Decomposing ROE involves expressing net income divided by shareholders’ equity as the product of component ratios.
Two-Component Disaggregation of ROE
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The two-component DuPont analysis reveals that the fluctuations in Return on Equity (ROE) between 2017 and 2021 were primarily driven by volatility in asset efficiency rather than significant shifts in capital structure. While Financial Leverage remained relatively stable throughout the period, Return on Assets (ROA) experienced substantial variance, which directly amplified the resulting returns to shareholders.
- Return on Assets (ROA)
- A significant peak in asset efficiency occurred in 2018, with ROA rising to 13.05% from 4.60% in 2017. This was followed by a sharp correction in 2019 to 6.90% and a further decline to 4.66% by 2020. A modest recovery was observed in 2021, where ROA increased to 5.76%. These fluctuations indicate that the primary driver of profitability variance during this period was the company's ability to generate earnings from its asset base.
- Financial Leverage
- The leverage ratio exhibited a gradual upward trend from 2017 to 2020, moving from 2.23 to a peak of 2.62. This suggests a moderate increase in the use of debt to finance assets during this timeframe. In 2021, the ratio reverted to 2.33, indicating a reduction in financial leverage to levels similar to those seen in 2018.
- Return on Equity (ROE)
- ROE mirrored the trajectory of ROA, reaching a high of 30.29% in 2018 due to the convergence of peak asset efficiency and steady leverage. Following the decline in ROA, ROE dropped to 16.26% in 2019 and 12.22% in 2020. Notably, the 2020 low in ROE occurred despite the period's highest financial leverage, confirming that the decline in asset productivity outweighed the magnifying effect of increased debt. The period ended with a slight recovery in ROE to 13.40% in 2021, supported by the improvement in ROA.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Three-Component Disaggregation of ROE
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The Return on Equity (ROE) demonstrated significant volatility from 2017 to 2021, peaking sharply in 2018 at 30.29% before stabilizing at 13.40% by the end of the period. This trajectory was primarily driven by fluctuations in profitability rather than structural shifts in asset efficiency or financial leverage.
- Net Profit Margin
- Profitability acted as the primary catalyst for ROE variance. A substantial increase from 8.20% in 2017 to 26.12% in 2018 accounts for the exceptional performance observed in that year. Following this peak, margins contracted to 13.99% in 2019 and reached a low of 11.14% in 2020, with a marginal recovery to 11.66% in 2021.
- Asset Turnover
- Asset utilization efficiency experienced a general downward trend for the majority of the period. The ratio declined from 0.56 in 2017 to a minimum of 0.42 in 2020, indicating a reduction in the efficiency of generating revenue from the asset base. A partial recovery to 0.49 occurred in 2021.
- Financial Leverage
- Financial leverage remained relatively stable but showed a steady increase from 2.23 in 2017 to a peak of 2.62 in 2020. This upward trend indicates an increased reliance on debt to amplify equity returns during those years, followed by a correction to 2.33 in 2021.
The analysis indicates that the 2018 surge in ROE was almost exclusively attributable to the spike in net profit margin. Conversely, the decline in ROE through 2020 resulted from the simultaneous compression of profit margins and a decline in asset turnover, which outweighed the supportive effect of increasing financial leverage. By 2021, all three components showed signs of stabilization.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Five-Component Disaggregation of ROE
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The Return on Equity (ROE) exhibited significant volatility between 2017 and 2021, characterized by a substantial peak in 2018 at 30.29% followed by a correction and stabilization in the 12% to 16% range. This fluctuation is primarily attributable to non-operational drivers rather than consistent growth in operational efficiency.
- Tax Burden
- The most significant volatility in the five-component analysis occurs within the tax burden ratio. A sharp increase to 1.51 in 2018 suggests a substantial tax benefit or credit that artificially inflated the ROE for that period. Following this anomaly, the ratio stabilized between 0.81 and 0.87 from 2019 through 2021, indicating a return to a more normalized tax environment.
- Operating Profitability (EBIT Margin)
- A downward trend in operating efficiency is observable. While the EBIT margin remained relatively stable around 19% from 2017 to 2019, it experienced a notable contraction starting in 2020, falling to 15.81% and further declining to 15.30% by 2021. This suggests increasing operating costs or pricing pressures impacting the core business profitability.
- Asset Utilization (Asset Turnover)
- Asset turnover shows a general decline over the analyzed period, decreasing from 0.56 in 2017 to 0.49 in 2021. A trough was reached in 2020 at 0.42, indicating a temporary reduction in the efficiency of generating revenue from the asset base, followed by a partial recovery in 2021.
- Financial Leverage
- Financial leverage increased steadily from 2.23 in 2017 to a peak of 2.62 in 2020. This indicates an increased reliance on debt to finance assets during the period. However, leverage decreased to 2.33 by 2021, suggesting a strategic deleveraging or a shift in the capital structure.
- Interest Burden
- The interest burden remained remarkably stable, fluctuating minimally between 0.86 and 0.90 throughout the five-year period. This consistency indicates that interest expenses have had a negligible impact on the overall volatility of the ROE compared to tax and operating factors.
In summary, the expansion of ROE in 2018 was an isolated event driven by tax advantages. The subsequent trend indicates a decline in operating margins and asset efficiency, which was partially offset by increased financial leverage through 2020. The final stabilization of ROE at 13.40% in 2021 reflects a combination of compressed margins and moderated leverage.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Two-Component Disaggregation of ROA
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The Return on Assets (ROA) exhibited significant volatility between 2017 and 2021, characterized by a substantial peak in 2018 followed by a period of contraction and a subsequent partial recovery in 2021.
- Net Profit Margin
- Profitability experienced an anomalous surge in 2018, rising to 26.12% from 8.20% in 2017. This peak was followed by a consistent decline to 13.99% in 2019 and 11.14% in 2020, before a slight stabilization at 11.66% in 2021. The magnitude of these shifts indicates that profit margin fluctuations were the dominant driver of overall ROA variance.
- Asset Turnover
- Asset utilization efficiency followed a gradual downward trend from 2017 to 2020, decreasing from a ratio of 0.56 to 0.42. This contraction suggests a decline in the company's ability to generate revenue from its asset base during this period. A reversal of this trend occurred in 2021, with the ratio improving to 0.49.
- ROA Disaggregation and Synthesis
- The peak ROA of 13.05% in 2018 was driven almost exclusively by the expansion of the net profit margin, which more than compensated for a simultaneous decrease in asset turnover. Conversely, the decline in ROA to 4.66% by 2020 resulted from the dual negative impact of contracting margins and diminishing asset efficiency. The recovery to 5.76% in 2021 was supported by a synchronized improvement in both profitability and asset turnover ratios.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Four-Component Disaggregation of ROA
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The Return on Assets (ROA) exhibited significant volatility between 2017 and 2021, characterized by a substantial peak in 2018 followed by a period of contraction and partial recovery. The ROA rose from 4.60% in 2017 to a high of 13.05% in 2018, before declining to 4.66% in 2020 and recovering slightly to 5.76% by the end of 2021.
- Tax Burden
- The tax burden ratio showed the most extreme fluctuations of all components. A notable spike occurred in 2018, where the ratio reached 1.51, suggesting a significant tax benefit or one-time credit that disproportionately inflated net income relative to earnings before taxes. Following this anomaly, the ratio stabilized between 0.81 and 0.87 from 2019 through 2021, indicating a more normalized tax environment.
- Interest Burden
- Interest burden remained remarkably consistent throughout the five-year period, fluctuating minimally between 0.86 and 0.90. This stability indicates that the cost of debt servicing relative to operating income remained steady, suggesting a disciplined approach to leverage and interest expense management.
- EBIT Margin
- Operating profitability remained strong and relatively stable from 2017 to 2019, peaking at 19.26% in 2018. However, a downward trend emerged starting in 2020, with the margin falling to 15.81% and further declining to 15.30% in 2021. This compression suggests an increase in operating expenses or a decline in pricing power during the latter part of the period.
- Asset Turnover
- Asset utilization efficiency experienced a general decline from 2017 to 2020, falling from a ratio of 0.56 to 0.42. This trend points to a decrease in the company's ability to generate sales from its asset base. A partial recovery was observed in 2021, as the ratio improved to 0.49, though it remained below the levels seen at the start of the analysis period.
The analysis indicates that the dramatic increase in ROA observed in 2018 was primarily driven by the tax burden component rather than operational improvements. The subsequent decline in ROA was a result of combined pressures from compressing EBIT margins and diminished asset turnover, which were not offset by the stabilization of the tax and interest burdens.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Disaggregation of Net Profit Margin
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The net profit margin exhibited significant volatility between 2017 and 2021, characterized by a dramatic spike in 2018 followed by a gradual stabilization. While the net profit margin reached a peak of 26.12% in 2018, it settled into a range between 11.14% and 13.99% from 2019 through 2021. An analysis of the disaggregated components reveals that this volatility was primarily driven by non-operational tax effects rather than core operational performance.
- Tax Burden
- The tax burden ratio demonstrates the highest degree of variance, shifting from 0.49 in 2017 to an anomalous peak of 1.51 in 2018. A ratio exceeding 1.00 typically indicates a tax benefit or credit, which directly accounts for the surge in net profit margin during that year. Following this event, the ratio normalized and remained relatively stable between 0.81 and 0.87 from 2019 to 2021.
- Interest Burden
- The interest burden remained remarkably consistent throughout the five-year period, fluctuating minimally between 0.86 and 0.90. This stability indicates that interest expenses have exerted a constant and predictable influence on the company's bottom line, contributing negligible volatility to the overall net profit margin.
- EBIT Margin
- Operational profitability remained stable at approximately 19% between 2017 and 2019. However, a downward trend is observed starting in 2020, with the margin declining to 15.81% and further to 15.30% by 2021. This suggests a contraction in operating efficiency or an increase in operating expenses during the final two years of the analyzed period.
In summary, the fluctuations in the net profit margin were not the result of operational shifts in the early part of the period, but were instead dominated by the tax burden's volatility in 2018. However, the more recent decline in the EBIT margin indicates a trend of eroding operational profitability that has persisted through 2021, which outweighs the relative stability of the interest burden.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?