Free Cash Flow to The Firm (FCFF)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The cash flow profile exhibits a period of steady growth followed by a severe contraction and a subsequent sharp recovery. Between 2017 and 2019, there was a consistent upward trajectory in both liquidity metrics, which was abruptly reversed in 2020 before rebounding to record highs in 2021.
- Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
- Operating cash flows grew steadily from 1,799 million US$ in 2017 to 2,767 million US$ in 2019. A significant reversal occurred in 2020, where the figure dropped to a deficit of 3,834 million US$. However, a strong recovery was recorded in 2021, with operating cash flow rising to 3,748 million US$, surpassing all previous levels in the analyzed period.
- Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF)
- FCFF followed a similar pattern to operating cash flows, increasing from 1,234 million US$ in 2017 to 1,723 million US$ in 2019. The 2020 fiscal year saw a substantial decline to negative 4,360 million US$. By 2021, FCFF recovered sharply to 3,345 million US$, representing the highest cash generation for the firm within the five-year window.
- Operational Cash Flow vs. FCFF Variance
- A consistent gap exists between operating cash flow and FCFF, indicating ongoing capital expenditures. In 2020, the FCFF deficit was more pronounced than the operating cash flow deficit, suggesting that capital outflows continued despite the operational collapse. The 2021 recovery demonstrates a high conversion rate from operating cash to free cash flow, as the gap narrowed relative to the total volume of cash generated.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Interest Paid, Net of Tax
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2 2021 Calculation
Cash paid for interest, tax = Cash paid for interest × EITR
= 342 × 21.00% = 72
An analysis of the cash outflows for interest, net of tax, reveals a period of moderate fluctuation followed by a significant escalation beginning in 2020. Between 2017 and 2019, payments remained relatively stable, ranging from a low of 116 million USD to a high of 161 million USD. This stability was interrupted in 2020, when cash paid for interest, net of tax, surged to 271 million USD, representing a 133% increase over the 2019 levels. This elevated expenditure persisted into 2021, ending the period at 270 million USD.
- Interest Payment Volatility
- The cash paid for interest, net of tax, exhibited a non-linear trend. A slight increase occurred between 2017 and 2018, followed by a contraction in 2019. The sharp spike in 2020 suggests a substantial increase in debt obligations or a rise in the cost of borrowing during that fiscal year, which remained constant through 2021.
- Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR) Fluctuations
- The EITR demonstrated significant volatility throughout the five-year period. The rate rose steadily from 10.89% in 2017 to a peak of 26.19% in 2019. A sharp decline to 13.42% was observed in 2020, followed by a recovery to 21.00% in 2021. These fluctuations impact the net-of-tax calculation of interest payments, as a lower EITR reduces the tax shield benefit of interest expenses.
- Relationship Between Tax Rates and Interest Outflows
- The most notable observation occurs in 2020, where the cash paid for interest, net of tax, reached its peak of 271 million USD despite the EITR dropping to 13.42%. Because a lower tax rate typically reduces the tax deduction benefit, the sharp increase in net cash outflow suggests that the gross interest expense increased substantially enough to override the impact of the declining tax rate.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Current
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |
| Enterprise value (EV) | 27,553) |
| Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) | 3,345) |
| Valuation Ratio | |
| EV/FCFF | 8.24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| EV/FCFF, Competitors1 | |
| Amazon.com Inc. | 280.36 |
| Home Depot Inc. | 27.95 |
| Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | 18.72 |
| TJX Cos. Inc. | 29.23 |
| EV/FCFF, Sector | |
| Consumer Discretionary Distribution & Retail | 208.11 |
| EV/FCFF, Industry | |
| Consumer Discretionary | 82.64 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 Click competitor name to see calculations.
If the company EV/FCFF is lower then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/FCFF is higher then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Historical
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Enterprise value (EV)1 | 33,864) | 27,651) | 19,078) | 21,786) | 18,262) | |
| Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF)2 | 3,345) | (4,360) | 1,723) | 1,258) | 1,234) | |
| Valuation Ratio | ||||||
| EV/FCFF3 | 10.12 | — | 11.07 | 17.32 | 14.80 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| EV/FCFF, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Amazon.com Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Home Depot Inc. | 20.22 | — | — | — | — | |
| Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | 14.88 | — | — | — | — | |
| TJX Cos. Inc. | 18.30 | — | — | — | — | |
| EV/FCFF, Sector | ||||||
| Consumer Discretionary Distribution & Retail | 130.00 | — | — | — | — | |
| EV/FCFF, Industry | ||||||
| Consumer Discretionary | 60.31 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
3 2021 Calculation
EV/FCFF = EV ÷ FCFF
= 33,864 ÷ 3,345 = 10.12
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial trajectory from 2017 to 2021 is characterized by a general expansion in enterprise value coupled with significant volatility in cash flow generation. While the overall valuation of the entity increased over the five-year period, the relationship between value and cash flow shifted due to a severe operational disruption in 2020 followed by a robust recovery in 2021.
- Enterprise Value (EV) Trends
- Enterprise value exhibited a consistent upward trend, rising from 18,262 million USD in 2017 to 33,864 million USD in 2021. A minor contraction occurred in 2019, but this was followed by accelerated growth in 2020 and 2021, indicating an increase in the total market value of the firm's operations.
- Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF) Volatility
- FCFF showed moderate growth between 2017 and 2019, reaching 1,723 million USD. This trend reversed sharply in 2020, resulting in a substantial deficit of negative 4,360 million USD. By 2021, a strong recovery was observed, with FCFF ascending to 3,345 million USD, the highest value recorded within the analyzed period.
- EV/FCFF Ratio Interpretation
- The EV/FCFF ratio peaked at 17.32 in 2018 before declining to 11.07 in 2019. Due to the negative FCFF in 2020, the ratio was not calculable for that year. In 2021, the ratio reached a period low of 10.12. This compression of the multiple suggests that the growth in free cash flow generation in 2021 significantly outpaced the increase in enterprise value, resulting in a more efficient valuation relative to cash flow than in the pre-2020 period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?