EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Generac Holdings Inc. pages available for free this week:
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Generac Holdings Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
| Cost of capital2 | ||||||
| Invested capital3 | ||||||
| Economic profit4 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2021 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The financial performance from 2017 to 2021 reflects a period of substantial operational growth coupled with an aggressive expansion of the capital base, resulting in a volatile trajectory for economic profit.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- A consistent and accelerating upward trend is observed in NOPAT, which rose from 230,606 thousand dollars in 2017 to 641,346 thousand dollars in 2021. The most significant growth occurred between 2020 and 2021, where NOPAT increased by approximately 52%, indicating a strong improvement in operational earnings capacity.
- Cost of Capital and Invested Capital
- Invested capital expanded steadily throughout the period, increasing from 1,710,524 thousand dollars in 2017 to 3,771,373 thousand dollars in 2021. This growth in the asset base was accompanied by a rising cost of capital, which climbed from 12.60% in 2017 to a peak of 16.37% in 2020, before slightly moderating to 16.21% in 2021. The simultaneous increase in both the amount of capital deployed and the cost of that capital heightened the threshold required to achieve positive economic value.
- Economic Profit Analysis
- Economic profit exhibited significant fluctuations, moving from a positive state in 2017 and 2018 into a deficit during 2019 and 2020. The negative economic profit in 2019 (-22,606 thousand dollars) and 2020 (-17,571 thousand dollars) indicates that during these years, the NOPAT was insufficient to cover the total capital charge. A recovery was realized in 2021, with economic profit returning to a positive 30,030 thousand dollars. This reversal was driven by the surge in NOPAT, which finally outpaced the costs associated with the expanded invested capital base.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for credit losses.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue related to extended warranties.
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in product warranty liability.
5 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income attributable to Generac Holdings Inc..
6 2021 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
7 2021 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
8 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income attributable to Generac Holdings Inc..
The annual financial data reveals a consistent upward trend in both net income attributable to Generac Holdings Inc. and net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) over the five-year period from 2017 to 2021.
- Net Income Attributable to Generac Holdings Inc.
- This metric increased steadily each year, starting at $159,386 thousand in 2017 and reaching $550,494 thousand by the end of 2021. The growth is particularly notable between 2019 and 2021, where net income rose substantially, indicating improved profitability.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- Likewise, NOPAT demonstrated a positive growth trajectory, increasing from $230,606 thousand in 2017 to $641,346 thousand in 2021. The increase in NOPAT aligns with the trend seen in net income, and the largest annual increments occurred from 2019 onward.
Overall, the data indicates strong financial performance with expanding profitability. The acceleration in growth after 2019 suggests successful operational improvements or favorable market conditions during this period. Both net income and NOPAT exhibit similar patterns, reinforcing the company’s capacity to convert operating results into net earnings effectively.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The data reveals a consistent upward trend in both the provision for income taxes and cash operating taxes over the five-year period from December 31, 2017, to December 31, 2021.
- Provision for Income Taxes
-
The provision for income taxes increased steadily from $43.6 million in 2017 to $134.96 million in 2021. This represents more than a threefold increase over the five years. Notably, the most significant annual increases were observed between 2019 and 2020, and between 2020 and 2021, indicating a surge in taxable income or changes in tax rates or tax liabilities.
- Cash Operating Taxes
-
Cash operating taxes also showed a consistent rise from $39.5 million in 2017 to $143.73 million in 2021. Similar to the provision for income taxes, the growth in cash operating taxes accelerated particularly after 2019, with a marked increase from 2019 to 2020 and again into 2021.
The parallel upward movement of both provision and cash operating taxes suggests increasing profitability or taxable events impacting the company's tax obligations. The faster growth in cash operating taxes relative to the provision, especially after 2019, might indicate changes in tax payment timing or adjustments to deferred tax assets or liabilities.
Overall, the data points to escalating tax expenses over the period, which could affect net profitability and cash flow management, meriting further analysis to understand the underlying drivers such as revenue growth, changes in tax legislation, or tax strategy adjustments.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of deferred revenue related to extended warranties.
5 Addition of product warranty liability.
6 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity attributable to Generac Holdings Inc..
7 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
8 Subtraction of construction in progress.
- Total Reported Debt & Leases
- The total reported debt and leases showed a relatively stable trend from 2017 to 2020, fluctuating slightly between approximately 935,873 and 972,646 thousand US dollars. However, in 2021, there was a notable increase to 1,083,975 thousand US dollars, representing a rise compared to prior years.
- Stockholders’ Equity Attributable to Generac Holdings Inc.
- Stockholders’ equity exhibited a consistent and substantial growth over the five-year period. Beginning at 559,552 thousand US dollars in 2017, it increased steadily each year, reaching 2,213,774 thousand US dollars in 2021. This growth signifies a strong enhancement of the equity base, more than tripling its initial value.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital demonstrated an upward trajectory throughout the period analyzed. Starting from 1,710,524 thousand US dollars in 2017, it rose continuously each year, culminating at 3,771,373 thousand US dollars in 2021. The increase indicates ongoing investments or retained earnings contributing to capital growth, with the largest annual rise observed between 2020 and 2021.
- Overall Analysis
- The data indicates that while the company maintained a relatively stable debt level until 2020 with a spike in 2021, it simultaneously experienced pronounced expansion in both equity and invested capital. The substantial growth in equity suggests strong financial health and possibly profitable operations or capital injections, which supported the increase in invested capital. The rise in debt in the latest year may reflect additional financing activities to support expansion or operational needs. Overall, the financial position shows strengthening capital structure and capacity.
Cost of Capital
Generac Holdings Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Borrowings and finance lease obligation3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Borrowings and finance lease obligation. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Borrowings and finance lease obligation3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Borrowings and finance lease obligation. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Borrowings and finance lease obligation3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Borrowings and finance lease obligation. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Borrowings and finance lease obligation3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Borrowings and finance lease obligation. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Borrowings and finance lease obligation3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Borrowings and finance lease obligation. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Invested capital2 | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | ||||||
| Caterpillar Inc. | ||||||
| Eaton Corp. plc | ||||||
| GE Aerospace | ||||||
| Honeywell International Inc. | ||||||
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | ||||||
| RTX Corp. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2021 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of economic value creation reveals a period of significant volatility between 2017 and 2021, characterized by a consistent expansion of the capital base juxtaposed with fluctuating returns. While the company steadily increased its invested capital, the ability to generate profit above the cost of capital varied, leading to alternating periods of value creation and value destruction.
- Invested Capital Trend
- A consistent upward trajectory in invested capital is observed throughout the five-year period. The capital base grew from 1,710,524 thousand USD in 2017 to 3,771,373 thousand USD by 2021. This represents a substantial increase in the resources deployed to generate returns, indicating an aggressive expansion of the company's operational scale.
- Economic Profit Performance
- Economic profit exhibited high volatility, peaking in 2018 at 42,438 thousand USD before entering a negative phase. The company experienced value destruction in 2019 and 2020, with losses of 22,606 thousand USD and 17,571 thousand USD, respectively. A recovery occurred in 2021, with economic profit returning to a positive 30,030 thousand USD, although this figure remained below the 2018 peak despite the much larger capital base.
- Economic Spread Ratio Analysis
- The economic spread ratio mirrors the volatility of the economic profit, reflecting the margin by which the return on invested capital exceeds its cost. The ratio peaked at 2.15% in 2018, followed by a contraction into negative territory, reaching a low of -1.01% in 2019. The subsequent recovery to -0.65% in 2020 and 0.80% in 2021 indicates a gradual return to positive value creation. The fact that the 2021 ratio of 0.80% is lower than the 2017 ratio of 0.88%, despite the increase in total economic profit, suggests that the growth in invested capital has outpaced the growth in economic profit.
In summary, the data indicates that while the company has successfully expanded its invested capital base, the efficiency of this capital in generating economic value has been inconsistent. The transition from positive to negative and back to positive economic spread highlights a cyclical struggle to maintain returns above the cost of capital during the period of rapid expansion.
Economic Profit Margin
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Net sales | ||||||
| Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue related to extended warranties | ||||||
| Adjusted net sales | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
| Boeing Co. | ||||||
| Caterpillar Inc. | ||||||
| Eaton Corp. plc | ||||||
| GE Aerospace | ||||||
| Honeywell International Inc. | ||||||
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | ||||||
| RTX Corp. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2021 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted net sales
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial performance from 2017 to 2021 is characterized by consistent growth in top-line revenue contrasted with significant volatility in economic value creation. While adjusted net sales increased steadily throughout the five-year period, the ability to generate economic profit fluctuated, reflecting periods where the company failed to earn returns above its cost of capital.
- Adjusted Net Sales Trend
- A sustained upward trajectory is observed in adjusted net sales, which grew from 1,692,306 thousand US$ in 2017 to 3,759,043 thousand US$ by 2021. This represents a substantial expansion of the business scale, with the most significant acceleration occurring between 2020 and 2021.
- Economic Profit Volatility
- Economic profit exhibited a cyclical pattern. After reaching a peak of 42,438 thousand US$ in 2018, the figure plummeted to a deficit of 22,606 thousand US$ in 2019 and remained negative in 2020 at 17,571 thousand US$. A recovery occurred in 2021, with economic profit returning to a positive value of 30,030 thousand US$.
- Economic Profit Margin Analysis
- The economic profit margin mirrored the volatility of the absolute economic profit. The margin peaked at 2.09% in 2018 before turning negative in 2019 (-1.02%) and 2020 (-0.70%). The return to a positive margin of 0.80% in 2021 indicates that the company regained its ability to create value exceeding its cost of capital, although the margin remained below the 2018 high despite the significantly larger sales volume.
The divergence between the steady increase in adjusted net sales and the fluctuating economic profit margin suggests that revenue growth did not linearly translate into economic value. The negative margins in 2019 and 2020 indicate a period of value destruction, where the cost of capital outweighed the operating returns, followed by a restoration of value creation in 2021.