AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

Generac Holdings Inc. (NYSE:GNRC)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since August 8, 2022.

Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios

Microsoft Excel

Short-term Activity Ratios (Summary)

Turnover Ratios

Average No. Days

Generac Holdings Inc., short-term (operating) activity ratios

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Turnover Ratios
Inventory turnover 2.18 2.53 2.69 2.38 2.87
Receivables turnover 6.84 6.63 6.90 6.20 5.97
Payables turnover 3.53 4.63 5.37 3.96 4.67
Working capital turnover 5.40 2.42 3.15 3.61 3.89
Average No. Days
Average inventory processing period 167 144 135 153 127
Add: Average receivable collection period 53 55 53 59 61
Operating cycle 220 199 188 212 188
Less: Average payables payment period 104 79 68 92 78
Cash conversion cycle 116 120 120 120 110

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


The analysis of short-term operating activity ratios reveals a trend of slowing inventory movement and increased reliance on trade credit, though these factors have been balanced to maintain a relatively stable cash conversion cycle.

Inventory and Receivables Management
A steady decline in inventory turnover is observed, falling from 2.87 in 2017 to 2.18 in 2021. This is reflected in the average inventory processing period, which expanded from 127 days to 167 days over the same period, indicating a slower movement of goods through the supply chain. Conversely, receivables management has improved. The receivables turnover ratio increased from 5.97 to 6.84, while the average receivable collection period decreased from 61 days to 53 days, demonstrating greater efficiency in converting credit sales into cash.
Payables and Working Capital Efficiency
The payables turnover ratio exhibits a downward trend, decreasing from 4.67 in 2017 to 3.53 in 2021. This correlates with an increase in the average payables payment period, which rose from 78 days to 104 days, suggesting a strategic shift toward extending payment terms with suppliers to preserve liquidity. Working capital turnover showed significant volatility, reaching a low of 2.42 in 2020 before spiking to 5.40 in 2021, indicating a substantial increase in the efficiency of working capital utilization relative to revenue generation in the final year.
Operating and Cash Conversion Cycles
The operating cycle lengthened from 188 days in 2017 to 220 days in 2021, primarily driven by the increase in the inventory processing period. However, the cash conversion cycle remained remarkably stable, fluctuating between 110 and 120 days throughout the period and ending at 116 days in 2021. This stability suggests that the delays in inventory turnover were effectively offset by the extended payables payment period, thereby neutralizing the potential negative impact on the overall cash flow cycle.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Inventory Turnover

Generac Holdings Inc., inventory turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Costs of goods sold 2,377,102 1,527,546 1,406,584 1,298,424 1,090,328
Inventories 1,089,705 603,317 522,024 544,750 380,341
Short-term Activity Ratio
Inventory turnover1 2.18 2.53 2.69 2.38 2.87
Benchmarks
Inventory Turnover, Competitors2
Boeing Co. 0.75 — — — —
Caterpillar Inc. 2.53 — — — —
Eaton Corp. plc 4.48 — — — —
GE Aerospace 3.40 — — — —
Honeywell International Inc. 4.29 — — — —
Lockheed Martin Corp. 19.45 — — — —
RTX Corp. 5.65 — — — —
Inventory Turnover, Sector
Capital Goods 2.28 — — — —
Inventory Turnover, Industry
Industrials 4.03 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Inventory turnover = Costs of goods sold ÷ Inventories
= 2,377,102 ÷ 1,089,705 = 2.18

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial performance between 2017 and 2021 reveals a significant expansion in operational scale, characterized by a consistent increase in both the cost of goods sold and total inventory holdings. However, this growth in volume was accompanied by a general decline in the efficiency of inventory utilization.

Costs of Goods Sold (COGS)
A steady upward trajectory is observed in the cost of goods sold, which rose from 1,090,328 thousand US dollars in 2017 to 2,377,102 thousand US dollars in 2021. The most substantial growth occurred between 2020 and 2021, representing a significant increase in production or sales volume.
Inventory Levels
Total inventories experienced a marked increase over the period, growing from 380,341 thousand US dollars in 2017 to 1,089,705 thousand US dollars in 2021. While there was a slight contraction in 2019, the balance nearly doubled between 2020 and 2021, suggesting a strategic build-up of stock or potential supply chain adjustments.
Inventory Turnover Ratio
The inventory turnover ratio exhibits an overall downward trend, decreasing from 2.87 in 2017 to 2.18 in 2021. This decline indicates that inventory is remaining in stock for longer durations before being sold. Because the growth in inventory levels has outpaced the growth in the cost of goods sold, the company has experienced a reduction in its operating efficiency regarding inventory management.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Receivables Turnover

Generac Holdings Inc., receivables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Net sales 3,737,184 2,485,200 2,204,336 2,023,464 1,672,445
Accounts receivable, less allowance for credit losses 546,466 374,906 319,538 326,133 280,002
Short-term Activity Ratio
Receivables turnover1 6.84 6.63 6.90 6.20 5.97
Benchmarks
Receivables Turnover, Competitors2
Boeing Co. 23.58 — — — —
Caterpillar Inc. 5.68 — — — —
Eaton Corp. plc 5.95 — — — —
GE Aerospace 4.55 — — — —
Honeywell International Inc. 5.04 — — — —
Lockheed Martin Corp. 34.15 — — — —
RTX Corp. 6.66 — — — —
Receivables Turnover, Sector
Capital Goods 7.57 — — — —
Receivables Turnover, Industry
Industrials 7.76 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Receivables turnover = Net sales ÷ Accounts receivable, less allowance for credit losses
= 3,737,184 ÷ 546,466 = 6.84

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of operating activity between 2017 and 2021 reveals a consistent expansion in revenue paired with stable efficiency in the management of accounts receivable. Despite significant growth in the volume of sales, the company maintained a steady pace of credit collection.

Net Sales Growth
Revenue exhibited a continuous upward trajectory, increasing from $1.67 billion in 2017 to $3.74 billion in 2021. A notable acceleration in growth is observed between 2020 and 2021, where net sales increased by approximately 50% within a single fiscal year.
Accounts Receivable Trends
Net accounts receivable grew from $280 million in 2017 to $546 million in 2021. While the balance generally increased to support higher sales volumes, a marginal decrease was recorded in 2019, falling from $326 million to $319 million, indicating a temporary optimization of credit recovery during that period.
Receivables Turnover Efficiency
The receivables turnover ratio remained within a narrow and healthy range, fluctuating between 5.97 and 6.90. The ratio improved from 5.97 in 2017 to a peak of 6.90 in 2019, followed by a slight dip to 6.63 in 2020 and a subsequent recovery to 6.84 in 2021. This stability suggests that the company's collection processes have scaled effectively in proportion to its rapid revenue growth, preventing an accumulation of overdue accounts.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Payables Turnover

Generac Holdings Inc., payables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Costs of goods sold 2,377,102 1,527,546 1,406,584 1,298,424 1,090,328
Accounts payable 674,208 330,247 261,977 328,091 233,639
Short-term Activity Ratio
Payables turnover1 3.53 4.63 5.37 3.96 4.67
Benchmarks
Payables Turnover, Competitors2
Boeing Co. 6.40 — — — —
Caterpillar Inc. 4.36 — — — —
Eaton Corp. plc 4.75 — — — —
GE Aerospace 3.32 — — — —
Honeywell International Inc. 3.40 — — — —
Lockheed Martin Corp. 74.34 — — — —
RTX Corp. 5.93 — — — —
Payables Turnover, Sector
Capital Goods 5.60 — — — —
Payables Turnover, Industry
Industrials 7.81 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Payables turnover = Costs of goods sold ÷ Accounts payable
= 2,377,102 ÷ 674,208 = 3.53

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of the operating activity ratios reveals a substantial expansion in the volume of goods sold accompanied by fluctuating efficiency in managing supplier obligations between 2017 and 2021. Costs of goods sold exhibited a consistent upward trajectory throughout the period, nearly doubling in value, which indicates a significant increase in operational scale.

Growth in Operational Scale and Liabilities
Costs of goods sold rose from 1,090,328 thousand dollars in 2017 to 2,377,102 thousand dollars in 2021. In parallel, accounts payable increased from 233,639 thousand dollars to 674,208 thousand dollars. This expansion suggests that the increase in production and sales volume was supported by a corresponding increase in supplier-provided credit.
Payables Turnover Volatility
The payables turnover ratio demonstrated instability over the five-year period. After an initial dip to 3.96 in 2018, the ratio peaked at 5.37 in 2019, indicating the fastest rate of supplier payment within the observed timeframe. However, this trend reversed over the following two years, with the ratio moderating to 4.63 in 2020 and falling further in 2021.
Analysis of the 2021 Performance Shift
A significant divergence is observed in 2021, where the payables turnover ratio dropped to its lowest point of 3.53. While costs of goods sold increased by approximately 55% compared to 2020, accounts payable grew by approximately 104%. This disproportionate increase in payables suggests a strategic extension of payment terms or a greater reliance on trade credit to finance the rapid growth in operational activity.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Working Capital Turnover

Generac Holdings Inc., working capital turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Current assets 1,848,464 1,669,733 1,195,829 1,120,769 818,556
Less: Current liabilities 1,155,907 641,524 497,064 560,706 388,872
Working capital 692,557 1,028,209 698,765 560,063 429,684
 
Net sales 3,737,184 2,485,200 2,204,336 2,023,464 1,672,445
Short-term Activity Ratio
Working capital turnover1 5.40 2.42 3.15 3.61 3.89
Benchmarks
Working Capital Turnover, Competitors2
Boeing Co. 2.34 — — — —
Caterpillar Inc. 3.54 — — — —
Eaton Corp. plc 65.65 — — — —
GE Aerospace 4.94 — — — —
Honeywell International Inc. 5.86 — — — —
Lockheed Martin Corp. 11.52 — — — —
RTX Corp. 9.75 — — — —
Working Capital Turnover, Sector
Capital Goods 5.01 — — — —
Working Capital Turnover, Industry
Industrials 6.90 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Working capital turnover = Net sales ÷ Working capital
= 3,737,184 ÷ 692,557 = 5.40

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of working capital turnover reveals a non-linear trajectory characterized by a multi-year period of declining efficiency followed by a substantial recovery in the final year of the observed period. While net sales exhibited consistent annual growth, the relationship between working capital and revenue generation shifted significantly over the five-year timeframe.

Working Capital Trends
Working capital increased steadily from 429,684 thousand US$ in 2017 to a peak of 1,028,209 thousand US$ in 2020. However, this trend reversed in 2021, with a notable reduction to 692,557 thousand US$, representing a contraction of approximately 33% from the previous year.
Net Sales Growth
Net sales demonstrated uninterrupted growth throughout the period, rising from 1,672,445 thousand US$ in 2017 to 3,737,184 thousand US$ in 2021. The most aggressive expansion occurred between 2020 and 2021, where sales increased by over 1.25 billion US$.
Working Capital Turnover Analysis
The turnover ratio followed a downward trend from 2017 to 2020, falling from 3.89 to 2.42. This decline suggests that during this period, working capital grew at a rate that outpaced sales growth, indicating a decrease in the efficiency of short-term asset utilization. In 2021, the ratio rose sharply to 5.40, the highest level in the analyzed period. This spike is the result of a simultaneous surge in net sales and a decrease in working capital, reflecting a significant optimization of operating liquidity to drive revenue.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Average Inventory Processing Period

Generac Holdings Inc., average inventory processing period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data
Inventory turnover 2.18 2.53 2.69 2.38 2.87
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average inventory processing period1 167 144 135 153 127
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Inventory Processing Period, Competitors2
Boeing Co. 486 — — — —
Caterpillar Inc. 144 — — — —
Eaton Corp. plc 82 — — — —
GE Aerospace 107 — — — —
Honeywell International Inc. 85 — — — —
Lockheed Martin Corp. 19 — — — —
RTX Corp. 65 — — — —
Average Inventory Processing Period, Sector
Capital Goods 160 — — — —
Average Inventory Processing Period, Industry
Industrials 91 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Average inventory processing period = 365 ÷ Inventory turnover
= 365 ÷ 2.18 = 167

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Analysis of inventory efficiency indicators between 2017 and 2021 reveals a general trend of slowing inventory movement and extended processing cycles.

Inventory Turnover Ratio
The inventory turnover ratio experienced a net decline over the observed period, falling from 2.87 in 2017 to 2.18 by 2021. Although a moderate recovery occurred in 2019, where the ratio rose to 2.69, the subsequent years showed a consistent downward trajectory. This contraction suggests a reduction in the frequency with which inventory is replaced during the annual cycle.
Average Inventory Processing Period
The duration required to process inventory exhibits an inverse correlation with the turnover ratio, showing a general upward trend. The processing period increased from 127 days in 2017 to 167 days in 2021. While there was a temporary reduction to 135 days in 2019, the period lengthened significantly in 2020 and 2021, representing a substantial increase in the amount of time capital remains tied up in unsold stock.

The convergence of a decreasing turnover ratio and an increasing processing period indicates a deterioration in short-term operational efficiency regarding inventory management. The increase of 40 days in the processing period from 2017 to 2021 suggests potential challenges in demand forecasting, supply chain bottlenecks, or a strategic decision to increase safety stock levels.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Average Receivable Collection Period

Generac Holdings Inc., average receivable collection period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data
Receivables turnover 6.84 6.63 6.90 6.20 5.97
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average receivable collection period1 53 55 53 59 61
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Receivable Collection Period, Competitors2
Boeing Co. 15 — — — —
Caterpillar Inc. 64 — — — —
Eaton Corp. plc 61 — — — —
GE Aerospace 80 — — — —
Honeywell International Inc. 72 — — — —
Lockheed Martin Corp. 11 — — — —
RTX Corp. 55 — — — —
Average Receivable Collection Period, Sector
Capital Goods 48 — — — —
Average Receivable Collection Period, Industry
Industrials 47 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Average receivable collection period = 365 ÷ Receivables turnover
= 365 ÷ 6.84 = 53

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of operating activity ratios from 2017 to 2021 indicates a general improvement in the efficiency of credit management and the acceleration of cash inflows from customers.

Receivables Turnover
An overall upward trajectory is observed in the receivables turnover ratio, which rose from 5.97 in 2017 to 6.84 by the end of 2021. The most significant growth occurred between 2017 and 2019, peaking at 6.90. Although a slight contraction to 6.63 occurred in 2020, the ratio recovered in 2021, suggesting a strengthened ability to convert receivables into cash relative to the volume of credit sales.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The average collection period demonstrates a corresponding downward trend, reflecting a reduction in the time required to collect outstanding payments. The period decreased from 61 days in 2017 to a low of 53 days in 2019. A marginal increase to 55 days was noted in 2020, followed by a return to 53 days in 2021. This reduction of eight days over the five-year span signifies more aggressive or effective credit collection policies.
Correlation and Stability
A strong inverse correlation exists between the turnover ratio and the collection period, confirming that as the frequency of receivable turnover increased, the duration of the collection cycle decreased. The stability of these metrics between 2019 and 2021 suggests that the company has established a sustainable operational baseline for its short-term credit cycle, maintaining a collection window of approximately 53 to 55 days.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Operating Cycle

Generac Holdings Inc., operating cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks

No. days

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data
Average inventory processing period 167 144 135 153 127
Average receivable collection period 53 55 53 59 61
Short-term Activity Ratio
Operating cycle1 220 199 188 212 188
Benchmarks
Operating Cycle, Competitors2
Boeing Co. 501 — — — —
Caterpillar Inc. 208 — — — —
Eaton Corp. plc 143 — — — —
GE Aerospace 187 — — — —
Honeywell International Inc. 157 — — — —
Lockheed Martin Corp. 30 — — — —
RTX Corp. 120 — — — —
Operating Cycle, Sector
Capital Goods 208 — — — —
Operating Cycle, Industry
Industrials 138 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Operating cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period
= 167 + 53 = 220

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An evaluation of the operating cycle between 2017 and 2021 reveals a general expansion in the time required to convert current assets into cash. While the cycle experienced some volatility, the total duration increased from 188 days in 2017 to 220 days by the end of 2021.

Average Inventory Processing Period
A fluctuating but overall upward trend is observed in the time required to process inventory. The period rose from 127 days in 2017 to a peak of 167 days in 2021. Although there was a brief reduction to 135 days in 2019, the subsequent increase indicates a slowing of inventory turnover or a strategic increase in stock holdings toward the end of the analyzed period.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The collection of receivables remained relatively stable and demonstrated a slight overall improvement. The period decreased from 61 days in 2017 to 53 days in 2021. This consistency suggests that credit management policies and collection efficiency have been maintained effectively despite changes in other operating areas.
Operating Cycle Analysis
The expansion of the total operating cycle is almost exclusively driven by the increase in the inventory processing period. Because the receivable collection period remained flat or improved, the growth of the operating cycle—which peaked at 220 days in 2021—is attributable to the increased duration of the inventory phase of the operating process.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Average Payables Payment Period

Generac Holdings Inc., average payables payment period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data
Payables turnover 3.53 4.63 5.37 3.96 4.67
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average payables payment period1 104 79 68 92 78
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Payables Payment Period, Competitors2
Boeing Co. 57 — — — —
Caterpillar Inc. 84 — — — —
Eaton Corp. plc 77 — — — —
GE Aerospace 110 — — — —
Honeywell International Inc. 107 — — — —
Lockheed Martin Corp. 5 — — — —
RTX Corp. 62 — — — —
Average Payables Payment Period, Sector
Capital Goods 65 — — — —
Average Payables Payment Period, Industry
Industrials 47 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Average payables payment period = 365 ÷ Payables turnover
= 365 ÷ 3.53 = 104

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of short-term operating activity indicates significant volatility in the management of accounts payable between 2017 and 2021. A consistent inverse correlation exists between the payables turnover ratio and the average payment period, reflecting fluctuations in the efficiency and timing of supplier settlements.

Payables Turnover
The turnover ratio exhibited a fluctuating trajectory, reaching a peak of 5.37 in 2019 before declining to a five-year low of 3.53 by 2021. This downward trend in the latter years indicates a reduction in the frequency with which the company clears its accounts payable obligations.
Average Payables Payment Period
The payment cycle showed substantial variance, with a minimum of 68 days recorded in 2019 and a maximum of 104 days in 2021. Following a sharp decrease in 2019, the payment period expanded steadily over the next two years, culminating in the longest payment cycle of the analyzed period.

The expansion of the payment period to 104 days in 2021, coinciding with the lowest recorded turnover ratio, suggests a trend toward extending credit terms with suppliers. This movement indicates a shift in working capital management, potentially aimed at maximizing cash preservation by delaying outflows to vendors.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Cash Conversion Cycle

Generac Holdings Inc., cash conversion cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks

No. days

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data
Average inventory processing period 167 144 135 153 127
Average receivable collection period 53 55 53 59 61
Average payables payment period 104 79 68 92 78
Short-term Activity Ratio
Cash conversion cycle1 116 120 120 120 110
Benchmarks
Cash Conversion Cycle, Competitors2
Boeing Co. 444 — — — —
Caterpillar Inc. 124 — — — —
Eaton Corp. plc 66 — — — —
GE Aerospace 77 — — — —
Honeywell International Inc. 50 — — — —
Lockheed Martin Corp. 25 — — — —
RTX Corp. 58 — — — —
Cash Conversion Cycle, Sector
Capital Goods 143 — — — —
Cash Conversion Cycle, Industry
Industrials 91 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Cash conversion cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period – Average payables payment period
= 167 + 53 – 104 = 116

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The cash conversion cycle remained relatively stable over the observed five-year period, fluctuating between 110 and 120 days. Despite significant volatility in the individual components of the cycle, the overall time required to convert resources into cash showed minimal net variance, ending at 116 days in 2021.

Average Inventory Processing Period
An overall upward trend is observed in the time required to process inventory, which increased from 127 days in 2017 to 167 days in 2021. Although a temporary decrease occurred in 2019, the period expanded significantly toward the end of the timeframe, indicating a slower turnover of goods or a strategic increase in stock levels.
Average Receivable Collection Period
A consistent improvement in collection efficiency is evident, as the average period decreased from 61 days in 2017 to 53 days in 2021. This downward trend suggests a more effective credit management process and a faster conversion of accounts receivable into cash.
Average Payables Payment Period
The period for settling obligations to suppliers exhibited significant volatility. After peaking at 92 days in 2018 and dropping to 68 days in 2019, the period increased sharply to 104 days by 2021. This extension of payment terms served as a critical offset to the increasing inventory processing time.

The stability of the cash conversion cycle is the result of a balancing effect between operational components. The deterioration in inventory turnover was largely mitigated by improvements in receivable collections and the strategic extension of payables payment periods, particularly in 2021, which prevented a significant increase in the total cash cycle.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?