Goodwill and Intangible Asset Disclosure
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
The total value of goodwill and other intangible assets experienced a period of expansion followed by a steady contraction between 2012 and 2016. The aggregate carrying amount peaked in 2014 at 6,569 million US dollars before declining to 5,904 million US dollars by the end of 2016.
- Other Intangible Assets
- A substantial increase in the gross carrying amount of other intangible assets occurred in 2014, rising from 229 million US dollars in 2013 to 1,037 million US dollars. Following this surge, the gross value remained relatively stable, ending 2016 at 1,013 million US dollars. The net carrying amount, however, showed a consistent decline from its 2014 peak of 993 million US dollars to 904 million US dollars in 2016, driven by a steady increase in accumulated amortization, which grew from 41 million US dollars in 2012 to 109 million US dollars in 2016.
- Goodwill Trends
- Goodwill remained static at 5,492 million US dollars during 2012 and 2013, with a marginal increase to 5,576 million US dollars in 2014. A downward trend emerged in the subsequent years, with values falling to 5,395 million US dollars in 2015 and further to 5,000 million US dollars in 2016. This reduction in goodwill suggests the recognition of impairment charges during the 2015 and 2016 fiscal periods.
- Combined Asset Trajectory
- The overall trajectory of these assets was characterized by a sharp increase in 2014, coinciding with the expansion of other intangible assets. From 2014 to 2016, the combined value decreased by approximately 10%, reflecting the dual impact of goodwill impairment and the systematic amortization of intangible assets.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjustments to Financial Statements: Removal of Goodwill
Anadarko Petroleum Corp., Financial Data: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
The financial trajectory between 2012 and 2016 is characterized by an initial period of expansion followed by a significant contraction in both the asset base and stockholders' equity. A consistent variance is observed between reported and adjusted values, representing the impact of goodwill and intangible assets on the balance sheet.
- Total Asset Trends
- Reported total assets exhibited growth from 52,589 million USD in 2012 to a peak of 61,689 million USD in 2014. A sharp reversal occurred in 2015, with assets declining to 46,414 million USD, a reduction of approximately 25% from the previous year's peak. This contraction continued marginally into 2016, closing at 45,564 million USD.
- Stockholders' Equity Volatility
- Equity peaked in 2013 at 21,857 million USD before entering a period of decline. The most substantial erosion occurred between 2014 and 2015, where reported equity fell from 19,725 million USD to 12,819 million USD. The adjusted stockholders' equity reflects an even more pronounced decline in tangible value, dropping from 14,149 million USD in 2014 to 7,424 million USD in 2015.
- Impact of Goodwill and Intangible Asset Adjustments
- The removal of goodwill and intangible assets resulted in a consistent reduction of both total assets and stockholders' equity, ranging from approximately 5,395 million USD to 5,576 million USD between 2012 and 2015. In 2016, this adjustment figure decreased to 5,000 million USD. The stability of this gap relative to the volatility of the reported totals indicates that the non-tangible asset component remained relatively constant despite the broader contraction of the company's financial position.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Financial Ratios: Removal of Goodwill (Summary)
Anadarko Petroleum Corp., Financial Ratios: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
The removal of goodwill and intangible assets reveals a higher degree of financial volatility and operational risk than is apparent in the reported figures. While reported metrics provide a smoothed view of performance, the adjusted ratios demonstrate that intangible assets have historically cushioned the perception of leverage and amplified the perceived stability of returns.
- Total Asset Turnover
- A consistent variance exists between reported and adjusted asset turnover, with adjusted figures remaining higher throughout the period from 2012 to 2016. This indicates that the inclusion of goodwill and intangible assets artificially lowers the perceived efficiency of asset utilization. Both metrics peaked between 2013 and 2014 before experiencing a downward trend, signaling a decline in the company's ability to generate revenue from its asset base.
- Financial Leverage
- Financial leverage shows a steady and significant upward trajectory. The adjusted leverage is markedly higher than the reported leverage, particularly from 2014 onward, escalating from 3.11 in 2012 to 5.62 by 2016. This divergence suggests that a substantial portion of the equity base is comprised of intangible assets; when these are removed, the company's reliance on debt relative to tangible assets is revealed to be much more aggressive.
- Return on Equity (ROE)
- A severe deterioration in profitability is evident, moving from positive returns in 2012 to deep negative territory by 2015. The adjusted ROE amplifies this volatility, showing a far more drastic collapse, reaching -90.14% in 2015 compared to the reported -52.20%. This suggests that the presence of goodwill acted as a buffer, masking the full extent of the losses relative to the tangible equity available to shareholders.
- Return on Assets (ROA)
- The ROA follows a trajectory similar to the ROE, with a transition from positive returns to losses starting in 2014. Adjusted ROA values are consistently lower (or more negative) than reported values during the period of decline. This confirms that the underlying tangible assets were less productive than reported, as the removal of intangible assets increases the denominator's sensitivity to net losses.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Total Asset Turnover
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
2016 Calculations
1 Total asset turnover = Sales revenues ÷ Total assets
= 8,447 ÷ 45,564 = 0.19
2 Adjusted total asset turnover = Sales revenues ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 8,447 ÷ 40,564 = 0.21
The financial data indicates a period of asset expansion followed by a significant contraction and a subsequent decline in asset utilization efficiency between 2012 and 2016. Total assets, both reported and adjusted, reached a peak in 2014 before experiencing a sharp decrease in 2015 and 2016.
- Asset Base Trends
- Reported total assets grew from 52,589 million USD in 2012 to a peak of 61,689 million USD in 2014. However, a substantial reduction occurred in 2015, with assets falling to 46,414 million USD, and continuing a slight decline to 45,564 million USD by 2016. Adjusted total assets followed an identical trajectory, though they remained consistently lower than reported figures, indicating a persistent presence of goodwill and intangible assets throughout the period.
- Asset Turnover Performance
- Reported total asset turnover showed modest improvement from 0.25 in 2012 to 0.27 in 2013 and 2014. A downward trend emerged thereafter, with the ratio falling to 0.20 in 2015 and 0.19 in 2016, signaling a decrease in the ability to generate revenue relative to the total asset base.
- Impact of Adjustments on Efficiency Ratios
- The adjusted total asset turnover was consistently higher than the reported turnover across all five years. This ratio peaked at 0.30 in 2013 before declining to 0.21 by 2016. The positive variance between adjusted and reported turnover demonstrates that the removal of intangible assets and goodwill provides a more favorable view of operational asset efficiency, although the overall trajectory of the adjusted ratio mirrors the decline seen in the reported figures after 2014.
The synchronized decline in both reported and adjusted asset turnover ratios from 2014 to 2016 suggests a fundamental decrease in asset productivity that persists regardless of whether intangible assets are excluded from the calculation.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Financial Leverage
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
2016 Calculations
1 Financial leverage = Total assets ÷ Stockholders’ equity
= 45,564 ÷ 12,212 = 3.73
2 Adjusted financial leverage = Adjusted total assets ÷ Adjusted stockholders’ equity
= 40,564 ÷ 7,212 = 5.62
The financial trajectory from 2012 to 2016 is characterized by an initial expansion in asset base followed by a significant contraction and a consistent increase in financial leverage. Total reported assets reached a peak of 61,689 million US$ in 2014 before declining to 45,564 million US$ by 2016. A similar pattern is observed in adjusted total assets, which peaked at 56,113 million US$ in 2014 and fell to 40,564 million US$ by the end of the period.
- Equity Erosion
- Stockholders' equity exhibited relative stability between 2012 and 2014, with reported values fluctuating between 19,725 million US$ and 21,857 million US$. However, a sharp decline occurred in 2015, with reported equity dropping to 12,819 million US$ and further decreasing to 12,212 million US$ in 2016. This erosion is more pronounced in adjusted stockholders' equity, which fell from a high of 16,365 million US$ in 2013 to 7,212 million US$ in 2016, indicating a substantial reduction in the equity buffer when intangible assets are excluded.
- Reported Financial Leverage
- The reported financial leverage ratio showed a steady upward trend, increasing from 2.55 in 2012 to 3.73 by 2016. The most significant acceleration in this ratio occurred between 2014 and 2015, where the ratio jumped from 3.13 to 3.62, coinciding with the sharp decrease in stockholders' equity.
- Adjusted Financial Leverage
- The adjusted financial leverage ratio reveals a more aggressive increase in risk profile than the reported figures. Starting at 3.11 in 2012, the ratio escalated to 5.62 by 2016. The divergence between reported and adjusted leverage widened significantly over time; while the reported leverage increased by 1.18 points, the adjusted leverage increased by 2.51 points. This suggests that the reliance on intangible assets to support the reported equity position grew more precarious as total equity declined.
The data indicates that the removal of goodwill and intangible assets significantly amplifies the observed financial leverage. The surge in adjusted financial leverage, particularly between 2014 and 2016, underscores a heightened sensitivity to equity volatility and suggests a more leveraged capital structure than is apparent through reported figures alone.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
2016 Calculations
1 ROE = 100 × Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders ÷ Stockholders’ equity
= 100 × -3,071 ÷ 12,212 = -25.15%
2 Adjusted ROE = 100 × Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders ÷ Adjusted stockholders’ equity
= 100 × -3,071 ÷ 7,212 = -42.58%
The financial period from 2012 to 2016 is characterized by a significant deterioration in both equity levels and returns on equity, with a marked acceleration of losses beginning in 2014.
- Stockholders' Equity Trends
- Reported stockholders' equity reached a peak of 21,857 million USD in 2013 before initiating a downward trend, concluding the period at 12,212 million USD in 2016. Adjusted stockholders' equity, which removes the impact of goodwill and intangible assets, consistently tracks below reported equity. A severe contraction is observed between 2014 and 2015, where adjusted equity declined from 14,149 million USD to 7,424 million USD, reflecting a substantial reduction in the tangible asset base.
- Comparative Analysis of ROE
- Reported ROE transitioned from a positive 11.59% in 2012 to a deficit of -52.20% in 2015, with a slight improvement to -25.15% in 2016. The adjusted ROE exhibits higher volatility and more extreme fluctuations. While it provided a higher return during the profitable years of 2012 and 2013, it plummeted more sharply than the reported metric during the downturn, reaching a low of -90.14% in 2015.
- Impact of Intangible Asset Removal
- The variance between reported and adjusted ROE indicates that the presence of goodwill and intangible assets serves to dampen the perceived volatility of returns. By reducing the equity denominator, the adjusted ROE amplifies the impact of net income or loss. This is evidenced by the fact that adjusted ROE is consistently higher than reported ROE when returns are positive and significantly more negative when returns are deficient, thereby providing a more conservative view of the returns generated on tangible capital.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
2016 Calculations
1 ROA = 100 × Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders ÷ Total assets
= 100 × -3,071 ÷ 45,564 = -6.74%
2 Adjusted ROA = 100 × Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 100 × -3,071 ÷ 40,564 = -7.57%
Analysis of asset valuation reveals a growth phase from 2012 to 2014, followed by a significant contraction in 2015. Reported total assets peaked at 61,689 million USD in 2014 before declining to 45,564 million USD by 2016. The consistent difference between reported and adjusted total assets indicates a substantial and relatively stable presence of goodwill and intangible assets throughout the five-year period, although a gradual decrease in these non-physical assets is observed toward the end of the sequence.
- Return on Assets (ROA) Trajectory
- A precipitous decline in profitability is evident, with both reported and adjusted ROA transitioning from positive values in 2012 and 2013 to significant negative returns starting in 2014. The most severe contraction occurred in 2015, where reported ROA reached -14.42% and adjusted ROA reached -16.31%, before exhibiting a partial recovery in 2016.
- Impact of Asset Adjustments on ROA
- The removal of goodwill and intangible assets results in an adjusted ROA that is consistently more volatile than the reported figure. When returns were positive in 2012 and 2013, the adjusted ROA was higher than the reported ROA. Conversely, during the period of losses from 2014 to 2016, the adjusted ROA deepened the negative percentages. This pattern demonstrates that the exclusion of non-physical assets amplifies the impact of net income or loss relative to the asset base.
- Asset Base Correlation
- The correlation between the decline in total assets and the collapse in ROA suggests a period of significant impairment or strategic restructuring coinciding with operational losses. The sharp reduction in total assets between 2014 and 2015 aligns with the most significant drop in return percentages, indicating a simultaneous deterioration of both asset value and earning power.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?