AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

General Dynamics Corp. (NYSE:GD)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since October 28, 2020.

Analysis of Property, Plant and Equipment

Microsoft Excel

Property, Plant and Equipment Disclosure

General Dynamics Corp., balance sheet: property, plant and equipment

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Machinery and equipment 5,441 5,534 4,736 4,582 4,394
Buildings and improvements 3,232 3,011 2,837 2,745 2,666
Land and improvements 400 386 357 333 328
Construction in process 688 472 307 269 288
PP&E, gross 9,761 9,403 8,237 7,929 7,676
Accumulated depreciation (5,286) (5,055) (4,720) (4,462) (4,210)
PP&E, net 4,475 4,348 3,517 3,467 3,466

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).


Between 2015 and 2019, gross property, plant, and equipment exhibited a consistent upward trajectory, increasing from 7,676 million US$ to 9,761 million US$. This growth was primarily driven by expansions in machinery and equipment, as well as a significant acceleration in construction in process during the latter part of the period.

Gross Asset Composition and Trends
Machinery and equipment remained the largest component of the asset base, growing from 4,394 million US$ in 2015 to 5,441 million US$ in 2019, with a peak observed in 2018 at 5,534 million US$. Buildings and improvements showed steady annual growth, rising from 2,666 million US$ to 3,232 million US$. Land and improvements also experienced a marginal but consistent increase, ending the period at 400 million US$.
Construction in Process (CIP)
A notable acceleration in capital investment is evident in construction in process. While values remained relatively stable between 2015 and 2017, there was a sharp increase starting in 2018, with the balance rising from 307 million US$ in 2017 to 688 million US$ by 2019. This suggests an intensification of long-term infrastructure projects or capacity expansions toward the end of the analyzed period.
Net Book Value and Depreciation
Accumulated depreciation increased steadily from 4,210 million US$ in 2015 to 5,286 million US$ in 2019, reflecting the ongoing aging of the asset base. Despite this, the net book value of property, plant, and equipment grew from 3,466 million US$ to 4,475 million US$. The most significant leap in net value occurred between 2017 and 2018, where net PP&E increased by approximately 23.8%, indicating a period of aggressive capital acquisition that outpaced depreciation expenses.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Asset Age Ratios (Summary)

General Dynamics Corp., asset age ratios

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Average age ratio 56.47% 56.06% 59.90% 58.74% 57.29%
Estimated total useful life (years) 20 18 22 21 20
Estimated age, time elapsed since purchase (years) 11 10 13 12 12
Estimated remaining life (years) 9 8 9 9 9

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).


The analysis of asset age ratios between 2015 and 2019 reveals a period of relative stability followed by a notable shift in the asset composition in 2018. The fixed asset base maintained a consistent aging profile, with a cyclical trend suggesting strategic capital reinvestment toward the end of the observed period.

Average Age Ratio
The average age ratio exhibited a gradual increase from 57.29% in 2015 to a peak of 59.90% in 2017, indicating a steady consumption of the assets' useful lives. However, a contraction occurred in 2018, where the ratio fell to 56.06%, before stabilizing slightly at 56.47% in 2019. This decline suggests a rejuvenation of the asset base, likely due to the acquisition of new property, plant, and equipment.
Asset Lifecycle and Estimated Age
Estimated total useful life trended upward from 20 years in 2015 to 22 years in 2017, coinciding with an increase in the estimated age of assets from 12 to 13 years. A significant correction is observed in 2018, where the estimated total useful life decreased to 18 years and the estimated age dropped to 10 years. This simultaneous decrease in both metrics points toward a replacement of older, long-life assets with newer assets that may have different estimated service lives.
Estimated Remaining Life
The estimated remaining life remained remarkably stable throughout the five-year period, hovering consistently around 9 years. A slight dip to 8 years was noted in 2018, mirroring the broader shifts in asset age and useful life during that fiscal year, before returning to 9 years in 2019. This stability indicates a consistent corporate strategy regarding the timing of asset replacements and depreciation schedules.

Overall, the data indicates that the asset base was aging predictably until 2018, at which point a shift occurred that reduced the average age and total useful life of the holdings. This pattern is characteristic of a capital expenditure cycle intended to modernize infrastructure and maintain operational efficiency.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Average Age

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Accumulated depreciation 5,286 5,055 4,720 4,462 4,210
PP&E, gross 9,761 9,403 8,237 7,929 7,676
Land and improvements 400 386 357 333 328
Asset Age Ratio
Average age1 56.47% 56.06% 59.90% 58.74% 57.29%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

2019 Calculations

1 Average age = 100 × Accumulated depreciation ÷ (PP&E, gross – Land and improvements)
= 100 × 5,286 ÷ (9,761 – 400) = 56.47%


The asset base of General Dynamics Corp. exhibited consistent growth between 2015 and 2019, characterized by a steady increase in both gross property, plant, and equipment (PP&E) and accumulated depreciation. The expansion of the gross asset base suggests a sustained commitment to capital investment, while the average age ratio indicates a strategic cycle of asset replacement and modernization.

Gross PP&E and Capital Investment
Gross PP&E grew from 7,676 million USD in 2015 to 9,761 million USD in 2019. A notable acceleration in investment occurred between 2017 and 2018, where gross assets increased by approximately 1,166 million USD. This surge indicates a significant acquisition of new fixed assets during that period.
Accumulated Depreciation Trends
Accumulated depreciation followed a linear upward trajectory, rising from 4,210 million USD in 2015 to 5,286 million USD in 2019. This progression is consistent with the natural aging of the company's asset portfolio and the systematic allocation of cost over the useful lives of the equipment.
Average Age Ratio Analysis
The average age ratio demonstrated a fluctuating trend. From 2015 to 2017, the ratio increased from 57.29% to 59.90%, suggesting that the existing asset base was aging faster than new assets were being integrated. However, a sharp decline to 56.06% was recorded in 2018, directly correlating with the spike in gross PP&E. This shift confirms that the substantial capital expenditures in 2018 effectively lowered the average age of the company's operational assets. The ratio remained relatively stable in 2019 at 56.47%.
Land and Improvements
Investment in land and improvements showed a gradual and steady increase, moving from 328 million USD in 2015 to 400 million USD in 2019. This represents a modest but consistent expansion of the company's physical footprint.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Estimated Total Useful Life

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
PP&E, gross 9,761 9,403 8,237 7,929 7,676
Land and improvements 400 386 357 333 328
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment 466 493 362 366 366
Asset Age Ratio (Years)
Estimated total useful life1 20 18 22 21 20

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

2019 Calculations

1 Estimated total useful life = (PP&E, gross – Land and improvements) ÷ Depreciation of property, plant and equipment
= (9,761 – 400) ÷ 466 = 20


An analysis of the fixed asset trajectory from 2015 to 2019 reveals a consistent expansion of the capital base coupled with strategic fluctuations in accounting estimates regarding asset longevity.

Growth in Capital Assets
Gross property, plant and equipment demonstrated a steady upward trend, increasing from 7,676 million USD in 2015 to 9,761 million USD in 2019. This overall growth is supported by a consistent rise in land and improvements, which climbed from 328 million USD to 400 million USD over the five-year period, indicating ongoing investment in physical infrastructure.
Relationship Between Useful Life and Depreciation
A notable correlation is observed between the estimated total useful life of assets and the annual depreciation expense. Between 2015 and 2017, the estimated useful life gradually increased from 20 to 22 years, while depreciation expenses remained relatively stable around 362 to 366 million USD. However, in 2018, the estimated useful life was reduced sharply to 18 years, which coincided with a significant spike in depreciation expenses to 493 million USD. This suggests that the shortening of the estimated asset lifespan accelerated the depreciation charge for that period.
Recent Stabilization Patterns
In 2019, the estimated total useful life returned to 20 years, and depreciation expenses moderately declined to 466 million USD. Despite this slight decrease, depreciation levels remained substantially higher than the 2015-2017 baseline, reflecting the impact of a larger gross asset base and the adjusted amortization schedules.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Estimated Age, Time Elapsed since Purchase

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Accumulated depreciation 5,286 5,055 4,720 4,462 4,210
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment 466 493 362 366 366
Asset Age Ratio (Years)
Time elapsed since purchase1 11 10 13 12 12

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

2019 Calculations

1 Time elapsed since purchase = Accumulated depreciation ÷ Depreciation of property, plant and equipment
= 5,286 ÷ 466 = 11


The financial metrics regarding property, plant, and equipment indicate a period of steady depreciation accumulation coupled with a strategic shift in asset composition occurring around 2018.

Accumulated Depreciation Trends
Accumulated depreciation demonstrated a consistent upward trajectory, rising from US$ 4,210 million in 2015 to US$ 5,286 million by 2019. This represents a total increase of approximately 25.6% over the five-year period, reflecting the continuous allocation of costs over the useful lives of the asset base.
Annual Depreciation Expense Volatility
Depreciation expenses remained relatively stagnant between 2015 and 2017, holding steady at approximately US$ 362 to 366 million. A significant increase was observed in 2018, with expenses peaking at US$ 493 million, followed by a slight moderation to US$ 466 million in 2019. This surge indicates a likely increase in the gross value of depreciable assets during the 2018 fiscal year.
Asset Age and Lifecycle Analysis
The average time elapsed since purchase fluctuated, peaking at 13 years in 2017 before dropping to 10 years in 2018 and slightly increasing to 11 years in 2019. The correlation between the decline in average asset age and the simultaneous spike in annual depreciation expense suggests a significant infusion of new capital assets in 2018, which served to modernize the infrastructure and lower the overall average age of the property, plant, and equipment portfolio.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Estimated Remaining Life

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
PP&E, net 4,475 4,348 3,517 3,467 3,466
Land and improvements 400 386 357 333 328
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment 466 493 362 366 366
Asset Age Ratio (Years)
Estimated remaining life1 9 8 9 9 9

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

2019 Calculations

1 Estimated remaining life = (PP&E, net – Land and improvements) ÷ Depreciation of property, plant and equipment
= (4,475 – 400) ÷ 466 = 9


The net property, plant, and equipment (PP&E) exhibits a trend of moderate growth from 2015 through 2017, followed by a substantial acceleration in value starting in 2018. Between December 31, 2017, and December 31, 2018, net PP&E increased from US$ 3,517 million to US$ 4,348 million, maintaining this upward trajectory to reach US$ 4,475 million by the end of 2019.

Asset Composition and Land Trends
Land and improvements demonstrate a consistent and steady upward trend, growing from US$ 328 million in 2015 to US$ 400 million in 2019. This indicates a gradual and continuous expansion of the real estate and land-based infrastructure over the five-year period.
Depreciation Dynamics
Depreciation expenses remained relatively stagnant between 2015 and 2017, fluctuating slightly between US$ 362 million and US$ 366 million. A significant increase occurred in 2018, with expenses rising to US$ 493 million, which correlates directly with the substantial increase in net PP&E during the same fiscal year. A slight decrease to US$ 466 million was recorded in 2019.
Asset Longevity and Estimated Remaining Life
The estimated remaining life of the asset portfolio has remained highly stable, reported at 9 years for the majority of the period. A brief decline to 8 years was observed in 2018, coinciding with the peak increase in net PP&E and depreciation expenses. By 2019, the estimated remaining life returned to 9 years, suggesting that the average useful life of the company's assets remains consistent despite significant capital investments.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?