AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

EQT Corp. (NYSE:EQT)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since October 27, 2022.

DuPont Analysis: Disaggregation of ROE, ROA, and Net Profit Margin

Microsoft Excel

Two-Component Disaggregation of ROE

EQT Corp., decomposition of ROE

Microsoft Excel
ROE = ROA × Financial Leverage
Dec 31, 2021 -11.52% = -5.35% × 2.15
Dec 31, 2020 -10.45% = -5.34% × 1.96
Dec 31, 2019 -12.46% = -6.50% × 1.92
Dec 31, 2018 -20.48% = -10.83% × 1.89
Dec 31, 2017 11.33% = 5.11% × 2.22

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


The analysis of the return on equity (ROE) through a two-component disaggregation reveals a significant deterioration in shareholder returns following 2017, driven primarily by a collapse in asset profitability rather than changes in capital structure.

Return on Assets (ROA)
A sharp reversal in asset productivity is observed between 2017 and 2018, where ROA shifted from a positive 5.11% to a negative 10.83%. Although the negative return narrowed slightly in subsequent years, reaching -5.34% in 2020 and remaining virtually flat at -5.35% in 2021, the company failed to return to profitability throughout the four-year period.
Financial Leverage
The leverage ratio remained relatively stable, fluctuating within a narrow range between 1.89 and 2.22. After a decrease from 2.22 in 2017 to 1.89 in 2018, a gradual upward trend occurred, with the ratio increasing to 2.15 by the end of 2021. This indicates a consistent reliance on debt to finance assets regardless of the underlying profitability.
Return on Equity (ROE)
The ROE reflects the compounding effect of negative asset returns and financial leverage. In 2017, leverage amplified a positive ROA to produce an ROE of 11.33%. Conversely, from 2018 onward, the use of leverage magnified the losses, resulting in a peak negative ROE of -20.48% in 2018. While ROE improved slightly in 2019 and 2020, it remained deeply negative, ending at -11.52% in 2021, closely tracking the trajectory of the ROA.

The interaction between these components demonstrates that the decline in ROE was fundamentally a result of negative earnings on assets. The stable level of financial leverage served to exacerbate the volatility and the depth of the losses experienced by shareholders during the period of negative asset returns.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Three-Component Disaggregation of ROE

EQT Corp., decomposition of ROE

Microsoft Excel
ROE = Net Profit Margin × Asset Turnover × Financial Leverage
Dec 31, 2021 -11.52% = -16.99% × 0.31 × 2.15
Dec 31, 2020 -10.45% = -36.49% × 0.15 × 1.96
Dec 31, 2019 -12.46% = -32.22% × 0.20 × 1.92
Dec 31, 2018 -20.48% = -47.80% × 0.23 × 1.89
Dec 31, 2017 11.33% = 56.90% × 0.09 × 2.22

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


The Return on Equity (ROE) experienced a significant reversal, transitioning from a positive 11.33% in 2017 to consistently negative values from 2018 through 2021. A three-component DuPont analysis reveals that this decline was driven primarily by a collapse in profitability, which outweighed improvements in asset efficiency.

Net Profit Margin
A severe contraction in profitability is observed, with the margin dropping from 56.90% in 2017 to -47.80% in 2018. While a gradual recovery trend followed, with the margin improving to -16.99% by 2021, the persistence of negative margins served as the primary catalyst for the negative ROE throughout the period.
Asset Turnover
Operational efficiency demonstrated a general upward trend, increasing from a ratio of 0.09 in 2017 to 0.31 in 2021. Despite this improvement in the capacity to generate revenue from the asset base, the efficiency gains were insufficient to offset the impact of negative net profit margins.
Financial Leverage
The financial leverage ratio remained relatively stable, fluctuating within a narrow range between 1.89 in 2018 and 2.22 in 2017. By 2021, the ratio returned to 2.15. In an environment of negative profitability, this leverage acted as a multiplier that exacerbated the negative returns experienced by equity holders.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Five-Component Disaggregation of ROE

EQT Corp., decomposition of ROE

Microsoft Excel
ROE = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin × Asset Turnover × Financial Leverage
Dec 31, 2021 -11.52% = — × — × -18.83% × 0.31 × 2.15
Dec 31, 2020 -10.45% = — × — × -37.54% × 0.15 × 1.96
Dec 31, 2019 -12.46% = — × — × -36.86% × 0.20 × 1.92
Dec 31, 2018 -20.48% = — × — × -57.76% × 0.23 × 1.89
Dec 31, 2017 11.33% = 4.71 × 0.66 × 18.41% × 0.09 × 2.22

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


The Return on Equity (ROE) experienced a severe contraction, shifting from a positive 11.33% in 2017 to a sustained period of negative returns, reaching -20.48% in 2018 and remaining negative through 2021. This decline indicates a period of significant erosion in shareholder value, primarily driven by a collapse in operating profitability.

Operating Profitability
The EBIT Margin served as the primary driver for the decline in ROE. A sharp transition occurred between 2017 and 2018, where the margin fell from 18.41% to -57.76%. Although a gradual recovery was observed toward the end of the period, with the margin improving to -18.83% by December 31, 2021, the persistent negative values indicate that operating expenses consistently exceeded gross profits during this timeframe.
Asset Efficiency
Asset Turnover demonstrated a general upward trend, increasing from 0.09 in 2017 to 0.31 in 2021. This suggests an improvement in the efficiency of asset utilization to generate revenue. However, the gains in asset turnover were insufficient to counteract the negative impact of the operating margins on the overall return.
Financial Leverage
Financial Leverage remained relatively stable, fluctuating within a narrow range between 1.89 and 2.22. After a slight decrease from 2017 to 2018, the leverage ratio trended upward again to 2.15 by 2021. Because leverage remained consistent, it did not act as the primary catalyst for the volatility in ROE, confirming that the performance decline was operational rather than structural.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Two-Component Disaggregation of ROA

EQT Corp., decomposition of ROA

Microsoft Excel
ROA = Net Profit Margin × Asset Turnover
Dec 31, 2021 -5.35% = -16.99% × 0.31
Dec 31, 2020 -5.34% = -36.49% × 0.15
Dec 31, 2019 -6.50% = -32.22% × 0.20
Dec 31, 2018 -10.83% = -47.80% × 0.23
Dec 31, 2017 5.11% = 56.90% × 0.09

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


The return on assets (ROA) experienced a significant reversal between 2017 and 2018, moving from a positive 5.11% to a negative 10.83%. Although the ROA showed slight recovery in subsequent years, it remained negative through 2021, concluding the period at -5.35%. This sustained negative performance indicates a persistent inability to generate positive net income from the asset base over the analyzed four-year window.

Net Profit Margin
A severe contraction in profitability is evident, with the margin collapsing from a peak of 56.90% in 2017 to -47.80% in 2018. While a gradual trend toward recovery is observed from 2019 onwards, the margin remained deeply negative, finishing at -16.99% in 2021. This component serves as the primary driver for the negative ROA, reflecting substantial operational losses or non-operating expenses that outweighed revenue generation.
Asset Turnover
Efficiency in asset utilization showed a general upward trajectory. The ratio increased from 0.09 in 2017 to 0.31 by 2021, representing a significant improvement in the company's ability to generate sales from its assets. Despite some volatility between 2018 and 2020, the overall trend indicates a more aggressive or efficient use of the asset base to drive top-line growth.
ROA Disaggregation Analysis
The two-component analysis reveals a divergence between operational efficiency and profitability. The improvement in asset turnover acted as a partial buffer against the negative net profit margins; however, it was insufficient to offset the losses. The persistence of a negative ROA despite an increasing asset turnover ratio confirms that the financial underperformance is rooted in margin erosion rather than asset underutilization.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Four-Component Disaggregation of ROA

EQT Corp., decomposition of ROA

Microsoft Excel
ROA = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin × Asset Turnover
Dec 31, 2021 -5.35% = — × — × -18.83% × 0.31
Dec 31, 2020 -5.34% = — × — × -37.54% × 0.15
Dec 31, 2019 -6.50% = — × — × -36.86% × 0.20
Dec 31, 2018 -10.83% = — × — × -57.76% × 0.23
Dec 31, 2017 5.11% = 4.71 × 0.66 × 18.41% × 0.09

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


The decomposition of Return on Assets (ROA) reveals a significant shift in financial performance beginning in 2018, characterized by a transition from positive profitability to sustained negative returns. While asset utilization improved over the period, it was insufficient to offset severe declines in operating profitability.

Return on Assets (ROA)
A sharp contraction is observed between 2017 and 2018, where ROA fell from 5.11% to -10.83%. Although a slight recovery trend occurred between 2019 and 2021, the ROA remained negative, concluding the period at -5.35%.
EBIT Margin
The EBIT margin serves as the primary driver of the negative ROA. After a positive start of 18.41% in 2017, the margin collapsed to -57.76% in 2018. While there was a gradual recovery toward the end of the period, reaching -18.83% in 2021, the persistent negative margins indicate ongoing operational losses.
Asset Turnover
An upward trend in asset efficiency is evident. Asset turnover increased from 0.09 in 2017 to a peak of 0.31 in 2021. This suggests that the company became more effective at generating revenue from its asset base, although these gains were not enough to restore overall profitability due to the negative EBIT margins.
Tax and Interest Burdens
Due to the absence of values for the subsequent years, a longitudinal trend cannot be established for tax and interest burdens. However, the 2017 figures establish a baseline where tax burden was 4.71 and interest burden was 0.66.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Disaggregation of Net Profit Margin

EQT Corp., decomposition of net profit margin ratio

Microsoft Excel
Net Profit Margin = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin
Dec 31, 2021 -16.99% = — × — × -18.83%
Dec 31, 2020 -36.49% = — × — × -37.54%
Dec 31, 2019 -32.22% = — × — × -36.86%
Dec 31, 2018 -47.80% = — × — × -57.76%
Dec 31, 2017 56.90% = 4.71 × 0.66 × 18.41%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


The financial performance from 2017 to 2021 is characterized by a significant shift from high profitability to substantial operating losses, followed by a gradual recovery phase starting in 2019.

EBIT Margin Trends
A sharp contraction in operating profitability occurred between 2017 and 2018, with the EBIT margin falling from 18.41% to -57.76%. This indicates a severe decline in operating efficiency or a collapse in revenue relative to operating expenses. From 2019 onward, a steady recovery trend is observable, with margins improving to -36.86% in 2019, remaining relatively flat at -37.54% in 2020, and further recovering to -18.83% by the end of 2021.
Net Profit Margin Analysis
The net profit margin mirrored the volatility of the EBIT margin, dropping from a peak of 56.90% in 2017 to -47.80% in 2018. The subsequent trajectory reflects the gradual improvement seen in operating results, moving from -32.22% in 2019 to -16.99% in 2021. The close alignment between the EBIT margin and the net profit margin suggests that operating performance was the primary determinant of bottom-line results during this period.
Financial Burden Components
Available data from 2017 indicates a tax burden ratio of 4.71 and an interest burden ratio of 0.66. These figures suggest that in 2017, tax obligations had a more pronounced impact on the relationship between operating profit and net income than interest expenses did.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?