However, the persistence of negative economic profit despite a massive increase in sales by 2021 indicates systemic challenges in achieving a return on invested capital that exceeds the cost of capital.