Adjusted Financial Ratios (Summary)
EQT Corp., Financial Ratios: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The financial performance from 2017 to 2021 is characterized by a significant transition from initial profitability to sustained net losses, accompanied by a deteriorating liquidity position and an increase in financial leverage.
- Profitability and Returns
- A sharp reversal in profitability occurred after 2017. Reported net profit margins dropped from 56.90% in 2017 to deep negative territory, reaching a low of -47.80% in 2018 before showing a gradual recovery to -16.99% by 2021. Adjusted net profit margins followed a similar trajectory, though they remained more severely depressed, ending at -23.42% in 2021. This trend is mirrored in the Return on Equity (ROE) and Return on Assets (ROA), both of which transitioned from positive values in 2017 to consistent negative figures through 2021, indicating an inability to generate positive returns for shareholders or from asset utilization during this period.
- Liquidity and Solvency
- Liquidity has weakened substantially over the analyzed period. While the adjusted current ratio peaked at 1.31 in 2019, it declined sharply to 0.45 by 2021, suggesting a diminished capacity to cover short-term obligations. Simultaneously, solvency metrics indicate an increasing reliance on debt. The adjusted debt-to-equity ratio rose steadily from 0.30 in 2017 to 0.50 in 2021, and the adjusted debt-to-capital ratio increased from 0.23 to 0.34 over the same timeframe. Financial leverage also trended upward from 2018, with adjusted leverage increasing from 1.63 in 2018 to 1.97 in 2021.
- Operational Efficiency
- Despite the lack of profitability, asset utilization improved. Both reported and adjusted total asset turnover ratios rose from 0.09 in 2017 to 0.31 in 2021. Although there was volatility between 2018 and 2020, the overall trend indicates that the company became more efficient at generating revenue from its asset base toward the end of the period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Total Asset Turnover
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Total asset turnover = Sales of natural gas, natural gas liquids and oil ÷ Total assets
= 6,804,020 ÷ 21,607,388 = 0.31
2 Adjusted total assets. See details »
3 2021 Calculation
Adjusted total asset turnover = Sales of natural gas, natural gas liquids and oil ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 6,804,020 ÷ 21,607,709 = 0.31
The adjusted total asset turnover exhibited significant volatility between 2017 and 2021, characterized by an overall increase in asset utilization efficiency. The ratio rose from a low of 0.09 in 2017 to a peak of 0.31 in 2021, reflecting a dynamic relationship between revenue generation and the capital asset base.
- Revenue Dynamics and Turnover Correlation
- Asset turnover fluctuated in close alignment with sales of natural gas, natural gas liquids, and oil. A sharp increase in turnover was observed in 2018 (0.23) following a revenue increase to approximately 4.70 billion US dollars. Conversely, a decline occurred between 2019 and 2020, with the ratio falling to 0.15 as sales decreased to 2.65 billion US dollars.
- Asset Base Optimization
- Total assets underwent a substantial reduction from 2017 (29.52 billion US dollars) through 2020 (18.11 billion US dollars). This contraction in the asset base contributed to the initial improvement in turnover ratios, although subsequent declines in revenue negatively impacted the metric through 2020.
- 2021 Performance Peak
- The highest efficiency level was reached in 2021, with the adjusted total asset turnover hitting 0.31. This improvement was primarily driven by a significant surge in sales to 6.80 billion US dollars, which more than offset the increase in total assets to 21.61 billion US dollars.
- Comparison of Reported and Adjusted Metrics
- No material variance is observed between the reported total asset turnover and the adjusted total asset turnover across the analyzed period. The adjusted total assets remained nearly identical to the reported total assets, resulting in identical turnover ratios for both metrics in every fiscal year.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Current Ratio
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Current ratio = Current assets ÷ Current liabilities
= 2,286,766 ÷ 5,080,171 = 0.45
2 Adjusted current assets. See details »
3 2021 Calculation
Adjusted current ratio = Adjusted current assets ÷ Current liabilities
= 2,287,087 ÷ 5,080,171 = 0.45
An analysis of the liquidity position from 2017 to 2021 reveals a volatile trend in short-term solvency, culminating in a significant decline by the end of the period.
- Adjusted Current Ratio Performance
- The adjusted current ratio exhibited fluctuation over the five-year period, starting at 0.95 in 2017 and reaching a peak of 1.31 in 2019. However, a sharp downward trend followed, with the ratio falling to 0.69 in 2020 and reaching a period low of 0.45 by December 31, 2021.
- Analysis of Current Liabilities and Assets
- The deterioration in the liquidity ratio is primarily attributable to a substantial increase in current liabilities. While adjusted current assets grew to 2,287,087 thousand USD in 2021, this was offset by a disproportionate surge in current liabilities, which rose from 1,762,410 thousand USD in 2020 to 5,080,171 thousand USD in 2021. This expansion of short-term obligations significantly outpaced the growth of liquid assets, leading to a weakened solvency position.
- Comparison of Reported and Adjusted Metrics
- A negligible variance is observed between the reported current ratio and the adjusted current ratio throughout the observed period. The adjustments made to current assets provided only marginal increases to the ratio in 2017 and 2019, indicating that the adjustments did not materially alter the overall assessment of the short-term financial position.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Debt to Equity
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Debt to equity = Total debt ÷ Common shareholders’ equity
= 5,485,002 ÷ 10,029,527 = 0.55
2 Adjusted total debt. See details »
3 Adjusted total equity. See details »
4 2021 Calculation
Adjusted debt to equity = Adjusted total debt ÷ Adjusted total equity
= 5,537,714 ÷ 10,984,696 = 0.50
Between 2017 and 2021, the company experienced a consistent increase in its leverage profile, as evidenced by both reported and adjusted debt-to-equity ratios. Although total debt levels fluctuated, the simultaneous contraction of the equity base during the initial years of the period resulted in a higher dependency on debt relative to equity.
- Debt Obligations Trend
- Total debt exhibited a downward trend from 2017 through 2020, decreasing from 5,997,329 thousand US$ to 4,925,466 thousand US$. However, this trend reversed in 2021, with total debt rising to 5,485,002 thousand US$. Adjusted total debt followed a nearly identical trajectory, peaking in 2017 and reaching its lowest point in 2020 before increasing in the final year of the analysis.
- Equity Base Dynamics
- Common shareholders' equity saw a steady decline from 13,319,618 thousand US$ in 2017 to a low of 9,255,240 thousand US$ in 2020, followed by a partial recovery to 10,029,527 thousand US$ in 2021. The adjusted total equity figures show a more pronounced decrease, dropping sharply from 20,312,355 thousand US$ in 2017 to 12,790,258 thousand US$ in 2018, after which it stabilized and slightly declined until a marginal increase in 2021.
- Comparative Ratio Analysis
- The reported debt-to-equity ratio rose from 0.45 in 2017 to 0.55 in 2021. Parallel to this, the adjusted debt-to-equity ratio increased from 0.30 in 2017 to 0.50 in 2021. The most significant expansion in the adjusted ratio occurred between 2017 and 2018, moving from 0.30 to 0.44. Throughout the entire period, the adjusted ratio remained lower than the reported ratio, indicating that the adjustments made to total debt and total equity consistently result in a more favorable leverage perception.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Debt to Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Debt to capital = Total debt ÷ Total capital
= 5,485,002 ÷ 15,514,529 = 0.35
2 Adjusted total debt. See details »
3 Adjusted total capital. See details »
4 2021 Calculation
Adjusted debt to capital = Adjusted total debt ÷ Adjusted total capital
= 5,537,714 ÷ 16,522,410 = 0.34
The adjusted debt to capital ratio exhibits a consistent upward trend over the five-year period from 2017 to 2021, rising from 0.23 to 0.34. This increase indicates a gradual shift in the capital structure toward a higher proportion of debt relative to total adjusted capital, despite fluctuations in the absolute levels of debt.
- Adjusted Leverage Trends
- The adjusted debt to capital ratio increased significantly between 2017 and 2019, moving from 0.23 to 0.32. The ratio remained stable at 0.32 through 2020 before experiencing a final increase to 0.34 by the end of 2021. This trajectory suggests a steady increase in leverage over the analyzed timeframe.
- Capital Base Contraction
- The rise in the adjusted leverage ratio was primarily driven by a substantial contraction in adjusted total capital. Adjusted total capital decreased from 26.5 billion in 2017 to 16.5 billion in 2021. This reduction in the denominator outweighed the changes in adjusted total debt, which decreased from 6.19 billion in 2017 to 4.97 billion in 2020, before rebounding to 5.53 billion in 2021.
- Comparison of Reported and Adjusted Metrics
- A divergence is observed between the reported and adjusted debt to capital ratios. The reported ratio showed less volatility, increasing modestly from 0.31 in 2017 to 0.35 in 2021. In contrast, the adjusted ratio started significantly lower at 0.23 and converged toward the reported ratio over time. This convergence is attributed to the narrowing gap between total capital and adjusted total capital, which was particularly wide in 2017.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Financial Leverage
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Financial leverage = Total assets ÷ Common shareholders’ equity
= 21,607,388 ÷ 10,029,527 = 2.15
2 Adjusted total assets. See details »
3 Adjusted total equity. See details »
4 2021 Calculation
Adjusted financial leverage = Adjusted total assets ÷ Adjusted total equity
= 21,607,709 ÷ 10,984,696 = 1.97
Between 2017 and 2021, the company's financial structure was characterized by a steady increase in adjusted financial leverage despite significant fluctuations in the overall asset base. While both reported and adjusted leverage ratios experienced movements, the adjusted metric demonstrated a consistent upward trajectory over the five-year period.
- Adjusted Financial Leverage Trend
- A consistent increase is observed in the adjusted financial leverage ratio, which rose from 1.46 in 2017 to 1.97 in 2021. This indicates a progressive increase in the proportion of adjusted assets financed through debt or liabilities relative to adjusted equity.
- Comparison of Reported and Adjusted Leverage
- A convergence is noted between reported and adjusted financial leverage over the analyzed period. In 2017, there was a significant variance between the reported ratio of 2.22 and the adjusted ratio of 1.46. By 2021, this gap narrowed substantially, with reported leverage at 2.15 and adjusted leverage at 1.97, suggesting a reduction in the impact of the adjustments applied to the leverage calculation.
- Asset and Equity Base Evolution
- Total assets declined from 29.5 billion US dollars in 2017 to a low of 18.1 billion US dollars in 2020, before recovering to 21.6 billion US dollars in 2021. Adjusted total equity underwent a sharp reduction between 2017 and 2018, falling from 20.3 billion to 12.8 billion US dollars, which served as a primary driver for the increase in the adjusted leverage ratio during the early part of the period.
- Leverage Stability and Growth
- While reported financial leverage fluctuated—decreasing from 2.22 in 2017 to 1.89 in 2018 before trending upward again—the adjusted financial leverage grew linearly every year. This suggests that when adjusting for specific financial items, the company's leverage profile became more aggressively geared over time.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Net Profit Margin
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Net profit margin = 100 × Net income (loss) attributable to EQT Corporation ÷ Sales of natural gas, natural gas liquids and oil
= 100 × -1,155,759 ÷ 6,804,020 = -16.99%
2 Adjusted net income (loss). See details »
3 2021 Calculation
Adjusted net profit margin = 100 × Adjusted net income (loss) ÷ Sales of natural gas, natural gas liquids and oil
= 100 × -1,593,295 ÷ 6,804,020 = -23.42%
A significant shift in financial performance occurred after 2017, as the entity transitioned from a state of positive profitability to a sustained period of adjusted net losses. This volatility is characterized by a sharp contraction in margins followed by a gradual, though incomplete, recovery toward the end of the analyzed period.
- Adjusted Net Profit Margin Trends
- The adjusted net profit margin experienced a severe decline from 10.88% in 2017 to its lowest point of -53.69% in 2018. Following this trough, the margin remained negative for three consecutive years, though a narrowing of losses is evident by 2021, where the margin improved to -23.42%.
- Revenue and Profitability Correlation
- Revenue fluctuated significantly, reaching a peak of 6.8 billion US dollars in 2021. Despite this substantial increase in sales, adjusted net income remained negative from 2018 through 2021. The data indicates that while higher sales volume in 2021 contributed to a less severe negative margin compared to previous years, it was not sufficient to return the entity to adjusted profitability.
- Comparison of Reported and Adjusted Performance
- A consistent divergence is observed between reported and adjusted net profit margins. The adjusted net profit margin was lower than the reported margin in every year from 2017 to 2021. This indicates that the adjustments made to the net income figures consistently exerted downward pressure on profitability metrics throughout the five-year period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
ROE = 100 × Net income (loss) attributable to EQT Corporation ÷ Common shareholders’ equity
= 100 × -1,155,759 ÷ 10,029,527 = -11.52%
2 Adjusted net income (loss). See details »
3 Adjusted total equity. See details »
4 2021 Calculation
Adjusted ROE = 100 × Adjusted net income (loss) ÷ Adjusted total equity
= 100 × -1,593,295 ÷ 10,984,696 = -14.50%
A comprehensive analysis of the financial performance from 2017 to 2021 reveals a transition from marginal profitability to a period of sustained negative returns on equity. The shift is characterized by a sharp decline in net income starting in 2018, which led to a prolonged trend of negative reported and adjusted ROE.
- Return on Equity Trends
- The Reported ROE plummeted from 11.33% in 2017 to -20.48% in 2018, remaining negative through 2021. The Adjusted ROE followed a similar trajectory, starting at a modest 1.42% in 2017 before dropping to -19.71% in 2018. While there was a period of relative stabilization between 2019 and 2020, where Adjusted ROE improved slightly from -13.26% to -10.56%, the metric deteriorated again in 2021, reaching -14.50%.
- Net Income and Loss Patterns
- The erosion of ROE is primarily driven by a consistent pattern of net losses. Following a positive reported net income of approximately 1.51 billion USD in 2017, the company experienced substantial losses every subsequent year, peaking at a reported loss of 2.24 billion USD in 2018. Adjusted net income reflects a more severe downturn, showing a loss of 2.52 billion USD in 2018 and ending the period with a loss of 1.59 billion USD in 2021.
- Equity Base Dynamics
- Common shareholders' equity exhibited a downward trend from 2017 to 2020, decreasing from 13.32 billion USD to 9.26 billion USD. A partial recovery was observed in 2021, with equity rising to 10.03 billion USD. Similarly, Adjusted total equity saw a significant contraction from 20.31 billion USD in 2017 to a low of 10.64 billion USD in 2020, before marginally increasing to 10.98 billion USD in 2021.
- Comparative Analysis of Reported vs. Adjusted Metrics
- A notable discrepancy exists in 2017, where the Reported ROE (11.33%) significantly exceeded the Adjusted ROE (1.42%), indicating that one-time gains or non-recurring items heavily influenced the reported results. From 2018 onward, the convergence of these two metrics suggests that the underlying operational losses became the primary driver of the company's financial performance, with the Adjusted ROE providing a more conservative view of the return on investment in 2021.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
ROA = 100 × Net income (loss) attributable to EQT Corporation ÷ Total assets
= 100 × -1,155,759 ÷ 21,607,388 = -5.35%
2 Adjusted net income (loss). See details »
3 Adjusted total assets. See details »
4 2021 Calculation
Adjusted ROA = 100 × Adjusted net income (loss) ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 100 × -1,593,295 ÷ 21,607,709 = -7.37%
A significant shift in profitability and asset utilization is observed between 2017 and 2021. Following a period of positive returns in 2017, a prolonged trend of negative returns on assets emerged, reflecting substantial net losses and fluctuations in the asset base.
- Asset Base Dynamics
- Total assets experienced a downward trajectory from a peak of approximately 29.5 billion US dollars in 2017 to a low of 18.1 billion US dollars in 2020, before increasing to 21.6 billion US dollars in 2021. Adjusted total assets followed a nearly identical pattern, indicating that the adjustments made to the asset base were minimal relative to the overall scale of the company's holdings.
- Earnings Performance
- A transition from profitability to recurring losses is evident. Net income dropped from 1.5 billion US dollars in 2017 to consistent negative values through 2021. Adjusted net income showed greater volatility and deeper losses than reported figures, particularly in 2018 and 2021, suggesting that non-reported adjustments negatively impacted the bottom line.
- Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA) Trends
- The Adjusted ROA demonstrates a sharp contraction from 0.97% in 2017 to a low of -12.10% in 2018. Although a moderate recovery occurred in 2019 (-7.96%) and 2020 (-6.20%), the ratio declined again to -7.37% in 2021. Throughout the period, Adjusted ROA remained consistently lower than Reported ROA, underscoring a persistent gap between reported performance and adjusted financial outcomes.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?