Return on capital (ROC) is after tax rate of return on net business assets. ROIC is unaffected by changes in interest rates or company debt and equity structure. It measures business productivity performance.
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
| Jun 30, 2018 | Jun 30, 2017 | Jun 30, 2016 | Jun 30, 2015 | Jun 30, 2014 | Jun 30, 2013 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | 4,669) | 4,273) | 4,025) | 9,417) | 4,517) | 7,896) | |
| Invested capital2 | 47,272) | 45,055) | 42,462) | 44,315) | 48,265) | 44,434) | |
| Performance Ratio | |||||||
| ROIC3 | 9.88% | 9.48% | 9.48% | 21.25% | 9.36% | 17.77% | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| ROIC, Competitors4 | |||||||
| Alphabet Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Comcast Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Meta Platforms Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Netflix Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Walt Disney Co. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-06-30).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2018 Calculation
ROIC = 100 × NOPAT ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × 4,669 ÷ 47,272 = 9.88%
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial performance between June 30, 2013, and June 30, 2018, is characterized by significant volatility in profitability metrics, while the capital base remained relatively stable. The fluctuations in the Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) are primarily driven by substantial swings in operating profits rather than systemic shifts in the amount of invested capital.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT exhibited high variance throughout the analyzed period. A significant peak was recorded in 2015 at 9,417 million US$, which was followed by a sharp contraction to 4,025 million US$ in 2016. A gradual recovery trend is observed in the final two years, with NOPAT increasing to 4,669 million US$ by June 30, 2018.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital remained within a relatively narrow range, fluctuating between a minimum of 42,462 million US$ in 2016 and a maximum of 48,265 million US$ in 2014. This stability indicates that the changes in capital efficiency were not the result of aggressive capital expansion or divestment, but rather changes in operational profitability.
- Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
- ROIC demonstrated sharp oscillations, closely mirroring the volatility of NOPAT. The ratio reached its peak at 21.25% in 2015 and started at 17.77% in 2013. However, a distinct baseline emerged between 2014 and 2018, where the ROIC consistently hovered between 9.36% and 9.88%, suggesting a stabilization of capital returns at a lower level following the high-performance years.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Decomposition of ROIC
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-06-30).
1 Operating profit margin (OPM). See calculations »
2 Turnover of capital (TO). See calculations »
3 Effective cash tax rate (CTR). See calculations »
The Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) exhibits significant volatility over the analyzed six-year period, characterized by distinct cycles of expansion and contraction. The overall performance is primarily driven by fluctuations in operating efficiency rather than changes in asset utilization or tax environments.
- Operating Profit Margin (OPM)
- A pattern of high instability is observed in the operating profit margin. Significant peaks occurred in 2013 (34.61%) and 2015 (37.99%), followed by sharp declines in 2014 (19.52%) and 2016 (18.70%). From 2016 to 2018, the margin remained relatively suppressed, hovering between 18.27% and 21.18%.
- Turnover of Capital (TO)
- Capital turnover remained remarkably stable throughout the period, with values ranging narrowly between 0.62 and 0.66. This consistency indicates that the efficiency of asset deployment in generating revenue did not change significantly and therefore did not contribute to the volatility seen in the final return metrics.
- Effective Cash Tax Rate (1 – CTR)
- The after-tax retention ratio fluctuated between a low of 70.59% in 2017 and a high of 86.23% in 2015. While these variations impacted the net ROIC, they were not the primary drivers of the overall trend.
- Decomposition of ROIC
- The ROIC movements correlate almost perfectly with the Operating Profit Margin. The peak ROIC of 21.25% in 2015 was a direct result of the period's highest OPM (37.99%) combined with a favorable tax retention rate (86.23%). Conversely, the decline in ROIC to approximately 9% between 2014 and 2018 aligns with the contraction in operating margins, confirming that profitability per unit of sales is the dominant lever affecting the return on invested capital.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Operating Profit Margin (OPM)
| Jun 30, 2018 | Jun 30, 2017 | Jun 30, 2016 | Jun 30, 2015 | Jun 30, 2014 | Jun 30, 2013 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | 4,669) | 4,273) | 4,025) | 9,417) | 4,517) | 7,896) | |
| Add: Cash operating taxes2 | 904) | 1,781) | 1,095) | 1,504) | 1,707) | 1,612) | |
| Net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT) | 5,572) | 6,053) | 5,120) | 10,921) | 6,224) | 9,509) | |
| Revenues | 30,400) | 28,500) | 27,326) | 28,987) | 31,867) | 27,675) | |
| Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue | 98) | 75) | 57) | (242) | 13) | (203) | |
| Adjusted revenues | 30,498) | 28,575) | 27,383) | 28,745) | 31,880) | 27,472) | |
| Profitability Ratio | |||||||
| OPM3 | 18.27% | 21.18% | 18.70% | 37.99% | 19.52% | 34.61% | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| OPM, Competitors4 | |||||||
| Alphabet Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Comcast Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Meta Platforms Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Netflix Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Walt Disney Co. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-06-30).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cash operating taxes. See details »
3 2018 Calculation
OPM = 100 × NOPBT ÷ Adjusted revenues
= 100 × 5,572 ÷ 30,498 = 18.27%
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The operating profit margin exhibited significant volatility between June 30, 2013, and June 30, 2018, characterized by sharp fluctuations rather than a steady linear trend. While adjusted revenues remained relatively stable, oscillating between approximately 27 billion and 32 billion US dollars, the net operating profit before taxes experienced substantial variances, leading to an inconsistent margin profile.
- Operating Profit Margin Volatility
- The margin peaked at 37.99% in 2015, representing the highest level of operational efficiency within the period. However, this peak was preceded and followed by sharp declines, with margins dropping to 19.52% in 2014 and further descending to 18.27% by 2018. This pattern indicates a lack of stability in converting revenue into operating profit.
- Revenue and Profitability Correlation
- A divergence is observed between revenue growth and profit margins. In 2014, revenues reached a period high of 31,880 million US dollars, yet the operating profit margin contracted to 19.52%. Similarly, in 2018, revenues increased to 30,498 million US dollars, but the operating profit margin declined to its lowest point of 18.27%, suggesting that higher sales volumes during these periods did not translate into improved operational efficiency.
- Net Operating Profit Trends
- Net operating profit before taxes showed a downward trajectory following the 2015 high of 10,921 million US dollars. By 2018, this figure decreased to 5,572 million US dollars. The reduction in profit, coupled with stagnant or slightly increasing revenues, confirms a compression of the operating margin over the latter half of the analyzed period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Turnover of Capital (TO)
| Jun 30, 2018 | Jun 30, 2017 | Jun 30, 2016 | Jun 30, 2015 | Jun 30, 2014 | Jun 30, 2013 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Revenues | 30,400) | 28,500) | 27,326) | 28,987) | 31,867) | 27,675) | |
| Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue | 98) | 75) | 57) | (242) | 13) | (203) | |
| Adjusted revenues | 30,498) | 28,575) | 27,383) | 28,745) | 31,880) | 27,472) | |
| Invested capital1 | 47,272) | 45,055) | 42,462) | 44,315) | 48,265) | 44,434) | |
| Efficiency Ratio | |||||||
| TO2 | 0.65 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.62 | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| TO, Competitors3 | |||||||
| Alphabet Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Comcast Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Meta Platforms Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Netflix Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Walt Disney Co. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-06-30).
1 Invested capital. See details »
2 2018 Calculation
TO = Adjusted revenues ÷ Invested capital
= 30,498 ÷ 47,272 = 0.65
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial performance from June 30, 2013, to June 30, 2018, is characterized by relative stability in capital efficiency despite fluctuations in both total revenues and the scale of invested capital. The relationship between revenue generation and the capital base remained consistent throughout the six-year period.
- Adjusted Revenues
- Revenues exhibited a volatile trend, peaking at US$ 31,880 million in 2014 before experiencing a decline over the next two years to a low of US$ 27,383 million in 2016. A recovery phase followed, with revenues increasing to US$ 30,498 million by June 30, 2018.
- Invested Capital
- The scale of invested capital mirrored the trajectory of adjusted revenues. A peak of US$ 48,265 million was observed in 2014, followed by a contraction to US$ 42,462 million by 2016. Capital levels then trended upward, reaching US$ 47,272 million by the end of the analyzed period.
- Turnover of Capital (TO)
- The turnover ratio remained remarkably stable, fluctuating within a narrow range between 0.62 and 0.66. The efficiency of capital utilization peaked in 2014 at 0.66 and reached its lowest point in 2013 at 0.62. This stability indicates that the company maintained a constant proportionality between its asset base and its ability to generate revenue, regardless of the absolute fluctuations in revenue or capital volume.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Effective Cash Tax Rate (CTR)
| Jun 30, 2018 | Jun 30, 2017 | Jun 30, 2016 | Jun 30, 2015 | Jun 30, 2014 | Jun 30, 2013 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | 4,669) | 4,273) | 4,025) | 9,417) | 4,517) | 7,896) | |
| Add: Cash operating taxes2 | 904) | 1,781) | 1,095) | 1,504) | 1,707) | 1,612) | |
| Net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT) | 5,572) | 6,053) | 5,120) | 10,921) | 6,224) | 9,509) | |
| Tax Rate | |||||||
| CTR3 | 16.22% | 29.41% | 21.39% | 13.77% | 27.42% | 16.96% | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| CTR, Competitors4 | |||||||
| Alphabet Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Comcast Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Meta Platforms Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Netflix Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Walt Disney Co. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-06-30).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cash operating taxes. See details »
3 2018 Calculation
CTR = 100 × Cash operating taxes ÷ NOPBT
= 100 × 904 ÷ 5,572 = 16.22%
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial performance over the six-year period ending June 30, 2018, is characterized by significant volatility in both operating profitability and the associated cash tax burden. There is no consistent linear trend in the effective cash tax rate (CTR), which suggests fluctuating tax efficiencies or varying impacts from deferred tax assets and liabilities.
- Effective Cash Tax Rate Fluctuations
- The CTR exhibited substantial variance, ranging from a period low of 13.77% in 2015 to a peak of 29.41% in 2017. This oscillation indicates that cash tax payments did not scale proportionally with operating profits over the observed timeframe.
- Analysis of Profitability and Tax Correlation
- A notable divergence is observed in 2015, where the net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT) reached its highest level at US$ 10,921 million, yet the CTR dropped to its lowest point of 13.77%. In contrast, 2017 saw the highest CTR of 29.41% despite a moderate NOPBT of US$ 6,053 million, marking the period of highest relative cash tax leakage.
- Cash Operating Tax Trends
- Cash operating taxes peaked in 2017 at US$ 1,781 million before experiencing a sharp decline to US$ 904 million in 2018. This final reduction represents the lowest absolute cash tax expenditure in the six-year series, contributing to a normalized CTR of 16.22% by the end of the period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?