Property, Plant and Equipment Disclosure
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
From 2017 to 2021, a consistent upward trend is observed in both gross and net property, plant, and equipment, indicating sustained capital expenditure and a strategic expansion of the operational infrastructure.
- Gross Asset Expansion
- Gross property, plant, and equipment increased from 3,800 million US dollars in 2017 to 5,498 million US dollars by 2021. This represents a total increase of approximately 44.7% over the five-year period, reflecting a continuous commitment to growing the company's physical asset base.
- Infrastructure and Equipment Allocation
- Growth was observed across all asset categories, although the pace varied. Land, buildings, and improvements experienced the most significant relative growth, increasing by approximately 77% from 936 million US dollars in 2017 to 1,656 million US dollars in 2021. Machinery and equipment grew at a steadier rate, rising from 2,864 million US dollars to 3,842 million US dollars, an increase of approximately 34%. The accelerated growth in buildings and improvements suggests a prioritization of facility expansion to support increased production capacity.
- Depreciation and Net Asset Value
- The allowance for depreciation rose from 1,825 million US dollars in 2017 to 2,665 million US dollars in 2021. Despite the increase in accumulated depreciation, net property, plant, and equipment grew consistently from 1,975 million US dollars to 2,833 million US dollars. The ratio of accumulated depreciation to gross assets remained stable at approximately 48% throughout the period, indicating a balanced replacement cycle where new asset acquisitions effectively offset the depreciation of older assets.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Asset Age Ratios (Summary)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The analysis of asset age ratios indicates a stable lifecycle management strategy for property, plant, and equipment, characterized by a consistent replacement cycle and periodic adjustments to asset utility expectations. The average age ratio fluctuated within a narrow range between 45.55% and 48.47% over the five-year period, suggesting that the asset base is maintained at approximately half of its useful life.
- Average Age Ratio Trends
- A slight downward trend was observed between 2017 and 2019, with the ratio decreasing from 48.03% to 45.55%. This trend reversed after 2019, with the ratio climbing to 48.47% by the end of 2021. The dip in 2018 and 2019 suggests a period of asset modernization or increased capital expenditure, while the subsequent rise indicates a period where depreciation outweighed new asset acquisitions.
- Useful Life and Remaining Utility
- The estimated total useful life of assets was increased from 14 years to 15 years starting in 2019. This accounting adjustment directly contributed to an increase in the estimated remaining life, which rose from 7 years to 8 years and remained constant through 2021. This extension suggests a revision in the perceived longevity of the equipment or a shift toward acquiring assets with longer durability.
- Asset Age and Purchase Timing
- The estimated age, representing the time elapsed since purchase, remained largely static at 7 years, with the exception of 2018 when it dropped to 6 years. The 2018 decrease correlates with the decline in the average age ratio, providing evidence of significant investment in new equipment during that fiscal year, which effectively lowered the average age of the overall asset portfolio.
Overall, the convergence of the average age ratio and the estimated remaining life indicates a balanced approach to capital maintenance, ensuring that the productive capacity of the infrastructure is sustained without excessive volatility in asset obsolescence.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Average Age
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2021 Calculations
1 Average age = 100 × Allowance for depreciation ÷ Property, plant and equipment, gross
= 100 × 2,665 ÷ 5,498 = 48.47%
The analysis of property, plant, and equipment from 2017 to 2021 reveals a consistent expansion of the asset base accompanied by fluctuating asset age dynamics.
- Gross Asset Growth
- Gross property, plant, and equipment exhibited a steady upward trajectory, increasing from US$ 3,800 million in 2017 to US$ 5,498 million by 2021. This sustained increase indicates a continuous commitment to capital investment and capacity expansion over the five-year period.
- Accumulated Depreciation Trends
- The allowance for depreciation rose proportionally with the growth of the gross asset base, increasing from US$ 1,825 million in 2017 to US$ 2,665 million in 2021. The consistent annual growth in this allowance reflects the ongoing systemic depreciation of the company's tangible infrastructure.
- Average Age Ratio Analysis
- The average age ratio followed a U-shaped pattern over the observed period. A downward trend was noted between 2017 and 2019, with the ratio decreasing from 48.03% to 45.55%, suggesting that the acquisition of new assets was outpacing the aging of the existing portfolio. This trend reversed after 2019, as the ratio climbed to 46.89% in 2020 and reached 48.47% by 2021. The most recent increase indicates that the asset base is aging relative to its total value, as the mitigating effect of new capital expenditures has diminished compared to the accumulation of depreciation.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Estimated Total Useful Life
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2021 Calculations
1 Estimated total useful life = Property, plant and equipment, gross ÷ Depreciation expense
= 5,498 ÷ 371 = 15
Between 2017 and 2021, a consistent expansion in the asset base and associated depreciation costs was observed, accompanied by a marginal adjustment in accounting estimates regarding asset longevity.
- Gross Property, Plant and Equipment Growth
- Gross property, plant and equipment exhibited a steady upward trajectory, increasing from US$ 3,800 million in 2017 to US$ 5,498 million by 2021. This represents a total increase of approximately 44.7% over the five-year period, indicating sustained capital expenditure and a strategic expansion of the physical asset base.
- Depreciation Expense Trends
- Depreciation expenses rose in correlation with the increase in gross assets, moving from US$ 271 million in 2017 to US$ 371 million in 2021. The growth in these expenses is primarily driven by the larger volume of depreciable assets acquired during the period.
- Estimated Total Useful Life Adjustments
- The estimated total useful life of assets was maintained at 14 years through 2018, followed by an increase to 15 years starting in 2019, which remained constant through 2021. This extension of the useful life by one year suggests a revision in the expected operational durability of the assets, which effectively moderates the annual depreciation charge relative to the total asset value.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Estimated Age, Time Elapsed since Purchase
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2021 Calculations
1 Time elapsed since purchase = Allowance for depreciation ÷ Depreciation expense
= 2,665 ÷ 371 = 7
An analysis of the fixed asset metrics from 2017 to 2021 reveals a consistent upward trajectory in both accumulated depreciation and annual depreciation expenses, while the estimated average age of assets remains stable.
- Accumulated Depreciation Trends
- The allowance for depreciation has increased steadily over the five-year period, rising from 1,825 million USD in 2017 to 2,665 million USD by the end of 2021. This sustained growth reflects a cumulative increase in the total value of depreciable assets over time.
- Annual Depreciation Expense Analysis
- Annual depreciation expenses have exhibited a continuous increase, growing from 271 million USD in 2017 to 371 million USD in 2021. The steady rise in these expenses indicates an expansion of the asset base or the acquisition of higher-value capital equipment.
- Asset Age and Replacement Cycle
- The time elapsed since purchase has remained remarkably consistent, fluctuating minimally between 6 and 7 years throughout the period. The stability of the average asset age, occurring simultaneously with rising depreciation costs, suggests a disciplined replacement cycle where new capital investments are integrated at a rate that offsets the aging of existing assets while increasing the overall scale of the asset portfolio.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Estimated Remaining Life
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2021 Calculations
1 Estimated remaining life = Property, plant and equipment, net ÷ Depreciation expense
= 2,833 ÷ 371 = 8
A consistent upward trajectory in net property, plant, and equipment is observed from 2017 through 2021. The asset base grew from 1,975 million US dollars to 2,833 million US dollars, representing a total increase of approximately 43% over the five-year period. This growth reflects sustained investment in physical infrastructure, although the pace of expansion decelerated in the latter two years of the analysis.
- Asset Base Expansion
- Net property, plant, and equipment exhibited steady annual growth, with the most significant increases occurring between 2017 and 2019. The growth rate moderated from a 16% increase in 2018 to a 3% increase in 2021, suggesting a transition toward a more stable capital expenditure phase.
- Depreciation Expense Correlation
- Depreciation expenses rose in tandem with the expanding asset base, increasing from 271 million US dollars in 2017 to 371 million US dollars in 2021. This progression indicates that the additions to property, plant, and equipment are being depreciated systematically, with the annual expense maintaining a relatively stable relationship with the total net asset value.
- Estimated Remaining Life Analysis
- The estimated remaining life of the assets shifted from seven years in 2017 and 2018 to eight years starting in 2019. This increase in the estimated utility period suggests either a change in the composition of the asset portfolio toward longer-lived assets or a strategic revision of depreciation estimates. The stability of this figure at eight years through 2021 indicates a consistent accounting approach for the assets managed during the latter half of the period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?