Adjusted Financial Ratios (Summary)
General Dynamics Corp., Financial Ratios: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
The financial profile over the observed five-year period indicates a strategic shift toward higher leverage coupled with a gradual decline in asset efficiency and a contraction in return metrics.
- Operational Efficiency and Liquidity
- A consistent downward trend is observed in total asset turnover, with both reported and adjusted ratios declining from approximately 0.98-0.99 in 2015 to 0.81 in 2019. This suggests a diminishing capacity to generate revenue relative to the company's asset base. Short-term liquidity remained relatively stable; the current ratio peaked in 2017 at 1.40 before moderating to 1.18 by the end of 2019.
- Solvency and Capital Structure
- A significant increase in financial leverage occurred starting in 2018. The reported debt-to-equity ratio rose sharply from 0.35 in 2017 to a peak of 1.06 in 2018, ending at 0.88 in 2019. This trajectory is mirrored in the debt-to-capital ratio, which increased from 0.26 in 2017 to 0.47 in 2019. Consequently, reported financial leverage peaked at 3.87 in 2018, reflecting a higher reliance on debt financing during the latter half of the period.
- Profitability and Return Analysis
- Reported net profit margins exhibited a gradual decline from 9.42% in 2015 to 8.85% in 2019. Adjusted margins showed higher volatility, peaking at 12.50% in 2017 before dropping to 8.32% in 2019. Return on assets (ROA) showed a steady decline from 9.27% to 7.13% over the five years. While return on equity (ROE) remained high, it trended downward from a peak of 28.51% in 2018 to 25.66% in 2019, with adjusted ROE showing a more pronounced decrease from its 2017 peak of 32.09% to 22.36% in 2019.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Total Asset Turnover
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 2019 Calculation
Total asset turnover = Revenue ÷ Total assets
= 39,350 ÷ 48,841 = 0.81
2 Adjusted total assets. See details »
3 2019 Calculation
Adjusted total asset turnover = Revenue ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 39,350 ÷ 48,808 = 0.81
An analysis of the financial performance from 2015 to 2019 reveals a period of significant asset expansion and fluctuating operational efficiency in terms of asset utilization.
- Revenue and Asset Growth Dynamics
- Revenue remained relatively stagnant between 2015 and 2017, fluctuating slightly around the US$ 31 billion mark. However, a substantial growth phase began in 2018, with revenue climbing to US$ 36,193 million and reaching US$ 39,350 million by 2019. In parallel, total assets experienced a consistent upward trend, growing from US$ 31,997 million in 2015 to US$ 48,841 million in 2019. A particularly sharp increase in the asset base occurred between 2017 and 2018, where assets rose by approximately US$ 10.36 billion.
- Adjusted Total Asset Turnover Performance
- The adjusted total asset turnover ratio demonstrates a general decline over the majority of the period. Starting at 0.99 in 2015, the ratio decreased steadily to 0.96 in 2016 and 0.86 in 2017, reaching a low of 0.77 in 2018. This downward trend indicates that the growth in adjusted total assets outpaced the growth in revenue, leading to a temporary reduction in asset productivity. A modest recovery occurred in 2019, with the ratio improving to 0.81.
- Comparison of Reported and Adjusted Metrics
- The adjusted total asset turnover closely tracks the movement of the reported total asset turnover, though differences are present. Between 2015 and 2016, the adjusted ratio was slightly higher than the reported ratio. By 2018, however, the adjusted ratio of 0.77 was lower than the reported ratio of 0.80, reflecting the impact of specific balance sheet adjustments on the perceived efficiency of the asset base during that fiscal year.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Current Ratio
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 2019 Calculation
Current ratio = Current assets ÷ Current liabilities
= 19,780 ÷ 16,801 = 1.18
2 Adjusted current assets. See details »
3 Adjusted current liabilities. See details »
4 2019 Calculation
Adjusted current ratio = Adjusted current assets ÷ Adjusted current liabilities
= 19,780 ÷ 16,801 = 1.18
The liquidity position of the company exhibits a fluctuating trend between 2015 and 2019, characterized by an initial improvement in the adjusted current ratio followed by a gradual decline. While current assets grew consistently from 14,571 million US$ in 2015 to 19,780 million US$ in 2019, current liabilities also increased significantly during the same period, rising from 12,445 million US$ to 16,801 million US$.
- Adjusted Current Ratio Performance
- The adjusted current ratio demonstrated an upward trajectory in the early part of the period, rising from 1.25 in 2015 to a peak of 1.40 in 2017. This indicates a strengthening of short-term solvency. However, a downward trend followed, with the ratio contracting to 1.23 in 2018 and further declining to 1.18 by the end of 2019.
- Variance Between Reported and Adjusted Metrics
- A divergence between reported and adjusted ratios is observed in 2015 and 2016. During these years, adjusted current liabilities were lower than reported current liabilities, resulting in a higher adjusted current ratio (1.25 vs 1.17 in 2015, and 1.33 vs 1.20 in 2016). Starting in 2017, the reported and adjusted values for assets and liabilities converged completely, leading to identical reported and adjusted current ratios for the remainder of the analyzed period.
- Asset and Liability Growth Dynamics
- The increase in current assets across the five-year span was approximately 35.7%. During the same timeframe, current liabilities grew by approximately 34.9%. The peak in the current ratio in 2017 was driven by a temporary acceleration in asset growth relative to liabilities. The subsequent decline in the ratio from 2017 to 2019 suggests that the growth in current liabilities began to outpace the growth in current assets toward the end of the period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Debt to Equity
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 2019 Calculation
Debt to equity = Total debt ÷ Shareholders’ equity
= 11,930 ÷ 13,577 = 0.88
2 Adjusted total debt. See details »
3 Adjusted shareholders’ equity. See details »
4 2019 Calculation
Adjusted debt to equity = Adjusted total debt ÷ Adjusted shareholders’ equity
= 13,433 ÷ 14,644 = 0.92
Between 2015 and 2019, the capital structure experienced a significant shift, primarily characterized by a substantial increase in debt obligations during the 2018 fiscal year. While shareholders' equity maintained a steady growth trend throughout the period, the surge in total debt led to a marked increase in leverage ratios, shifting the company from a conservative to a more leveraged financial position.
- Debt Obligations
- Total debt remained relatively stable between 2015 and 2017, moving from US$ 3,399 million to US$ 3,982 million. A sharp increase occurred in 2018, with reported debt rising to US$ 12,417 million, before experiencing a slight contraction to US$ 11,930 million by December 31, 2019.
- Equity Growth
- Shareholders' equity exhibited consistent annual growth over the five-year period, increasing from US$ 10,738 million in 2015 to US$ 13,577 million in 2019. This steady upward trajectory suggests a consistent accumulation of capital or retained earnings.
- Adjusted Debt to Equity Ratio
- The adjusted debt to equity ratio was stable between 0.40 and 0.43 from 2015 to 2017. A significant inflection point is observed in 2018, where the ratio peaked at 1.09, indicating that adjusted debt exceeded adjusted equity for the first time in the analyzed period. By the end of 2019, the ratio moderated to 0.92, reflecting the combined effect of reduced debt and increased equity.
- Comparison of Reported and Adjusted Metrics
- Adjusted total debt and adjusted shareholders' equity remained consistently higher than reported values across all years. Despite these variances, the adjusted debt to equity ratio closely mirrored the trend of the reported ratio, confirming that the adjustments did not fundamentally alter the overall trajectory of the company's leverage profile.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Debt to Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 2019 Calculation
Debt to capital = Total debt ÷ Total capital
= 11,930 ÷ 25,507 = 0.47
2 Adjusted total debt. See details »
3 Adjusted total capital. See details »
4 2019 Calculation
Adjusted debt to capital = Adjusted total debt ÷ Adjusted total capital
= 13,433 ÷ 28,077 = 0.48
The leverage profile of the entity remained relatively stable between 2015 and 2017, followed by a substantial increase in debt levels in 2018 and a slight moderation in 2019.
- Adjusted Debt to Capital Ratio Trend
- The adjusted debt to capital ratio demonstrated minimal volatility from 2015 through 2017, fluctuating slightly between 0.29 and 0.30. A significant escalation occurred in 2018, with the ratio peaking at 0.52, before declining to 0.48 by the end of 2019.
- Capital Structure Shifts
- A pronounced increase in leverage is evident in 2018, where adjusted total debt rose from 5,188 million US$ in 2017 to 13,882 million US$. Adjusted total capital similarly increased from 17,259 million US$ to 26,633 million US$ during the same period, indicating a major expansion of the balance sheet.
- Analysis of Adjusted versus Reported Metrics
- Adjusted debt and capital figures are consistently higher than their reported counterparts across all five years. Despite these higher nominal values, the adjusted debt to capital ratio tracks closely with the reported ratio, typically maintaining a variance of approximately 0.01 to 0.05, suggesting that the adjustments apply proportionally to both debt and total capital.
- Recent Debt Trajectory
- Following the 2018 peak, a downward trend in leverage began in 2019. Adjusted total debt decreased from 13,882 million US$ to 13,433 million US$, while adjusted total capital continued to grow to 28,077 million US$, contributing to the reduction of the adjusted debt to capital ratio to 0.48.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Financial Leverage
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 2019 Calculation
Financial leverage = Total assets ÷ Shareholders’ equity
= 48,841 ÷ 13,577 = 3.60
2 Adjusted total assets. See details »
3 Adjusted shareholders’ equity. See details »
4 2019 Calculation
Adjusted financial leverage = Adjusted total assets ÷ Adjusted shareholders’ equity
= 48,808 ÷ 14,644 = 3.33
Between 2015 and 2019, a significant expansion of the balance sheet was observed, characterized by substantial growth in both total assets and shareholders' equity. Total assets increased from 31,997 million US$ to 48,841 million US$, representing a growth of approximately 52.6% over the period. This expansion was most pronounced between 2017 and 2018, where total assets rose from 35,046 million US$ to 45,408 million US$. During the same timeframe, shareholders' equity experienced a steadier upward trajectory, increasing from 10,738 million US$ to 13,577 million US$.
- Financial Leverage Trends
- The reported financial leverage remained relatively stable between 2015 and 2017, fluctuating between 2.98 and 3.06. A sharp increase occurred in 2018, with the ratio peaking at 3.87, before retreating to 3.60 in 2019. The adjusted financial leverage mirrored this pattern but maintained lower absolute values, starting at 2.92 in 2015, peaking at 3.67 in 2018, and concluding at 3.33 in 2019.
- Impact of Financial Adjustments
- A consistent divergence exists between reported and adjusted metrics. Adjusted shareholders' equity was higher than reported equity in every year of the analysis, reaching 14,644 million US$ in 2019 compared to the reported 13,577 million US$. This adjustment resulted in an adjusted financial leverage ratio that remained lower than the reported ratio across the entire five-year period, suggesting that the adjustments mitigate the perceived level of financial risk.
- Asset and Equity Correlation
- The spike in leverage observed in 2018 correlates with a disproportionate increase in total assets relative to the growth in shareholders' equity. While assets grew by approximately 29.8% between 2017 and 2018, shareholders' equity only increased by 2.6% in the same interval, leading to the observed peak in both reported and adjusted leverage ratios.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Net Profit Margin
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 2019 Calculation
Net profit margin = 100 × Net earnings ÷ Revenue
= 100 × 3,484 ÷ 39,350 = 8.85%
2 Adjusted net earnings. See details »
3 2019 Calculation
Adjusted net profit margin = 100 × Adjusted net earnings ÷ Revenue
= 100 × 3,274 ÷ 39,350 = 8.32%
Revenue remained relatively stable between 2015 and 2017, averaging approximately $31 billion, before accelerating to $39.35 billion by 2019. During this period, the reported net profit margin remained remarkably consistent at approximately 9.4% through 2017, followed by a marginal decline to 8.85% by the end of 2019.
- Adjusted Net Profit Margin Volatility
- The adjusted net profit margin experienced significant fluctuations, contrasting with the stability of the reported margin. An upward trend occurred between 2015 and 2017, where the margin rose from 8.95% to a peak of 12.50%. This was followed by a sharp contraction in 2018 to 8.42%, with a further slight decrease to 8.32% in 2019.
- Reported versus Adjusted Earnings Divergence
- A notable shift in the relationship between reported and adjusted earnings is observed. Between 2016 and 2017, adjusted net earnings were higher than reported earnings, suggesting that non-recurring expenses negatively impacted the reported figures. In contrast, during 2018 and 2019, adjusted net earnings fell below reported earnings, indicating that reported figures were bolstered by one-time gains or other adjustments.
- Revenue Growth and Margin Compression
- Despite a substantial increase in revenue from $30.97 billion in 2017 to $39.35 billion in 2019, both reported and adjusted profit margins declined. This inverse relationship suggests that the growth in top-line revenue was accompanied by a disproportionate increase in costs or a shift toward lower-margin revenue streams.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 2019 Calculation
ROE = 100 × Net earnings ÷ Shareholders’ equity
= 100 × 3,484 ÷ 13,577 = 25.66%
2 Adjusted net earnings. See details »
3 Adjusted shareholders’ equity. See details »
4 2019 Calculation
Adjusted ROE = 100 × Adjusted net earnings ÷ Adjusted shareholders’ equity
= 100 × 3,274 ÷ 14,644 = 22.36%
The financial performance from 2015 to 2019 exhibits a notable divergence between reported and adjusted return on equity (ROE) metrics. While the reported ROE remained relatively stable, fluctuating within a range of 25.47% to 28.51%, the adjusted ROE demonstrated significantly higher volatility, characterized by a sharp increase followed by a consistent decline.
- Adjusted ROE Performance Trends
- A strong upward trajectory was observed between 2015 and 2017, with the adjusted ROE rising from 25.99% to a peak of 32.09%. However, this trend reversed abruptly in 2018, falling to 23.90%, and continued to decrease to 22.36% by the end of 2019. This indicates that after 2017, the company's ability to generate adjusted profit relative to its adjusted equity base diminished.
- Earnings Divergence
- A significant variance between reported and adjusted net earnings is evident during the mid-period. In 2016 and 2017, adjusted net earnings substantially exceeded reported net earnings, peaking in 2017 at 3,873 million USD compared to 2,912 million USD reported. Conversely, in 2018 and 2019, the trend inverted, with reported net earnings surpassing adjusted figures, suggesting that non-recurring adjustments had a positive impact on reported results in the latter years.
- Equity Expansion and Impact on Returns
- Adjusted shareholders' equity grew consistently throughout the five-year period, increasing from 10,832 million USD in 2015 to 14,644 million USD in 2019. This steady expansion of the equity base contributed to the compression of the adjusted ROE in the final two years, as the growth in adjusted net earnings did not scale proportionally with the increase in adjusted equity.
- Comparative Analysis of ROE Metrics
- The reported ROE showed greater resilience and less variance than the adjusted ROE. The gap between the two metrics was most pronounced in 2017, where the adjusted ROE was 6.62 percentage points higher than the reported ROE. By 2019, this relationship reversed, with the reported ROE exceeding the adjusted ROE by 3.30 percentage points, highlighting a shift in the nature of the adjustments affecting the bottom line.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 2019 Calculation
ROA = 100 × Net earnings ÷ Total assets
= 100 × 3,484 ÷ 48,841 = 7.13%
2 Adjusted net earnings. See details »
3 Adjusted total assets. See details »
4 2019 Calculation
Adjusted ROA = 100 × Adjusted net earnings ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 100 × 3,274 ÷ 48,808 = 6.71%
The financial performance between 2015 and 2019 is characterized by a significant expansion of the asset base and a subsequent compression of return on assets (ROA). While net earnings grew in absolute terms toward the end of the period, the pace of asset accumulation outstripped earnings growth, leading to a general decline in asset utilization efficiency.
- Reported ROA Trends
- A consistent downward trajectory is observed in the reported ROA, which declined from 9.27% in 2015 to 7.13% by 2019. This steady decline occurred despite an increase in net earnings from 2,965 million USD in 2015 to 3,484 million USD in 2019, confirming that the growth in total assets—which rose from 31,997 million USD to 48,841 million USD—outpaced the growth in profitability.
- Adjusted ROA Dynamics
- The adjusted ROA exhibited greater volatility than the reported metric. An initial upward trend was observed from 2015 to 2017, with the ratio rising from 8.89% to a peak of 10.71%. This improvement was driven by a significant increase in adjusted net earnings, which peaked at 3,873 million USD in 2017. However, a sharp contraction occurred in 2018, with the ratio falling to 6.51%, followed by a marginal recovery to 6.71% in 2019.
- Impact of Asset Base Expansion
- A critical shift in the financial structure occurred between 2017 and 2018, during which adjusted total assets increased by approximately 29%, rising from 36,177 million USD to 46,835 million USD. This substantial expansion of the asset base, coinciding with a decrease in adjusted net earnings from 3,873 million USD in 2017 to 3,048 million USD in 2018, accounts for the precipitous drop in both reported and adjusted return metrics during that period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?