Stock Analysis on Net
Stock Analysis on Net

Northrop Grumman Corp. (NYSE:NOC)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since April 27, 2023.

Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios

Microsoft Excel

Short-term Activity Ratios (Summary)

Northrop Grumman Corp., short-term (operating) activity ratios

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Turnover Ratios
Inventory turnover 29.78 35.02 38.63 33.95 35.63
Receivables turnover 24.22 24.31 24.52 25.52 20.78
Payables turnover 11.26 12.93 16.24 11.94 10.68
Working capital turnover 40.62 12.32 6.38 27.05 21.40
Average No. Days
Average inventory processing period 12 10 9 11 10
Add: Average receivable collection period 15 15 15 14 18
Operating cycle 27 25 24 25 28
Less: Average payables payment period 32 28 22 31 34
Cash conversion cycle -5 -3 2 -6 -6

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).


The analysis of short-term operating activity from 2018 to 2022 reveals a company with highly efficient working capital management, characterized by a predominantly negative cash conversion cycle and rapid asset turnover.

Inventory and Receivables Management
Inventory turnover experienced a gradual decline from a peak of 38.63 in 2020 to 29.78 by the end of 2022, resulting in a slight extension of the average inventory processing period from 9 to 12 days. Conversely, receivables management demonstrated improvement; the receivables turnover ratio rose from 20.78 in 2018 and stabilized around 24.22 by 2022, which shortened the average receivable collection period from 18 days to a consistent 15 days.
Payables and Cash Conversion Cycle
The average payables payment period showed fluctuation, dropping to a low of 22 days in 2020 before recovering to 32 days in 2022. This volatility is mirrored in the payables turnover ratio, which peaked at 16.24 in 2020. Despite these fluctuations, the cash conversion cycle remained negative for four of the five years analyzed, ranging from -6 to -3 days, with the sole exception of 2020 when it reached 2 days. This indicates that the company typically recovers cash from sales before its obligations to suppliers fall due.
Operating Cycle and Working Capital Efficiency
The operating cycle remained remarkably stable, fluctuating narrowly between 24 and 28 days over the five-year period. However, working capital turnover exhibited significant volatility, plummeting to 6.38 in 2020 before surging to a period high of 40.62 in 2022. This suggests substantial shifts in the relationship between net working capital and annual revenue, though the overall trend indicates an aggressive increase in the efficiency of working capital utilization toward the end of the period.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Turnover Ratios


Average No. Days


Inventory Turnover

Northrop Grumman Corp., inventory turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Cost of sales 29,128 28,399 29,321 26,582 23,304
Inventoried costs, net 978 811 759 783 654
Short-term Activity Ratio
Inventory turnover1 29.78 35.02 38.63 33.95 35.63
Benchmarks
Inventory Turnover, Competitors2
Boeing Co. 0.81 0.75 — — —
Caterpillar Inc. 2.54 2.53 — — —
Eaton Corp. plc 4.04 4.48 — — —
GE Aerospace 3.19 3.40 — — —
Honeywell International Inc. 4.04 4.29 — — —
Lockheed Martin Corp. 18.68 19.45 — — —
RTX Corp. 5.03 5.65 — — —
Inventory Turnover, Sector
Capital Goods 2.28 2.28 — — —
Inventory Turnover, Industry
Industrials 4.28 4.03 — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Inventory turnover = Cost of sales ÷ Inventoried costs, net
= 29,128 ÷ 978 = 29.78

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of operating activity between 2018 and 2022 reveals a general increase in production costs accompanied by fluctuating inventory efficiency. While the cost of sales expanded significantly in the early part of the period, the efficiency of inventory utilization experienced a notable decline by the end of the observed timeframe.

Cost of Sales Trends
Annual expenditures rose from 23,304 million USD in 2018 to a peak of 29,321 million USD in 2020. A period of relative stabilization followed, with the value concluding at 29,128 million USD in 2022, indicating a sustained increase in the scale of operations compared to 2018 levels.
Inventoried Costs Analysis
Net inventoried costs exhibited a general upward trajectory, increasing from 654 million USD in 2018 to 978 million USD in 2022. A significant acceleration in inventory accumulation is observed between 2021 and 2022, where costs rose from 811 million USD to 978 million USD.
Inventory Turnover Performance
The inventory turnover ratio demonstrated volatility, reaching a peak of 38.63 in 2020 before entering a downward trend. The ratio fell to 29.78 by 2022, the lowest level within the five-year period. This decline suggests a slowing rate of inventory conversion, as the growth in inventoried costs outpaced the growth in the cost of sales during the final two years of the analysis.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Receivables Turnover

Northrop Grumman Corp., receivables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Sales 36,602 35,667 36,799 33,841 30,095
Accounts receivable, net 1,511 1,467 1,501 1,326 1,448
Short-term Activity Ratio
Receivables turnover1 24.22 24.31 24.52 25.52 20.78
Benchmarks
Receivables Turnover, Competitors2
Boeing Co. 26.46 23.58 — — —
Caterpillar Inc. 6.39 5.68 — — —
Eaton Corp. plc 5.09 5.95 — — —
GE Aerospace 4.09 4.55 — — —
Honeywell International Inc. 4.77 5.04 — — —
Lockheed Martin Corp. 26.34 34.15 — — —
RTX Corp. 7.36 6.66 — — —
Receivables Turnover, Sector
Capital Goods 7.36 7.57 — — —
Receivables Turnover, Industry
Industrials 8.17 7.76 — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Receivables turnover = Sales ÷ Accounts receivable, net
= 36,602 ÷ 1,511 = 24.22

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of operational activity between 2018 and 2022 reveals a general increase in sales revenue coupled with a highly stable level of net accounts receivable. Total sales grew from 30,095 million US$ in 2018 to a peak of 36,799 million US$ in 2020, before stabilizing at 36,602 million US$ by 2022. During this same period, net accounts receivable remained within a narrow band, ranging from 1,326 million US$ to 1,511 million US$.

Receivables Turnover Trend
A significant increase in the receivables turnover ratio occurred between 2018 and 2019, rising from 20.78 to 25.52. This peak was driven by a simultaneous increase in sales and a reduction in outstanding receivables, indicating a marked improvement in collection efficiency. From 2019 through 2022, the ratio experienced a gradual, marginal decline, settling at 24.22. Despite this slight downward trajectory, the ratio remained substantially higher than the 2018 baseline.
Operational Efficiency and Credit Management
The consistency of the turnover ratio above 24.0 from 2019 onward suggests a disciplined approach to credit management. The ability to maintain stable receivable balances while supporting higher sales volumes indicates that the company successfully optimized its cash conversion cycle. The minimal volatility in the ratio over the final three years of the period demonstrates a predictable and efficient receivables collection process.

The relationship between sales growth and receivable levels indicates that revenue expansion did not lead to a proportional increase in credit risk or a slowing of payment cycles. The overall trend reflects a strong capacity to convert credit sales into cash rapidly, supporting short-term liquidity.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Payables Turnover

Northrop Grumman Corp., payables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Cost of sales 29,128 28,399 29,321 26,582 23,304
Trade accounts payable 2,587 2,197 1,806 2,226 2,182
Short-term Activity Ratio
Payables turnover1 11.26 12.93 16.24 11.94 10.68
Benchmarks
Payables Turnover, Competitors2
Boeing Co. 6.18 6.40 — — —
Caterpillar Inc. 4.76 4.36 — — —
Eaton Corp. plc 4.51 4.75 — — —
GE Aerospace 2.98 3.32 — — —
Honeywell International Inc. 3.53 3.40 — — —
Lockheed Martin Corp. 27.25 74.34 — — —
RTX Corp. 5.40 5.93 — — —
Payables Turnover, Sector
Capital Goods 5.21 5.60 — — —
Payables Turnover, Industry
Industrials 7.83 7.81 — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Payables turnover = Cost of sales ÷ Trade accounts payable
= 29,128 ÷ 2,587 = 11.26

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of short-term operating activity reveals a period of volatility in payables management between 2018 and 2022, characterized by a significant spike in turnover efficiency in 2020 followed by a return to historical norms.

Cost of Sales Trends
Cost of sales exhibited a general upward trajectory, increasing from US$ 23,304 million in 2018 to US$ 29,128 million by 2022. The most substantial growth occurred between 2018 and 2020, with a subsequent period of relative stabilization through 2022.
Trade Accounts Payable Volatility
Payables remained relatively stable between 2018 and 2019 before experiencing a sharp contraction to US$ 1,806 million in 2020. This was followed by a steady increase over the next two years, reaching a five-year peak of US$ 2,587 million in 2022.
Payables Turnover Dynamics
The payables turnover ratio demonstrated a non-linear trend, rising from 10.68 in 2018 to a peak of 16.24 in 2020. This peak indicates a period where suppliers were paid significantly faster, driven by the combination of increased costs of sales and a reduction in outstanding payables. From 2021 onward, the ratio declined to 12.93 and then to 11.26 in 2022, signaling a deceleration in payment frequency and an extension of the payment cycle, which aligns with the increase in trade accounts payable during the same period.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Working Capital Turnover

Northrop Grumman Corp., working capital turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Current assets 12,488 12,426 15,344 10,685 9,680
Less: Current liabilities 11,587 9,530 9,580 9,434 8,274
Working capital 901 2,896 5,764 1,251 1,406
 
Sales 36,602 35,667 36,799 33,841 30,095
Short-term Activity Ratio
Working capital turnover1 40.62 12.32 6.38 27.05 21.40
Benchmarks
Working Capital Turnover, Competitors2
Boeing Co. 3.42 2.34 — — —
Caterpillar Inc. 4.62 3.54 — — —
Eaton Corp. plc 8.70 65.65 — — —
GE Aerospace 7.93 4.94 — — —
Honeywell International Inc. 7.03 5.86 — — —
Lockheed Martin Corp. 12.93 11.52 — — —
RTX Corp. 20.15 9.75 — — —
Working Capital Turnover, Sector
Capital Goods 6.79 5.01 — — —
Working Capital Turnover, Industry
Industrials 10.34 6.90 — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Working capital turnover = Sales ÷ Working capital
= 36,602 ÷ 901 = 40.62

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of operating activity from 2018 to 2022 reveals a significant divergence between stable revenue growth and highly volatile working capital levels, resulting in substantial fluctuations in the working capital turnover ratio.

Sales Performance
Revenue demonstrated a consistent upward trajectory from 2018 to 2020, increasing from US$ 30,095 million to US$ 36,799 million. Following this period, sales remained relatively stable, with a slight dip in 2021 to US$ 35,667 million before recovering to US$ 36,602 million by the end of 2022. This stability in the numerator indicates that the volatility observed in the turnover ratio is driven primarily by changes in the balance sheet rather than fluctuations in top-line performance.
Working Capital Volatility
Working capital exhibited extreme variance over the five-year period. After maintaining a range between US$ 1,251 million and US$ 1,406 million in 2018 and 2019, there was a sharp increase to US$ 5,764 million in 2020. This peak was followed by a rapid contraction over the subsequent two years, falling to US$ 2,896 million in 2021 and reaching a period low of US$ 901 million by December 31, 2022.
Working Capital Turnover Interpretation
The working capital turnover ratio fluctuated dramatically in inverse correlation with working capital levels. The ratio rose from 21.40 in 2018 to 27.05 in 2019, before plummeting to a low of 6.38 in 2020, coinciding with the surge in working capital. From 2021 onward, the ratio experienced a steep acceleration, reaching 40.62 by 2022. This peak suggests an aggressive reduction in the amount of working capital required to support each dollar of sales, indicating either highly optimized short-term asset management or a significant reduction in net current assets relative to revenue.

In summary, the period is characterized by a transition from moderate turnover to a state of high efficiency or lean working capital management by 2022. The dramatic shift from a ratio of 6.38 in 2020 to 40.62 in 2022 highlights a fundamental change in the company's short-term financial structure.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Average Inventory Processing Period

Northrop Grumman Corp., average inventory processing period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data
Inventory turnover 29.78 35.02 38.63 33.95 35.63
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average inventory processing period1 12 10 9 11 10
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Inventory Processing Period, Competitors2
Boeing Co. 452 486 — — —
Caterpillar Inc. 144 144 — — —
Eaton Corp. plc 90 82 — — —
GE Aerospace 114 107 — — —
Honeywell International Inc. 90 85 — — —
Lockheed Martin Corp. 20 19 — — —
RTX Corp. 73 65 — — —
Average Inventory Processing Period, Sector
Capital Goods 160 160 — — —
Average Inventory Processing Period, Industry
Industrials 85 91 — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Average inventory processing period = 365 ÷ Inventory turnover
= 365 ÷ 29.78 = 12

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of short-term activity ratios reveals a period of fluctuation in inventory management efficiency between 2018 and 2022. While the metrics remained relatively stable in the early part of the observation period, a distinct decline in efficiency is evident by the end of 2022, characterized by a slower movement of stock.

Inventory Turnover
The inventory turnover ratio exhibited volatility over the five-year period, peaking at 38.63 in 2020. Following this peak, a consistent downward trend occurred, with the ratio falling to 35.02 in 2021 and reaching a five-year low of 29.78 by December 31, 2022. This trajectory indicates a reduction in the frequency with which inventory is cycled throughout the fiscal year.
Average Inventory Processing Period
The average inventory processing period moved inversely to the turnover ratio, reaching its highest level of efficiency in 2020 with a processing time of 9 days. However, this metric increased to 10 days in 2021 and further extended to 12 days in 2022. The increase in the number of days required to process inventory suggests a slowing in the conversion of raw materials and work-in-progress into completed sales.

Overall, the synchronization between the declining turnover ratio and the increasing processing period from 2020 to 2022 points to a deterioration in inventory liquidity and operational throughput during the final two years of the analyzed period.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Average Receivable Collection Period

Northrop Grumman Corp., average receivable collection period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data
Receivables turnover 24.22 24.31 24.52 25.52 20.78
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average receivable collection period1 15 15 15 14 18
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Receivable Collection Period, Competitors2
Boeing Co. 14 15 — — —
Caterpillar Inc. 57 64 — — —
Eaton Corp. plc 72 61 — — —
GE Aerospace 89 80 — — —
Honeywell International Inc. 77 72 — — —
Lockheed Martin Corp. 14 11 — — —
RTX Corp. 50 55 — — —
Average Receivable Collection Period, Sector
Capital Goods 50 48 — — —
Average Receivable Collection Period, Industry
Industrials 45 47 — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Average receivable collection period = 365 ÷ Receivables turnover
= 365 ÷ 24.22 = 15

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of short-term operating activity indicates a period of efficiency gains followed by a phase of high stability in the management of receivables from 2018 through 2022.

Receivables Turnover
A significant increase in turnover is observed between 2018 and 2019, where the ratio rose from 20.78 to 25.52. Following this peak, a marginal and consistent downward trend occurred, with the ratio settling at 24.22 by the end of 2022. This suggests an initial optimization of credit collection processes followed by a period of operational equilibrium.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The collection period decreased from 18 days in 2018 to 14 days in 2019, reflecting an improvement in the speed of cash conversion. From 2020 through 2022, the collection period remained constant at 15 days. This stability indicates a highly predictable and disciplined approach to invoicing and payment collection.
Operational Efficiency Synthesis
The inverse relationship between the turnover ratio and the collection period confirms a stabilized liquidity position. The maintenance of a 15-day collection cycle for three consecutive years demonstrates consistency in credit policy and effective management of the accounts receivable ledger.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Operating Cycle

Northrop Grumman Corp., operating cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks

No. days

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data
Average inventory processing period 12 10 9 11 10
Average receivable collection period 15 15 15 14 18
Short-term Activity Ratio
Operating cycle1 27 25 24 25 28
Benchmarks
Operating Cycle, Competitors2
Boeing Co. 466 501 — — —
Caterpillar Inc. 201 208 — — —
Eaton Corp. plc 162 143 — — —
GE Aerospace 203 187 — — —
Honeywell International Inc. 167 157 — — —
Lockheed Martin Corp. 34 30 — — —
RTX Corp. 123 120 — — —
Operating Cycle, Sector
Capital Goods 210 208 — — —
Operating Cycle, Industry
Industrials 130 138 — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Operating cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period
= 12 + 15 = 27

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The operating cycle exhibits a high degree of stability over the five-year period from 2018 to 2022, reflecting consistent efficiency in short-term operational activities. The combined duration required to convert inventory into cash remained within a narrow range of 24 to 28 days.

Average Inventory Processing Period
The period for inventory processing remained relatively constant, fluctuating between 9 and 12 days. A slight increase to 12 days was observed by the end of 2022, following a period of stability around 10 days. This suggests a consistent approach to inventory management with a minor lengthening of the processing timeline in the final year of the analyzed period.
Average Receivable Collection Period
A notable improvement in collection efficiency occurred between 2018 and 2019, where the period decreased from 18 days to 14 days. Subsequently, the collection period stabilized at 15 days from 2020 through 2022, indicating a highly disciplined and predictable credit and collections process.
Operating Cycle
The overall operating cycle decreased from 28 days in 2018 to a minimum of 24 days in 2020 before gradually returning to 27 days by 2022. Because the receivable collection period remained steady after 2019, the fluctuations in the total operating cycle were primarily driven by marginal shifts in inventory processing times.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Average Payables Payment Period

Northrop Grumman Corp., average payables payment period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data
Payables turnover 11.26 12.93 16.24 11.94 10.68
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average payables payment period1 32 28 22 31 34
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Payables Payment Period, Competitors2
Boeing Co. 59 57 — — —
Caterpillar Inc. 77 84 — — —
Eaton Corp. plc 81 77 — — —
GE Aerospace 123 110 — — —
Honeywell International Inc. 103 107 — — —
Lockheed Martin Corp. 13 5 — — —
RTX Corp. 68 62 — — —
Average Payables Payment Period, Sector
Capital Goods 70 65 — — —
Average Payables Payment Period, Industry
Industrials 47 47 — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Average payables payment period = 365 ÷ Payables turnover
= 365 ÷ 11.26 = 32

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of short-term operating activity reveals a cyclical fluctuation in the management of accounts payable between 2018 and 2022, characterized by a period of accelerated payments followed by a return toward historical baseline levels.

Payables Turnover
A notable upward trend occurred from 2018 to 2020, with the turnover ratio increasing from 10.68 to a peak of 16.24. This acceleration indicates a higher frequency of supplier payments during this interval. However, a reversal followed in 2021 and 2022, as the ratio declined to 12.93 and 11.26, respectively, suggesting a deceleration in the rate at which payables were settled.
Average Payables Payment Period
The payment duration mirrored the turnover trend, exhibiting a contraction from 34 days in 2018 to a minimum of 22 days in 2020. This reduction signifies a significantly shorter window for settling obligations with vendors. Subsequently, the period extended to 28 days in 2021 and 32 days in 2022, indicating a shift back toward longer payment terms, nearly returning to the 2018 duration.

The inverse correlation between the turnover ratio and the payment period confirms a consistent relationship in the management of short-term liabilities. The peak payment velocity observed in 2020 was temporary, as the operational cycle reverted to a longer payment duration by the end of the analyzed period.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Cash Conversion Cycle

Northrop Grumman Corp., cash conversion cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks

No. days

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data
Average inventory processing period 12 10 9 11 10
Average receivable collection period 15 15 15 14 18
Average payables payment period 32 28 22 31 34
Short-term Activity Ratio
Cash conversion cycle1 -5 -3 2 -6 -6
Benchmarks
Cash Conversion Cycle, Competitors2
Boeing Co. 407 444 — — —
Caterpillar Inc. 124 124 — — —
Eaton Corp. plc 81 66 — — —
GE Aerospace 80 77 — — —
Honeywell International Inc. 64 50 — — —
Lockheed Martin Corp. 21 25 — — —
RTX Corp. 55 58 — — —
Cash Conversion Cycle, Sector
Capital Goods 140 143 — — —
Cash Conversion Cycle, Industry
Industrials 83 91 — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Cash conversion cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period – Average payables payment period
= 12 + 15 – 32 = -5

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The operating activity ratios indicate a highly efficient working capital management strategy, characterized by a predominantly negative cash conversion cycle. This suggests that operational liquidity is effectively bolstered by financing activities through suppliers, as cash is collected from customers and inventory is processed faster than obligations to vendors are settled.

Average Inventory Processing Period
Inventory turnover remains remarkably stable over the five-year period, fluctuating within a narrow range between 9 and 12 days. The slight increase to 12 days by December 31, 2022, represents a marginal expansion in the time required to move inventory, yet the overall trend reflects a consistent and lean inventory management process.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The collection of receivables demonstrates high efficiency and consistency. Following a reduction from 18 days in 2018 to 14 days in 2019, the period stabilized at 15 days from 2020 through 2022, indicating a predictable and disciplined approach to credit collection.
Average Payables Payment Period
This metric exhibits the most significant volatility among the operating ratios. A notable contraction occurred in 2020, where the payment period dropped to 22 days from 31 days in the preceding year. Subsequently, a recovery trend is observed, with the period extending back to 32 days by the end of 2022, suggesting a return to longer supplier payment terms.
Cash Conversion Cycle
The cash conversion cycle remained negative for four of the five years analyzed, reaching -6 days in 2018 and 2019, and -5 days in 2022. The only exception occurred in 2020, when the cycle shifted to a positive 2 days. This anomaly correlates directly with the sharp decrease in the payables payment period during that year. The return to a negative cycle in 2021 and 2022 confirms a strategic optimization of liquidity through the timing of supplier payments.

AI Ask an analyst for more