Profitability ratios measure the company ability to generate profitable sales from its resources (assets).
Profitability Ratios (Summary)
Return on Sales
Return on Investment
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
A comprehensive evaluation of profitability ratios from 2012 to 2016 reveals a period of severe financial deterioration, peaking in 2015 before showing signs of partial stabilization in 2016.
- Profit Margin Trends
- Gross profit margin remained relatively stable, fluctuating slightly around 80% between 2012 and 2014, before experiencing a significant contraction to 66.42% in 2015 and 65.67% in 2016. In contrast, operating profit margins exhibited extreme volatility, shifting from a peak of 33.00% in 2014 to a critical low of -92.86% in 2015. Net profit margins followed a similar trajectory of collapse, transitioning from a positive 17.97% in 2012 to a deficit of 70.55% in 2015, with a partial recovery to -36.36% by the end of 2016.
- Return on Investment Metrics
- Return on Equity (ROE) and Return on Assets (ROA) both demonstrate a consistent downward trajectory throughout the observed period. ROE declined from 11.59% in 2012 to a nadir of -52.20% in 2015, while ROA fell from 4.55% to -14.42% over the same interval. While both metrics showed a corrective move toward zero in 2016, they remained substantially negative, indicating a continued failure to generate positive returns from assets and shareholder equity.
The divergence between the relatively resilient gross margin and the precipitous decline in operating and net margins indicates that the profitability crisis was not driven solely by direct production costs. Instead, the data suggests that substantial operating expenses, impairments, or non-operating losses occurred, particularly during the 2015 fiscal year, which severely eroded the bottom line and shareholder value.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Gross Profit Margin
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
1 2016 Calculation
Gross profit margin = 100 × Gross profit ÷ Sales revenues
= 100 × 5,547 ÷ 8,447 = 65.67%
Between 2012 and 2016, a distinct shift in financial performance occurred, characterized by a period of stability and growth followed by a sharp contraction in both absolute profitability and margin efficiency.
- Revenue and Gross Profit Trends
- Sales revenues experienced a steady upward trajectory from 2012 through 2014, peaking at 16,375 million US dollars. During this period, gross profit grew in tandem, reaching a maximum of 13,058 million US dollars in 2014. This growth phase was followed by a severe downturn in 2015, where revenues dropped to 9,486 million US dollars and gross profit fell to 6,301 million US dollars. The decline continued into 2016, with revenues ending at 8,447 million US dollars and gross profit at 5,547 million US dollars.
- Gross Profit Margin Analysis
- The gross profit margin remained remarkably stable between 2012 and 2014, fluctuating within a narrow range around 80%, with a peak of 80.21% in 2013. This indicates that during the growth phase, direct costs were managed proportionally to revenue increases. However, a significant margin compression occurred in 2015, with the ratio falling to 66.42%, and a further slight decrease to 65.67% in 2016.
- Profitability Insight
- The correlation between the collapse in sales revenue and the contraction of the gross profit margin after 2014 suggests a fundamental shift in the cost-to-revenue relationship. The reduction in margin indicates that the cost of sales did not decrease at the same rate as the revenue decline, leading to reduced operational efficiency and diminished profitability per dollar of sales.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Operating Profit Margin
| Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | Dec 31, 2012 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Operating income (loss) | (2,599) | (8,809) | 5,403) | 3,333) | 3,727) | |
| Sales revenues | 8,447) | 9,486) | 16,375) | 14,867) | 13,307) | |
| Profitability Ratio | ||||||
| Operating profit margin1 | -30.77% | -92.86% | 33.00% | 22.42% | 28.01% | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Operating Profit Margin, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ConocoPhillips | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Exxon Mobil Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
1 2016 Calculation
Operating profit margin = 100 × Operating income (loss) ÷ Sales revenues
= 100 × -2,599 ÷ 8,447 = -30.77%
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial performance from 2012 to 2016 is characterized by a period of initial growth and operational stability followed by a severe contraction and a subsequent partial recovery in efficiency.
- Revenue Trends
- Sales revenues exhibited a steady upward trajectory between 2012 and 2014, peaking at 16,375 million US dollars. This growth phase was followed by a sharp decline in 2015, where revenues dropped to 9,486 million US dollars, with a further decrease to 8,447 million US dollars by the end of 2016.
- Operating Income Volatility
- Operating income remained positive through 2014, reaching its highest point of 5,403 million US dollars. A critical downturn occurred in 2015, resulting in a substantial operating loss of 8,809 million US dollars. Although the operating loss narrowed significantly to 2,599 million US dollars in 2016, the company did not return to profitability within the analyzed period.
- Operating Profit Margin Analysis
- The operating profit margin demonstrated resilience and strength from 2012 to 2014, fluctuating between 22.42% and a peak of 33.00%. A severe collapse was observed in 2015, with the margin plummeting to -92.86%, indicating that operating expenses vastly exceeded revenues. By 2016, the margin improved to -30.77%, suggesting a reduction in the scale of operational losses relative to sales, despite the continuing decline in total revenue.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Net Profit Margin
| Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | Dec 31, 2012 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders | (3,071) | (6,692) | (1,750) | 801) | 2,391) | |
| Sales revenues | 8,447) | 9,486) | 16,375) | 14,867) | 13,307) | |
| Profitability Ratio | ||||||
| Net profit margin1 | -36.36% | -70.55% | -10.69% | 5.39% | 17.97% | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Net Profit Margin, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ConocoPhillips | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Exxon Mobil Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
1 2016 Calculation
Net profit margin = 100 × Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders ÷ Sales revenues
= 100 × -3,071 ÷ 8,447 = -36.36%
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial performance from 2012 to 2016 is characterized by a severe transition from profitability to substantial net losses, coinciding with a volatile revenue trajectory.
- Revenue Trends
- Sales revenues exhibited an initial growth phase, increasing from 13,307 million US dollars in 2012 to a peak of 16,375 million US dollars in 2014. This growth trend reversed abruptly in 2015, with revenues falling to 9,486 million US dollars, followed by a further decline to 8,447 million US dollars in 2016.
- Net Income Volatility
- Net income attributable to common stockholders experienced a steep and consistent decline during the first four years of the period. Profits fell from 2,391 million US dollars in 2012 to 801 million US dollars in 2013, before shifting to a net loss of 1,750 million US dollars in 2014. The deficit deepened significantly in 2015 to a loss of 6,692 million US dollars, before moderating to 3,071 million US dollars in 2016.
- Net Profit Margin Analysis
- The net profit margin reflects a critical collapse in profitability. A positive margin of 17.97% in 2012 compressed to 5.39% in 2013 and turned negative in 2014 at -10.69%. The most severe contraction occurred in 2015, where the margin reached -70.55%. While the margin improved to -36.36% in 2016, it remained deeply negative, indicating that the company continued to incur losses that were substantial relative to its total sales revenue.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Return on Equity (ROE)
| Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | Dec 31, 2012 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders | (3,071) | (6,692) | (1,750) | 801) | 2,391) | |
| Stockholders’ equity | 12,212) | 12,819) | 19,725) | 21,857) | 20,629) | |
| Profitability Ratio | ||||||
| ROE1 | -25.15% | -52.20% | -8.87% | 3.66% | 11.59% | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| ROE, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ConocoPhillips | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Exxon Mobil Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
1 2016 Calculation
ROE = 100 × Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders ÷ Stockholders’ equity
= 100 × -3,071 ÷ 12,212 = -25.15%
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
A significant deterioration in profitability is evident between 2012 and 2016. The period is characterized by a transition from positive net income and positive returns to substantial losses and deeply negative return on equity.
- Net Income Trajectory
- A severe downward trend in net income is observed, moving from a profit of US$ 2,391 million in 2012 to a substantial net loss of US$ 6,692 million in 2015. Although the loss narrowed to US$ 3,071 million in 2016, the company failed to return to profitability within the observed timeframe.
- Stockholders' Equity Erosion
- Equity levels remained relatively stable through 2013, peaking at US$ 21,857 million. However, a consistent decline followed, with equity dropping to US$ 12,212 million by 2016. This erosion of the equity base is closely correlated with the accumulated net losses recorded starting in 2014.
- Return on Equity (ROE) Analysis
- The Return on Equity exhibited a precipitous decline, falling from 11.59% in 2012 to 3.66% in 2013, before turning negative in 2014. The most acute contraction occurred in 2015, where ROE reached a low of -52.20%. While the ROE improved to -25.15% in 2016, the negative values across the final three years indicate a sustained failure to generate returns on shareholder capital.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Return on Assets (ROA)
| Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | Dec 31, 2012 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders | (3,071) | (6,692) | (1,750) | 801) | 2,391) | |
| Total assets | 45,564) | 46,414) | 61,689) | 55,781) | 52,589) | |
| Profitability Ratio | ||||||
| ROA1 | -6.74% | -14.42% | -2.84% | 1.44% | 4.55% | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| ROA, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ConocoPhillips | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Exxon Mobil Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
1 2016 Calculation
ROA = 100 × Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders ÷ Total assets
= 100 × -3,071 ÷ 45,564 = -6.74%
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The profitability trajectory of the entity experienced a significant deterioration between 2012 and 2016, characterized by a transition from positive returns to substantial losses. The period is marked by a sharp decline in efficiency in utilizing assets to generate earnings, culminating in a severe trough in 2015.
- Return on Assets (ROA) Trend
- A consistent downward trend in ROA is observed from 2012 to 2015, falling from a peak of 4.55% to a low of -14.42%. Although a partial recovery occurred in 2016, with the ratio improving to -6.74%, the figure remained negative, indicating a continued inability to generate a positive return on the asset base during the latter half of the observed period.
- Net Income Performance
- The decline in ROA is primarily driven by a collapse in net income attributable to common stockholders. Earnings decreased from US$ 2,391 million in 2012 to US$ 801 million in 2013, before shifting to a net loss of US$ 1,750 million in 2014. The financial downturn peaked in 2015 with a net loss of US$ 6,692 million, followed by a reduction in losses to US$ 3,071 million in 2016.
- Asset Base Dynamics
- Total assets grew steadily from US$ 52,589 million in 2012 to a peak of US$ 61,689 million in 2014. However, a significant contraction occurred in 2015, with assets dropping to US$ 46,414 million, and further declining to US$ 45,564 million in 2016. This contraction coincided with the period of most severe losses, suggesting the impact of asset impairments or strategic divestitures during the period of financial instability.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?