Stock Analysis on Net
Stock Analysis on Net

EQT Corp. (NYSE:EQT)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since October 27, 2022.

Return on Capital (ROC)

Microsoft Excel

Return on capital (ROC) is after tax rate of return on net business assets. ROIC is unaffected by changes in interest rates or company debt and equity structure. It measures business productivity performance.


Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)

EQT Corp., ROIC calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 (1,348,798) (908,089) (1,339,125) (2,332,609) 408,113
Invested capital2 16,527,021 15,621,670 16,653,426 18,393,800 26,508,072
Performance Ratio
ROIC3 -8.16% -5.81% -8.04% -12.68% 1.54%
Benchmarks
ROIC, Competitors4
Chevron Corp. 10.04% — — — —
ConocoPhillips 13.45% — — — —
Exxon Mobil Corp. 12.01% — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2021 Calculation
ROIC = 100 × NOPAT ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × -1,348,798 ÷ 16,527,021 = -8.16%

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of return on invested capital (ROIC) reveals a period of significant financial volatility and consistent value erosion between 2018 and 2021. Following a marginal positive return in 2017, the company experienced a sharp transition into negative territory, indicating that the generated operating profits were insufficient to cover the costs of the capital deployed.

Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT) Trends
A severe deterioration in profitability is observed starting in 2018, where NOPAT shifted from a positive 408,113 thousand US$ to a substantial loss of 2,332,609 thousand US$. Although there was a gradual narrowing of these losses through 2019 and 2020, the trend reversed in 2021 with losses expanding again to 1,348,798 thousand US$. This pattern indicates a sustained inability to achieve operational profitability over the majority of the analyzed period.
Invested Capital Dynamics
The capital base underwent a significant contraction between 2017 and 2020, decreasing from 26,508,072 thousand US$ to 15,621,670 thousand US$. This downward trajectory suggests a strategic reduction in assets or a significant deleveraging process. However, this trend reversed in 2021, as invested capital increased to 16,527,021 thousand US$, marking the first expansion of the capital base in four years.
ROIC Performance and Correlation
The ROIC fluctuated in alignment with NOPAT volatility. After a peak of 1.54% in 2017, the ratio plummeted to -12.68% in 2018. A partial recovery was noted through 2020, where the ROIC improved to -5.81%, though it remained negative. The subsequent decline to -8.16% in 2021 reflects the combined impact of increasing operating losses and a growing capital base, suggesting a decrease in capital efficiency.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Decomposition of ROIC

EQT Corp., decomposition of ROIC

Microsoft Excel
ROIC = OPM1 × TO2 × 1 – CTR3
Dec 31, 2021 -8.16% = -18.87% × 0.41 × 100.00%
Dec 31, 2020 -5.81% = -37.50% × 0.17 × 100.00%
Dec 31, 2019 -8.04% = -36.86% × 0.23 × 100.00%
Dec 31, 2018 -12.68% = -60.55% × 0.26 × 100.00%
Dec 31, 2017 1.54% = 14.17% × 0.10 × 108.60%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 Operating profit margin (OPM). See calculations »

2 Turnover of capital (TO). See calculations »

3 Effective cash tax rate (CTR). See calculations »


The analysis of return on invested capital (ROIC) from 2017 to 2021 reveals a period of significant financial volatility and sustained negative returns. The overall performance indicates a systemic struggle to translate invested capital into positive operating earnings, primarily driven by severe operating losses.

Operating Profit Margin (OPM)
A precipitous decline in profitability is observed after 2017, where the margin shifted from a positive 14.17% to a low of -60.55% in 2018. Although a recovery trend emerged thereafter, with the margin improving to -18.87% by 2021, the operational efficiency remained negative throughout the four-year period.
Turnover of Capital (TO)
Capital efficiency demonstrated an overall upward trajectory, increasing from 0.10 in 2017 to 0.41 in 2021. The substantial increase in the turnover ratio suggests an improved ability to generate revenue from the invested capital base, although these gains were insufficient to counteract the negative operating margins.
Effective Cash Tax Rate (CTR)
The tax impact remained largely neutral from 2018 through 2021, with the (1 - CTR) value holding steady at 100%. A slight deviation occurred in 2017 with a value of 108.60%, indicating a marginal tax benefit that slightly augmented the ROIC for that period.
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
The resulting ROIC transitioned from a positive 1.54% in 2017 to a series of negative returns, reaching a low of -12.68% in 2018. While there was a gradual improvement toward -5.81% in 2020, the figure regressed to -8.16% in 2021. The decomposition confirms that the negative ROIC is predominantly a function of poor operating margins rather than capital underutilization.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Operating Profit Margin (OPM)

EQT Corp., OPM calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 (1,348,798) (908,089) (1,339,125) (2,332,609) 408,113
Add: Cash operating taxes2 64,624 (85,720) (58,336) (510,482) (32,320)
Net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT) (1,284,174) (993,809) (1,397,460) (2,843,091) 375,793
 
Sales of natural gas, natural gas liquids and oil 6,804,020 2,650,299 3,791,414 4,695,519 2,651,318
Profitability Ratio
OPM3 -18.87% -37.50% -36.86% -60.55% 14.17%
Benchmarks
OPM, Competitors4
Chevron Corp. 15.98% — — — —
ConocoPhillips 29.99% — — — —
Exxon Mobil Corp. 14.69% — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cash operating taxes. See details »

3 2021 Calculation
OPM = 100 × NOPBT ÷ Sales of natural gas, natural gas liquids and oil
= 100 × -1,284,174 ÷ 6,804,020 = -18.87%

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The operational performance between 2017 and 2021 is characterized by significant volatility in profitability and revenue. After an initial period of positive returns, a sustained phase of operating losses occurred, although a trend toward margin recovery became evident by the end of the period.

Operating Profit Margin (OPM) Trends
A severe contraction in operating efficiency is observed between 2017 and 2018, where the OPM plummeted from 14.17% to -60.55%. Despite remaining in negative territory for the subsequent three years, the margin showed a gradual recovery, improving to -36.86% in 2019 and eventually reaching -18.87% by December 31, 2021.
Net Operating Profit Before Taxes (NOPBT)
The NOPBT shifted from a positive US$ 375.79 million in 2017 to a substantial loss of US$ 2.84 billion in 2018. Operating losses narrowed progressively through 2020, reaching a period low of US$ 993.81 million, before expanding slightly to US$ 1.28 billion in 2021.
Sales Revenue Dynamics
Revenue experienced significant fluctuations, with sales of natural gas, natural gas liquids, and oil reaching a peak of US$ 6.80 billion in 2021. This surge in revenue in the final year played a critical role in reducing the operating profit margin deficit, despite the absolute NOPBT remaining negative.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Turnover of Capital (TO)

EQT Corp., TO calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Sales of natural gas, natural gas liquids and oil 6,804,020 2,650,299 3,791,414 4,695,519 2,651,318
Invested capital1 16,527,021 15,621,670 16,653,426 18,393,800 26,508,072
Efficiency Ratio
TO2 0.41 0.17 0.23 0.26 0.10
Benchmarks
TO, Competitors3
Chevron Corp. 0.80 — — — —
ConocoPhillips 0.60 — — — —
Exxon Mobil Corp. 1.01 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 Invested capital. See details »

2 2021 Calculation
TO = Sales of natural gas, natural gas liquids and oil ÷ Invested capital
= 6,804,020 ÷ 16,527,021 = 0.41

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of capital turnover between 2017 and 2021 reveals a period of significant structural adjustment in the capital base accompanied by high volatility in revenue generation.

Revenue Trends
Sales of natural gas, natural gas liquids, and oil exhibited substantial fluctuations over the five-year period. Following an initial increase in 2018, revenues declined for two consecutive years, reaching a low in 2020 of approximately 2.65 billion US dollars. A sharp recovery occurred in 2021, with sales increasing to 6.8 billion US dollars, the highest level in the period analyzed.
Invested Capital Trajectory
A consistent downward trend in invested capital was observed from 2017 through 2020, with the balance decreasing from 26.5 billion US dollars to 15.6 billion US dollars. This represents a significant reduction in the capital base. A slight reversal of this trend occurred in 2021, as invested capital rose to 16.5 billion US dollars.
Turnover of Capital Performance
The turnover of capital ratio experienced considerable volatility, mirroring the fluctuations in sales while being influenced by the shrinking capital base. The ratio improved from 0.10 in 2017 to 0.41 in 2021. The most notable efficiency gain occurred in 2021, where the turnover ratio more than doubled from 0.17 in the previous year. This suggests a substantial increase in the capacity of the company to generate revenue relative to its invested capital during the final year of the period.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Effective Cash Tax Rate (CTR)

EQT Corp., CTR calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 (1,348,798) (908,089) (1,339,125) (2,332,609) 408,113
Add: Cash operating taxes2 64,624 (85,720) (58,336) (510,482) (32,320)
Net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT) (1,284,174) (993,809) (1,397,460) (2,843,091) 375,793
Tax Rate
CTR3 — — — — -8.60%
Benchmarks
CTR, Competitors4
Chevron Corp. 21.79% — — — —
ConocoPhillips 25.25% — — — —
Exxon Mobil Corp. 19.45% — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cash operating taxes. See details »

3 2021 Calculation
CTR = 100 × Cash operating taxes ÷ NOPBT
= 100 × 64,624 ÷ -1,284,174 = —

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial performance between 2017 and 2021 is characterized by a transition from operating profitability to persistent operational losses, accompanied by fluctuating cash tax positions.

Net Operating Profit Before Taxes (NOPBT) Trends
A positive NOPBT of 375.79 million USD was recorded in 2017, followed by a sharp decline into negative territory starting in 2018. The most significant operational loss occurred in 2018, reaching 2.84 billion USD. Operational deficits persisted through 2021, with losses fluctuating between 993.81 million USD and 1.39 billion USD.
Cash Operating Tax Patterns
Cash operating taxes were negative from 2017 through 2020, representing net cash inflows or tax benefits. A peak tax benefit of 510.48 million USD was observed in 2018, correlating with the period of maximum operational loss. This trend reversed in 2021, when cash operating taxes became positive at 64.62 million USD, indicating a cash outflow for taxes despite continued operating losses.
Effective Cash Tax Rate (CTR) Analysis
The effective cash tax rate for 2017 was -8.60%, signifying that cash tax benefits were realized while the entity was operationally profitable. In subsequent years, the relationship between NOPBT and cash taxes shifted; while the company operated at a loss, it generally maintained cash tax benefits until 2021, when the divergence resulted in tax payments regardless of the negative operating profit.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?