Stock Analysis on Net

EQT Corp. (NYSE:EQT)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since October 27, 2022.

Economic Value Added (EVA)

Microsoft Excel

EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.

Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.

Paying user area


We accept:

Visa Mastercard American Express Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check American Express SafeKey

Economic Profit

EQT Corp., economic profit calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1
Cost of capital2
Invested capital3
 
Economic profit4

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cost of capital. See details »

3 Invested capital. See details »

4 2021 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= × =


The period under review demonstrates a consistent pattern of negative economic profit. Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) fluctuates significantly, beginning with a positive value in 2017, then experiencing substantial negative values from 2018 through 2021. Invested capital shows a decreasing trend from 2017 to 2020, followed by a slight increase in 2021. The cost of capital varies over the period, generally remaining in the double digits except for 2019, where it falls to 6.44%. These factors combine to produce consistently negative economic profit values throughout the observed timeframe.

Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
NOPAT begins at US$408,113 thousand in 2017, then declines sharply to a negative US$-2,332,609 thousand in 2018. It remains negative for the subsequent years, fluctuating between US$-908,089 thousand and US$-1,348,798 thousand. This indicates a significant and sustained struggle to generate profits from core operations after accounting for taxes.
Cost of Capital
The cost of capital starts at 14.93% in 2017, decreases to 11.36% in 2018, and reaches a low of 6.44% in 2019. It then increases to 11.80% in 2020 and 12.53% in 2021. The fluctuations in the cost of capital likely reflect changes in market conditions and the company’s risk profile, but it does not appear to correlate directly with the NOPAT performance.
Invested Capital
Invested capital decreases from US$26,508,072 thousand in 2017 to US$15,621,670 thousand in 2020. A modest increase is observed in 2021, reaching US$16,527,021 thousand. This suggests a potential reduction in the scale of operations or asset divestitures during the 2017-2020 period, followed by a slight reinvestment in 2021.
Economic Profit
Economic profit is negative throughout the entire period, ranging from US$-2,411,030 thousand to US$-4,421,472 thousand. The most substantial negative economic profit occurs in 2018 (US$-4,421,472 thousand). The consistent negative values indicate that the company is not generating returns exceeding its cost of capital, suggesting value destruction rather than value creation.

In summary, the observed financial performance indicates a consistent inability to generate economic profit. While the cost of capital fluctuates, the primary driver of the negative economic profit appears to be the consistently low, and often negative, NOPAT. The trend in invested capital suggests a potential restructuring or scaling back of operations, but this has not resulted in improved profitability.


Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)

EQT Corp., NOPAT calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Net income (loss) attributable to EQT Corporation
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1
Increase (decrease) in provision for doubtful accounts2
Increase (decrease) in equity equivalents3
Interest expense
Interest expense, operating lease liability4
Adjusted interest expense
Tax benefit of interest expense5
Adjusted interest expense, after taxes6
(Income) loss from discontinued operations, net of tax7
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »

2 Addition of increase (decrease) in provision for doubtful accounts.

3 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income (loss) attributable to EQT Corporation.

4 2021 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =

5 2021 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

6 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income (loss) attributable to EQT Corporation.

7 Elimination of discontinued operations.


Net Income (Loss) Attributable to EQT Corporation
Over the five-year period from 2017 to 2021, net income exhibited a significant downward trend. In 2017, net income was positive, amounting to approximately $1.51 billion. However, from 2018 onwards, the company incurred losses each year, with the loss magnitude increasing initially in 2018 (around $2.24 billion), followed by a somewhat reduced loss of roughly $1.22 billion in 2019. The losses remained substantial in 2020 and 2021, with figures close to $967 million and $1.16 billion respectively. This pattern suggests persistent financial challenges beginning in 2018 and continuing through 2021, without a return to profitability within this timeframe.
Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
The NOPAT data reveals a similar trajectory to net income, indicating consistent operating losses from 2018 forward. Starting with a positive NOPAT of about $408 million in 2017, the company faced a steep decline to a negative $2.33 billion in 2018. Subsequent years show ongoing negative NOPAT values, though somewhat less severe than 2018, with losses of approximately $1.34 billion, $908 million, and $1.35 billion in 2019, 2020, and 2021 respectively. The continuous negative NOPAT reflects challenges in the core operations, implying difficulties in generating operating profitability post-2017.
Overall Trend Analysis
The data indicates a critical inflection point between 2017 and 2018, with both net income and operating profit shifting sharply from profitability to significant losses. This negative trend persists without material improvement through to 2021. Despite some fluctuations in the magnitude of losses, the absence of recovery highlights ongoing adverse conditions impacting the company's earnings and operational efficiency over this interval.

Cash Operating Taxes

EQT Corp., cash operating taxes calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Income tax benefit
Less: Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
Add: Tax savings from interest expense
Cash operating taxes

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


The financial data reflects fluctuations and notable trends in the tax-related components over the five-year period ending December 31, 2021.

Income Tax Benefit
This item shows a consistent decrease in the magnitude of the tax benefit from 2017 through 2020, moving from approximately -1,188,416 thousand US dollars in 2017 to -298,858 thousand US dollars in 2020. The decreasing absolute value suggests a diminishing tax benefit over time. However, in 2021, there is a slight reversal with the income tax benefit increasing in magnitude to -434,175 thousand US dollars, indicating a partial rebound in the tax benefits recognized.
Cash Operating Taxes
Cash operating taxes exhibit significant volatility during the period. Notably, there is a sharp increase in the cash operating tax outflow in 2018, with a value of -510,482 thousand US dollars, which markedly exceeds the amounts of the surrounding years. In 2019 and 2020, these operating taxes decreased substantially to -58,336 and -85,720 thousand US dollars respectively. Contrasting with previous years, a positive figure of 64,624 thousand US dollars is observed in 2021, indicating a cash inflow or a tax refund rather than an outflow, which marks a substantial positive shift in this cash flow item.

Overall, the data reveals a general trend of decreasing income tax benefits until 2020 followed by a slight increase in 2021, alongside a volatile pattern in cash operating taxes which includes a significant outflow anomaly in 2018 and a notable positive inflow in 2021. These trends suggest shifts in the tax strategy, tax payments, or recognition of tax benefits, as well as possible changes in underlying tax positions or operational tax circumstances during the analyzed period.


Invested Capital

EQT Corp., invested capital calculation (financing approach)

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Current portion of debt
Credit facility borrowings
Term Loan Facility borrowings
Senior notes
Note payable to EQM Midstream Partners, LP
Operating lease liability1
Total reported debt & leases
Common shareholders’ equity
Net deferred tax (assets) liabilities2
Provision for doubtful accounts3
Equity equivalents4
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax5
Noncontrolling interest in consolidated subsidiaries
Adjusted common shareholders’ equity
Invested capital

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.

2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »

3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.

4 Addition of equity equivalents to common shareholders’ equity.

5 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.


Total reported debt & leases
Over the five-year period, total reported debt and leases exhibited a general downward trend from 6,193,259 thousand USD at the end of 2017 to a low of 4,975,379 thousand USD at the end of 2020. However, this was followed by an increase to 5,537,714 thousand USD at the end of 2021, indicating a partial reversal of the previous declining trend.
Common shareholders’ equity
The common shareholders' equity showed a consistent decline from 13,319,618 thousand USD in 2017 to a low of 9,255,240 thousand USD in 2020. Notably, in 2021 there was a recovery to 10,029,527 thousand USD, suggesting improvement in equity position after several years of decrease.
Invested capital
Invested capital experienced a sharp decline from 26,508,072 thousand USD in 2017 to 15,621,670 thousand USD in 2020. This represents a significant reduction in invested capital over these years. In 2021, there was a modest increase to 16,527,021 thousand USD, signaling a stabilization or slight growth after the downward trajectory.

Cost of Capital

EQT Corp., cost of capital calculations

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »


Economic Spread Ratio

EQT Corp., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
Invested capital2
Performance Ratio
Economic spread ratio3
Benchmarks
Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4
Chevron Corp.
ConocoPhillips
Exxon Mobil Corp.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2021 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial performance, as indicated by economic value added metrics, demonstrates a consistent pattern of negative economic profit over the five-year period from 2017 to 2021. Simultaneously, invested capital experienced fluctuations, impacting the economic spread ratio.

Economic Profit
Economic profit consistently remained negative throughout the observed period. The magnitude of the loss varied, with the largest negative economic profit recorded in 2017 at -3,550,756 US$ in thousands. While there was a reduction in the loss between 2017 and 2019, the negative profit trend resumed in 2020 and intensified through 2021, reaching -3,420,059 US$ in thousands.
Invested Capital
Invested capital decreased significantly from 2017 to 2019, moving from 26,508,072 US$ in thousands to 16,653,426 US$ in thousands. It then experienced a slight decline in 2020 before increasing modestly in 2021 to 16,527,021 US$ in thousands. The overall trend suggests a reduction in capital employed, followed by stabilization in the latter years.
Economic Spread Ratio
The economic spread ratio exhibited a consistently negative trend, indicating that the company’s return on invested capital was less than its cost of capital. The ratio worsened considerably from -13.39% in 2017 to -24.04% in 2018, representing the largest single-year decline. Although the ratio improved slightly in 2019, it continued to deteriorate in 2020 and 2021, reaching -20.69% in the most recent year. This suggests a widening gap between the cost of capital and the returns generated from invested capital.

The combined trends suggest that while the company has attempted to optimize its capital base, it has not been sufficient to generate positive economic profit. The consistently negative economic spread ratio highlights a fundamental challenge in achieving returns that exceed the cost of capital.


Economic Profit Margin

EQT Corp., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
Sales of natural gas, natural gas liquids and oil
Performance Ratio
Economic profit margin2
Benchmarks
Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3
Chevron Corp.
ConocoPhillips
Exxon Mobil Corp.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 2021 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Sales of natural gas, natural gas liquids and oil
= 100 × ÷ =

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The period under review demonstrates significant fluctuations in economic profit and, consequently, the economic profit margin. Economic profit consistently remained negative across all observed years, indicating the company’s returns were insufficient to cover the cost of capital. However, the magnitude of the negative economic profit varied considerably.

Economic Profit
Economic profit exhibited volatility. It worsened from 2017 to 2018, improving in 2019, then declining again in 2020, and finally worsening substantially in 2021. The largest negative economic profit occurred in 2017, while the least negative occurred in 2019. The substantial decline in 2021 represents a significant deterioration in value creation.
Sales of Natural Gas, Natural Gas Liquids and Oil
Sales experienced a substantial increase from 2017 to 2018. Following this peak, sales decreased in 2019 and again in 2020. A considerable recovery and subsequent increase in sales was observed in 2021, reaching the highest level during the analyzed period. This suggests external market conditions or company-specific strategies significantly impacted revenue generation.
Economic Profit Margin
The economic profit margin mirrored the trends in economic profit, remaining negative throughout the period. The margin was most negative in 2017 at -133.92%. It improved to -63.59% in 2019, but then deteriorated to -103.83% in 2020. A notable improvement was seen in 2021, with the margin reaching -50.27%, despite the larger absolute economic loss. The improvement in the margin in 2021, despite the increased economic loss, is attributable to the significantly higher sales volume.

The relationship between sales and economic profit margin suggests that while increased sales can partially offset negative economic profit, the company has consistently failed to generate returns exceeding its cost of capital. The fluctuations highlight the sensitivity of economic performance to both revenue levels and the underlying cost of capital.