Property, Plant and Equipment Disclosure
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The organization experienced significant growth in its asset base between 2017 and 2021, with gross property and equipment increasing from 356.5 million USD to 674.6 million USD. This upward trajectory indicates a sustained period of capital investment and expansion of operational capacity.
- Production and Infrastructure Expansion
- Buildings and improvements represented the largest single asset category throughout the period, growing from 132.1 million USD in 2017 to 244.3 million USD in 2021. Simultaneously, machinery and equipment saw the most aggressive relative growth, increasing by approximately 106% from 90.5 million USD to 186.6 million USD. This combined increase suggests a strategic focus on scaling manufacturing capabilities.
- Administrative and Support Assets
- Office equipment and systems demonstrated a consistent upward trend, rising from 73.3 million USD in 2017 to 125.0 million USD in 2021. Land and improvements also grew steadily, nearly doubling from 13.1 million USD to 26.1 million USD over the five-year window.
- Operational Tooling and Logistics
- Investment in dies and tools remained relatively stable until 2021, where a significant increase to 31.6 million USD was observed. Vehicles showed a steady climb from 1.9 million USD in 2017 to 7.6 million USD in 2021, reflecting expanded logistical requirements.
- Future Capacity Indicators
- Construction in progress exhibited fluctuations but reached a peak of 47.6 million USD by December 31, 2021. This represents a substantial increase from 18.8 million USD in 2017, indicating that significant capital projects were underway at the end of the period, which will likely transition into fixed assets in subsequent years.
Accumulated depreciation grew from 126.2 million USD in 2017 to 233.7 million USD in 2021. Despite this increase, the net property and equipment value rose significantly from 230.4 million USD to 440.9 million USD. The fact that net assets grew at a rate nearly proportional to gross assets suggests that new investments are outpacing the depreciation of older assets, maintaining a modern and expanding industrial footprint.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Asset Age Ratios (Summary)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The analysis of property, plant, and equipment indicates a stable asset lifecycle management strategy over the five-year period from 2017 to 2021. The asset base maintains a consistent age profile, suggesting a steady cadence of capital expenditures and asset replacements that prevent the aging of the overall production capacity.
- Average Age Ratio Trends
- The average age ratio remained relatively constant, fluctuating within a narrow range between 35.05% and 38.13%. A marginal downward trend was observed between 2017 and 2019, followed by a peak in 2020 at 38.13%, before moderating to 36.04% by the end of 2021. This stability suggests that the depletion of asset value through depreciation is being offset by the timely acquisition of new equipment.
- Asset Life Cycle and Utility
- Estimated total useful life has remained stable, oscillating between 14 and 16 years throughout the period. The estimated age of the assets has consistently stayed between 5 and 6 years, which corresponds to an estimated remaining life of 9 to 10 years. These metrics indicate that the asset portfolio is moderately young, with the majority of its operational utility still intact.
- Operational Implications
- The consistent gap between the elapsed age and the total useful life suggests a low immediate risk of mass asset obsolescence. The stability across these ratios implies a disciplined approach to capital budgeting and a systematic replacement cycle that maintains the company's operational efficiency.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Average Age
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2021 Calculations
1 Average age = 100 × Accumulated depreciation ÷ (Gross property and equipment – Land and improvements)
= 100 × 233,699 ÷ (674,551 – 26,137) = 36.04%
Between 2017 and 2021, there was a consistent and significant expansion in the total asset base. Gross property and equipment grew from 356,548 thousand USD to 674,551 thousand USD, indicating a sustained period of capital investment. Simultaneously, accumulated depreciation rose from 126,168 thousand USD to 233,699 thousand USD, reflecting the natural aging of the asset portfolio over the five-year period.
- Capital Expenditure and Asset Growth
- A strong upward trend in gross property and equipment is evident, with the total value nearly doubling by the end of 2021. This growth is further supported by the increase in land and improvements, which rose from 13,118 thousand USD in 2017 to 26,137 thousand USD in 2021, suggesting a strategic expansion of physical infrastructure and operational capacity.
- Average Age Ratio Stability
- Despite the substantial increase in the total volume of assets, the average age ratio remained remarkably stable, fluctuating within a narrow range between 35.05% and 38.13%. A slight decline was observed between 2017 and 2019, followed by a peak of 38.13% in 2020, before returning to 36.04% in 2021.
- Asset Replacement Cycle Interpretation
- The relative stability of the average age ratio, coinciding with a sharp increase in gross property and equipment, indicates an effective capital replacement strategy. The data suggests that new assets are being acquired at a rate that not only facilitates growth but also offsets the depreciation of older assets, thereby maintaining a consistent average age of the overall productive capacity.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Estimated Total Useful Life
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2021 Calculations
1 Estimated total useful life = (Gross property and equipment – Land and improvements) ÷ Depreciation expense
= (674,551 – 26,137) ÷ 42,155 = 15
The company has demonstrated a consistent expansion of its capital asset base from 2017 through 2021. The growth in gross property and equipment is accompanied by a corresponding increase in depreciation expenses, while the estimated useful life of these assets has remained relatively stable.
- Capital Asset Expansion
- Gross property and equipment exhibited a continuous upward trend, increasing from 356.5 million US dollars in 2017 to 674.6 million US dollars by the end of 2021. This growth is further reflected in land and improvements, which rose from 13.1 million US dollars to 26.1 million US dollars over the same period, with the most significant increase occurring between 2020 and 2021.
- Depreciation Expense Correlation
- Depreciation expenses grew in tandem with the gross asset base, rising from 23.1 million US dollars in 2017 to 42.2 million US dollars in 2021. The steady increase in these expenses suggests a proportional relationship between the acquisition of new assets and the subsequent allocation of their cost over their useful lives.
- Useful Life Stability
- The estimated total useful life of assets has fluctuated within a narrow range of 14 to 16 years. After a peak of 16 years in 2018, the estimate settled at 14 years for 2019 and 2020, before returning to 15 years in 2021. This stability indicates that the nature of the assets being acquired has remained consistent in terms of expected longevity, and there have been no fundamental shifts in the company's accounting estimates regarding asset durability.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Estimated Age, Time Elapsed since Purchase
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2021 Calculations
1 Time elapsed since purchase = Accumulated depreciation ÷ Depreciation expense
= 233,699 ÷ 42,155 = 6
The analysis of property, plant, and equipment reveals a consistent expansion of the asset base accompanied by a disciplined replacement cycle. While cumulative depreciation has risen steadily, the average age of assets has remained relatively stable, indicating ongoing capital investment to modernize operational capacity.
- Accumulated Depreciation Trends
- A continuous upward trajectory is observed in accumulated depreciation, which increased from 126,168 thousand US dollars in 2017 to 233,699 thousand US dollars by 2021. This growth represents a total increase of approximately 85% over the five-year period, reflecting the systematic allocation of cost over the useful lives of the company's tangible assets.
- Depreciation Expense Growth
- Annual depreciation expenses have demonstrated a steady increase, rising from 23,127 thousand US dollars in 2017 to 42,155 thousand US dollars in 2021. The nearly twofold increase in annual depreciation suggests an expansion in the gross value of property, plant, and equipment, as higher annual charges typically correlate with a larger volume of depreciable assets on the balance sheet.
- Asset Age and Replacement Cycle
- The time elapsed since purchase has fluctuated narrowly between 5 and 6 years. The lack of a linear increase in the average age of assets, despite the rising accumulated depreciation, indicates a recurring cycle of capital expenditures. The reduction in estimated age from 6 years in 2018 to 5 years in 2019 and 2020 suggests the acquisition of new assets that offset the aging of older equipment, thereby maintaining a consistent technological and operational profile.
In summary, the convergence of increasing depreciation expenses and a stable asset age points toward a strategy of aggressive capacity expansion and regular asset renewal. The company is effectively replacing aging infrastructure while simultaneously growing its total asset base to support operational requirements.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Estimated Remaining Life
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2021 Calculations
1 Estimated remaining life = (Property and equipment, net – Land and improvements) ÷ Depreciation expense
= (440,852 – 26,137) ÷ 42,155 = 10
Net property and equipment demonstrated a consistent upward trajectory between 2017 and 2021, increasing from US$ 230,380 thousand to US$ 440,852 thousand. This expansion indicates a period of sustained capital investment in the company's operational infrastructure. A similar growth pattern is observed in land and improvements, which effectively doubled from US$ 13,118 thousand to US$ 26,137 thousand over the five-year period.
- Depreciation Expense Trends
- Depreciation expenses rose steadily from US$ 23,127 thousand in 2017 to US$ 42,155 thousand in 2021. The increase in annual depreciation aligns with the expansion of the net asset base, suggesting that new acquisitions are being integrated into the depreciation schedule as they are deployed.
- Estimated Remaining Life Stability
- The estimated remaining life of property and equipment remained remarkably stable, fluctuating narrowly between 9 and 10 years throughout the analyzed period. The lack of significant variance suggests a consistent accounting policy and a standardized lifecycle for the types of assets being acquired.
- Asset Turnover and Replacement Cycle
- The stability of the remaining life, despite a near doubling of net property and equipment, indicates that the company is likely acquiring new assets with useful lives similar to those of the existing fleet. This prevents the average remaining life from decreasing as older assets age, pointing toward a continuous replacement and expansion cycle.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?