Decomposing ROE involves expressing net income divided by shareholders’ equity as the product of component ratios.
Two-Component Disaggregation of ROE
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The two-component DuPont analysis reveals a period of growth followed by severe volatility and a marginal recovery in Return on Equity (ROE) from 2017 to 2021. The trajectory of ROE was driven by the interaction between fluctuating asset efficiency and a consistent, aggressive increase in financial leverage.
- Return on Assets (ROA)
- Operational efficiency showed a steady improvement from 2017 to 2019, with ROA increasing from 2.04% to 2.64%. This trend was abruptly reversed in 2020, as ROA collapsed to -13.98%, reflecting a significant decline in profitability relative to the asset base. A recovery was observed in 2021, where ROA returned to a slightly positive position of 0.06%.
- Financial Leverage
- A continuous upward trend in financial leverage is observed throughout the entire period. The ratio increased from 4.09 in 2017 to 10.48 in 2021. This systematic increase indicates a growing reliance on debt to finance assets, which acted as a multiplier for both the operational gains and the subsequent losses.
- Return on Equity (ROE)
- The ROE trend demonstrates the amplifying effect of leverage. Between 2017 and 2019, ROE rose from 8.36% to 14.24%, supported by both rising ROA and increasing leverage. In 2020, the combination of a deeply negative ROA and a high leverage ratio of 7.38 resulted in a severe contraction, with ROE dropping to -103.16%. By 2021, the ROE recovered to 0.58%; however, this marginal positive return was heavily dependent on the peak leverage ratio of 10.48, which magnified the negligible ROA.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Three-Component Disaggregation of ROE
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The return on equity (ROE) exhibited significant volatility between 2017 and 2021, characterized by an initial growth phase, a severe contraction, and a marginal recovery. While ROE improved steadily from 8.36% in 2017 to a peak of 14.24% in 2019, it collapsed to -103.16% in 2020 before returning to a positive but negligible 0.58% by the end of 2021.
- Net Profit Margin
- Profitability remained relatively stable with a slight upward trajectory between 2017 and 2019, reaching 4.68%. A catastrophic decline occurred in 2020, where the margin fell to -50.24%, reflecting substantial net losses. By 2021, the margin returned to positive territory, although it remained constrained at 0.14%.
- Asset Turnover
- Asset utilization efficiency peaked at 0.62 in 2018 before experiencing a downward trend. A sharp contraction was observed in 2020, with the ratio dropping to 0.28, indicating a diminished capacity to generate revenue from the asset base. A partial recovery to 0.40 was recorded in 2021.
- Financial Leverage
- An aggressive and consistent increase in financial leverage was observed throughout the five-year period. The ratio rose from 4.09 in 2017 to 10.48 in 2021. This sustained increase in debt relative to equity acted as a multiplier, enhancing ROE during the profitable years leading up to 2019 and severely exacerbating the negative ROE during the 2020 downturn.
The analysis indicates that the growth in ROE prior to 2020 was driven by a combination of improving profit margins and increasing financial leverage. The collapse in 2020 was primarily precipitated by the simultaneous failure of profit margins and asset turnover, while the high level of leverage amplified the resulting negative return. The 2021 recovery suggests a stabilization of operations, though the return to equity remains low despite the highest recorded level of financial leverage.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Five-Component Disaggregation of ROE
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The Return on Equity (ROE) exhibited a period of steady growth from 2017 to 2019, peaking at 14.24%, before experiencing a severe contraction to -103.16% in 2020 and a marginal recovery to 0.58% by the end of 2021. This volatility is the result of divergent trends across the five components of the DuPont disaggregation, characterized by a catastrophic operational collapse in 2020 and a persistent increase in financial leverage.
- Operating Profitability and Asset Efficiency
- The EBIT margin showed an upward trajectory from 6.01% in 2017 to 7.80% in 2019, indicating improving operational efficiency. However, this was reversed by a precipitous drop to -51.45% in 2020, reflecting a significant operational shock, followed by a partial recovery to 3.61% in 2021. Similarly, asset turnover peaked at 0.62 in 2018 before declining to 0.28 in 2020, signaling a marked decrease in the ability to generate revenue from the asset base during the crisis period, with a modest rebound to 0.40 in 2021.
- Financial Leverage
- Unlike the operational metrics, financial leverage demonstrated a consistent and aggressive increase throughout the five-year period. The ratio rose from 4.09 in 2017 to 10.48 in 2021. This steady escalation indicates a growing reliance on debt to finance assets, which significantly amplified both the gains in ROE leading up to 2019 and the losses experienced in 2020.
- Tax and Interest Burdens
- The tax burden declined steadily from 0.89 in 2017 to 0.74 in 2019, suggesting a higher effective tax impact on pre-tax earnings over that period. The interest burden remained relatively stable between 0.70 and 0.82 from 2017 to 2019, but shifted to a negative value of -0.13 in 2021, indicating that interest expenses had a fundamentally different impact on net income relative to EBIT during the recovery phase.
The synthesis of these components reveals that the positive ROE trend through 2019 was driven by synchronized improvements in operating margins and increasing financial leverage. The collapse of ROE in 2020 was primarily triggered by the simultaneous failure of the EBIT margin and asset turnover. While leverage continued to climb through 2021, it was insufficient to return ROE to pre-2020 levels due to the incomplete recovery of operational margins and asset productivity.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Two-Component Disaggregation of ROA
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The Return on Assets (ROA) exhibited a period of steady growth between 2017 and 2019, followed by a severe contraction in 2020 and a marginal recovery in 2021. This trajectory highlights extreme volatility in asset productivity, driven by a simultaneous decline in profitability and operational efficiency during the 2020 fiscal year.
- Net Profit Margin
- Profitability remained relatively stable from 2017 to 2019, increasing from 3.76% to a peak of 4.68%. A dramatic reversal occurred in 2020, where the margin plummeted to -50.24%, indicating a substantial net loss relative to revenue. By 2021, the margin returned to positive territory at 0.14%, suggesting a cessation of heavy losses, although profitability remained significantly below pre-2020 levels.
- Asset Turnover
- Asset utilization fluctuated moderately between 2017 and 2019, with a peak efficiency ratio of 0.62 in 2018. A significant decline to 0.28 was recorded in 2020, reflecting a sharp drop in the volume of revenue generated per unit of asset. A recovery to 0.40 in 2021 indicates an improvement in operational throughput, though efficiency had not yet returned to the levels observed in the 2017-2019 period.
- ROA Disaggregation Synthesis
- The collapse of ROA to -13.98% in 2020 was the result of a dual impact: a catastrophic failure in profit margins combined with a decrease in asset turnover. The recovery to 0.06% in 2021 was achieved through the stabilization of the net profit margin and a partial restoration of asset efficiency. Consequently, the overall return on assets by the end of 2021 remained negligible compared to the growth trend established prior to the 2020 downturn.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Four-Component Disaggregation of ROA
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
Return on Assets (ROA) exhibited a steady upward trend from 2017 to 2019, rising from 2.04% to 2.64%. This growth was abruptly reversed in 2020, where ROA collapsed to -13.98%, before returning to a near-breakeven point of 0.06% in 2021. The four-component disaggregation reveals that this volatility was primarily driven by a collapse in operating margins and a significant reduction in asset utilization efficiency during the 2020 fiscal year.
- EBIT Margin
- Operational profitability showed gradual improvement between 2017 and 2019, increasing from 6.01% to 7.80%. A severe contraction occurred in 2020, with the margin dropping to -51.45%, representing the most significant driver of the decline in ROA. A partial recovery was observed in 2021, with the margin returning to a positive 3.61%.
- Asset Turnover
- Asset efficiency peaked in 2018 at a ratio of 0.62. A downward trajectory followed, reaching a low of 0.28 in 2020, which indicates a substantial decrease in the company's ability to generate revenue from its asset base. By 2021, the ratio improved to 0.40, though it remained below pre-2020 levels.
- Tax Burden
- A consistent decline is observed in the tax burden ratio from 0.89 in 2017 to 0.74 in 2019. This downward trend suggests that a larger portion of operating income was absorbed by taxes during this period, thereby exerting a negative influence on the net ROA.
- Interest Burden
- The interest burden improved from 0.70 in 2017 to 0.82 in 2019, indicating a reduction in the impact of interest expenses relative to operating income. However, a significant shift occurred by 2021, where the ratio turned negative (-0.13), reflecting a fundamental change in the relationship between EBIT and interest obligations.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Disaggregation of Net Profit Margin
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The analysis of the net profit margin disaggregation reveals a period of steady operational improvement followed by a severe contraction and a subsequent marginal recovery between 2017 and 2021.
- Operational Profitability and Net Margin Trends
- A strong positive correlation is observed between the EBIT margin and the net profit margin. From 2017 to 2019, the EBIT margin expanded from 6.01% to 7.80%, which supported a corresponding rise in the net profit margin from 3.76% to 4.68%. This growth was abruptly reversed in 2020, characterized by a collapse in the EBIT margin to -51.45% and a net profit margin of -50.24%. While the EBIT margin returned to positive territory in 2021 at 3.61%, the net profit margin remained near break-even at 0.14%, indicating that operational recovery did not immediately translate into significant bottom-line profitability.
- Tax Burden Dynamics
- Between 2017 and 2019, the tax burden ratio exhibited a consistent decline, moving from 0.89 to 0.74. This downward trend indicates that a larger portion of pre-tax income was allocated to taxes over this period, creating a headwind for net income growth despite improving operating margins.
- Interest Burden Performance
- The interest burden ratio showed an upward trend from 0.70 in 2017 to 0.82 in 2019, suggesting that interest expenses consumed a smaller fraction of operating profits during those years. A significant anomaly is noted in 2021, where the ratio fell to -0.13, reflecting a fundamental shift in the relationship between interest obligations and operating income following the extreme losses of 2020.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?