Financial Reporting Quality: Aggregate Accruals
Earnings can be decomposed into cash and accrual components. The accrual component (aggregate accruals) has been found to have less persistence than the cash component, and therefore (1) earnings with higher accrual component are less persistent than earnings with smaller accrual component, all else equal; and (2) the cash component of earnings should receive a higher weighting evaluating company performance.
Balance-Sheet-Based Accruals Ratio
General Dynamics Corp., balance sheet computation of aggregate accruals
US$ in millions
| Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Assets | ||||||
| Total assets | 48,841) | 45,408) | 35,046) | 32,872) | 31,997) | |
| Less: Cash and equivalents | 902) | 963) | 2,983) | 2,334) | 2,785) | |
| Operating assets | 47,939) | 44,445) | 32,063) | 30,538) | 29,212) | |
| Operating Liabilities | ||||||
| Total liabilities | 35,264) | 33,676) | 23,611) | 21,896) | 21,259) | |
| Less: Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt | 2,920) | 973) | 2) | 900) | 501) | |
| Less: Long-term debt, excluding current portion | 9,010) | 11,444) | 3,980) | 2,988) | 2,898) | |
| Operating liabilities | 23,334) | 21,259) | 19,629) | 18,008) | 17,860) | |
| Net operating assets1 | 24,605) | 23,186) | 12,434) | 12,530) | 11,352) | |
| Balance-sheet-based aggregate accruals2 | 1,419) | 10,752) | (96) | 1,178) | —) | |
| Financial Ratio | ||||||
| Balance-sheet-based accruals ratio3 | 5.94% | 60.37% | -0.77% | 9.87% | — | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Balance-Sheet-Based Accruals Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Cummins Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | — | — | — | — | — | |
| General Electric Co. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Balance-Sheet-Based Accruals Ratio, Sector | ||||||
| Capital Goods | 200.00% | — | — | — | — | |
| Balance-Sheet-Based Accruals Ratio, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 200.00% | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 2019 Calculation
Net operating assets = Operating assets – Operating liabilities
= 47,939 – 23,334 = 24,605
2 2019 Calculation
Balance-sheet-based aggregate accruals = Net operating assets2019 – Net operating assets2018
= 24,605 – 23,186 = 1,419
3 2019 Calculation
Balance-sheet-based accruals ratio = 100 × Balance-sheet-based aggregate accruals ÷ Avg. net operating assets
= 100 × 1,419 ÷ [(24,605 + 23,186) ÷ 2] = 5.94%
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
| Financial ratio | Description | The company |
|---|---|---|
| Balance-sheet-based accruals ratio | Ratio is found by dividing balance-sheet-based aggregate accruals by average net operating assets. | Using the balance-sheet-based accruals ratio, General Dynamics Corp. improved earnings quality from 2018 to 2019. |
Cash-Flow-Statement-Based Accruals Ratio
General Dynamics Corp., cash flow statement computation of aggregate accruals
US$ in millions
| Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net earnings | 3,484) | 3,345) | 2,912) | 2,955) | 2,965) | |
| Less: Net cash provided by operating activities | 2,981) | 3,148) | 3,879) | 2,198) | 2,499) | |
| Less: Net cash (used) provided by investing activities | (994) | (10,234) | (791) | (426) | 200) | |
| Cash-flow-statement-based aggregate accruals | 1,497) | 10,431) | (176) | 1,183) | 266) | |
| Financial Ratio | ||||||
| Cash-flow-statement-based accruals ratio1 | 6.26% | 58.57% | -1.41% | 9.91% | — | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Cash-Flow-Statement-Based Accruals Ratio, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Caterpillar Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Cummins Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Eaton Corp. plc | — | — | — | — | — | |
| General Electric Co. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Honeywell International Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| RTX Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Cash-Flow-Statement-Based Accruals Ratio, Sector | ||||||
| Capital Goods | -15.07% | — | — | — | — | |
| Cash-Flow-Statement-Based Accruals Ratio, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | -11.07% | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 2019 Calculation
Cash-flow-statement-based accruals ratio = 100 × Cash-flow-statement-based aggregate accruals ÷ Avg. net operating assets
= 100 × 1,497 ÷ [(24,605 + 23,186) ÷ 2] = 6.26%
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
| Financial ratio | Description | The company |
|---|---|---|
| Cash-flow-statement-based accruals ratio | Ratio is found by dividing cash-flow-statement-based aggregate accruals by average net operating assets. | Using the cash-flow-statement-based accruals ratio, General Dynamics Corp. improved earnings quality from 2018 to 2019. |