Goodwill and Intangible Asset Disclosure
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
The financial position regarding intangible assets and goodwill remained relatively stable between 2015 and 2017, followed by a substantial increase in 2018. This surge is primarily attributed to a significant rise in both goodwill and contract and program intangible assets, suggesting a major acquisition or strategic business combination during the 2018 fiscal year. Following this expansion, the values remained largely plateaued through 2019.
- Goodwill Trends
- Goodwill exhibited a steady profile from 2015 to 2017, ranging from 11,443 million to 11,914 million US dollars. A sharp escalation occurred in 2018, with the balance rising to 19,594 million US dollars, representing an approximate 64% increase over the previous year. This value remained nearly constant at 19,677 million US dollars by the end of 2019.
- Intangible Asset Composition
- Contract and program intangible assets were the primary driver of growth among identifiable intangibles. These assets grew from 1,684 million US dollars in 2017 to 3,771 million US dollars in 2018. In contrast, trade names, trademarks, technology, and software showed marginal, incremental growth over the five-year period, indicating that the 2018 expansion was specifically tied to contractual programs rather than brand or software acquisition.
- Amortization and Net Carrying Value
- Accumulated amortization showed a consistent upward trend, increasing from 1,591 million US dollars in 2015 to 2,258 million US dollars in 2019. While the gross carrying amount of intangible assets spiked in 2018, the net carrying amount experienced a slight decline from 2,585 million US dollars in 2018 to 2,315 million US dollars in 2019, reflecting the ongoing impact of periodic amortization charges.
- Aggregate Asset Position
- The combined total of intangible assets and goodwill grew from 12,206 million US dollars in 2015 to 21,992 million US dollars in 2019. The most significant shift occurred between 2017 and 2018, where the total increased from 12,616 million US dollars to 22,179 million US dollars, fundamentally altering the composition of the balance sheet regarding non-physical assets.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjustments to Financial Statements: Removal of Goodwill
General Dynamics Corp., Financial Data: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
Analysis of the balance sheet adjustments reveals a significant reliance on intangible assets and goodwill to maintain a positive reported equity position. Between 2015 and 2019, a widening divergence is observed between reported values and adjusted values for both total assets and shareholders' equity.
- Total Asset Trends
- Reported total assets grew consistently from 31,997 million US$ in 2015 to 48,841 million US$ in 2019. However, adjusted total assets, which exclude goodwill and intangibles, increased at a slower rate, rising from 20,554 million US$ to 29,164 million US$ over the same period. The disparity between reported and adjusted assets expanded markedly in 2018, where the gap grew to 19,594 million US$, compared to 11,914 million US$ in 2017.
- Shareholders' Equity Divergence
- A stark contrast exists between reported and adjusted equity measures. Reported shareholders' equity maintained a steady upward trajectory, increasing from 10,738 million US$ in 2015 to 13,577 million US$ in 2019. In contrast, adjusted shareholders' equity remained negative throughout the entire period. A severe contraction occurred in 2018, with adjusted equity dropping from -479 million US$ in 2017 to -7,862 million US$, before partially recovering to -6,100 million US$ in 2019.
The data indicates that the reported growth in equity is driven by the recognition of intangible assets. The shift to a significantly more negative adjusted equity position in 2018 coincides with the substantial increase in the total asset gap, suggesting that the addition of goodwill and intangible assets has decoupled reported net worth from the underlying tangible asset base.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Financial Ratios: Removal of Goodwill (Summary)
General Dynamics Corp., Financial Ratios: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
An evaluation of financial performance between 2015 and 2019 reveals a consistent downward trend in asset efficiency and profitability metrics, although the removal of goodwill provides a more favorable perspective on the underlying operational performance.
- Total Asset Turnover
- A steady decline is observed in reported total asset turnover, which decreased from 0.98 in 2015 to 0.81 in 2019. When goodwill is excluded, the adjusted total asset turnover remains significantly higher, starting at 1.53 in 2015 and ending at 1.35 in 2019. The substantial variance between these two figures indicates that goodwill constitutes a significant portion of the total asset base, effectively suppressing the reported efficiency of asset utilization.
- Return on Assets (ROA)
- Reported ROA experienced a continuous contraction over the period, falling from 9.27% in 2015 to 7.13% in 2019. The adjusted ROA, which removes the impact of goodwill, demonstrates a similar downward trajectory but maintains a much higher baseline, moving from 14.43% in 2015 to 11.95% in 2019. This suggests that while the overall return on assets is declining, the return on tangible assets is considerably stronger than the reported figures suggest.
- Financial Leverage and ROE
- Reported financial leverage showed an overall increasing trend, rising from 2.98 in 2015 to 3.60 in 2019, with a notable peak of 3.87 in 2018. Despite the fluctuations in leverage and the decline in asset turnover, the reported Return on Equity (ROE) remained relatively stable, fluctuating between a high of 28.51% in 2018 and a low of 25.47% in 2017, ending the period at 25.66% in 2019.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Total Asset Turnover
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
2019 Calculations
1 Total asset turnover = Revenue ÷ Total assets
= 39,350 ÷ 48,841 = 0.81
2 Adjusted total asset turnover = Revenue ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 39,350 ÷ 29,164 = 1.35
An examination of the financial metrics from 2015 to 2019 reveals a consistent increase in total assets, accompanied by a widening divergence between reported and adjusted asset values. This trend indicates a growing proportion of goodwill and intangible assets within the balance sheet over the five-year period.
- Asset Valuation Trends
- Reported total assets grew steadily from 31,997 million US dollars in 2015 to 48,841 million US dollars in 2019, with a particularly sharp increase occurring between 2017 and 2018. While adjusted total assets also increased from 20,554 million US dollars to 29,164 million US dollars, the growth was less aggressive than that of the reported figures. The resulting increase in the delta between reported and adjusted assets suggests that a significant portion of the asset growth is attributable to non-physical assets.
- Reported Asset Turnover Analysis
- The reported total asset turnover ratio demonstrates a continuous downward trajectory, declining from 0.98 in 2015 to 0.81 in 2019. This decrease indicates a reduction in the efficiency with which the total asset base is utilized to generate revenue, reflecting the impact of the expanding balance sheet.
- Adjusted Asset Turnover Analysis
- The adjusted total asset turnover ratio remained consistently and significantly higher than the reported ratio throughout the period, starting at 1.53 in 2015 and ending at 1.35 in 2019. Although a general decline is observed, the substantial gap between the adjusted and reported ratios indicates that the core operating assets are considerably more efficient at generating revenue than the total asset base. The data suggests that the deterioration in the reported turnover ratio is primarily driven by the accumulation of goodwill and intangible assets rather than a decline in the productivity of tangible operating assets.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Financial Leverage
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
2019 Calculations
1 Financial leverage = Total assets ÷ Shareholders’ equity
= 48,841 ÷ 13,577 = 3.60
2 Adjusted financial leverage = Adjusted total assets ÷ Adjusted shareholders’ equity
= 29,164 ÷ -6,100 = —
A significant divergence exists between reported financial metrics and adjusted metrics when removing the impact of goodwill and intangible assets. While reported total assets grew from 31,997 million USD in 2015 to 48,841 million USD in 2019, the growth in adjusted total assets was less aggressive, rising from 20,554 million USD to 29,164 million USD over the same period. This indicates that a substantial portion of the balance sheet expansion is attributed to non-tangible assets.
- Asset Composition and Intangible Growth
- The gap between reported and adjusted total assets remained relatively stable between 2015 and 2017, fluctuating around 11.4 billion to 11.9 billion USD. However, a sharp increase occurred in 2018, where the difference expanded to approximately 19.6 billion USD. This pattern suggests a significant acquisition or asset revaluation during 2018 that heavily weighted the balance sheet toward goodwill and intangible assets.
- Tangible Equity Position
- Reported shareholders' equity showed a steady upward trend, increasing from 10,738 million USD in 2015 to 13,577 million USD in 2019. In contrast, adjusted shareholders' equity remained consistently negative throughout the five-year period. The deficit was relatively contained between 2015 and 2017, ranging from -469 million to -705 million USD, but deteriorated sharply in 2018 to -7,862 million USD, before recovering slightly to -6,100 million USD in 2019.
- Financial Leverage Analysis
- Reported financial leverage increased from 2.98 in 2015 to 3.60 in 2019, peaking at 3.87 in 2018. When focusing on adjusted figures, the negative adjusted shareholders' equity indicates that the company's liabilities exceed its tangible assets. The extreme volatility in adjusted equity, particularly the collapse in 2018, suggests that the reported leverage ratios mask a much higher risk profile regarding tangible solvency and asset backing.
The overall trend demonstrates that while the reported financial position appears stable and growing, the underlying tangible asset base is insufficient to cover total liabilities. The volatility observed in 2018 underscores a heavy reliance on intangible valuations to maintain positive reported equity and moderate reported leverage ratios.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
2019 Calculations
1 ROE = 100 × Net earnings ÷ Shareholders’ equity
= 100 × 3,484 ÷ 13,577 = 25.66%
2 Adjusted ROE = 100 × Net earnings ÷ Adjusted shareholders’ equity
= 100 × 3,484 ÷ -6,100 = —
An analysis of the capital structure reveals a significant divergence between reported and adjusted shareholders' equity from 2015 to 2019. While reported equity shows consistent growth, the adjusted equity—reflecting the removal of goodwill and intangible assets—remains negative throughout the period, indicating that the value of intangible assets exceeds the total reported equity.
- Reported Shareholders' Equity Trend
- A steady upward trajectory is observed, with values increasing from 10,738 million US dollars in 2015 to 13,577 million US dollars by 2019. This represents a consistent growth in the reported book value over the five-year period.
- Adjusted Shareholders' Equity Volatility
- Adjusted equity maintains a negative balance across all observed years. A sharp decline is noted between 2017 and 2018, where the value dropped from -479 million US dollars to -7,862 million US dollars, followed by a slight recovery to -6,100 million US dollars in 2019. This trend suggests a substantial increase in the acquisition or carrying value of goodwill and intangible assets relative to tangible equity.
- Reported Return on Equity (ROE) Performance
- The reported ROE exhibits relative stability, fluctuating within a narrow range between 25.47% and 28.51%. This stability persists despite the significant volatility and negative status of the adjusted equity base.
- Analysis of Adjusted ROE Implications
- The persistent negative adjusted shareholders' equity implies that the adjusted ROE would be mathematically inverted or not meaningful for traditional performance benchmarking. The data indicates that the reported returns are generated against a capital structure heavily weighted toward intangible assets, signaling that the company's tangible net worth is insufficient to cover its liabilities once goodwill and intangibles are excluded.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
2019 Calculations
1 ROA = 100 × Net earnings ÷ Total assets
= 100 × 3,484 ÷ 48,841 = 7.13%
2 Adjusted ROA = 100 × Net earnings ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 100 × 3,484 ÷ 29,164 = 11.95%
A consistent expansion in the asset base is observed between 2015 and 2019. Reported total assets grew from 31,997 million USD to 48,841 million USD, while adjusted total assets increased from 20,554 million USD to 29,164 million USD. The widening gap between these two metrics indicates an increasing proportion of goodwill and intangible assets within the overall balance sheet structure over the five-year period.
- Asset Growth Analysis
- Reported total assets experienced a substantial increase, most notably between 2017 and 2018, where a growth of 10,362 million USD occurred. Adjusted total assets followed a more steady upward trajectory, increasing by approximately 41.8% from 2015 to 2019. The acceleration of reported assets relative to adjusted assets suggests significant capital allocation toward acquisitions or the recognition of intangible assets.
- Return on Assets (ROA) Trends
- Reported ROA exhibited a continuous downward trend, declining from 9.27% in 2015 to 7.13% in 2019. Adjusted ROA remained consistently higher than the reported figures, starting at 14.43% in 2015 and ending at 11.95% in 2019. A brief reversal in the downward trend of Adjusted ROA was noted in 2018, where the figure rose to 12.96% from 12.59% in the previous year.
The divergence between reported and adjusted ROA highlights the dilutive impact of goodwill and intangible assets on the measured efficiency of the company's asset base. While the reported ROA shows a steady decline, the adjusted ROA suggests that the core operating assets maintained a higher level of productivity, although a general downward trend persists across both metrics over the long term.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?