Property, Plant and Equipment Disclosure
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
The overall trajectory of properties and equipment exhibits a period of expansion followed by a contraction. Gross properties and equipment increased steadily from 2012 to 2014, reaching a peak of 75,107 million US dollars, before declining over the subsequent two years to 69,013 million US dollars by the end of 2016.
- Asset Composition and Segment Trends
- Oil and gas exploration and production constitute the primary component of the asset base. This segment mirrored the overall trend, peaking at 63,674 million US dollars in 2014 and decreasing to 57,581 million US dollars by 2016. Conversely, midstream assets showed consistent growth from 6,032 million US dollars in 2012 to a plateau of approximately 8,613 million US dollars by 2016. Marketing assets became negligible after 2013, while other assets remained relatively stable, experiencing a marginal increase over the five-year period.
- Accumulated Depreciation, Depletion, and Amortization (DD&A)
- Accumulated DD&A showed a consistent upward trend from 2012 through 2015, increasing from 25,200 million US dollars to 36,932 million US dollars. This indicates a steady consumption of the economic benefits of the assets. A slight stabilization occurred in 2016, with the balance ending at 36,845 million US dollars.
- Net Book Value Analysis
- Net properties and equipment peaked in 2014 at 41,589 million US dollars. A significant reduction in net value is observed between 2014 and 2015, where the value dropped by approximately 18.8% to 33,751 million US dollars. This downward trend continued into 2016, resulting in a final net value of 32,168 million US dollars. The decline in net value was more pronounced than the decline in gross assets, driven by the continued accumulation of DD&A and the reduction in gross asset holdings after 2014.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Asset Age Ratios (Summary)
| Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | Dec 31, 2012 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average age ratio | 53.39% | 52.25% | 44.63% | 42.55% | 39.62% |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
The average age ratio of property, plant, and equipment exhibits a consistent and continuous upward trajectory from 2012 through 2016, indicating a progressive aging of the company's fixed asset base.
- Trend Progression
- The average age ratio rose from 39.62% in 2012 to 53.39% by the end of 2016. This represents a total increase of 13.77 percentage points over the five-year period, reflecting a steady shift toward a more mature asset portfolio.
- Analysis of Growth Rates
- Growth was relatively stable between 2012 and 2014, with the ratio increasing from 39.62% to 44.63%. A notable acceleration occurred between 2014 and 2015, during which the ratio climbed by 7.62 percentage points to 52.25%. The trend decelerated slightly in the final year, reaching 53.39% in 2016.
- Operational Insights
- The sustained increase in the average age ratio suggests that the accumulation of depreciation is outpacing the acquisition of new capital assets. This pattern typically indicates a period of reduced capital expenditure relative to the depreciation of existing assets, which may lead to higher maintenance costs or the eventual need for significant reinvestment to modernize operational infrastructure.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Average Age
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
2016 Calculations
1 Average age = 100 × Accumulated DD&A ÷ Gross properties and equipment
= 100 × 36,845 ÷ 69,013 = 53.39%
The analysis of property, plant, and equipment from 2012 to 2016 reveals a consistent increase in the age of the asset base, coinciding with a transition from asset growth to asset contraction.
- Average Age Ratio Trends
- A steady upward trajectory is observed in the average age ratio, which rose from 39.62% in 2012 to 53.39% by 2016. The most significant acceleration occurred between 2014 and 2015, where the ratio increased by 7.62 percentage points. This trend indicates that a larger proportion of the company's fixed assets is depreciated, suggesting a decrease in the relative rate of new capital investment compared to the total asset value.
- Gross Property and Equipment Dynamics
- Gross assets experienced growth in the early part of the period, peaking at 75,107 million US dollars in 2014. However, a reversal occurred in 2015 and 2016, with values declining to 69,013 million US dollars. This contraction in gross assets, paired with the rising average age, suggests a period of diminished capital expenditure or the strategic divestment of assets.
- Accumulated DD&A and Asset Lifecycle
- Accumulated depreciation, depletion, and amortization showed consistent growth from 25,200 million US dollars in 2012 to a peak of 36,932 million US dollars in 2015. The slight decrease observed in 2016 to 36,845 million US dollars, occurring alongside a decline in gross assets, is indicative of the removal of fully or partially depreciated assets from the balance sheet through disposals or write-downs.
In summary, the convergence of a rising average age ratio and declining gross asset values indicates an aging infrastructure. The data reflects a shift from a phase of expansion between 2012 and 2014 to a phase of asset consolidation or reduced reinvestment between 2015 and 2016.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?