Decomposing ROE involves expressing net income divided by shareholders’ equity as the product of component ratios.
Two-Component Disaggregation of ROE
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
Return on Equity (ROE) exhibited significant volatility between 2018 and 2022, fluctuating from a high of 54.19% in 2021 to a low of 25.49% in 2019. The overall trajectory indicates a transition in the drivers of shareholder returns, shifting from a reliance on financial gearing to an increase in operational asset efficiency, followed by a simultaneous contraction in both components by 2022.
- Return on Assets (ROA)
- A non-linear trend is observed in asset productivity. After a decline from 8.58% in 2018 to 5.47% in 2019, ROA experienced a substantial surge, peaking at 16.45% in 2021. Although this figure moderated to 11.19% in 2022, the level remained higher than the 2018-2020 period, suggesting an improvement in the underlying profitability of the asset base.
- Financial Leverage
- A consistent downward trend in financial leverage is evident starting after 2019. The leverage ratio decreased from a peak of 4.66 in 2019 to 2.86 by the end of 2022. This steady decline indicates a strategic reduction in the use of debt to amplify returns or a general strengthening of the equity base relative to total assets.
- ROE Disaggregation Analysis
- The relationship between ROA and financial leverage reveals a shift in the composition of ROE. In 2018 and 2019, ROE was heavily supported by high financial leverage (above 4.60). By 2021, the peak ROE of 54.19% was driven primarily by the sharp increase in ROA, which offset the simultaneous decline in leverage. However, the reduction in ROE to 31.97% in 2022 resulted from a dual contraction, as both asset returns and financial leverage continued to decline.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Three-Component Disaggregation of ROE
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The Return on Equity (ROE) exhibited significant volatility between 2018 and 2022, characterized by a notable peak in 2021 reaching 54.19% before moderating to 31.97% by the end of 2022. This fluctuation is primarily driven by shifts in profitability and financial structure rather than operational efficiency.
- Net Profit Margin
- Profitability margins demonstrated substantial variance over the period. Following a decline from 10.73% in 2018 to a low of 6.64% in 2019, margins recovered and spiked to a peak of 19.64% in 2021. This sharp increase served as the primary catalyst for the surge in ROE during that fiscal year, although the margin subsequently contracted to 13.38% in 2022.
- Asset Turnover
- Operational efficiency remained remarkably stable and showed a consistent, albeit slight, upward trend. The ratio improved incrementally from 0.80 in 2018 to 0.84 in 2021 and 2022. This stability indicates that the company's ability to generate revenue from its asset base remained constant and was not a significant driver of the fluctuations in overall equity returns.
- Financial Leverage
- A sustained downward trend in financial leverage is observed, indicating a strategic reduction in debt or an increase in equity relative to assets. After peaking at 4.66 in 2019, the leverage ratio declined steadily to 2.86 by 2022. This deleveraging process suggests a reduction in financial risk, which acted as a drag on ROE, offsetting some of the gains achieved through improved profit margins.
The overall trend indicates a transition in the drivers of shareholder returns. While the company previously relied more heavily on financial leverage to amplify ROE, the more recent performance has been driven by enhanced profit margins, despite a significantly lower leverage profile. The stability of the asset turnover ratio underscores a consistent operational baseline against which these profitability and solvency changes occurred.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Five-Component Disaggregation of ROE
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The Return on Equity (ROE) exhibited significant volatility between 2018 and 2022, characterized by a notable peak of 54.19% in 2021 and a subsequent decline to 31.97% in 2022. The five-component disaggregation reveals that this volatility was primarily driven by fluctuations in operating margins and a sustained reduction in financial leverage, while asset utilization remained constant.
- EBIT Margin
- Operating profitability demonstrated the highest degree of variance among the components. After a decline from 14.30% in 2018 to a low of 9.09% in 2019, the margin expanded sharply to a peak of 26.62% in 2021. Although it moderated to 17.33% in 2022, the margin remained higher than 2018-2020 levels, serving as a primary catalyst for the surge in ROE during the 2021 period.
- Financial Leverage
- A consistent and significant downward trend is observed in financial leverage, which decreased from 4.60 in 2018 to 2.86 by 2022. This steady deleveraging suggests a strategic shift toward a more conservative capital structure, which acted as a persistent drag on ROE, offsetting some of the gains achieved through improved operating margins.
- Asset Turnover
- Asset efficiency remained remarkably stable throughout the five-year period. The ratio moved marginally from 0.80 in 2018 to 0.84 in 2022, indicating that changes in ROE were not driven by improvements in the velocity of asset utilization or revenue generation per unit of asset.
- Interest Burden
- The interest burden remained relatively stable, fluctuating between 0.83 and 0.94. An upward trend toward the end of the period, reaching 0.92 in 2022, suggests a reduction in the impact of interest expenses on the conversion of operating profit to net income, aligning with the observed reduction in financial leverage.
- Tax Burden
- The tax burden showed minimal variance, generally hovering between 0.84 and 0.88, with a temporary dip to 0.78 in 2021. These figures indicate a consistent effective tax rate that exerted a steady influence on the final ROE calculation without introducing significant volatility.
In summary, the overall trajectory of ROE was dictated by a tension between expanding operating margins and a contraction in financial leverage. The exceptional performance in 2021 was the result of a peak in EBIT margin that momentarily overwhelmed the downward pressure from declining leverage. By 2022, the stabilization of the EBIT margin and the continued reduction in leverage led to a normalization of the return on equity.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Two-Component Disaggregation of ROA
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The Return on Assets (ROA) exhibited significant volatility between 2018 and 2022, characterized by a notable trough in 2019 and a peak in 2021. A two-component disaggregation reveals that these fluctuations were driven almost exclusively by changes in profitability margins rather than shifts in asset utilization efficiency.
- Net Profit Margin
- A volatile trend is observed in profit margins, which declined from 10.73% in 2018 to a period low of 6.64% in 2019. A subsequent recovery occurred, culminating in a significant surge to 19.64% in 2021, before moderating to 13.38% by the end of 2022. This metric served as the primary driver of overall ROA variance.
- Asset Turnover
- Asset utilization remained remarkably stable throughout the analyzed period. A slight but consistent upward trend was observed, increasing from 0.80 in 2018 to 0.84 in 2021, where it remained constant through 2022. This indicates a steady rate of revenue generation relative to the asset base, contributing minimally to the volatility of the total return.
- Return on Assets (ROA) Synthesis
- The ROA followed the trajectory of the Net Profit Margin closely, moving from 8.58% in 2018 to a low of 5.47% in 2019, peaking at 16.45% in 2021, and ending at 11.19% in 2022. Because the asset turnover ratio remained nearly flat, the fluctuations in ROA are directly attributable to the volatility in net profit margins, suggesting that earnings quality and cost management had a far greater impact on asset productivity than operational efficiency or asset growth.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Four-Component Disaggregation of ROA
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The Return on Assets (ROA) exhibited significant volatility between 2018 and 2022, characterized by a decline in 2019, a steady recovery through 2020, a substantial peak in 2021 at 16.45%, and a subsequent correction to 11.19% in 2022. A disaggregation of the ROA reveals that the primary driver of this performance variance was the operational profitability margin, while asset utilization remained remarkably stable.
- EBIT Margin
- The EBIT margin served as the most volatile component of the ROA calculation. After a contraction to 9.09% in 2019, the margin experienced a sharp increase, peaking at 26.62% in 2021. This surge was the principal catalyst for the spike in overall ROA. Although the margin declined to 17.33% in 2022, it remained higher than the levels observed between 2018 and 2020.
- Asset Turnover
- Asset turnover demonstrated a consistent and slight upward trend, moving from 0.80 in 2018 to 0.84 in 2022. This stability indicates that changes in ROA were not driven by fluctuations in asset efficiency or sales volume relative to the asset base, but rather by changes in profitability per unit of sale.
- Interest Burden
- The interest burden remained relatively stable, fluctuating within a narrow range between 0.83 and 0.94. An improvement was noted in 2021 and 2022, where the ratio moved closer to 1.0, suggesting a reduction in the impact of interest expenses on the net return relative to operating income.
- Tax Burden
- The tax burden remained generally consistent, fluctuating between 0.84 and 0.88 for most of the period. A notable dip to 0.78 occurred in 2021, coinciding with the peak in ROA, which indicates that a lower effective tax impact contributed to the higher net return during that specific fiscal year.
In summary, the overall fluctuations in ROA were predominantly dictated by the volatility of the EBIT margin. The stability of the asset turnover ratio suggests a consistent operational scale, while the interest and tax burdens exerted a secondary and relatively stable influence on the final return.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Disaggregation of Net Profit Margin
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The net profit margin demonstrated significant volatility between 2018 and 2022, characterized by a contraction in 2019, a subsequent recovery, and a peak in 2021 before moderating in 2022. Analysis of the disaggregated components indicates that operating performance was the primary driver of these fluctuations.
- Operational Profitability (EBIT Margin)
- The EBIT margin exhibits a strong correlation with the net profit margin. A notable contraction occurred in 2019, falling to 9.09% from 14.30% in 2018. This was followed by a substantial surge in 2021, where the margin reached 26.62%, representing the peak operational efficiency within the period. The subsequent decline to 17.33% in 2022 suggests a normalization of operating results.
- Interest Burden
- The interest burden remained relatively stable, fluctuating within a narrow range between 0.83 and 0.94. The increase to 0.94 in 2021 indicates a reduction in the relative impact of interest expenses on operating income, suggesting that the surge in EBIT significantly outweighed any changes in debt servicing costs.
- Tax Burden
- The tax burden remained largely consistent, although a decrease to 0.78 was observed in 2021. This indicates that during the year of peak operational profitability, a higher proportion of earnings before taxes was allocated to tax expenses compared to the other years analyzed.
- Net Profit Margin Integration
- The overall net profit margin tracked the EBIT margin closely, moving from 10.73% in 2018 to a low of 6.64% in 2019, before peaking at 19.64% in 2021. The stability of the interest burden and the relative consistency of the tax burden confirm that the volatility in the bottom line was almost exclusively driven by changes in operating margins rather than financial leverage or tax strategy.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?