Property, Plant and Equipment Disclosure
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
An analysis of the asset base between 2017 and 2021 reveals a period of contraction followed by a significant expansion in capital investment. The total property, plant, and equipment at cost experienced a decline from 2017 through 2019, reaching a trough of approximately 21.66 billion USD, before rebounding to a peak of 26.02 billion USD by the end of 2021.
- Gross Asset Composition and Trends
- Oil and gas producing properties constitute the vast majority of the asset base. These assets decreased from 23.94 billion USD in 2017 to 21.32 billion USD in 2019, indicating a period of asset divestment or depreciation exceeding new additions. However, a substantial increase occurred in 2021, with the value rising to 25.52 billion USD, suggesting an aggressive phase of capital investment or acquisition.
- Other properties exhibited a sharp decline between 2017 and 2018, falling from 1.46 billion USD to 333 million USD. This suggests a strategic disposal of non-core assets. This segment remained relatively stagnant until 2021, when it rose to 492 million USD.
- Depreciation and Net Book Value Analysis
- Accumulated depreciation and depletion showed a non-linear trend, decreasing in 2018 to 4.76 billion USD—likely due to the disposal of fully or partially depleted assets—before increasing steadily. By 2021, accumulated depreciation and depletion reached 7.60 billion USD, reflecting the aging of the asset base and the utilization of new investments.
- The net property, plant, and equipment value followed a downward trajectory from 19.73 billion USD in 2017 to a low of 16.05 billion USD in 2020. The subsequent increase to 18.42 billion USD in 2021 indicates that the growth in gross asset costs outpaced the increase in accumulated depreciation for that period.
The overall trajectory indicates a strategic shift from asset consolidation and reduction between 2018 and 2020 toward significant capital expansion in 2021, resulting in a strengthened net asset position despite increasing depletion charges.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Asset Age Ratios (Summary)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
An analysis of asset age metrics reveals a steady increase in the average age ratio from 2018 through 2021, indicating that the company's property, plant, and equipment are progressing further through their estimated useful lives. After a slight decrease between 2017 and 2018, the ratio rose from 21.47% to 29.20%, suggesting a gradual aging of the asset base relative to its total expected utility.
- Asset Life Cycle Revisions
- A significant adjustment in accounting estimates or asset composition is evident between 2017 and 2018, as the estimated total useful life decreased sharply from 26 years to 14 years. This downward revision persisted through 2019 before stabilizing at 16 years in 2020 and 2021.
- Estimated Asset Age Trends
- The estimated age, representing the time elapsed since purchase, dropped from 6 years in 2017 to 3 years in 2018, likely reflecting substantial new capital investments that lowered the weighted average age of the asset pool. Following this decline, the estimated age trended upward, reaching 5 years by December 31, 2021.
- Remaining Utility Analysis
- The estimated remaining life of assets experienced a notable contraction from 20 years in 2017 to 11 years by 2021. The fluctuations observed between 2018 and 2020, where remaining life shifted from 11 to 10 and then back to 12 years, align with the adjustments made to the total useful life estimates.
The convergence of an increasing average age ratio and a stabilizing total useful life suggests that a larger portion of the company's fixed assets is moving toward the end of its depreciable life. This pattern indicates that future capital expenditures may be required to replace aging infrastructure and maintain operational capacity.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Average Age
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2021 Calculations
1 Average age = 100 × Accumulated depreciation and depletion ÷ Property, plant and equipment, at cost
= 100 × 7,597,172 ÷ 26,016,092 = 29.20%
The analysis of property, plant, and equipment reveals a progressive aging of the asset base over the five-year period ending December 31, 2021. While there were fluctuations in total asset cost, the overall trend indicates an increase in the proportion of assets that have been depleted or depreciated relative to their original cost.
- Property, Plant, and Equipment at Cost
- Asset costs exhibited volatility between 2017 and 2020, declining from 25.4 billion USD to approximately 22 billion USD. A significant reversal occurred in 2021, with costs rising to 26.0 billion USD, signaling a period of substantial capital expenditure or asset acquisition.
- Accumulated Depreciation and Depletion
- Following a decrease in 2018, accumulated depreciation and depletion entered a consistent upward trajectory. The value rose from 4.8 billion USD in 2018 to 7.6 billion USD by the end of 2021, reflecting the ongoing systematic allocation of the cost of physical assets over their useful lives.
- Average Age Ratio
- The average age ratio demonstrates a steady climb from a low of 21.47% in 2018 to 29.20% in 2021. This increasing trend indicates that the asset base is maturing, as the accumulated depreciation is growing faster than the gross cost of the assets. Even the significant increase in asset cost in 2021 was insufficient to lower the average age ratio, suggesting that the existing legacy assets are contributing heavily to the overall age of the portfolio.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Estimated Total Useful Life
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2021 Calculations
1 Estimated total useful life = Property, plant and equipment, at cost ÷ Depreciation and depletion
= 26,016,092 ÷ 1,676,702 = 16
The financial data reveals a significant shift in the valuation and accounting treatment of property, plant, and equipment between 2017 and 2021. A notable volatility is observed in both the gross asset cost and the estimated useful lives of those assets, suggesting adjustments in operational strategy or accounting methodologies.
- Property, Plant, and Equipment Trends
- Gross assets at cost experienced a downward trend from 2017 to 2019, declining from US$ 25,396,026 thousand to US$ 21,655,351 thousand. This contraction was reversed starting in 2020, culminating in a peak of US$ 26,016,092 thousand by the end of 2021, indicating a period of renewed capital investment or asset acquisition.
- Estimated Total Useful Life
- A substantial reduction in the estimated total useful life occurred between 2017 and 2018, where the estimate dropped from 26 years to 14 years. This represents a nearly 46% reduction in the projected lifespan of assets. The estimate subsequently stabilized, increasing slightly to 16 years in 2020 and remaining constant through 2021.
- Depreciation and Depletion Dynamics
- Annual depreciation and depletion expenses increased sharply from US$ 970,985 thousand in 2017 to US$ 1,569,038 thousand in 2018. This increase correlates with the reduction in estimated useful life, which accelerates the rate of expense recognition over a shorter period. Expenses remained elevated relative to 2017 levels throughout the period, ending at US$ 1,676,702 thousand in 2021, mirroring the recovery in total asset costs.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Estimated Age, Time Elapsed since Purchase
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2021 Calculations
1 Time elapsed since purchase = Accumulated depreciation and depletion ÷ Depreciation and depletion
= 7,597,172 ÷ 1,676,702 = 5
The financial data indicates a significant shift in the asset base between 2017 and 2018, followed by a period of steady accumulation and aging of property, plant, and equipment through 2021.
- Asset Age and Replacement Cycle
- The time elapsed since purchase decreased sharply from 6 years in 2017 to 3 years in 2018. This reduction suggests a substantial refresh of the asset base, likely resulting from the disposal of older assets or the acquisition of new capital equipment. Following this reset, the average age of assets increased incrementally, reaching 5 years by December 31, 2021.
- Accumulated Depreciation and Depletion Trends
- Accumulated depreciation and depletion experienced a notable contraction in 2018, falling from US$ 5,666,018 thousand to US$ 4,755,505 thousand. This decline aligns with the observed reduction in asset age, further supporting the occurrence of significant asset disposals during that period. From 2019 onward, the balance grew consistently, ending the period at US$ 7,597,172 thousand in 2021, which indicates a phase of asset maturation and continued usage.
- Annual Depreciation and Depletion Expenses
- Annual charges for depreciation and depletion rose from US$ 970,985 thousand in 2017 to US$ 1,676,702 thousand in 2021. A significant increase occurred between 2017 and 2018, reflecting the higher cost basis of the updated asset base. The expenses remained relatively stable between 2019 and 2020 before rising again in 2021, suggesting an increase in the volume of depreciable assets or a change in utilization rates.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Estimated Remaining Life
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2021 Calculations
1 Estimated remaining life = Net property, plant and equipment ÷ Depreciation and depletion
= 18,418,920 ÷ 1,676,702 = 11
An analysis of the company's property, plant and equipment reveals a period of significant volatility in asset valuation and a fundamental shift in the estimated useful life of its assets between 2017 and 2021.
- Net Property, Plant and Equipment Trends
- The net value of property, plant and equipment experienced a steady decline from December 31, 2017, at approximately 19.73 billion US dollars, to a low of 16.05 billion US dollars by December 31, 2020. This downward trajectory was reversed in 2021, with the asset base increasing to 18.42 billion US dollars, indicating a period of renewed capital investment or asset acquisition.
- Depreciation and Depletion Volatility
- Annual depreciation and depletion expenses showed a sharp increase between 2017 and 2018, rising from 970.99 million US dollars to 1.57 billion US dollars. Following this spike, expenses remained relatively elevated, fluctuating between 1.39 billion and 1.68 billion US dollars through 2021. The correlation between the spike in depreciation and the decline in net asset value suggests an acceleration in the consumption of economic benefits from the asset base.
- Estimated Remaining Asset Life
- A substantial revision in accounting estimates occurred between 2017 and 2018, where the estimated remaining life of assets dropped from 20 years to 11 years. This 45% reduction explains the simultaneous increase in annual depreciation and depletion expenses. From 2018 through 2021, the remaining life stabilized, fluctuating narrowly between 10 and 12 years, suggesting a consistent approach to asset lifespan projections in recent periods.
- Synthesis of Asset Lifecycle and Valuation
- The convergence of the data suggests a structural shift in the asset portfolio or a conservative re-evaluation of asset utility starting in 2018. The reduction in estimated remaining life likely drove higher periodic depreciation charges, which contributed to the decline in net property, plant and equipment until 2020. The subsequent increase in net assets in 2021, while remaining life stayed constant at 11 years, implies that new capital expenditures are being integrated into the balance sheet under these updated, shorter-life assumptions.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?