,

,

,

only). No headers, lists, or divs. * *NOPAT:* 2020 (182k) $\rightarrow$ 2021 (446k) $\rightarrow$ 2022 (237k) $\rightarrow$ 2023 (-138k) $\rightarrow$ 2024 (-409k) $\rightarrow$ 2025 (-206k). * *Observation:* Peaked in 2021, crashed into negative territory from 2023 onwards. Showing a partial recovery in 2025 but still deeply negative. * *Cost of Capital:* 2020 (15.71%) $\rightarrow$ 2021 (15.55%) $\rightarrow$ 2022 (14.75%) $\rightarrow$ 2023 (12.42%) $\rightarrow$ 2024 (13.22%) $\rightarrow$ 2025 (14.68%). * *Observation:* Relatively stable between 12% and 16%. Slight dip in 2023, then creeping back up. * *Invested Capital:* 2020 (1.59M) $\rightarrow$ 2021 (1.96M) $\rightarrow$ 2022 (2.50M) $\rightarrow$ 2023 (2.90M) $\rightarrow$ 2024 (3.05M) $\rightarrow$ 2025 (3.04M). * *Observation:* Consistent growth from 2020 to 2024, plateauing in 2025. * *Economic Profit:* 2020 (-68k) $\rightarrow$ 2021 (141k) $\rightarrow$ 2022 (-130k) $\rightarrow$ 2023 (-498k) $\rightarrow$ 2024 (-813k) $\rightarrow$ 2025 (-653k). * *Observation:* Only positive in 2021. Significant erosion of value from 2022-2024, with a slight reduction in losses in 2025. * *Overview:* The company's ability to create economic value has deteriorated significantly over the analyzed period. While there was a brief window of value creation in 2021, the subsequent years show a failure to cover the cost of capital. * *NOPAT Analysis:* NOPAT shows a volatile trajectory, transitioning from profitability to significant operating losses starting in 2023. This suggests a decline in operational efficiency or a significant increase in operating costs. * *Capital Growth vs. Returns:* Invested capital increased steadily from $1.59 billion in 2020 to over $3 billion by 2024. However, this increase in capital has not translated into higher profits; instead, it has amplified the economic losses as the cost of capital is applied to a larger base. * *Economic Profit Trend:* Economic profit reached its nadir in 2024 at -813 million. The narrow improvement in 2025 (-653 million) is primarily driven by a reduction in NOPAT losses rather than a reduction in the cost of capital, which actually increased in 2025. * Check HTML tags: Use only `

`, `

`, `

`, `

`. * Check constraints: No intro, no "table", no "markdown", third person.

Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) exhibited considerable fluctuation over the observed period. Initial values demonstrated growth, followed by a significant decline and subsequent negative values. This analysis details the observed trends in NOPAT and its relationship to net income (loss).

Overall Trend

NOPAT began at US$182.539 thousand in June 2020 and increased substantially to US$446.535 thousand by July 2021. A subsequent decrease was observed in July 2022, with NOPAT reported at US$237.780 thousand. The period from July 2022 to June 2025 witnessed a marked downturn, culminating in a negative NOPAT of US$206.411 thousand in June 2025.

Growth Phase (2020-2021)

The period between June 2020 and July 2021 showed a strong positive trend in NOPAT. This represents a significant increase of approximately 144.3% over the two-year period, indicating improved operational efficiency or increased revenue generation during this time. This growth outpaced the increase in net income during the same period.

Decline and Negative Values (2022-2025)

Following the peak in July 2021, NOPAT experienced a decline, becoming negative in July 2023 and remaining so through June 2025. The negative NOPAT values suggest that the company’s operating profits, after accounting for taxes, were insufficient to cover the cost of capital employed. The magnitude of the negative NOPAT increased substantially from US$138.034 thousand in July 2023 to US$206.411 thousand in June 2025.

Relationship to Net Income (Loss)

While NOPAT and net income both experienced fluctuations, the trend in net income was more volatile. Net income was positive through July 2022, but turned negative in July 2023 and reached a substantial loss in June 2024. The divergence between NOPAT and net income suggests that non-operating items, such as interest expense or gains/losses on asset sales, significantly impacted the overall net income figure, particularly in the later years. The negative NOPAT values consistently preceded or coincided with the negative net income, indicating operational performance is a key driver of overall profitability.

The observed trends in NOPAT warrant further investigation to determine the underlying causes of the decline and negative values. Factors such as increased operating costs, decreased revenue, or changes in the tax rate could be contributing to this performance.

`, `

`, `

`, `

`. No other tags. * *Income Tax Provision (Benefit):* * 2020: 38,800 * 2021: 65,800 * 2022: 36,200 * 2023: 29,200 * 2024: 140,800 * 2025: -198,000 (Benefit/Tax Credit) * *Cash Operating Taxes:* * 2020: 39,755 * 2021: 83,144 * 2022: 77,620 * 2023: 76,959 * 2024: 50,313 * 2025: 53,841 * *Cash Operating Taxes Trend:* * Significant increase from 2020 to 2021 (approx 109% increase). * Relatively stable period from 2021 to 2023 (around 77k-83k). * Noticeable decline in 2024 (~50k), followed by a slight recovery in 2025 (~54k). * *Comparison (Income Tax Provision vs. Cash Operating Taxes):* * Income tax provision is highly volatile (swinging from 140.8M to -198M). * Cash operating taxes are significantly more stable. This indicates that non-cash tax adjustments (deferred taxes, valuation allowances, or one-time accounting adjustments) heavily influence the provision, while the actual cash outflow remains more consistent. * In 2025, there is a massive divergence: the company recorded a tax benefit of $198M, yet still paid ~$53.8M in cash operating taxes. * Paragraph 1: Overall summary of the trends. * Definition List: * Cash Operating Tax Volatility. * Divergence between Provision and Cash Flow. * Long-term trajectory. * *P1:* The cash operating taxes exhibit a period of growth followed by stabilization and a subsequent moderate decline. Between June 2020 and July 2021, payments increased from $39.76 million to $83.14 million, marking the peak of cash tax outflows within the analyzed period. * *DL/DT/DD:* * *Tax Outflow Stability:* From 2021 to 2023, cash operating taxes remained relatively range-bound, fluctuating slightly between $76.96 million and $83.14 million. A contraction occurred in 2024, with payments dropping to $50.31 million, before stabilizing around $53.84 million in June 2025. * *Provision vs. Cash Divergence:* A significant disconnect is observed between the income tax provision and actual cash operating taxes. While the income tax provision showed extreme volatility—culminating in a substantial tax benefit of $198 million in 2025—the cash operating taxes remained positive and relatively steady. This suggests that the reported tax benefits are largely driven by non-cash accounting adjustments rather than actual cash recoveries. * *EVA Implications:* The stability of cash operating taxes relative to the volatile tax provision indicates that the cash flow impact on the Economic Value Added (EVA) calculation is more predictable than the accrual-based tax figures would suggest. * Only `

`, `

`, `

`, `

`. * No `

`, `
• `, `

  `, etc. * No "table", "markdown", "rows/columns". * No introduction. * No `` or ``.

`, `

`, `

`, `

`. * *Total Reported Debt & Leases:* * 2020: 1,189.3M * 2021: 1,239.9M * 2022: 1,936M (Significant jump) * 2023: 2,873.7M (Significant jump) * 2024: 2,559.6M (Slight decrease) * 2025: 2,608.2M (Stable) * *Trend:* Strong upward trajectory from 2020 to 2023, followed by stabilization. * *Stockholders' Equity:* * 2020: 1,749.2M * 2021: 1,972.8M * 2022: 1,875M (Slight dip) * 2023: 1,355.8M (Decrease) * 2024: 957.3M (Significant decrease) * 2025: 1,134.7M (Slight recovery) * *Trend:* Peaked in 2021, then entered a steady decline until 2024, with a modest recovery in 2025. * *Invested Capital:* * 2020: 1,599.3M * 2021: 1,964.1M * 2022: 2,500.7M * 2023: 2,902.9M * 2024: 3,056.3M * 2025: 3,043.2M * *Trend:* Consistent and significant growth from 2020 through 2024, plateauing in 2025. * *Synthesis:* * Invested capital growth is primarily driven by an increase in debt/leases, while stockholders' equity has contracted over the latter half of the period. This suggests a shift in the capital structure toward higher leverage. * *Paragraph 1:* Overview of invested capital growth. * *DL section:* Specific breakdowns of Debt, Equity, and Capitalization shift. * *Check Constraints:* No "table", "markdown", "I", "Lumentum is...". Start directly. * *Check HTML tags:* Only `

`, `

`, `

`, `

`. No `

`, `
• `. *Drafting the HTML:* `

  The overall trajectory of invested capital exhibits a consistent upward trend from June 2020 through June 2024, followed by a period of stabilization in 2025. Total invested capital grew from US$ 1,599,300 thousand in 2020 to a peak of US$ 3,056,300 thousand in 2024, representing a significant expansion of the capital base used to generate returns.

  ` `

  ` `

  Debt and Lease Obligations

  ` `

  A substantial increase in total reported debt and leases is observed, particularly between 2021 and 2023. Obligations rose from US$ 1,239,900 thousand in 2021 to US$ 2,873,700 thousand in 2023. While there was a slight contraction in 2024, the debt level remained elevated, ending at US$ 2,608,200 thousand in 2025.

  ` `

  Stockholders' Equity Trends

  ` `

  Stockholders' equity peaked in July 2021 at US$ 1,972,800 thousand before entering a multi-year decline. The equity base reached its lowest point in June 2024 at US$ 957,300 thousand, though a partial recovery to US$ 1,134,700 thousand occurred by June 2025.

  ` `

  Capital Structure Shift

  ` `

  The growth in invested capital was primarily financed through debt rather than equity. The divergence between the rising debt levels and falling equity levels indicates a strategic shift toward higher financial leverage to support the expansion of the invested capital base.

  ` `

  ` * Senior Financial Statement Analyst role? Yes. * Objective/Professional? Yes. * Third person/Impersonal? Yes. * No intro/background? Yes. * No "table/markdown/rows/columns"? Yes. * Strict HTML tags? Yes. * Correct data usage? Yes.

`, `

`, `

`, `

` only). * *Economic Profit (US$ thousands):* * 2020: -68,760 * 2021: 141,135 (Peak) * 2022: -130,996 * 2023: -498,448 * 2024: -813,222 (Trough) * 2025: -653,111 (Slight recovery but still deep negative) * *Trend:* Highly volatile, generally declining significantly from 2021 onwards. * *Invested Capital (US$ thousands):* * 2020: 1,599,300 * 2021: 1,964,100 * 2022: 2,500,700 * 2023: 2,902,900 * 2024: 3,056,300 * 2025: 3,043,200 * *Trend:* Consistent growth from 2020 to 2024, stabilizing/slightly dipping in 2025. * *Economic Spread Ratio (%):* * 2020: -4.30% * 2021: 7.19% (Peak) * 2022: -5.24% * 2023: -17.17% * 2024: -26.61% (Trough) * 2025: -21.46% (Partial recovery) * *Trend:* Mirrors economic profit; severe decline in value creation capability after 2021. * *General Summary:* The company experienced a brief period of value creation in 2021 but has since entered a period of significant value destruction. While invested capital grew, it failed to generate returns above the cost of capital. * *Economic Spread Ratio Analysis:* The ratio plummeted from a positive 7.19% in 2021 to a low of -26.61% in 2024. This indicates a widening gap between the return on invested capital and the cost of capital. * *Capital Efficiency:* The steady increase in invested capital (nearly doubling from 2020 to 2024) coupled with deepening economic losses suggests poor capital allocation or adverse market conditions affecting operational returns. * *Recent Trend:* A slight moderation in economic profit losses and the spread ratio in 2025 suggests a potential slowing of the decline, though the company remains in a state of value destruction. * Use `

` for the intro. * Use `

`, `

`, `

` for the specific items. * Ensure no `

`, `
• `, etc. * *Wait, check the output constraints again.* No ``, ``, `
  `, `

  `, `
  • `, `

    -

    `. Only `

    `, `

    `, `

    `, `

    `. *Drafting HTML:*

    The financial performance from 2020 to 2025 is characterized by a significant transition from brief value creation to substantial economic value destruction. Despite a consistent expansion of the capital base, the organization has struggled to maintain a positive return relative to its cost of capital.

    Economic Spread Ratio Trend

    The economic spread ratio exhibited extreme volatility, peaking at 7.19% in 2021 before entering a steep decline. The ratio reached a trough of -26.61% in 2024, indicating that the return on invested capital fell significantly below the cost of capital. A marginal recovery to -21.46% occurred by 2025, although the ratio remains deeply negative.

    Economic Profit Correlation

    Economic profit closely mirrored the spread ratio, shifting from a positive US$ 141.1 million in 2021 to an annual loss of US$ 813.2 million by 2024. This downward trajectory suggests an inability to translate increased investment into economic gains, with the magnitude of value destruction accelerating between 2022 and 2024.

    Invested Capital Utilization

    Invested capital grew steadily from US$ 1.6 billion in 2020 to a peak of approximately US$ 3.06 billion in 2024. The divergence between the rising capital base and the falling economic profit highlights a decline in capital efficiency, as larger investments were associated with increasing economic losses.

    * Role: Senior Financial Analyst? Yes. * Company: Lumentum (not introduced/background provided)? Yes. * Topic: EVA/Spread Ratio? Yes. * Objective, 3rd person? Yes. * No "table", "markdown", "data provided", "rows/columns"? Yes. * Start directly with analysis? Yes. * English? Yes. * Strict HTML? Yes. (Only `

    `, `

    `, `

    `, `

    `). *Self-Correction during drafting:* Make sure I don't use `

    ` for the lists. I must use `

    `. *Final check of the numbers:* 2020: -4.3% / -68M / 1.6B 2021: 7.19% / 141M / 1.9B 2022: -5.24% / -131M / 2.5B 2023: -17.17% / -498M / 2.9B 2024: -26.61% / -813M / 3.05B 2025: -21.46% / -653M / 3.04B *All numbers match.*

The economic profit margin demonstrates a volatile pattern over the observed period. Initially positive, it deteriorated significantly, culminating in substantial negative values. A review of the economic profit reveals a similar trajectory, supporting the margin’s trend.

Economic Profit Margin Trend

In June 2020, the economic profit margin stood at -4.10%. This improved substantially to 8.10% by July 2021, indicating a period of value creation. However, the margin reversed course, declining to -7.65% in July 2022. Subsequent years witnessed a dramatic worsening, reaching -28.18% in July 2023, -59.90% in June 2024, and -39.70% in June 2025. This indicates a consistent erosion of economic profitability.

Relationship to Adjusted Net Revenue

Adjusted net revenue exhibited a generally upward trend from 2020 to 2023, increasing from US$1,677.6 million to US$1,769.1 million. Despite this revenue growth, the economic profit margin declined significantly during this period. The substantial decrease in revenue to US$1,357.7 million in June 2024 coincided with the most significant drop in the economic profit margin, suggesting a strong correlation between revenue levels and profitability. A partial recovery in revenue to US$1,645.1 million in June 2025 did not fully offset the margin decline.

Economic Profit as a Driver

The economic profit itself moved from a loss of US$-68.76 million in June 2020 to a profit of US$141.14 million in July 2021, aligning with the positive economic profit margin. However, the subsequent decline in economic profit to US$-130.996 million, US$-498.448 million, US$-813.222 million, and US$-653.111 million directly mirrors the negative trend in the economic profit margin. The magnitude of the losses increased substantially in the later years, driving the margin to increasingly negative levels.

The observed trends suggest that while revenue growth occurred in certain periods, it was insufficient to maintain or improve economic profitability. The substantial decline in both economic profit and the economic profit margin indicates increasing costs or decreasing operational efficiency relative to revenue, or a combination of both. Further investigation into the underlying drivers of these changes is warranted.