EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Twenty-First Century Fox Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Income Statement
- Common-Size Balance Sheet: Assets
- Common-Size Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
- Common Stock Valuation Ratios
- Price to FCFE (P/FCFE)
- Present Value of Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE)
- Price to Sales (P/S) since 2005
- Analysis of Revenues
- Analysis of Debt
- Aggregate Accruals
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Twenty-First Century Fox Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Jun 30, 2018 | Jun 30, 2017 | Jun 30, 2016 | Jun 30, 2015 | Jun 30, 2014 | Jun 30, 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | |||||||
| Cost of capital2 | |||||||
| Invested capital3 | |||||||
| Economic profit4 | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-06-30).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2018 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The financial performance between June 30, 2013, and June 30, 2018, is characterized by significant volatility in operational profitability and a recurring inability to generate positive economic profit. While the organization maintained a relatively stable base of invested capital, the returns generated were frequently insufficient to cover the cost of that capital, resulting in a destruction of economic value in four of the six analyzed years.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- A high degree of instability is observed in NOPAT over the period. After starting at 7,896 million USD in 2013, profits dropped sharply in 2014 before reaching a peak of 9,417 million USD in 2015. However, this peak was short-lived, as NOPAT collapsed to 4,025 million USD in 2016 and remained stagnant, fluctuating between 4,000 million USD and 4,700 million USD through 2018.
- Cost of Capital and Invested Capital
- The cost of capital remained relatively consistent, ranging from a low of 14.67% in 2016 to a high of 16.69% in 2018. Simultaneously, invested capital showed moderate fluctuations, peaking at 48,265 million USD in 2014 and reaching a minimum of 42,462 million USD in 2016. The lack of a strong downward trend in invested capital, coupled with a rising cost of capital toward the end of the period, created a challenging threshold for value creation.
- Economic Profit Trends
- Economic profit exhibits a predominantly negative trend, indicating that the company failed to earn a return exceeding its weighted average cost of capital in most years. Positive economic profit was recorded only in 2013 (568 million USD) and 2015 (2,445 million USD). In contrast, significant value destruction occurred in 2014, 2016, 2017, and 2018, with the deficit deepening to 3,221 million USD by the end of the period. The correlation between the drop in NOPAT after 2015 and the subsequent negative economic profit suggests that operational earnings declined more rapidly than the cost of capital or the invested capital base.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-06-30).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowances for returns and doubtful accounts.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in restructuring program liabilities.
5 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income attributable to Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. stockholders.
6 2018 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
7 2018 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense, net = Adjusted interest expense, net × Statutory income tax rate
= × 28.00% =
8 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income attributable to Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. stockholders.
9 2018 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 28.00% =
10 Elimination of after taxes investment income.
11 Elimination of discontinued operations.
- Net Income Attributable to Stockholders
- The net income showed notable fluctuations over the analyzed periods. It started at 7,097 million USD in 2013, then declined significantly to 4,514 million USD in 2014. In 2015, there was a strong rebound with net income increasing to 8,306 million USD, marking the highest value in the timeframe. Afterward, net income dropped sharply to 2,755 million USD in 2016 and remained relatively low in 2017, with a slight increase to 2,952 million USD. In 2018, net income rose again to 4,464 million USD, indicating partial recovery but still below the earlier peak.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- The net operating profit after taxes demonstrated a pattern similar to net income but with somewhat less pronounced variation. Starting at 7,896 million USD in 2013, it decreased substantially to 4,517 million USD in 2014. NOPAT peaked at 9,417 million USD in 2015, exceeding the initial period's value. Following this peak, it declined sharply to 4,025 million USD in 2016. The next two years showed moderate growth, with NOPAT increasing to 4,273 million USD in 2017 and 4,669 million USD in 2018.
- Overall Trend Analysis
- Both net income and NOPAT experienced significant volatility throughout the six years. The years 2014 and 2016 are characterized by marked downturns in profitability metrics. The year 2015 stands out as a peak period for both measures, reflecting a temporary strong financial performance. After 2016, there is evidence of gradual operational improvement through 2018, though neither net income nor NOPAT returned to their earlier peak levels by the end of the period. The data suggests a cycle of recovery following considerable profit contractions, warranting further examination of underlying causes during downturn years.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-06-30).
- Provision for income taxes from continuing operations
- The provision for income taxes generally declined from 2013 to 2016, starting at 1,690 million US dollars in 2013 and decreasing steadily to 1,130 million in 2016. In 2017, there was a notable increase to 1,419 million, followed by a significant drop to a negative figure of -364 million in 2018, which may indicate a tax benefit or a reversal of previous tax provisions.
- Cash operating taxes
- Cash operating taxes fluctuated over the period. Beginning at 1,612 million US dollars in 2013, the figure increased to 1,707 million in 2014, then decreased to 1,504 million in 2015. A more marked decline occurred in 2016 with taxes dropping to 1,095 million. Subsequently, there was a sharp rise to 1,781 million in 2017 before falling significantly to 904 million in 2018. The fluctuations suggest variability in cash tax payments potentially linked to changing profitability or tax planning strategies.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-06-30).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of deferred revenue.
5 Addition of restructuring program liabilities.
6 Addition of equity equivalents to total Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. stockholders’ equity.
7 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
8 Subtraction of construction in progress.
9 Subtraction of available-for-sale securities.
- Total reported debt & leases
- The total reported debt and leases displayed fluctuations over the six-year period. Starting at $19,912 million in 2013, the debt increased to a peak of $22,748 million in 2014. Following this peak, there was a general decline in debt, descending to $20,609 million in 2015 and remaining relatively stable through 2016 and 2017, with slight increases and decreases respectively. By 2018, the debt had further decreased to $21,076 million. Overall, the debt levels demonstrate initial growth followed by a slight reduction and stabilization trend.
- Total Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc. stockholders’ equity
- Stockholders' equity showed an overall increasing trend despite some variability. Beginning at $16,998 million in 2013, there was a moderate increase to $17,418 million in 2014, followed by a small decrease to $17,220 million in 2015. A notable decline occurred in 2016, when equity dropped sharply to $13,661 million. After this decline, equity rebounded, increasing to $15,722 million in 2017 and further to $19,564 million in 2018, marking the highest equity value in the period.
- Invested capital
- Invested capital demonstrated a fluctuating but generally downward trend in the earlier years, followed by recovery in later years. It began at $44,434 million in 2013, increased to $48,265 million in 2014, then decreased significantly to $44,315 million in 2015 and further declined to $42,462 million in 2016. From 2016 onwards, invested capital increased, reaching $45,055 million in 2017 and $47,272 million in 2018, though it did not quite return to the previous peak observed in 2014.
Cost of Capital
Twenty-First Century Fox Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Borrowings3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 28.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 28.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Borrowings. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Borrowings3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Borrowings. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Borrowings3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Borrowings. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Borrowings3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-06-30).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Borrowings. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Borrowings3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2014-06-30).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Borrowings. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Borrowings3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2013-06-30).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Borrowings. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Jun 30, 2018 | Jun 30, 2017 | Jun 30, 2016 | Jun 30, 2015 | Jun 30, 2014 | Jun 30, 2013 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Economic profit1 | |||||||
| Invested capital2 | |||||||
| Performance Ratio | |||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | |||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | |||||||
| Alphabet Inc. | |||||||
| Comcast Corp. | |||||||
| Meta Platforms Inc. | |||||||
| Netflix Inc. | |||||||
| Trade Desk Inc. | |||||||
| Walt Disney Co. | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-06-30).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2018 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of economic value creation from June 30, 2013, to June 30, 2018, reveals a period of significant volatility and a general trend toward value destruction. The company struggled to consistently generate returns exceeding its cost of capital, as evidenced by the alternating signs of economic profit and the economic spread ratio.
- Economic Profit Trends
- Economic profit exhibited extreme fluctuations throughout the period. While the period began with a positive value of US$ 568 million in 2013, this was followed by a sharp decline to negative US$ 3,298 million in 2014. A brief recovery occurred in 2015, reaching a peak of US$ 2,445 million, before returning to a sustained negative trajectory from 2016 through 2018. By June 30, 2018, economic profit had fallen to negative US$ 3,221 million, indicating a failure to generate surplus value above the required return on invested capital.
- Invested Capital Stability
- Invested capital remained relatively stable over the six-year horizon, fluctuating within a range of approximately US$ 42.5 billion to US$ 48.3 billion. A peak was observed in 2014 at US$ 48,265 million, followed by a gradual decline to a low of US$ 42,462 million in 2016. In the final two years, capital investment trended upward again, reaching US$ 47,272 million by June 30, 2018. This stability in the capital base suggests that the volatility in economic profit was driven by operational performance or changes in the cost of capital rather than significant changes in the scale of investment.
- Economic Spread Ratio Analysis
- The economic spread ratio, which measures the percentage difference between the return on invested capital and the weighted average cost of capital, mirrors the volatility of the economic profit. The ratio was positive in 2013 (1.28%) and 2015 (5.52%), indicating periods of value creation. However, negative spreads were recorded in all other years, with significant troughs in 2014 (-6.83%) and 2018 (-6.81%). The prevalence of negative spreads indicates that for the majority of the analyzed period, the company's returns were insufficient to cover its cost of capital, resulting in the erosion of economic value.
Overall, the data indicates a pattern of inconsistency in capital efficiency. The inability to maintain a positive economic spread ratio suggests that the company faced persistent challenges in translating its invested capital into returns that exceeded the minimum threshold required by its investors.
Economic Profit Margin
| Jun 30, 2018 | Jun 30, 2017 | Jun 30, 2016 | Jun 30, 2015 | Jun 30, 2014 | Jun 30, 2013 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Economic profit1 | |||||||
| Revenues | |||||||
| Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue | |||||||
| Adjusted revenues | |||||||
| Performance Ratio | |||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | |||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | |||||||
| Alphabet Inc. | |||||||
| Comcast Corp. | |||||||
| Meta Platforms Inc. | |||||||
| Netflix Inc. | |||||||
| Trade Desk Inc. | |||||||
| Walt Disney Co. | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-06-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-06-30).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2018 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted revenues
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial performance from 2013 to 2018 is characterized by extreme volatility in economic value creation, despite relatively stable revenue streams. The organization shifted between generating positive economic profit and incurring substantial economic losses, indicating a struggle to consistently exceed the cost of capital.
- Economic Profit Trends
- Economic profit exhibited a highly erratic pattern, starting at 568 million USD in 2013 before dropping to a deficit of 3,298 million USD in 2014. A temporary recovery was observed in 2015 with a profit of 2,445 million USD, but this was followed by a sustained negative trend. From 2016 through 2018, economic profit remained negative, widening to a loss of 3,221 million USD by the end of the period.
- Adjusted Revenue Correlation
- Adjusted revenues fluctuated within a range of approximately 27 billion to 32 billion USD, peaking in 2014 at 31,880 million USD and reaching a low in 2016 at 27,383 million USD. By 2018, revenues had recovered to 30,498 million USD. The lack of correlation between revenue growth and economic profit suggests that the losses were driven by factors other than top-line performance, such as increased operational costs or higher capital charges.
- Economic Profit Margin Analysis
- The economic profit margin mirrored the instability of the absolute profit figures. The margin peaked at 8.50% in 2015 but turned negative for the remainder of the analyzed period. A consistent decline is observed from 2016 (-8.05%) to 2018 (-10.56%), signifying a progressive failure to generate returns that exceed the required cost of capital relative to the scale of operations.