Lockheed Martin Corp. (LMT)
Financial Reporting Quality: Aggregate Accruals
High level of difficulty
Earnings can be decomposed into cash and accrual components. The accrual component (aggregate accruals) has been found to have less persistence than the cash component, and therefore (1) earnings with higher accrual component are less persistent than earnings with smaller accrual component, all else equal; and (2) the cash component of earnings should receive a higher weighting evaluating company performance.
Balance-Sheet-Based Accruals Ratio
Lockheed Martin Corp., balance sheet computation of aggregate accruals
US$ in millions
| Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Assets | ||||||
| Total assets | 44,876 | 46,521 | 47,806 | 49,128 | 37,073 | |
| Less: Cash and cash equivalents | 772 | 2,861 | 1,837 | 1,090 | 1,446 | |
| Operating assets | 44,104 | 43,660 | 45,969 | 48,038 | 35,627 | |
| Operating Liabilities | ||||||
| Total liabilities | 43,427 | 47,130 | 46,200 | 46,031 | 33,673 | |
| Less: Current maturities of long-term debt and commercial paper | 1,500 | 750 | — | 956 | — | |
| Less: Long-term debt, net, excluding current maturities | 12,604 | 13,513 | 14,282 | 14,305 | 6,169 | |
| Operating liabilities | 29,323 | 32,867 | 31,918 | 30,770 | 27,504 | |
| Net operating assets1 | 14,781 | 10,793 | 14,051 | 17,268 | 8,123 | |
| Balance-sheet-based aggregate accruals2 | 3,988 | (3,258) | (3,217) | 9,145 | — | |
| Ratio | ||||||
| Balance-sheet-based accruals ratio3 | 31.19% | -26.23% | -20.54% | 72.03% | — | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Balance-Sheet-Based Accruals Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | 114.97% | 63.07% | -137.37% | -10.11% | — | |
| General Dynamics Corp. | 60.37% | -0.77% | 9.87% | 0.00% | — | |
| Northrop Grumman Corp. | 61.81% | 12.46% | 0.60% | 4.51% | — | |
| Raytheon Co. | 9.47% | -2.62% | -2.91% | 21.45% | — | |
| United Technologies Corp. | 46.18% | 7.98% | 8.80% | -11.04% | — | |
| Balance-Sheet-Based Accruals Ratio, Sector | ||||||
| Aerospace & Defense | 46.91% | 2.27% | -2.03% | 7.04% | — | |
| Balance-Sheet-Based Accruals Ratio, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 4.94% | 8.49% | -15.11% | -22.63% | — | |
Based on: 10-K (filing date: 2019-02-08), 10-K (filing date: 2018-02-06), 10-K (filing date: 2017-02-09), 10-K (filing date: 2016-02-24), 10-K (filing date: 2015-02-09).
1 2018 Calculation
Net operating assets = Operating assets – Operating liabilities
= 44,104 – 29,323 = 14,781
2 2018 Calculation
Balance-sheet-based aggregate accruals = Net operating assets 2018 – Net operating assets 2017
= 14,781 – 10,793 = 3,988
3 2018 Calculation
Balance-sheet-based accruals ratio = 100 × Balance-sheet-based aggregate accruals ÷ Avg. net operating assets
= 100 × 3,988 ÷ [(14,781 + 10,793) ÷ 2] = 31.19%
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
| Ratio | Description | The company |
|---|---|---|
| Balance-sheet-based accruals ratio | Ratio is found by dividing balance-sheet-based aggregate accruals by average net operating assets. | Using the balance-sheet-based accruals ratio, Lockheed Martin Corp. deteriorated earnings quality from 2017 to 2018. |
Cash-Flow-Statement-Based Accruals Ratio
Lockheed Martin Corp., cash flow statement computation of aggregate accruals
US$ in millions
| Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net earnings | 5,046 | 2,002 | 5,302 | 3,605 | 3,614 | |
| Less: Net cash provided by operating activities | 3,138 | 6,476 | 5,189 | 5,101 | 3,866 | |
| Less: Net cash used for investing activities | (1,075) | (1,147) | (985) | (9,734) | (1,723) | |
| Cash-flow-statement-based aggregate accruals | 2,983 | (3,327) | 1,098 | 8,238 | 1,471 | |
| Ratio | ||||||
| Cash-flow-statement-based accruals ratio1 | 23.33% | -26.78% | 7.01% | 64.89% | — | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Cash-Flow-Statement-Based Accruals Ratio, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | -6.67% | -264.01% | -87.06% | -51.58% | — | |
| General Dynamics Corp. | 58.57% | -1.41% | 9.91% | 2.34% | — | |
| Northrop Grumman Corp. | 51.59% | 2.79% | 1.97% | 2.72% | — | |
| Raytheon Co. | 0.02% | 0.77% | -5.49% | 12.72% | — | |
| United Technologies Corp. | 24.46% | 4.03% | 2.60% | 7.67% | — | |
| Cash-Flow-Statement-Based Accruals Ratio, Sector | ||||||
| Aerospace & Defense | 29.18% | -4.40% | 0.73% | 12.00% | — | |
| Cash-Flow-Statement-Based Accruals Ratio, Industry | ||||||
| Industrials | 0.53% | -2.18% | -8.32% | -6.18% | — | |
Based on: 10-K (filing date: 2019-02-08), 10-K (filing date: 2018-02-06), 10-K (filing date: 2017-02-09), 10-K (filing date: 2016-02-24), 10-K (filing date: 2015-02-09).
1 2018 Calculation
Cash-flow-statement-based accruals ratio = 100 × Cash-flow-statement-based aggregate accruals ÷ Avg. net operating assets
= 100 × 2,983 ÷ [(14,781 + 10,793) ÷ 2] = 23.33%
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
| Ratio | Description | The company |
|---|---|---|
| Cash-flow-statement-based accruals ratio | Ratio is found by dividing cash-flow-statement-based aggregate accruals by average net operating assets. | Using the cash-flow-statement-based accruals ratio, Lockheed Martin Corp. improved earnings quality from 2017 to 2018. |