Free Cash Flow to The Firm (FCFF)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
1, 2 See details »
The financial performance between 2012 and 2016 is characterized by a period of initial stability followed by a severe contraction and a subsequent partial recovery. A notable divergence exists between operating cash flows and free cash flow to the firm, indicating significant fluctuations in capital allocations and operational efficiency.
- Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
- Operating cash flows remained robust and relatively stable from 2012 to 2014, peaking at 8,888 million US$ in 2013. However, a precipitous decline occurred in 2015, where cash flow from operations shifted to a deficit of 1,877 million US$. By 2016, a recovery was observed as the figure returned to a positive 3,000 million US$, although this remained significantly below the levels maintained in the first three years of the period.
- Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF)
- FCFF exhibited higher volatility and a more aggressive downward trajectory than operating cash flows. While 2012 and 2013 saw positive FCFF of 1,721 million US$ and 1,560 million US$ respectively, the metric turned negative in 2014 (-477 million US$) and collapsed to -6,416 million US$ in 2015. A marginal return to positive territory was achieved in 2016 with a value of 206 million US$.
- Analysis of Cash Flow Divergence
- A widening gap between operating cash flows and FCFF is evident between 2013 and 2015. In 2014, despite operating cash flows remaining strong at 8,466 million US$, FCFF turned negative, suggesting a substantial increase in capital expenditures or other firm-level investments. This trend intensified in 2015, where the FCFF deficit far exceeded the operating loss, indicating that capital outflows continued at a high rate despite the collapse in operational cash generation.
- Recovery Pattern
- The 2016 fiscal year marks a pivot toward stabilization. Both operating cash flow and FCFF returned to positive values. The fact that FCFF recovered to 206 million US$ while operating cash flow reached 3,000 million US$ suggests a possible reduction in capital expenditure levels compared to the 2014-2015 period, allowing the firm to generate positive free cash flow despite operating levels not yet returning to their 2012-2014 peaks.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Interest Paid, Net of Tax
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
2 2016 Calculation
Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized, tax = Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized × EITR
= 856 × 27.00% = 231
3 2016 Calculation
Capitalized interest, tax = Capitalized interest × EITR
= 132 × 27.00% = 36
An analysis of the financial data from 2012 to 2016 reveals significant volatility in cash interest expenditures and fluctuations in the effective income tax rate, while capitalized interest shows a consistent long-term decline.
- Cash Interest Expenditures
- Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized and tax, exhibited substantial variance over the five-year period. After a decrease from 472 million USD in 2012 to 282 million USD in 2013, expenditures rose to 448 million USD in 2014 before reaching a peak of 1,413 million USD in 2015. This represents a sharp increase of approximately 215% in a single year. By 2016, this figure declined significantly to 625 million USD, although it remained higher than the levels observed between 2012 and 2014.
- Capitalized Interest Trends
- Capitalized interest, net of tax, followed a general downward trajectory. From a high of 152 million USD in 2012, the amount decreased to 96 million USD by 2016. This steady decline suggests a reduction in the scale of interest-bearing investments in qualifying long-term assets over the analyzed period.
- Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR) Volatility
- The effective income tax rate demonstrated instability, most notably in 2013 when it spiked to 55.00%. Following this peak, the rate returned to 35.00% in 2014 and continued a gradual descent to 30.00% in 2015 and 27.00% in 2016. The fluctuation in the EITR directly impacts the net-of-tax calculations for both cash interest payments and capitalized interest.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Current
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |
| Enterprise value (EV) | 42,437) |
| Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) | 206) |
| Valuation Ratio | |
| EV/FCFF | 205.77 |
| Benchmarks | |
| EV/FCFF, Competitors1 | |
| Chevron Corp. | 26.61 |
| ConocoPhillips | 22.63 |
| ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. | 28.81 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).
1 Click competitor name to see calculations.
If the company EV/FCFF is lower then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/FCFF is higher then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Historical
| Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | Dec 31, 2012 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Enterprise value (EV)1 | 52,747) | 38,042) | 53,609) | 54,057) | 54,164) | |
| Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF)2 | 206) | (6,416) | (477) | 1,560) | 1,721) | |
| Valuation Ratio | ||||||
| EV/FCFF3 | 255.76 | — | — | 34.66 | 31.46 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| EV/FCFF, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ConocoPhillips | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
3 2016 Calculation
EV/FCFF = EV ÷ FCFF
= 52,747 ÷ 206 = 255.76
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
Analysis of the financial trajectory between 2012 and 2016 reveals a period of extreme volatility in cash flow generation contrasted with a relatively resilient enterprise valuation. While the enterprise value remained largely consistent near the 54 billion USD mark for the majority of the period, the free cash flow to the firm exhibited a severe decline, entering negative territory in 2014 and reaching a significant trough in 2015.
- Enterprise Value (EV) Trends
- The enterprise value showed minimal fluctuation between 2012 and 2014, followed by a sharp contraction to 38,042 million USD in 2015. A strong recovery occurred in 2016, with the value returning to 52,747 million USD, nearly matching the levels observed at the start of the analyzed period.
- Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF) Trends
- FCFF transitioned from a positive 1,721 million USD in 2012 to a substantial deficit of 6,416 million USD by 2015. Although the figure returned to a positive state in 2016 at 206 million USD, this represents a marginal recovery compared to the initial 2012-2013 levels, indicating a severe disruption in cash-generating capacity during the mid-period.
- EV/FCFF Ratio Interpretation
- The ratio increased modestly from 31.46 in 2012 to 34.66 in 2013. Because FCFF turned negative in 2014 and 2015, the ratio was not applicable for those years. By 2016, the ratio expanded drastically to 255.76, reflecting a significant disconnect between the recovered enterprise value and the disproportionately low free cash flow produced in that year.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?