AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

EQT Corp. (NYSE:EQT)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since October 27, 2022.

Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios

Microsoft Excel

Short-term Activity Ratios (Summary)

Turnover Ratios

Average No. Days

EQT Corp., short-term (operating) activity ratios

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Turnover Ratios
Receivables turnover 4.73 4.68 6.21 3.78 3.99
Payables turnover 5.08 3.76 4.76 4.43 3.65
Working capital turnover — — 9.27 — —
Average No. Days
Average receivable collection period 77 78 59 97 92
Average payables payment period 72 97 77 82 100

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


The analysis of short-term activity ratios reveals fluctuating efficiency in the management of working capital components between 2017 and 2021, characterized by a significant shift in the timing of cash inflows and outflows.

Receivables Management
Receivables turnover demonstrated instability, starting at 3.99 in 2017 and reaching a peak of 6.21 in 2019 before stabilizing at 4.73 by 2021. This volatility is mirrored in the average receivable collection period, which saw a sharp reduction to 59 days in 2019 from a high of 97 days in 2018. Although the collection period increased to 77 days by 2021, the overall trend indicates a moderate improvement in collection efficiency compared to the 2017-2018 period.
Payables Management
The payables turnover ratio generally trended upward, rising from 3.65 in 2017 to 5.08 in 2021, despite a temporary decline in 2020. Correspondingly, the average payables payment period exhibited a downward trend, decreasing from 100 days in 2017 to 72 days in 2021. This suggests an acceleration in the settlement of obligations to suppliers, reducing the amount of time the company utilizes trade credit to fund operations.
Operational Liquidity and Turnover
A critical shift is observed in the relationship between collection and payment cycles. In the early period (2017-2019), the average payables payment period consistently exceeded the average receivable collection period, effectively providing a source of spontaneous financing. However, by 2021, the collection period (77 days) exceeded the payment period (72 days), indicating a potential increase in pressure on short-term liquidity. The working capital turnover ratio for 2019 was recorded at 9.27, reflecting the efficiency of utilizing working capital to generate revenue during that specific fiscal year.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Receivables Turnover

EQT Corp., receivables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Sales of natural gas, natural gas liquids and oil 6,804,020 2,650,299 3,791,414 4,695,519 2,651,318
Accounts receivable, less provision for doubtful accounts 1,438,031 566,552 610,088 1,241,843 664,685
Short-term Activity Ratio
Receivables turnover1 4.73 4.68 6.21 3.78 3.99
Benchmarks
Receivables Turnover, Competitors2
Chevron Corp. 8.45 — — — —
ConocoPhillips 6.87 — — — —
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. 10.29 — — — —
Receivables Turnover, Sector
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels 9.20 — — — —
Receivables Turnover, Industry
Energy 8.75 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Receivables turnover = Sales of natural gas, natural gas liquids and oil ÷ Accounts receivable, less provision for doubtful accounts
= 6,804,020 ÷ 1,438,031 = 4.73

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of the receivables turnover reveals a fluctuating pattern between 2017 and 2021, mirroring the significant volatility observed in the annual sales of natural gas, natural gas liquids, and oil.

Turnover Volatility and Peak Efficiency
The receivables turnover ratio exhibited instability in the early part of the period, moving from 3.99 in 2017 to 3.78 in 2018. A significant peak in collection efficiency was reached in 2019, with the ratio climbing to 6.21. This spike occurred as accounts receivable decreased sharply by approximately 50%, outpacing the decline in sales and indicating a period of highly accelerated cash conversion.
Revenue-Driven Scaling
Following the 2019 peak, the turnover ratio moderated to 4.68 in 2020. In 2021, a substantial increase in sales to 6.8 billion US dollars was accompanied by a proportional rise in accounts receivable to 1.4 billion US dollars. Despite this massive increase in volume, the turnover ratio remained stable at 4.73, suggesting that credit management processes scaled effectively with the expansion of business activity.
Operational Insights
The variance in turnover suggests that the speed of converting receivables into cash has been inconsistent over the five-year window. While the 2019 figures highlight a period of maximum efficiency, the convergence of the ratio around 4.7 in 2020 and 2021 indicates a stabilization of the operating cycle, where the company maintained a consistent relationship between its credit extensions and its revenue generation.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Payables Turnover

EQT Corp., payables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Sales of natural gas, natural gas liquids and oil 6,804,020 2,650,299 3,791,414 4,695,519 2,651,318
Accounts payable 1,339,251 705,461 796,438 1,059,873 726,433
Short-term Activity Ratio
Payables turnover1 5.08 3.76 4.76 4.43 3.65
Benchmarks
Payables Turnover, Competitors2
Chevron Corp. 9.46 — — — —
ConocoPhillips 9.12 — — — —
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. 10.39 — — — —
Payables Turnover, Sector
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels 9.94 — — — —
Payables Turnover, Industry
Energy 9.69 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Payables turnover = Sales of natural gas, natural gas liquids and oil ÷ Accounts payable
= 6,804,020 ÷ 1,339,251 = 5.08

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of short-term activity between 2017 and 2021 reveals a volatile yet generally improving efficiency in the management of supplier obligations. The interaction between revenue fluctuations and accounts payable balances indicates a dynamic approach to working capital and liability settlement.

Payables Turnover Trend
The payables turnover ratio exhibited a general upward trajectory, moving from 3.65 in 2017 to a period high of 5.08 in 2021. A consistent increase was observed from 2017 through 2019, with the ratio reaching 4.76, suggesting a progressive acceleration in the rate at which obligations to suppliers were settled.
Correlation with Revenue Volatility
A significant deviation occurred in 2020, where the turnover ratio declined to 3.76. This contraction coincided with a reduction in sales to approximately 2.65 billion US dollars, the lowest level in the observed period, indicating a deceleration in payment frequency during a period of lower operational volume.
Operational Peak and Recovery
The 2021 fiscal year showed a sharp recovery and the highest efficiency in the analyzed timeframe. The turnover ratio reached 5.08, aligning with a substantial increase in sales to 6.80 billion US dollars. Despite accounts payable increasing to 1.34 billion US dollars, the rate of turnover accelerated, reflecting a more rapid cycle of procurement and payment.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Working Capital Turnover

EQT Corp., working capital turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Current assets 2,286,766 1,215,450 1,754,855 1,969,664 1,163,055
Less: Current liabilities 5,080,171 1,762,410 1,345,902 2,355,001 1,232,237
Working capital (2,793,405) (546,960) 408,953 (385,337) (69,182)
 
Sales of natural gas, natural gas liquids and oil 6,804,020 2,650,299 3,791,414 4,695,519 2,651,318
Short-term Activity Ratio
Working capital turnover1 — — 9.27 — —
Benchmarks
Working Capital Turnover, Competitors2
Chevron Corp. 22.40 — — — —
ConocoPhillips 11.37 — — — —
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. 110.19 — — — —
Working Capital Turnover, Sector
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels 35.45 — — — —
Working Capital Turnover, Industry
Energy 31.75 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Working capital turnover = Sales of natural gas, natural gas liquids and oil ÷ Working capital
= 6,804,020 ÷ -2,793,405 = —

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial data reveals significant volatility in both working capital and revenue streams between 2017 and 2021, characterized by a recurring pattern of negative working capital and cyclical sales performance.

Working Capital Trends
A consistent trend of negative working capital is observed in four of the five analyzed years. The deficit expanded from -69,182 thousand US$ in 2017 to a substantial -2,793,405 thousand US$ by 2021. A brief pivot to a positive working capital position occurred in 2019, reaching 408,953 thousand US$, before returning to a deficit in 2020 and accelerating sharply downward in 2021.
Revenue Performance
Sales of natural gas, natural gas liquids, and oil exhibited considerable fluctuation. After an initial increase from 2,651,318 thousand US$ in 2017 to a peak of 4,695,519 thousand US$ in 2018, revenue declined over the following two years, reaching a low of 2,650,299 thousand US$ in 2020. However, a significant recovery is evident in 2021, with sales surging to 6,804,020 thousand US$.
Working Capital Turnover Analysis
The working capital turnover ratio is only provided for 2019, recorded at 9.27. This reflects the only period within the five-year window where working capital was positive, allowing for a traditional calculation of efficiency. The absence of ratios for 2017, 2018, 2020, and 2021 is a direct result of the negative working capital positions, which renders the standard turnover ratio mathematically non-indicative of operational efficiency in those periods.

The simultaneous occurrence of the highest revenue peak in 2021 and the most severe working capital deficit suggests a period of intense operational expansion or a strategic shift in the management of short-term obligations during that fiscal year.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Average Receivable Collection Period

EQT Corp., average receivable collection period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data
Receivables turnover 4.73 4.68 6.21 3.78 3.99
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average receivable collection period1 77 78 59 97 92
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Receivable Collection Period, Competitors2
Chevron Corp. 43 — — — —
ConocoPhillips 53 — — — —
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. 35 — — — —
Average Receivable Collection Period, Sector
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels 40 — — — —
Average Receivable Collection Period, Industry
Energy 42 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Average receivable collection period = 365 ÷ Receivables turnover
= 365 ÷ 4.73 = 77

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of short-term operating activity reveals significant volatility in the efficiency of receivable management between 2017 and 2021. A notable peak in collection efficiency occurred in 2019, followed by a period of normalization and stabilization in subsequent years.

Receivables Turnover Trend
The receivables turnover ratio exhibited a slight decline from 3.99 in 2017 to 3.78 in 2018. A substantial increase occurred in 2019, with the ratio peaking at 6.21, indicating a significant acceleration in the conversion of accounts receivable into cash. This metric subsequently moderated to 4.68 in 2020 and remained stable at 4.73 in 2021.
Average Receivable Collection Period Analysis
The average receivable collection period demonstrates a direct inverse correlation with turnover ratios. After a slight increase from 92 days in 2017 to 97 days in 2018, the collection period decreased sharply to 59 days in 2019, representing the most efficient recovery of funds during the observed timeframe. This efficiency gain was not sustained in the following years, as the collection period rose to 78 days in 2020 and 77 days in 2021, suggesting a return to a more moderate collection cycle.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Average Payables Payment Period

EQT Corp., average payables payment period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data
Payables turnover 5.08 3.76 4.76 4.43 3.65
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average payables payment period1 72 97 77 82 100
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Payables Payment Period, Competitors2
Chevron Corp. 39 — — — —
ConocoPhillips 40 — — — —
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. 35 — — — —
Average Payables Payment Period, Sector
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels 37 — — — —
Average Payables Payment Period, Industry
Energy 38 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Average payables payment period = 365 ÷ Payables turnover
= 365 ÷ 5.08 = 72

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of operating activity ratios reveals a general trend toward increased efficiency in the settlement of accounts payable, characterized by a rising turnover ratio and a corresponding decrease in the average payment period over the five-year period ending December 31, 2021.

Payables Turnover
The turnover ratio exhibited a general upward trajectory, increasing from 3.65 in 2017 to 5.08 in 2021. Aside from a temporary contraction in 2020, where the ratio declined to 3.76, the overall growth indicates a more frequent cycling of payables, suggesting an acceleration in the rate at which obligations to suppliers are settled.
Average Payables Payment Period
The average time taken to settle payables decreased from 100 days in 2017 to 72 days in 2021. This downward trend reflects a shift toward shorter payment cycles, reducing the duration of outstanding short-term liabilities. The most significant reduction occurred during the initial phase of the period, with the duration dropping from 100 days in 2017 to 77 days by 2019.
Fiscal Year 2020 Variance
A notable divergence from the established trend occurred in 2020, characterized by a spike in the payment period to 97 days and a simultaneous drop in turnover to 3.76. This anomaly suggests a temporary extension of payment terms or a reduction in the velocity of supplier payments during that fiscal year. This trend was sharply reversed in 2021, which recorded the lowest payment period and highest turnover of the analyzed timeframe, indicating a recovery and subsequent optimization of payables management.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?