AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

General Dynamics Corp. (NYSE:GD)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since October 28, 2020.

Analysis of Reportable Segments

Microsoft Excel

Segment Profit Margin

General Dynamics Corp., profit margin by reportable segment

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Aerospace 15.63% 17.62% 19.40% 17.84% 19.27%
Combat Systems 14.21% 15.41% 15.75% 15.03% 15.64%
Information Technology 7.46% 7.35% 8.46% 7.68% —
Mission Systems 13.83% 13.94% 14.24% 12.74% —
Marine Systems 8.55% 8.95% 8.56% 7.37% 9.09%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).


Analysis of the reportable segments reveals a general divergence in profitability patterns between 2015 and 2019. While certain segments maintained relative stability, the highest-margin business experienced a notable contraction toward the end of the period.

Aerospace
This segment historically maintained the highest profit margins across the portfolio, peaking at 19.40% in 2017. However, a distinct downward trend is observed starting in 2018, with margins contracting to 15.63% by 2019, representing a significant erosion of profitability over the final two years of the period.
Combat Systems
Profitability remained relatively consistent from 2015 through 2018, fluctuating narrowly around the 15% mark. A moderate decline occurred in 2019, where the margin decreased to 14.21%.
Marine Systems
This segment exhibited initial volatility, with margins dropping from 9.09% in 2015 to 7.37% in 2016. A subsequent recovery phase saw margins return to a stable range between 8.55% and 8.95% from 2017 through 2019.
Mission Systems
Since reporting began in 2016, this segment demonstrated steady performance. After an initial increase to 14.24% in 2017, the margin remained resilient, closing 2019 at 13.83%.
Information Technology
This segment recorded the lowest profit margins of all reportable units. Following its 2016 introduction at 7.68%, margins remained flat, fluctuating minimally between 7.35% and 8.46% through 2019.

Overall, the data indicates a compression of margins in the most profitable segments, while the lower-margin segments—specifically Information Technology and Marine Systems—maintained a more consistent, albeit lower, baseline of profitability.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Segment Profit Margin: Aerospace

General Dynamics Corp.; Aerospace; segment profit margin calculation

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Operating earnings 1,532 1,490 1,577 1,394 1,706
Revenue 9,801 8,455 8,129 7,815 8,851
Segment Profitability Ratio
Segment profit margin1 15.63% 17.62% 19.40% 17.84% 19.27%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Segment profit margin = 100 × Operating earnings ÷ Revenue
= 100 × 1,532 ÷ 9,801 = 15.63%


The Aerospace segment exhibited a divergence between revenue growth and profitability over the five-year period ending December 31, 2019. While top-line performance recovered and expanded significantly toward the end of the period, the conversion of that revenue into operating income diminished, resulting in a contraction of profit margins.

Revenue Trends
Following a contraction in 2016, revenue entered a period of sustained growth. This trajectory culminated in a substantial increase in 2019, with revenue reaching 9,801 million US dollars, the highest value recorded in the analyzed timeframe.
Operating Earnings Performance
Operating earnings displayed notable volatility, peaking at 1,706 million US dollars in 2015 before declining to 1,394 million US dollars in 2016. Despite the subsequent recovery in revenue, operating earnings failed to return to 2015 levels, remaining relatively stagnant between 1,490 million and 1,577 million US dollars from 2017 through 2019.
Segment Profit Margin Analysis
A general downward trend is observed in the segment profit margin. After reaching a peak of 19.40% in 2017, the margin declined to 17.62% in 2018 and further to 15.63% in 2019. This margin compression is most pronounced in 2019, where a significant increase in revenue was not matched by a proportional increase in operating earnings, suggesting a rise in operating costs or a shift toward lower-margin revenue streams.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Segment Profit Margin: Combat Systems

General Dynamics Corp.; Combat Systems; segment profit margin calculation

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Operating earnings 996 962 937 831 882
Revenue 7,007 6,241 5,949 5,530 5,640
Segment Profitability Ratio
Segment profit margin1 14.21% 15.41% 15.75% 15.03% 15.64%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Segment profit margin = 100 × Operating earnings ÷ Revenue
= 100 × 996 ÷ 7,007 = 14.21%


The Combat Systems segment exhibits a consistent growth pattern in top-line revenue and operating earnings over the five-year period from 2015 to 2019. While the segment successfully expanded its scale of operations, this growth was not accompanied by a corresponding increase in profit margins, which experienced a notable decline toward the end of the analyzed period.

Revenue Trends
Revenue experienced a slight contraction in 2016, decreasing to US$ 5,530 million from US$ 5,640 million in 2015. Following this dip, a sustained upward trend was observed, with revenue climbing to US$ 5,949 million in 2017 and reaching US$ 7,007 million by December 31, 2019. This represents a significant expansion in the segment's total volume of business over the five-year window.
Operating Earnings Performance
Operating earnings followed a trajectory similar to revenue, with a decrease to US$ 831 million in 2016. Earnings subsequently increased for three consecutive years, peaking at US$ 996 million in 2019. The consistent growth in absolute earnings since 2016 demonstrates a steady increase in the segment's total profit contribution.
Segment Profit Margin Analysis
The segment profit margin remained relatively stable between 15.03% and 15.75% from 2015 through 2018. However, a distinct downward shift occurred in 2019, where the margin fell to 14.21%. This indicates that while both revenue and operating earnings reached their highest levels in 2019, the costs associated with generating that revenue increased at a faster rate than earnings, resulting in margin compression.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Segment Profit Margin: Information Technology

General Dynamics Corp.; Information Technology; segment profit margin calculation

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Operating earnings 628 608 373 340 —
Revenue 8,422 8,269 4,410 4,428 —
Segment Profitability Ratio
Segment profit margin1 7.46% 7.35% 8.46% 7.68% —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Segment profit margin = 100 × Operating earnings ÷ Revenue
= 100 × 628 ÷ 8,422 = 7.46%


The Information Technology segment experienced a significant expansion in scale between 2016 and 2019, characterized by a substantial increase in both revenue and operating earnings, while maintaining a relatively stable profit margin.

Revenue and Operating Earnings Growth
Revenue remained nearly flat between 2016 and 2017, moving from 4,428 million USD to 4,410 million USD. A sharp increase occurred in 2018, where revenue rose to 8,269 million USD, representing a growth of approximately 87% over the previous year. This upward trend continued modestly into 2019, reaching 8,422 million USD. Operating earnings followed a similar trajectory, increasing from 340 million USD in 2016 to 628 million USD in 2019, with the most pronounced growth occurring between 2017 and 2018.
Segment Profit Margin Analysis
The segment profit margin exhibited minimal volatility despite the rapid increase in business volume. The margin peaked in 2017 at 8.46%, up from 7.68% in 2016. However, the margin contracted to 7.35% in 2018, coinciding with the surge in revenue, which suggests that the expansion may have involved lower-margin contracts or increased operational costs associated with growth. By 2019, the margin showed a slight recovery, rising to 7.46%.
Operational Trends
The data indicates a transition from a period of stability (2016-2017) to a period of aggressive expansion (2018), followed by a phase of stabilization (2019). While the absolute profitability increased significantly, the consistent margin range between 7.35% and 8.46% indicates that the segment has maintained a steady level of operational efficiency regardless of the total volume of revenue processed.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Segment Profit Margin: Mission Systems

General Dynamics Corp.; Mission Systems; segment profit margin calculation

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Operating earnings 683 659 638 601 —
Revenue 4,937 4,726 4,481 4,716 —
Segment Profitability Ratio
Segment profit margin1 13.83% 13.94% 14.24% 12.74% —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Segment profit margin = 100 × Operating earnings ÷ Revenue
= 100 × 683 ÷ 4,937 = 13.83%


The Mission Systems segment demonstrated a steady increase in absolute profitability between 2016 and 2019, characterized by consistent growth in operating earnings despite fluctuations in total revenue.

Revenue Performance
Revenue experienced a non-linear trajectory, decreasing from US$ 4,716 million in 2016 to US$ 4,481 million in 2017. A recovery followed, with revenue climbing to US$ 4,726 million in 2018 and reaching a period high of US$ 4,937 million by December 31, 2019.
Operating Earnings Growth
Operating earnings exhibited a consistent upward trend throughout the analyzed period. Earnings rose from US$ 601 million in 2016 to US$ 683 million in 2019, reflecting an uninterrupted annual growth pattern regardless of the volatility seen in top-line revenue.
Profit Margin Analysis
The segment profit margin increased from 12.74% in 2016 to a peak of 14.24% in 2017. This peak coincided with the lowest revenue point of the period, indicating a significant improvement in operational efficiency or a shift toward a higher-margin product mix during that year. From 2017 to 2019, the margin underwent a slight compression, settling at 13.83%, suggesting that subsequent revenue expansion was achieved with marginally lower profitability per unit of sale.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Segment Profit Margin: Marine Systems

General Dynamics Corp.; Marine Systems; segment profit margin calculation

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Operating earnings 785 761 685 595 728
Revenue 9,183 8,502 8,004 8,072 8,013
Segment Profitability Ratio
Segment profit margin1 8.55% 8.95% 8.56% 7.37% 9.09%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Segment profit margin = 100 × Operating earnings ÷ Revenue
= 100 × 785 ÷ 9,183 = 8.55%


The Marine Systems segment demonstrated an overall upward trajectory in scale and profitability between 2015 and 2019, despite a period of margin contraction and earnings volatility in the early part of the period.

Revenue Growth
Revenue remained relatively stagnant from 2015 to 2017, fluctuating around the $8 billion mark. A period of accelerated growth began in 2018, with revenue increasing to $8.502 billion, and continuing into 2019 to reach a peak of $9.183 billion. This represents a total revenue expansion of approximately 14.6% over the five-year span.
Operating Earnings Trends
Operating earnings experienced a sharp decline in 2016, dropping to $595 million from $728 million in the previous year. Following this trough, a consistent year-over-year recovery was observed, with earnings rising to $685 million in 2017, $761 million in 2018, and culminating in $785 million in 2019.
Segment Profit Margin Volatility
The segment profit margin mirrored the earnings trend, falling from 9.09% in 2015 to a low of 7.37% in 2016. Although the margin recovered significantly to 8.95% by 2018, a slight contraction to 8.55% occurred in 2019. The 2019 results indicate that while the segment achieved its highest absolute revenue and operating earnings, the growth in operating expenses slightly offset the gains in revenue, leading to a marginal compression of the profit percentage.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Segment Return on Assets (Segment ROA)

General Dynamics Corp., ROA by reportable segment

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Aerospace 12.43% 13.28% 15.57% 14.24% 20.41%
Combat Systems 8.88% 9.76% 9.52% 9.35% 10.02%
Information Technology 4.41% 4.29% 12.35% 12.24% —
Mission Systems 11.01% 11.01% 10.89% 10.61% —
Marine Systems 20.04% 24.31% 23.57% 19.43% 24.51%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).


An evaluation of segment returns on assets reveals a diverging performance trajectory across business units from 2015 through 2019. While certain segments maintained relative stability, others experienced significant compression in asset efficiency, with a general trend toward lower returns in the high-performing units by the end of the period.

Aerospace
A consistent downward trend is observed, with the return on assets decreasing from a peak of 20.41% in 2015 to 12.43% by 2019. This indicates a steady erosion of asset productivity over the five-year window.
Marine Systems
This segment consistently yielded the highest returns among all reportable units, despite notable volatility. Performance fluctuated from 24.51% in 2015 to a low of 19.43% in 2016, recovered to 24.31% in 2018, and concluded the period at 20.04%.
Information Technology
A sharp contraction in performance occurred between 2017 and 2018, where the return on assets fell from 12.35% to 4.29%. The return remained largely stagnant at 4.41% through 2019, marking the lowest efficiency level across all segments in the final two years.
Combat and Mission Systems
These segments demonstrated the greatest stability. Combat Systems fluctuated narrowly between 8.88% and 10.02%. Mission Systems showed a marginal but steady increase from 10.61% in 2016 to a plateau of 11.01% in 2018 and 2019.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Segment ROA: Aerospace

General Dynamics Corp.; Aerospace; segment ROA calculation

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Operating earnings 1,532 1,490 1,577 1,394 1,706
Identifiable assets 12,324 11,220 10,126 9,792 8,358
Segment Profitability Ratio
Segment ROA1 12.43% 13.28% 15.57% 14.24% 20.41%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Segment ROA = 100 × Operating earnings ÷ Identifiable assets
= 100 × 1,532 ÷ 12,324 = 12.43%


The Aerospace segment exhibits a clear downward trend in Return on Assets (ROA) over the five-year period ending December 31, 2019. Despite fluctuations in operating earnings, the consistent growth of the asset base has resulted in a steady erosion of asset productivity, with the ROA declining from 20.41% in 2015 to 12.43% in 2019.

Operating Earnings Performance
Operating earnings displayed significant volatility throughout the period. After a peak of 1,706 million USD in 2015, earnings dropped to 1,394 million USD in 2016. While a recovery occurred in 2017 (1,577 million USD), earnings remained below 2015 levels for the remainder of the period, ending at 1,532 million USD in 2019.
Identifiable Asset Growth
A consistent and aggressive expansion of the asset base is observed. Identifiable assets grew annually from 8,358 million USD in 2015 to 12,324 million USD in 2019. This represents a total increase of approximately 47.4% over five years, indicating significant capital investment or asset accumulation within the segment.
ROA Trend Analysis
The segment ROA experienced a sharp contraction between 2015 and 2016, falling from 20.41% to 14.24%. Although there was a marginal improvement to 15.57% in 2017, the ratio resumed its decline in 2018 (13.28%) and 2019 (12.43%). This trend suggests that the growth in identifiable assets has significantly outpaced the growth in operating earnings, leading to diminished efficiency in generating profit from the segment's employed capital.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Segment ROA: Combat Systems

General Dynamics Corp.; Combat Systems; segment ROA calculation

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Operating earnings 996 962 937 831 882
Identifiable assets 11,220 9,853 9,846 8,885 8,800
Segment Profitability Ratio
Segment ROA1 8.88% 9.76% 9.52% 9.35% 10.02%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Segment ROA = 100 × Operating earnings ÷ Identifiable assets
= 100 × 996 ÷ 11,220 = 8.88%


The Combat Systems segment demonstrated a general increase in operating earnings and a substantial expansion of its asset base over the five-year period from 2015 to 2019. While profitability increased in absolute terms, the rate of asset growth exceeded the rate of earnings growth, resulting in a volatile and ultimately declining return on assets (ROA).

Operating Earnings Trend
Operating earnings exhibited a recovery and growth trajectory following a decline in 2016. After decreasing from 882 million in 2015 to 831 million in 2016, earnings grew steadily for three consecutive years, reaching 996 million by December 31, 2019. This represents a cumulative increase of approximately 12.9% over the analysis period.
Identifiable Assets Growth
Identifiable assets experienced a consistent upward trend, increasing from 8,800 million in 2015 to 11,220 million in 2019. The most significant expansions occurred between 2016 and 2017 and again between 2018 and 2019. The total asset base expanded by approximately 27.5% during the period.
Segment Return on Assets (ROA) Analysis
The Segment ROA fluctuated, starting at a peak of 10.02% in 2015 before dropping to 9.35% in 2016. A gradual recovery was observed through 2018, where the ratio reached 9.76%. However, 2019 saw a notable decline to 8.88%, the lowest level in the recorded period. This compression in ROA is attributed to the disproportionate increase in identifiable assets relative to operating earnings growth, particularly in 2019, where a significant asset surge outweighed the incremental gain in operating income.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Segment ROA: Information Technology

General Dynamics Corp.; Information Technology; segment ROA calculation

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Operating earnings 628 608 373 340 —
Identifiable assets 14,248 14,159 3,021 2,778 —
Segment Profitability Ratio
Segment ROA1 4.41% 4.29% 12.35% 12.24% —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Segment ROA = 100 × Operating earnings ÷ Identifiable assets
= 100 × 628 ÷ 14,248 = 4.41%


The Information Technology segment exhibited a significant shift in its financial structure and asset efficiency between 2016 and 2019. While operating earnings demonstrated a consistent upward trajectory, a substantial expansion of the asset base led to a marked compression in the Return on Assets (ROA).

Operating Earnings Trend
Operating earnings grew steadily from 340 million US dollars in 2016 to 628 million US dollars in 2019. A notable acceleration occurred between 2017 and 2018, where earnings increased by approximately 63%, indicating a strong expansion in the segment's ability to generate profit from its operations.
Identifiable Assets Expansion
The asset base remained relatively stable between 2016 and 2017, moving from 2,778 million to 3,021 million US dollars. However, a sharp increase was recorded in 2018, with identifiable assets surging to 14,159 million US dollars. This represents an increase of roughly 368% in a single year, suggesting a major acquisition or a significant strategic investment during that period.
Segment ROA Analysis
The Segment ROA was stable and relatively high at 12.24% in 2016 and 12.35% in 2017. Following the massive increase in identifiable assets, the ROA declined sharply to 4.29% in 2018 and remained at a similar level of 4.41% in 2019. This decline indicates that the growth in operating earnings was insufficient to offset the rapid expansion of the asset base, resulting in lower overall asset productivity.

In summary, the segment transitioned from a lean operation with high asset efficiency to a much larger enterprise with lower relative returns. The disparity between the growth rates of earnings and assets from 2017 to 2018 is the primary driver of the observed decline in the ROA.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Segment ROA: Mission Systems

General Dynamics Corp.; Mission Systems; segment ROA calculation

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Operating earnings 683 659 638 601 —
Identifiable assets 6,205 5,984 5,856 5,667 —
Segment Profitability Ratio
Segment ROA1 11.01% 11.01% 10.89% 10.61% —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Segment ROA = 100 × Operating earnings ÷ Identifiable assets
= 100 × 683 ÷ 6,205 = 11.01%


The Mission Systems segment demonstrates a consistent upward trajectory in both absolute profitability and asset utilization between 2016 and 2019. Operating earnings and identifiable assets grew in tandem, resulting in a gradual improvement and subsequent stabilization of the return on assets (ROA).

Operating Earnings Trend
Operating earnings exhibited steady growth over the four-year period, increasing from 601 million US dollars in 2016 to 683 million US dollars by 2019. This represents a cumulative increase in earnings, with the most significant year-over-year growth occurring between 2016 and 2017.
Identifiable Assets Expansion
The asset base of the segment expanded incrementally each year, rising from 5,667 million US dollars in 2016 to 6,205 million US dollars in 2019. This growth suggests a continuous investment in the segment's operational capacity to support increased earnings.
Segment ROA Performance
The Segment ROA improved from 10.61% in 2016 to 11.01% in 2018, indicating that operating earnings grew at a slightly faster rate than the asset base during this interval. For the period ending December 31, 2019, the ROA remained flat at 11.01%, signaling that the growth in operating earnings had aligned precisely with the growth in identifiable assets, reaching a point of operational efficiency equilibrium.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Segment ROA: Marine Systems

General Dynamics Corp.; Marine Systems; segment ROA calculation

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Operating earnings 785 761 685 595 728
Identifiable assets 3,918 3,130 2,906 3,063 2,970
Segment Profitability Ratio
Segment ROA1 20.04% 24.31% 23.57% 19.43% 24.51%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Segment ROA = 100 × Operating earnings ÷ Identifiable assets
= 100 × 785 ÷ 3,918 = 20.04%


The Marine Systems segment experienced fluctuations in profitability and asset utilization between 2015 and 2019, characterized by a recovery in operating earnings followed by a significant expansion of the asset base.

Operating Earnings Performance
Operating earnings exhibited a volatile but generally upward trajectory after an initial decline. A notable contraction occurred in 2016, with earnings falling to US$ 595 million from US$ 728 million in 2015. This was followed by a consistent three-year growth phase, with earnings rising to US$ 685 million in 2017, US$ 761 million in 2018, and peaking at US$ 785 million in 2019.
Identifiable Asset Trends
Identifiable assets remained relatively stable from 2015 through 2018, fluctuating between US$ 2,906 million and US$ 3,130 million. However, a substantial increase was recorded in 2019, where assets rose to US$ 3,918 million, representing a growth of approximately 25.2% over the previous year.
Segment Return on Assets (ROA) Interpretation
The Segment ROA demonstrated significant variability. The initial drop from 24.51% in 2015 to 19.43% in 2016 correlates directly with the decrease in operating earnings. Efficiency recovered by 2018, reaching 24.31% as earnings grew while assets remained contained. The subsequent decline to 20.04% in 2019 indicates that the aggressive expansion of the asset base outpaced the growth in operating income, thereby diluting the overall return on assets for the period.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Segment Asset Turnover

General Dynamics Corp., asset turnover by reportable segment

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Aerospace 0.80 0.75 0.80 0.80 1.06
Combat Systems 0.62 0.63 0.60 0.62 0.64
Information Technology 0.59 0.58 1.46 1.59 —
Mission Systems 0.80 0.79 0.77 0.83 —
Marine Systems 2.34 2.72 2.75 2.64 2.70

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).


The asset turnover ratios across the reportable segments demonstrate varying levels of efficiency in utilizing assets to generate revenue, with a significant divergence between the Marine Systems segment and other business units.

Marine Systems
This segment consistently maintains the highest asset turnover ratio of all reportable segments, indicating superior asset efficiency. The ratio remained relatively stable between 2.64 and 2.75 from 2016 through 2018, before experiencing a decline to 2.34 in 2019.
Information Technology
The most pronounced volatility is observed in this segment. After starting at 1.59 in 2016, the ratio underwent a sharp contraction to 0.58 in 2018, remaining nearly flat at 0.59 in 2019. This represents a significant reduction in revenue generation per unit of asset between 2017 and 2018.
Aerospace
A downward adjustment occurred between 2015 and 2016, with the ratio falling from 1.06 to 0.80. Following this initial decrease, the segment entered a period of relative stagnation, with the ratio fluctuating marginally between 0.75 and 0.80 through 2019.
Combat Systems and Mission Systems
These two segments exhibit the highest levels of stability. Combat Systems maintained a narrow range between 0.60 and 0.64 throughout the entire period. Mission Systems followed a similar pattern of stability, with ratios ranging between 0.77 and 0.83 from 2016 to 2019.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Segment Asset Turnover: Aerospace

General Dynamics Corp.; Aerospace; segment asset turnover calculation

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Revenue 9,801 8,455 8,129 7,815 8,851
Identifiable assets 12,324 11,220 10,126 9,792 8,358
Segment Activity Ratio
Segment asset turnover1 0.80 0.75 0.80 0.80 1.06

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Segment asset turnover = Revenue ÷ Identifiable assets
= 9,801 ÷ 12,324 = 0.80


The Aerospace segment experienced a period of expanding asset bases coupled with fluctuating revenue streams between 2015 and 2019, resulting in a notable decline and subsequent stabilization of asset utilization efficiency.

Revenue Trends
Revenue exhibited volatility in the early part of the period, decreasing from 8,851 million US dollars in 2015 to 7,815 million US dollars in 2016. However, a consistent recovery trend followed, with revenues growing steadily to reach a peak of 9,801 million US dollars by December 31, 2019.
Identifiable Assets Growth
A continuous upward trajectory is observed in the growth of identifiable assets. Assets increased every year of the analyzed period, rising from 8,358 million US dollars in 2015 to 12,324 million US dollars in 2019. This represents a significant expansion of the segment's resource base.
Segment Asset Turnover Analysis
The asset turnover ratio experienced a sharp contraction from 1.06 in 2015 to 0.80 in 2016. This decline indicates that the growth in assets outpaced the generation of revenue during this transition. Between 2016 and 2019, the ratio remained relatively stable, fluctuating slightly between 0.75 and 0.80. The stabilization at 0.80 in 2019 suggests that while revenue growth accelerated toward the end of the period, it did not fully offset the cumulative increase in the asset base to return to 2015 efficiency levels.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Segment Asset Turnover: Combat Systems

General Dynamics Corp.; Combat Systems; segment asset turnover calculation

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Revenue 7,007 6,241 5,949 5,530 5,640
Identifiable assets 11,220 9,853 9,846 8,885 8,800
Segment Activity Ratio
Segment asset turnover1 0.62 0.63 0.60 0.62 0.64

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Segment asset turnover = Revenue ÷ Identifiable assets
= 7,007 ÷ 11,220 = 0.62


The Combat Systems segment exhibited a general growth trajectory in both revenue and identifiable assets between 2015 and 2019, while maintaining a consistent level of asset utilization efficiency.

Revenue Trends
Revenue experienced a marginal decline in 2016 but entered a period of sustained growth thereafter, increasing from US$ 5,530 million in 2016 to US$ 7,007 million by 2019. The most significant expansion occurred in 2019, marking a substantial increase in the segment's top-line performance over the five-year period.
Asset Base Evolution
Identifiable assets grew steadily from US$ 8,800 million in 2015 to US$ 11,220 million in 2019. Significant increases in assets were observed in 2017 and 2019, suggesting a strategic expansion of the resource base to support increased operational demands.
Asset Turnover Efficiency
The segment asset turnover ratio remained relatively stable, fluctuating within a narrow range between 0.60 and 0.64. A minimum value of 0.60 was recorded in 2017, coinciding with a period where asset growth temporarily outpaced revenue growth. However, the ratio recovered to 0.63 in 2018 and settled at 0.62 in 2019. This pattern indicates that the segment successfully scaled its asset base in proportion to its revenue growth, maintaining a consistent level of operational efficiency.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Segment Asset Turnover: Information Technology

General Dynamics Corp.; Information Technology; segment asset turnover calculation

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Revenue 8,422 8,269 4,410 4,428 —
Identifiable assets 14,248 14,159 3,021 2,778 —
Segment Activity Ratio
Segment asset turnover1 0.59 0.58 1.46 1.59 —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Segment asset turnover = Revenue ÷ Identifiable assets
= 8,422 ÷ 14,248 = 0.59


The Information Technology segment experienced a significant shift in its operational scale and asset efficiency between 2016 and 2019. While the segment initially maintained a lean asset base relative to its revenue, a substantial increase in identifiable assets occurred in 2018, which fundamentally altered the asset turnover profile.

Revenue Trajectory
Revenue remained stable between 2016 and 2017, hovering around 4.4 billion US dollars. However, a sharp increase is observed in 2018, where revenue rose to 8.27 billion US dollars, representing an increase of approximately 87% over the previous year. This growth trend continued modestly into 2019, reaching 8.42 billion US dollars.
Identifiable Asset Growth
Identifiable assets showed a marginal increase from 2.78 billion US dollars in 2016 to 3.02 billion US dollars in 2017. A dramatic expansion occurred in 2018, with assets surging to 14.16 billion US dollars. This increase of over 360% suggests a major capital investment or a significant acquisition within the segment during that fiscal year. Assets remained relatively flat in 2019 at 14.25 billion US dollars.
Segment Asset Turnover Analysis
The segment asset turnover ratio declined steadily from 1.59 in 2016 to 1.46 in 2017. A precipitous drop occurred in 2018, with the ratio falling to 0.58. This decline is directly attributable to the fact that asset growth vastly outpaced revenue growth during the 2018 expansion. The ratio stabilized at 0.59 in 2019, indicating that the segment's ability to generate revenue from its newly expanded asset base remained constant in the subsequent period.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Segment Asset Turnover: Mission Systems

General Dynamics Corp.; Mission Systems; segment asset turnover calculation

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Revenue 4,937 4,726 4,481 4,716 —
Identifiable assets 6,205 5,984 5,856 5,667 —
Segment Activity Ratio
Segment asset turnover1 0.80 0.79 0.77 0.83 —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Segment asset turnover = Revenue ÷ Identifiable assets
= 4,937 ÷ 6,205 = 0.80


The Mission Systems segment experienced fluctuations in operational efficiency between 2016 and 2019, characterized by a mid-period decline followed by a gradual recovery in asset utilization.

Revenue Trends
Revenue exhibited a non-linear trajectory, starting at 4,716 million US$ in 2016 and declining to 4,481 million US$ in 2017. Following this contraction, revenue grew steadily for two consecutive years, reaching 4,726 million US$ in 2018 and peaking at 4,937 million US$ by the end of 2019.
Identifiable Asset Growth
A consistent upward trend in identifiable assets is observed throughout the reporting period. Assets increased annually from 5,667 million US$ in 2016 to 6,205 million US$ in 2019, representing a steady expansion of the segment's resource base.
Segment Asset Turnover Analysis
The asset turnover ratio, which measures the efficiency of generating revenue from assets, declined from 0.83 in 2016 to a low of 0.77 in 2017. This decrease was the result of simultaneous revenue contraction and asset growth. Subsequently, the ratio improved to 0.79 in 2018 and 0.80 in 2019, indicating that revenue growth began to outpace the increase in identifiable assets, although the ratio remained below the 2016 baseline.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Segment Asset Turnover: Marine Systems

General Dynamics Corp.; Marine Systems; segment asset turnover calculation

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Revenue 9,183 8,502 8,004 8,072 8,013
Identifiable assets 3,918 3,130 2,906 3,063 2,970
Segment Activity Ratio
Segment asset turnover1 2.34 2.72 2.75 2.64 2.70

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Segment asset turnover = Revenue ÷ Identifiable assets
= 9,183 ÷ 3,918 = 2.34


The Marine Systems segment demonstrated a general upward trajectory in both revenue and asset base over the five-year period ending December 31, 2019, although asset efficiency experienced a contraction in the final year.

Revenue Growth Trends
Revenue remained relatively stagnant between 2015 and 2017, fluctuating around 8 billion USD. A positive growth trend emerged in 2018 and 2019, culminating in a peak of 9,183 million USD. This reflects a total increase of approximately 14.6% from the 2015 baseline.
Asset Base Evolution
Identifiable assets exhibited relative stability from 2015 to 2018, maintaining a range between 2,906 million USD and 3,130 million USD. However, a significant expansion occurred in 2019, with assets rising to 3,918 million USD, representing a 25.1% increase over the prior year.
Segment Asset Turnover Analysis
The asset turnover ratio remained consistent from 2015 through 2018, fluctuating minimally between 2.64 and 2.75, which indicates a stable efficiency in generating revenue from the asset base. In 2019, the ratio declined to 2.34. This downward shift is a direct result of the growth in identifiable assets outpacing the growth in revenue, suggesting a period of intensified capital investment or a lag between asset acquisition and revenue realization.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Segment Capital Expenditures to Depreciation

General Dynamics Corp., capital expenditures to depreciation by reportable segment

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Aerospace 0.78 1.26 0.90 0.82 1.43
Combat Systems 1.28 1.05 0.98 0.83 0.87
Information Technology 0.39 0.19 0.50 0.24 —
Mission Systems 1.25 0.75 0.78 1.43 —
Marine Systems 3.68 2.09 1.13 0.88 1.57

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).


An analysis of the capital expenditures to depreciation ratios reveals divergent investment strategies across the reportable segments between 2015 and 2019. While some segments maintained low or fluctuating investment levels relative to asset depreciation, others demonstrated a significant acceleration in capital spending, particularly toward the end of the period.

Marine Systems
This segment exhibited the most aggressive growth in capital investment. After a decline from 1.57 in 2015 to 0.88 in 2016, the ratio climbed consistently, reaching a peak of 3.68 by December 31, 2019. This sharp upward trajectory indicates a substantial increase in capital spending that far outpaced the depreciation of existing assets.
Combat Systems
A steady upward trend is observed in this segment. From a low of 0.83 in 2016, the ratio increased annually to reach 1.28 in 2019, suggesting a phased and consistent increase in investment in long-term assets.
Aerospace
The investment pattern for this segment was characterized by volatility. The ratio started at 1.43 in 2015, dropped significantly in 2016, recovered to 1.26 in 2018, and subsequently fell to 0.78 by 2019, ending the period below the depreciation threshold.
Mission Systems
Investment levels in this segment fluctuated considerably. A high of 1.43 in 2016 was followed by a period of decline, reaching a low of 0.75 in 2018, before recovering to 1.25 in 2019.
Information Technology
This segment consistently maintained the lowest capital expenditures to depreciation ratios of all analyzed segments. Ratios remained below 1.0 throughout the observed period, peaking at 0.50 in 2017 and ending at 0.39 in 2019, indicating that capital spending remained well below the rate of asset depreciation.

Overall, the shift in capital allocation is most prominent in the Marine Systems segment, whereas the Information Technology segment shows a sustained pattern of minimal capital reinvestment relative to depreciation.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Segment Capital Expenditures to Depreciation: Aerospace

General Dynamics Corp.; Aerospace; segment capital expenditures to depreciation calculation

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Capital expenditures 138 194 132 125 210
Depreciation and amortization 178 154 147 153 147
Segment Financial Ratio
Segment capital expenditures to depreciation1 0.78 1.26 0.90 0.82 1.43

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Segment capital expenditures to depreciation = Capital expenditures ÷ Depreciation and amortization
= 138 ÷ 178 = 0.78


Between 2015 and 2019, the Aerospace segment exhibited a volatile pattern of capital investment relative to its depreciation and amortization costs. The segment fluctuated between phases of asset expansion and periods where investment fell below the replacement cost of existing assets.

Capital Expenditure Trends
Annual capital expenditures showed significant variance, peaking at 210 million USD in 2015 and 194 million USD in 2018. The lowest expenditure occurred in 2016 at 125 million USD, indicating an inconsistent investment cycle rather than a steady growth trajectory.
Depreciation and Amortization Analysis
Depreciation and amortization remained relatively stable throughout the analyzed period, ranging between 147 million USD and 178 million USD. A gradual upward trend is noted toward the end of the period, reaching its highest point in 2019, which reflects an increasing base of depreciable assets.
Segment Capital Expenditures to Depreciation Ratio
The ratio demonstrates a cyclical approach to capital allocation. In 2015 and 2018, the ratio exceeded 1.0, reaching 1.43 and 1.26 respectively, indicating that investments in new assets surpassed the value lost to depreciation. In contrast, the ratio fell below 1.0 in 2016, 2017, and 2019, reaching a period low of 0.78 in 2019. This suggests that during those specific years, capital reinvestment was insufficient to fully cover the depreciation of the asset base.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Segment Capital Expenditures to Depreciation: Combat Systems

General Dynamics Corp.; Combat Systems; segment capital expenditures to depreciation calculation

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Capital expenditures 109 91 84 71 79
Depreciation and amortization 85 87 86 86 91
Segment Financial Ratio
Segment capital expenditures to depreciation1 1.28 1.05 0.98 0.83 0.87

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Segment capital expenditures to depreciation = Capital expenditures ÷ Depreciation and amortization
= 109 ÷ 85 = 1.28


The Combat Systems segment exhibits a clear transition in its capital allocation strategy between 2015 and 2019. The period is characterized by a shift from a phase of conservative spending, where investments were below the rate of asset depreciation, to a phase of active capacity expansion and asset growth.

Capital Expenditure Trends
Capital expenditures experienced a slight initial decline, falling from 79 million US dollars in 2015 to 71 million US dollars in 2016. Following this trough, a consistent upward trend is observed, with annual spending increasing to 84 million US dollars in 2017, 91 million US dollars in 2018, and reaching a peak of 109 million US dollars by 2019.
Depreciation and Amortization Stability
Expenses related to depreciation and amortization remained relatively stagnant throughout the five-year period. The figures fluctuated minimally, beginning at 91 million US dollars in 2015 and ending at 85 million US dollars in 2019. This stability suggests a consistent baseline of asset wear-and-tear and a lack of significant asset retirements or sudden write-downs.
Capital Expenditures to Depreciation Ratio
The ratio of capital expenditures to depreciation serves as a primary indicator of investment intensity. From 2015 to 2016, the ratio remained below 1.0, dipping to a low of 0.83, which indicates that the segment was not replacing its assets as quickly as they were depreciating. A critical inflection point occurred between 2017 and 2018, as the ratio climbed from 0.98 to 1.05. This trend culminated in 2019 with a ratio of 1.28, confirming a strategic pivot toward increasing the net book value of the segment's asset base and investing in future productive capacity.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Segment Capital Expenditures to Depreciation: Information Technology

General Dynamics Corp.; Information Technology; segment capital expenditures to depreciation calculation

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Capital expenditures 147 62 16 10 —
Depreciation and amortization 377 333 32 42 —
Segment Financial Ratio
Segment capital expenditures to depreciation1 0.39 0.19 0.50 0.24 —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Segment capital expenditures to depreciation = Capital expenditures ÷ Depreciation and amortization
= 147 ÷ 377 = 0.39


The Information Technology segment exhibits a significant escalation in capital investment and a substantial increase in its depreciation base between 2016 and 2019. While capital expenditures grew consistently throughout the period, the depreciation and amortization figures experienced a sharp increase in 2018, indicating a fundamental shift in the segment's asset structure or the integration of significant new assets.

Capital Expenditure Trends
A strong upward trajectory is observed in capital expenditures, which rose from 10 million US dollars in 2016 to 147 million US dollars by 2019. The most pronounced acceleration occurred between 2017 and 2019, where spending increased more than ninefold, suggesting an aggressive expansion of the segment's infrastructure or technological capabilities.
Depreciation and Amortization Volatility
Depreciation and amortization remained relatively stable between 2016 and 2017, ranging from 32 million to 42 million US dollars. However, a significant spike occurred in 2018, with the value jumping to 333 million US dollars, and further increasing to 377 million US dollars in 2019. This abrupt increase typically reflects the recognition of depreciation from major prior acquisitions or the commissioning of large-scale capital projects.
Segment Capital Expenditures to Depreciation Ratio
The ratio of capital expenditures to depreciation fluctuated between 0.19 and 0.50. A peak of 0.50 was reached in 2017, followed by a drop to 0.19 in 2018, coinciding with the surge in depreciation expenses. By 2019, the ratio recovered to 0.39. Throughout the entire observed period, the ratio remained consistently below 1.0, indicating that the segment's investment in new capital assets was lower than the accounting depreciation of its existing asset base.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Segment Capital Expenditures to Depreciation: Mission Systems

General Dynamics Corp.; Mission Systems; segment capital expenditures to depreciation calculation

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Capital expenditures 75 49 47 87 —
Depreciation and amortization 60 65 60 61 —
Segment Financial Ratio
Segment capital expenditures to depreciation1 1.25 0.75 0.78 1.43 —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Segment capital expenditures to depreciation = Capital expenditures ÷ Depreciation and amortization
= 75 ÷ 60 = 1.25


The Mission Systems segment exhibited a fluctuating capital investment strategy between 2016 and 2019, characterized by varying levels of capital expenditures against a relatively stable baseline of depreciation and amortization. The relationship between these two metrics indicates alternating periods of asset expansion and asset consumption.

Capital Expenditure Trends
Spending on capital assets showed significant volatility, starting at 87 million US$ in 2016 before declining sharply to 47 million US$ in 2017. This lower level of spending persisted through 2018 at 49 million US$, followed by a recovery to 75 million US$ in 2019.
Depreciation and Amortization Stability
Depreciation and amortization remained consistent throughout the period, fluctuating minimally between 60 million US$ and 65 million US$. This stability suggests a steady rate of asset aging and a consistent base of depreciable assets within the segment.
Segment Capital Expenditures to Depreciation Ratio
The ratio shifted from 1.43 in 2016 to a low of 0.75 in 2018, before rising again to 1.25 in 2019. Ratios above 1.0 in 2016 and 2019 indicate that the segment was investing in new assets at a rate exceeding the depreciation of existing ones, suggesting growth or modernization. Conversely, ratios below 1.0 in 2017 and 2018 indicate a period where capital reinvestment was insufficient to offset the depreciation of the asset base.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Segment Capital Expenditures to Depreciation: Marine Systems

General Dynamics Corp.; Marine Systems; segment capital expenditures to depreciation calculation

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Capital expenditures 449 243 123 92 166
Depreciation and amortization 122 116 109 105 106
Segment Financial Ratio
Segment capital expenditures to depreciation1 3.68 2.09 1.13 0.88 1.57

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 2019 Calculation
Segment capital expenditures to depreciation = Capital expenditures ÷ Depreciation and amortization
= 449 ÷ 122 = 3.68


The Marine Systems segment exhibits a significant acceleration in capital investment relative to its asset depreciation over the analyzed five-year period. While the segment maintained a relatively stable base of depreciation and amortization, capital expenditures experienced a substantial surge, particularly in the latter half of the period, indicating a strategic shift toward aggressive capacity expansion or modernization.

Capital Expenditure Trends
Investment levels showed initial volatility, decreasing from 166 million USD in 2015 to a low of 92 million USD in 2016. However, a consistent and rapid upward trajectory followed, with expenditures increasing to 123 million USD in 2017, 243 million USD in 2018, and peaking at 449 million USD by 2019. This represents an increase of approximately 387% from the 2016 trough to the 2019 year-end.
Depreciation and Amortization Stability
Depreciation and amortization expenses remained remarkably stable throughout the period, moving from 106 million USD in 2015 to 122 million USD in 2019. The marginal annual increases suggest a consistent rate of asset aging and a steady historical asset base, providing a neutral baseline against which capital spending is measured.
Analysis of the Capital Expenditure to Depreciation Ratio
The ratio fluctuated significantly, starting at 1.57 in 2015 before dropping to 0.88 in 2016, the only instance where capital spending fell below the annual depreciation expense. From 2017 onward, the ratio expanded rapidly, reaching 1.13 in 2017, 2.09 in 2018, and 3.68 in 2019. The sharp climb in this ratio indicates that the segment is investing in new assets at a rate far exceeding the replacement of worn-out assets, signaling a period of intensive growth and long-term capital commitment.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Revenue

General Dynamics Corp., revenue by reportable segment

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Aerospace 9,801 8,455 8,129 7,815 8,851
Combat Systems 7,007 6,241 5,949 5,530 5,640
Information Technology 8,422 8,269 4,410 4,428 —
Mission Systems 4,937 4,726 4,481 4,716 —
Information Systems and Technology (legacy) — — — — 8,965
Marine Systems 9,183 8,502 8,004 8,072 8,013
Total 39,350 36,193 30,973 30,561 31,469

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).


Aggregate revenue exhibited a general upward trajectory over the five-year period, increasing from US$ 31,469 million in 2015 to US$ 39,350 million in 2019. While a slight contraction occurred in 2016, the company experienced accelerated growth starting in 2018, with a notable revenue surge between 2017 and 2019.

Aerospace
Revenue in this segment showed initial volatility, decreasing from US$ 8,851 million in 2015 to US$ 7,815 million in 2016. However, a consistent recovery followed, culminating in a significant increase to US$ 9,801 million by 2019, representing the highest single-year revenue peak for the segment.
Combat Systems
A steady growth pattern is observed after a marginal dip in 2016. Revenue rose incrementally from US$ 5,530 million in 2016 to US$ 7,007 million in 2019, indicating a stable expansion of this business line.
Information Technology and Mission Systems
A structural reporting shift occurred after 2015, where the legacy Information Systems and Technology segment (US$ 8,965 million) was reorganized into Information Technology and Mission Systems. The Information Technology segment experienced a substantial expansion in 2018, jumping from US$ 4,410 million to US$ 8,269 million. Mission Systems remained relatively stable, fluctuating between US$ 4,481 million and US$ 4,937 million during the 2016-2019 period.
Marine Systems
This segment maintained a consistent performance profile with modest growth through 2017, followed by a more pronounced increase in 2018 and 2019, ending the period at US$ 9,183 million.

The overall revenue growth was primarily driven by the expansion of the Information Technology segment and strong year-end performance in Aerospace and Marine Systems. The combined growth of these segments contributed to a total revenue increase of approximately 25% from 2015 to 2019.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Operating earnings

General Dynamics Corp., operating earnings by reportable segment

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Aerospace 1,532 1,490 1,577 1,394 1,706
Combat Systems 996 962 937 831 882
Information Technology 628 608 373 340 —
Mission Systems 683 659 638 601 —
Information Systems and Technology (legacy) — — — — 903
Marine Systems 785 761 685 595 728
Corporate 24 (23) 26 (17) (41)
Total 4,648 4,457 4,236 3,744 4,178

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).


Total operating earnings exhibited a recovery and growth trajectory between 2016 and 2019. After a decrease from US$ 4,178 million in 2015 to US$ 3,744 million in 2016, the total earnings grew consistently for three consecutive years, culminating in US$ 4,648 million by December 31, 2019.

Aerospace Segment
The Aerospace segment remains the largest individual contributor to operating earnings, although it has experienced volatility. Earnings decreased from a 2015 peak of US$ 1,706 million to US$ 1,394 million in 2016, subsequently fluctuating between US$ 1,490 million and US$ 1,577 million through 2019.
Combat and Marine Systems
Both segments demonstrate consistent growth following a dip in 2016. Combat Systems earnings rose from US$ 831 million in 2016 to US$ 996 million in 2019. Similarly, Marine Systems recovered from US$ 595 million in 2016 to reach US$ 785 million by the end of the period.
Information Technology and Mission Systems
A reporting transition occurred after 2015, as the legacy Information Systems and Technology segment, which earned US$ 903 million in 2015, was replaced by two separate segments. The Information Technology segment showed rapid expansion, growing from US$ 340 million in 2016 to US$ 628 million in 2019. Mission Systems showed steady growth, increasing from US$ 601 million in 2016 to US$ 683 million in 2019.
Corporate and Aggregate Trends
Corporate results were inconsistent, alternating between net expenses and net credits over the five-year period. However, the overall growth in total operating earnings was primarily driven by the combined performance gains in the Combat, Marine, and newly restructured Information Technology and Mission Systems segments, which offset the fluctuations observed in Aerospace.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Identifiable assets

General Dynamics Corp., identifiable assets by reportable segment

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Aerospace 12,324 11,220 10,126 9,792 8,358
Combat Systems 11,220 9,853 9,846 8,885 8,800
Information Technology 14,248 14,159 3,021 2,778 —
Mission Systems 6,205 5,984 5,856 5,667 —
Information Systems and Technology (legacy) — — — — 8,577
Marine Systems 3,918 3,130 2,906 3,063 2,970
Corporate 926 1,062 3,291 2,987 3,292
Total 48,841 45,408 35,046 33,172 31,997

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).


Total identifiable assets exhibited a consistent upward trajectory from 2015 to 2019, increasing from $31,997 million to $48,841 million. The most pronounced expansion occurred between 2017 and 2018, during which the total asset base grew by approximately 29.6%.

Core Segment Expansion
The Aerospace segment demonstrated steady and uninterrupted growth, rising from $8,358 million in 2015 to $12,324 million in 2019. Combat Systems followed a similar positive trend, increasing from $8,800 million to $11,220 million over the same period, despite a brief plateau between 2017 and 2018.
Structural Reorganization and IT Surge
A significant reallocation of assets is observed following 2015, marked by the elimination of the legacy Information Systems and Technology segment, which held $8,577 million. This was succeeded by the establishment of the Information Technology and Mission Systems segments. While Mission Systems grew modestly from $5,667 million in 2016 to $6,205 million in 2019, the Information Technology segment experienced an exponential increase in 2018, jumping from $3,021 million to $14,159 million. This surge represents the primary driver of the overall increase in total identifiable assets for the organization.
Marine Systems and Corporate Asset Trends
Marine Systems assets remained relatively stable between 2015 and 2018, fluctuating around the $3,000 million mark, before increasing to $3,918 million in 2019. Conversely, Corporate assets showed a marked decline; after peaking at $3,291 million in 2017, values dropped sharply to $1,062 million in 2018 and further to $926 million by 2019.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Capital expenditures

General Dynamics Corp., capital expenditures by reportable segment

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Aerospace 138 194 132 125 210
Combat Systems 109 91 84 71 79
Information Technology 147 62 16 10 —
Mission Systems 75 49 47 87 —
Information Systems and Technology (legacy) — — — — 73
Marine Systems 449 243 123 92 166
Corporate 69 51 26 7 41
Total 987 690 428 392 569

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).


Total capital expenditures exhibited a significant upward trajectory between 2016 and 2019, rising from US$ 392 million to US$ 987 million. While there was an initial contraction from 2015 to 2016, the subsequent years show an accelerating investment phase, with the total expenditure in 2019 representing an increase of approximately 73% over 2018 levels.

Marine Systems Growth
This segment emerged as the primary driver of overall capital expenditure growth. After a decline in 2016 to US$ 92 million, investments scaled rapidly, reaching US$ 449 million by 2019. This represents the most substantial absolute increase across all reportable segments, indicating a strategic prioritization of capacity or infrastructure expansion within the marine portfolio.
Information Technology Scaling
An exponential increase in spending is observed within the Information Technology segment. Starting from a baseline of US$ 10 million in 2016, expenditures grew to US$ 147 million by 2019. This rapid ascent suggests a significant shift in operational focus or the integration of new technological capabilities.
Aerospace Expenditure Volatility
Spending within the Aerospace segment demonstrated a fluctuating pattern. A peak of US$ 210 million in 2015 was followed by a period of lower investment, with a secondary peak of US$ 194 million in 2018 before receding to US$ 138 million in 2019. This suggests a cyclical or project-based approach to capital allocation.
Combat Systems and Mission Systems Trends
Combat Systems showed a consistent and steady upward trend, increasing from US$ 79 million in 2015 to US$ 109 million in 2019. Mission Systems exhibited more variance, with expenditures dropping from US$ 87 million in 2016 to US$ 47 million in 2017, before recovering to US$ 75 million by 2019.
Corporate and Legacy Transitions
Corporate expenditures recovered from a low of US$ 7 million in 2016 to US$ 69 million in 2019. Additionally, the disappearance of the Information Systems and Technology (legacy) segment after 2015, coinciding with the emergence of the Information Technology segment in 2016, indicates a structural reorganization of reportable segments.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Depreciation and amortization

General Dynamics Corp., depreciation and amortization by reportable segment

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Aerospace 178 154 147 153 147
Combat Systems 85 87 86 86 91
Information Technology 377 333 32 42 —
Mission Systems 60 65 60 61 —
Information Systems and Technology (legacy) — — — — 131
Marine Systems 122 116 109 105 106
Corporate 7 8 7 6 7
Total 829 763 441 453 482

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).


Total depreciation and amortization expenses remained relatively stable from 2015 through 2017, followed by a substantial increase in 2018 and 2019. The aggregate expenditure rose from 441 million US dollars in 2017 to 829 million US dollars by the end of 2019, representing a significant escalation in non-cash charges.

Information Technology Segment Acceleration
The primary driver of the overall increase in depreciation and amortization is the Information Technology segment. After reporting 32 million US dollars in 2017, expenses surged to 333 million US dollars in 2018 and further increased to 377 million US dollars in 2019. This sharp upward trajectory indicates a major acquisition or a significant expansion of the asset base during the 2018 fiscal period.
Structural Reporting Changes
A transition in segment reporting is observed between 2015 and 2016. The Information Systems and Technology (legacy) segment, which accounted for 131 million US dollars in 2015, was phased out, coinciding with the introduction of the Information Technology and Mission Systems reporting lines.
Aerospace and Marine Systems Growth
The Aerospace segment exhibited stability between 2015 and 2018, followed by a notable increase to 178 million US dollars in 2019. Similarly, Marine Systems showed a consistent and gradual upward trend, increasing from 106 million US dollars in 2015 to 122 million US dollars in 2019.
Stability in Combat and Mission Systems
Depreciation and amortization for Combat Systems and Mission Systems remained largely flat. Combat Systems experienced a slight decrease from 91 million US dollars in 2015 to 85 million US dollars in 2019, while Mission Systems fluctuated minimally between 60 million and 65 million US dollars.
Corporate Expenses
Corporate-level depreciation and amortization remained negligible and consistent throughout the period, fluctuating between 6 million and 8 million US dollars.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?