Free Cash Flow to The Firm (FCFF)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
Between 2017 and 2021, cash generation exhibited a trajectory of initial expansion, a significant contraction in 2020, and a subsequent partial recovery in 2021. Both cash provided by operating activities and free cash flow to the firm followed a highly correlated path, peaking in 2019 before experiencing volatility.
- Operating Cash Flow Trends
- Cash provided by operating activities grew steadily from 1,629 million US$ in 2017 to a peak of 3,399 million US$ in 2019. This period of growth was followed by a 19.4% decline in 2020 to 2,739 million US$, with a marginal recovery to 2,798 million US$ by the end of 2021.
- Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF) Performance
- FCFF mirrored the operating cash flow pattern, increasing from 1,726 million US$ in 2017 to 3,790 million US$ in 2019. The peak was followed by a sharp decrease to 2,862 million US$ in 2020, before rising slightly to 2,983 million US$ in 2021.
- Analysis of Cash Flow Variance
- A consistent positive variance is observed where FCFF remains higher than cash provided by operating activities across all reported years. This indicates that the adjustments made to operating cash flow—specifically the addition of after-tax interest expenses and the deduction of capital expenditures—resulted in a net positive impact on the firm's total free cash flow throughout the five-year period.
- Growth and Contraction Cycles
- The most significant growth occurred between 2017 and 2019, where FCFF increased by approximately 119%. The subsequent decline in 2020 represents a correction of roughly 24.5% from the 2019 peak, suggesting a period of external or internal volatility that impacted the firm's ability to generate cash before a stabilizing trend emerged in 2021.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Interest Paid, Net of Tax
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2 2021 Calculation
Cash paid for interest, tax = Cash paid for interest × EITR
= 664 × 16.00% = 106
The analysis of cash outflows for interest, net of tax, indicates a period of significant expansion followed by a phase of relative stabilization. Between 2017 and 2019, there was a substantial increase in net interest payments, which subsequently corrected in 2020 and remained steady through 2021.
- Net Interest Cash Outflows
- Cash paid for interest, net of tax, experienced a sharp upward trajectory from 2017 to 2019, rising from 232 million US dollars to a peak of 680 million US dollars. This represents a substantial increase in the net cost of debt servicing over a three-year period. A subsequent reduction occurred in 2020, with payments dropping to 525 million US dollars, followed by a modest increase to 558 million US dollars in 2021.
- Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR) Volatility
- The effective income tax rate demonstrated significant fluctuations. Rates were highest in 2017 and 2018 at 35% and 33%, respectively, before declining sharply to a period low of 4% in 2019. The rate then increased to 22% in 2020 and decreased to 16% in 2021.
- Relationship Between Tax Rates and Interest Payments
- The peak net interest payment of 680 million US dollars in 2019 coincided with the lowest observed effective income tax rate of 4%. Given that these figures are reported net of tax, the minimal tax shield available in 2019 likely amplified the net cash outflow relative to the gross interest expense. Conversely, the higher tax rates observed in 2017 and 2018 provided a more significant tax offset, reducing the net cash impact of interest payments during those years.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Current
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |
| Enterprise value (EV) | 37,871) |
| Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) | 2,983) |
| Valuation Ratio | |
| EV/FCFF | 12.70 |
| Benchmarks | |
| EV/FCFF, Competitors1 | |
| Alphabet Inc. | 46.64 |
| Comcast Corp. | 8.04 |
| Meta Platforms Inc. | 32.89 |
| Netflix Inc. | 27.33 |
| Walt Disney Co. | 20.39 |
| EV/FCFF, Sector | |
| Media & Entertainment | 42.31 |
| EV/FCFF, Industry | |
| Communication Services | 48.42 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 Click competitor name to see calculations.
If the company EV/FCFF is lower then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/FCFF is higher then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Historical
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Enterprise value (EV)1 | 26,581) | 42,035) | 28,601) | 33,012) | 16,764) | |
| Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF)2 | 2,983) | 2,862) | 3,790) | 2,925) | 1,726) | |
| Valuation Ratio | ||||||
| EV/FCFF3 | 8.91 | 14.69 | 7.55 | 11.29 | 9.71 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| EV/FCFF, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Alphabet Inc. | 27.17 | — | — | — | — | |
| Comcast Corp. | 15.77 | — | — | — | — | |
| Meta Platforms Inc. | 15.40 | — | — | — | — | |
| Netflix Inc. | 335.37 | — | — | — | — | |
| Walt Disney Co. | 78.66 | 63.77 | — | — | — | |
| EV/FCFF, Sector | ||||||
| Media & Entertainment | 24.79 | — | — | — | — | |
| EV/FCFF, Industry | ||||||
| Communication Services | 31.50 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
3 2021 Calculation
EV/FCFF = EV ÷ FCFF
= 26,581 ÷ 2,983 = 8.91
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
An analysis of the financial metrics from 2017 to 2021 reveals significant volatility in the enterprise value relative to the more stabilized movements of the free cash flow to the firm.
- Enterprise Value (EV) Dynamics
- The enterprise value exhibited substantial fluctuations throughout the observed period. A sharp increase occurred between 2017 and 2018, where the value rose from 16,764 million to 33,012 million. Following a slight dip in 2019, the value reached a peak of 42,035 million in 2020, before contracting significantly to 26,581 million by the end of 2021.
- Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF) Performance
- FCFF demonstrated a steady upward trend in the early part of the period, growing from 1,726 million in 2017 to a peak of 3,790 million in 2019. A decline was noted in 2020 to 2,862 million, followed by a marginal recovery to 2,983 million in 2021. This suggests that while cash generation remained relatively robust, it did not scale proportionally with the volatility seen in the enterprise value.
- EV/FCFF Ratio Interpretation
- The EV/FCFF ratio shifted unpredictably, reflecting the disconnect between market-based valuation and operational cash flow. The ratio reached its lowest point of 7.55 in 2019, during the year of peak FCFF. A significant spike to 14.69 occurred in 2020, driven by the convergence of the highest recorded enterprise value and a decline in free cash flow. By 2021, the ratio compressed to 8.91, indicating a normalization of the valuation multiple relative to the firm's cash-generating capacity.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?