Income Statement
Twenty-First Century Fox Inc., selected items from income statement, long-term trends
US$ in millions
| 12 months ended: | Revenues | Net income (loss) attributable to Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. stockholders |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2018 | 30,400) | 4,464) |
| Jun 30, 2017 | 28,500) | 2,952) |
| Jun 30, 2016 | 27,326) | 2,755) |
| Jun 30, 2015 | 28,987) | 8,306) |
| Jun 30, 2014 | 31,867) | 4,514) |
| Jun 30, 2013 | 27,675) | 7,097) |
| Jun 30, 2012 | 33,706) | 1,179) |
| Jun 30, 2011 | 33,405) | 2,739) |
| Jun 30, 2010 | 32,778) | 2,539) |
| Jun 30, 2009 | 30,423) | (3,378) |
| Jun 30, 2008 | 32,996) | 5,387) |
| Jun 30, 2007 | 28,655) | 3,426) |
| Jun 30, 2006 | 25,327) | 2,314) |
| Jun 30, 2005 | 23,859) | 2,128) |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2010-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2009-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2008-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2007-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2006-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2005-06-30).
The financial performance from 2005 to 2018 is characterized by steady revenue growth in the early period followed by a phase of volatility in both top-line and bottom-line results. While revenues maintained a relatively stable baseline after 2008, net income experienced extreme fluctuations, including a significant loss and several high-magnitude peaks.
- Revenue Trends
- A period of consistent expansion is observed between 2005 and 2008, with revenues increasing from 23,859 million to 32,996 million. Following this growth phase, revenues entered a period of fluctuation. A notable decline occurred in 2013, where revenues dropped to 27,675 million, before recovering to 31,867 million in 2014. The final years of the period show a stabilization trend, ending at 30,400 million in 2018.
- Net Income Volatility
- Profitability exhibited significant instability compared to revenue. Net income grew steadily until 2008, reaching 5,387 million, but reversed sharply in 2009 to a net loss of 3,378 million. Recovery began in 2010, leading to exceptional profit peaks in 2013 (7,097 million) and 2015 (8,306 million). These peaks occurred despite revenues in 2013 and 2015 being lower than the 2008 peak, suggesting the influence of non-operating gains or significant cost reductions.
- Profitability Correlation
- The relationship between revenue and net income appears decoupled in the latter half of the period. For instance, 2015 recorded the highest net income (8,306 million) despite revenues (28,987 million) being approximately 12% lower than the 2008 peak. Conversely, the 2009 net loss occurred during a year when revenues remained relatively high at 30,423 million, indicating that bottom-line performance was driven by factors other than sales volume during these intervals.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Balance Sheet: Assets
| Current assets | Total assets | |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2018 | 19,333) | 53,831) |
| Jun 30, 2017 | 16,286) | 50,724) |
| Jun 30, 2016 | 14,949) | 48,365) |
| Jun 30, 2015 | 17,376) | 50,051) |
| Jun 30, 2014 | 15,376) | 54,793) |
| Jun 30, 2013 | 15,567) | 50,944) |
| Jun 30, 2012 | 19,448) | 56,663) |
| Jun 30, 2011 | 21,784) | 61,980) |
| Jun 30, 2010 | 18,024) | 54,384) |
| Jun 30, 2009 | 15,836) | 53,121) |
| Jun 30, 2008 | 14,362) | 62,308) |
| Jun 30, 2007 | 15,906) | 62,343) |
| Jun 30, 2006 | 13,123) | 56,649) |
| Jun 30, 2005 | 12,779) | 54,692) |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2010-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2009-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2008-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2007-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2006-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2005-06-30).
The asset structure of the organization exhibits significant fluctuations between 2005 and 2018, characterized by a period of growth followed by a contraction and a subsequent recovery phase. While total assets remained within a range of approximately 48 billion to 62 billion US dollars, the composition of those assets shifted, notably in the proportion of current assets relative to the total asset base.
- Total Asset Volatility
- Total assets peaked in 2007 and 2008 at approximately 62.3 billion US dollars. A gradual decline followed, reaching a period low of 48.37 billion US dollars in 2016. By June 30, 2018, total assets recovered to 53.83 billion US dollars, indicating a cyclical pattern of asset accumulation and divestment or depreciation.
- Current Asset Growth and Trends
- Current assets showed a strong upward trajectory from 12.78 billion US dollars in 2005 to a peak of 21.78 billion US dollars in 2011. Following this peak, a downward trend was observed until 2014, where values dropped to 15.38 billion US dollars. A recovery phase began thereafter, with current assets rising to 19.33 billion US dollars by 2018.
- Liquidity and Asset Composition
- The ratio of current assets to total assets expanded over the analyzed period. In 2005, current assets represented approximately 23.4% of total assets. This proportion increased significantly by 2011, reaching approximately 35.1%. Even during the period of lowest total assets in 2016, the current asset ratio remained elevated at approximately 30.9%, ending the period in 2018 at approximately 35.9%. This suggests a strategic shift toward a more liquid balance sheet over the thirteen-year duration.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Twenty-First Century Fox Inc., selected items from liabilities and stockholders’ equity, long-term trends
US$ in millions
| Current liabilities | Total borrowings | Total Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. stockholders’ equity | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2018 | 8,244) | 19,523) | 19,564) |
| Jun 30, 2017 | 7,238) | 19,913) | 15,722) |
| Jun 30, 2016 | 7,068) | 19,725) | 13,661) |
| Jun 30, 2015 | 7,262) | 19,039) | 17,220) |
| Jun 30, 2014 | 8,856) | 19,058) | 17,418) |
| Jun 30, 2013 | 8,435) | 16,458) | 16,998) |
| Jun 30, 2012 | 9,617) | 15,455) | 24,684) |
| Jun 30, 2011 | 9,571) | 15,495) | 29,506) |
| Jun 30, 2010 | 8,862) | 13,320) | 25,113) |
| Jun 30, 2009 | 10,639) | 14,289) | 23,224) |
| Jun 30, 2008 | 9,182) | 13,511) | 28,623) |
| Jun 30, 2007 | 7,494) | 12,502) | 32,922) |
| Jun 30, 2006 | 6,373) | 11,427) | 29,874) |
| Jun 30, 2005 | 6,649) | 10,999) | 29,377) |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2010-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2009-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2008-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2007-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2006-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2005-06-30).
An analysis of the capital structure from 2005 to 2018 reveals a significant shift in the financing strategy, characterized by a steady increase in long-term debt and a general contraction of stockholders' equity over the majority of the period.
- Current Liabilities Trends
- Short-term obligations exhibited moderate volatility. An upward trend was observed from 2005, with liabilities rising from 6,649 million US$ to a peak of 10,639 million US$ in 2009. Following this peak, current liabilities generally declined, stabilizing between 7,068 million US$ and 8,856 million US$ from 2010 through 2017, before ending the period at 8,244 million US$ in 2018.
- Total Borrowings Trajectory
- Total borrowings demonstrated a consistent long-term increase. Debt levels rose from 10,999 million US$ in 2005 to 19,523 million US$ in 2018. A notable acceleration in borrowing occurred between 2013 and 2014, where debt increased from 16,458 million US$ to 19,058 million US$. From 2014 to 2018, total borrowings remained elevated, plateauing near the 19 billion US$ to 20 billion US$ range.
- Stockholders' Equity Fluctuations
- Equity experienced a broad downward trend for much of the observed period. After reaching a peak of 32,922 million US$ in 2007, stockholders' equity declined significantly, reaching a low of 13,661 million US$ by 2016. A partial recovery occurred in the final two years of the analysis, with equity rising to 19,564 million US$ by June 30, 2018.
- Leverage and Solvency Observations
- The inverse movement of total borrowings and stockholders' equity indicates a substantial increase in financial leverage. In 2005, borrowings represented approximately 37% of stockholders' equity. By 2016, this ratio shifted dramatically, with borrowings exceeding equity, representing approximately 143% of the equity base. This suggests a strategic shift toward debt-funded operations or capital distributions that reduced the equity cushion over time.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Cash Flow Statement
Twenty-First Century Fox Inc., selected items from cash flow statement, long-term trends
US$ in millions
| 12 months ended: | Net cash provided by operating activities | Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities | Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2018 | 4,227) | (1,177) | (1,464) |
| Jun 30, 2017 | 3,785) | (752) | (1,281) |
| Jun 30, 2016 | 3,048) | (1,638) | (5,330) |
| Jun 30, 2015 | 3,617) | 6,736) | (7,102) |
| Jun 30, 2014 | 2,964) | (935) | (3,776) |
| Jun 30, 2013 | 3,002) | 86) | (4,571) |
| Jun 30, 2012 | 3,790) | (1,421) | (5,115) |
| Jun 30, 2011 | 4,471) | (2,247) | 1,360) |
| Jun 30, 2010 | 3,854) | (313) | (1,445) |
| Jun 30, 2009 | 2,248) | (627) | 315) |
| Jun 30, 2008 | 3,925) | (6,347) | (643) |
| Jun 30, 2007 | 4,110) | (2,076) | (273) |
| Jun 30, 2006 | 3,257) | (2,060) | (1,932) |
| Jun 30, 2005 | 3,371) | (303) | (681) |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2010-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2009-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2008-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2007-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2006-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2005-06-30).
The financial profile from 2005 to 2018 is characterized by consistent operational cash generation, punctuated by significant volatility in investing and financing activities. Operational liquidity remained positive throughout the entire period, serving as the primary funding source for the company's strategic movements.
- Operating Activities
- Net cash provided by operating activities demonstrated resilience, generally fluctuating between 3 billion and 4.5 billion US dollars. A significant contraction is observed in 2009, where cash flow dropped to 2,248 million US dollars, marking the lowest point in the analyzed period. However, a recovery followed immediately, reaching a peak of 4,471 million US dollars in 2011. The latter half of the period shows a stabilized range, ending with a strong upward trajectory to 4,227 million US dollars by 2018.
- Investing Activities
- Investing cash flows were predominantly negative, reflecting continuous capital expenditure and acquisitions. A major spike in investment spending occurred in 2008, with a net outflow of 6,347 million US dollars. This trend shifted dramatically in 2015, when a substantial cash inflow of 6,736 million US dollars was recorded, indicating a significant divestiture or sale of assets. Outside of this anomaly and the 2008 peak, investing outflows remained relatively moderate, typically ranging between 300 million and 2,200 million US dollars.
- Financing Activities
- Financing activities were characterized by heavy net outflows for the majority of the period, suggesting aggressive debt repayment, dividend distributions, or share repurchases. The most intense periods of cash outflow occurred between 2012 and 2016, with a peak outflow of 7,102 million US dollars in 2015. This particular outflow aligns chronologically with the massive cash inflow from investing activities in the same year, suggesting that proceeds from asset sales were utilized to settle financial obligations or return capital to shareholders. Periodic inflows in 2009 and 2011 indicate occasional reliance on external financing to bolster liquidity.
Overall, the synergy between the three cash flow components reveals a business model capable of generating steady internal funding, which was leveraged to manage large-scale investment cycles and significant financial restructuring during the mid-2010s.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Per Share Data
| 12 months ended: | Basic earnings per share 1 | Diluted earnings per share 2 | Dividend per share 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2018 | 2.41 | 2.40 | 0.36 |
| Jun 30, 2017 | 1.59 | 1.59 | 0.36 |
| Jun 30, 2016 | 1.42 | 1.42 | 0.30 |
| Jun 30, 2015 | 3.91 | 3.90 | 0.28 |
| Jun 30, 2014 | 1.99 | 1.99 | 0.25 |
| Jun 30, 2013 | 3.03 | 3.03 | 0.17 |
| Jun 30, 2012 | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.18 |
| Jun 30, 2011 | 1.04 | 1.04 | 0.15 |
| Jun 30, 2010 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.14 |
| Jun 30, 2009 | -1.29 | -1.29 | 0.12 |
| Jun 30, 2008 | 1.82 | 1.81 | 0.12 |
| Jun 30, 2007 | 1.14 | 1.14 | 0.12 |
| Jun 30, 2006 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.13 |
| Jun 30, 2005 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.10 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2010-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2009-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2008-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2007-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2006-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2005-06-30).
1, 2, 3 Data adjusted for splits and stock dividends.
The financial performance per share between 2005 and 2018 is characterized by significant volatility in earnings juxtaposed with a steady, incremental growth in dividend distributions.
- Earnings Per Share Analysis
- Basic and diluted earnings per share exhibit a high degree of fluctuation throughout the period. An initial growth phase from 2005 to 2008, peaking at 1.82 US$, was followed by a sharp contraction in 2009, resulting in a deficit of -1.29 US$. Following this trough, earnings recovered but remained unstable, reaching a period high of 3.91 US$ in 2015. A subsequent decline occurred in 2016 to 1.42 US$, before an upward trend resumed in 2017 and 2018, ending at 2.41 US$. The close alignment between basic and diluted figures indicates that dilutive instruments had a negligible impact on the per-share value.
- Dividend Distribution Trends
- Dividend per share shows a consistent and disciplined growth pattern, moving from 0.10 US$ in 2005 to 0.36 US$ in 2018. This growth trajectory remained largely independent of earnings volatility; specifically, dividends were maintained at 0.12 US$ during the 2009 earnings deficit. The gradual increase in payouts suggests a commitment to stable shareholder returns despite the periodic instability of net income.
- Earnings-to-Dividend Relationship
- A decoupling is observed between earnings volatility and dividend policy. While earnings per share experienced dramatic swings—including a transition from a significant loss in 2009 to a peak in 2015—the dividend growth remained linear and predictable. This divergence suggests that dividend payments were not tied to annual earnings fluctuations but were likely supported by cash reserves or a long-term capital allocation strategy.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?