Goodwill and Intangible Asset Disclosure
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The total value of goodwill and other intangible assets grew significantly from US$ 10,645 million in 2017 to US$ 17,758 million in 2021. The most substantial expansion occurred between 2019 and 2020, where the total increased by US$ 5,036 million, suggesting a period of intense acquisition activity.
- Goodwill Analysis
- Goodwill exhibited a strong upward trajectory, increasing from US$ 7,168 million in 2017 to US$ 12,918 million in 2021. A notable surge was recorded between 2019 and 2020, with the balance rising from US$ 9,069 million to US$ 12,778 million, indicating that the company paid significant premiums over the fair market value of identifiable net assets during acquisitions.
- Identified Intangible Assets Trends
- Developed technologies served as the primary driver of growth among identifiable intangibles, rising from US$ 2,416 million in 2017 to US$ 5,326 million in 2021. Customer relationships grew more modestly from US$ 2,088 million to US$ 2,324 million over the same period. In contrast, patents and trademarks remained relatively stagnant, showing minimal variance throughout the five-year window.
- Amortization and Carrying Amounts
- The gross carrying amount of other intangible assets rose from US$ 5,314 million in 2017 to a peak of US$ 8,656 million in 2020 before slightly declining to US$ 8,542 million in 2021. Simultaneously, accumulated amortization increased consistently every year, growing from US$ 1,837 million in 2017 to US$ 3,702 million in 2021, which reflects the systematic expense recognition of acquired assets over their useful lives.
- Volatility in Research and Development
- In-process research and development (IPR&D) demonstrated high volatility compared to other asset categories. The balance fluctuated from US$ 25 million in 2017 to a peak of US$ 110 million in 2019, before dropping to US$ 29 million by 2021, characterizing the temporary nature of these assets as they are either capitalized into developed technology or written off.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjustments to Financial Statements: Removal of Goodwill
Stryker Corp., Financial Data: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
An examination of the financial position between 2017 and 2021 reveals a consistent expansion in reported total assets, which grew from 22,197 million USD to 34,631 million USD. However, the growth of adjusted total assets, which excludes goodwill and intangible assets, occurred at a slower pace, rising from 15,029 million USD to 21,713 million USD. This divergence indicates that a progressively larger portion of the asset base is comprised of intangible elements over the five-year period.
- Asset Composition Trends
- The gap between reported and adjusted total assets expanded from approximately 7.2 billion USD in 2017 to approximately 12.9 billion USD by 2021. This trend suggests an aggressive acquisition strategy or significant increases in the valuation of intangible assets, leading to a balance sheet that is increasingly weighted toward non-physical assets.
- Equity Divergence and Volatility
- While reported shareholders' equity demonstrated steady growth, increasing from 9,966 million USD in 2017 to 14,877 million USD in 2021, the adjusted equity exhibited significant instability. Adjusted equity rose modestly until 2019, reaching 3,738 million USD, before experiencing a precipitous decline to 306 million USD in 2020. A partial recovery was observed in 2021, with adjusted equity rising to 1,959 million USD.
- Tangible Net Worth Analysis
- The removal of goodwill and intangible assets reveals a stark contrast in the company's tangible financial standing. In 2020, the disparity reached its peak; while reported equity remained strong at 13,084 million USD, the adjusted equity fell to nearly zero, indicating that the vast majority of the equity base was supported by intangible assets rather than tangible capital during that fiscal year.
The observed patterns suggest that the company's reported growth is heavily influenced by the accounting treatment of goodwill and intangibles. The extreme volatility in adjusted equity relative to the stability of reported equity indicates that tangible net worth is highly sensitive to adjustments, particularly in the 2020-2021 period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Financial Ratios: Removal of Goodwill (Summary)
Stryker Corp., Financial Ratios: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The exclusion of goodwill and intangible assets from financial calculations reveals a significant divergence between reported performance and the underlying efficiency of tangible assets. The adjustment consistently elevates efficiency and profitability ratios, suggesting that a substantial portion of the balance sheet is comprised of non-physical assets acquired through business combinations.
- Asset Utilization Efficiency
- Total asset turnover is consistently higher on an adjusted basis across all periods. While reported turnover fluctuated between 0.42 and 0.56, the adjusted turnover remained higher, ranging from 0.67 to 0.83. This indicates that the core operating assets generate significantly more revenue than the total asset base suggests, as the reported figures are weighed down by the carrying value of goodwill.
- Capital Structure and Financial Leverage
- A stark contrast is observed in financial leverage. Reported leverage remained relatively stable, moving between 2.23 and 2.62. However, adjusted financial leverage exhibits extreme volatility, specifically peaking at 70.43 in 2020. This suggests that goodwill and intangible assets represent a dominant component of the company's equity; when these are removed, the remaining tangible equity base is small relative to total liabilities, resulting in an exponentially higher adjusted leverage ratio.
- Profitability and Return Metrics
- The impact of removing intangible assets is most pronounced in the return ratios. Reported ROE fluctuated between 10.23% and 30.29%, whereas adjusted ROE reached peaks of 522.55% in 2020 and 112.19% in 2018. This disparity highlights that the return on tangible equity is far superior to the reported return. Similarly, adjusted ROA consistently outperforms reported ROA, with the adjusted figures peaking at 19.03% in 2018 compared to the reported 13.05%, confirming that tangible assets are more productive in generating net income than the total asset base implies.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Total Asset Turnover
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2021 Calculations
1 Total asset turnover = Net sales ÷ Total assets
= 17,108 ÷ 34,631 = 0.49
2 Adjusted total asset turnover = Net sales ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 17,108 ÷ 21,713 = 0.79
A consistent increase in the asset base is observed from 2017 to 2021. Reported total assets grew from 22,197 million US dollars to 34,631 million US dollars, while adjusted total assets rose from 15,029 million US dollars to 21,713 million US dollars. The divergence between these two figures indicates a substantial expansion of goodwill and intangible assets over the five-year period, which grew from approximately 7,168 million US dollars in 2017 to 12,918 million US dollars by 2021.
- Reported Total Asset Turnover
- The reported turnover ratio exhibited a general downward trend from 0.56 in 2017 to a low of 0.42 in 2020, before recovering to 0.49 in 2021. This decline suggests that the growth in the total asset base, heavily influenced by acquisitions and intangible assets, initially outpaced the growth in revenue generation.
- Adjusted Total Asset Turnover
- The adjusted turnover ratio, which excludes the impact of goodwill and intangible assets, remained consistently higher than the reported ratio. It moved from 0.83 in 2017 to a low of 0.67 in 2020, followed by a strong recovery to 0.79 in 2021. This indicates that the core operating assets are utilized more efficiently than the total asset base suggests.
- Comparative Efficiency Gap
- A significant spread persists between the reported and adjusted turnover ratios throughout the period. The fact that the adjusted ratio is consistently higher demonstrates that the inclusion of non-physical assets suppresses the perceived efficiency of the company's asset utilization. The recovery observed in 2021 across both metrics suggests an improvement in operational productivity or revenue growth relative to the asset base.
The analysis reveals that while the total asset base has expanded significantly, a large portion of this growth is attributable to intangible assets. The higher adjusted total asset turnover confirms that the underlying physical and operating assets generate revenue more effectively than the consolidated asset base, which is weighed down by the increasing volume of goodwill.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Financial Leverage
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2021 Calculations
1 Financial leverage = Total assets ÷ Total Stryker shareholders’ equity
= 34,631 ÷ 14,877 = 2.33
2 Adjusted financial leverage = Adjusted total assets ÷ Adjusted total Stryker shareholders’ equity
= 21,713 ÷ 1,959 = 11.08
A comparative analysis of reported and adjusted financial metrics reveals a significant divergence in the corporate leverage profile when intangible assets and goodwill are excluded. While reported figures suggest a stable growth trajectory, the adjusted metrics indicate heightened volatility and a substantial reliance on non-tangible asset valuation.
- Asset Composition Trends
- Reported total assets exhibited consistent growth, increasing from US$ 22,197 million in 2017 to US$ 34,631 million in 2021. Adjusted total assets also trended upward, rising from US$ 15,029 million to US$ 21,713 million. The widening variance between reported and adjusted totals indicates that goodwill and intangible assets constitute an increasingly large portion of the total asset base.
- Equity Volatility
- A stark contrast is observed between reported and adjusted shareholders' equity. Reported equity grew steadily from US$ 9,966 million in 2017 to US$ 14,877 million in 2021. Conversely, adjusted equity proved highly volatile; after rising to US$ 3,738 million in 2019, it experienced a precipitous decline to US$ 306 million in 2020, before recovering to US$ 1,959 million in 2021. This volatility suggests that the tangible equity cushion is minimal compared to the total reported equity.
- Financial Leverage Analysis
- Reported financial leverage remained relatively stable over the five-year period, fluctuating within a narrow range between 2.23 and 2.62. In contrast, adjusted financial leverage displayed extreme sensitivity, peaking at 70.43 in 2020. This spike was directly correlated with the sharp contraction in adjusted equity. While the adjusted leverage ratio moderated to 11.08 by 2021, it remained substantially higher than the reported ratio of 2.33, reflecting a significantly higher risk profile when intangible assets are stripped from the balance sheet.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2021 Calculations
1 ROE = 100 × Net earnings ÷ Total Stryker shareholders’ equity
= 100 × 1,994 ÷ 14,877 = 13.40%
2 Adjusted ROE = 100 × Net earnings ÷ Adjusted total Stryker shareholders’ equity
= 100 × 1,994 ÷ 1,959 = 101.79%
A significant divergence exists between reported and adjusted shareholders' equity, indicating that a substantial portion of the total equity base is comprised of goodwill and intangible assets. While reported equity grew consistently from 9,966 million US$ in 2017 to 14,877 million US$ in 2021, adjusted equity exhibited high volatility and remained considerably lower, highlighting a capital structure heavily weighted toward non-tangible assets.
- Equity Composition and Trends
- Reported shareholders' equity maintained a steady upward trajectory over the five-year period. In contrast, adjusted equity grew modestly between 2017 and 2019, increasing from 2,798 million US$ to 3,738 million US$. However, a sharp contraction occurred in 2020, where adjusted equity fell to 306 million US$, before partially recovering to 1,959 million US$ in 2021. This disparity suggests that the growth in reported equity is primarily driven by the accumulation of intangible assets rather than tangible capital.
- Return on Equity (ROE) Divergence
- The Reported ROE remained relatively stable, fluctuating between a low of 10.23% in 2017 and a high of 30.29% in 2018. When intangible assets are removed from the equity calculation, the Adjusted ROE increases dramatically, reflecting a much higher return on tangible capital. Adjusted ROE reached 112.19% in 2018 and 101.79% in 2021, indicating that the company generates substantial earnings relative to its tangible net worth.
- Analysis of the 2020 Anomaly
- The year 2020 presents a distinct outlier in the adjusted metrics. The collapse of adjusted equity to 306 million US$ resulted in an Adjusted ROE spike to 522.55%, despite the Reported ROE remaining modest at 12.22%. This mathematical surge is a direct consequence of the diminished tangible equity base, which serves to amplify the ROE ratio regardless of the underlying net income performance.
The overall trend demonstrates that the inclusion of goodwill and intangible assets significantly masks the underlying efficiency of the company's tangible asset base. The substantial gap between the two ROE metrics suggests that the company operates with high asset-light efficiency, though the extreme volatility in adjusted equity during 2020 introduces significant variance in tangible performance metrics.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2021 Calculations
1 ROA = 100 × Net earnings ÷ Total assets
= 100 × 1,994 ÷ 34,631 = 5.76%
2 Adjusted ROA = 100 × Net earnings ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 100 × 1,994 ÷ 21,713 = 9.18%
The analysis of asset utilization from 2017 to 2021 reveals a consistent growth in the total asset base, accompanied by an increasing divergence between reported and adjusted asset values. This gap indicates a substantial accumulation of goodwill and intangible assets over the period, which significantly impacts the interpretation of the return on assets (ROA).
- Asset Base Expansion and Composition
- Reported total assets increased from 22,197 million US dollars in 2017 to 34,631 million US dollars in 2021. During the same period, adjusted total assets grew from 15,029 million US dollars to 21,713 million US dollars. The expansion of the gap between these two figures suggests that intangible assets and goodwill have grown at a faster rate than tangible operating assets.
- Comparative ROA Analysis
- A persistent positive variance is observed between reported and adjusted ROA across all years. Adjusted ROA consistently outperforms reported ROA, reflecting the higher earning power of the operating asset base when non-operating intangible assets are excluded. For instance, in 2018, the adjusted ROA reached a peak of 19.03%, significantly higher than the reported ROA of 13.05%.
- Efficiency Trends and Volatility
- Both metrics exhibit a similar trajectory of volatility, characterized by a sharp increase in 2018, a subsequent decline through 2020, and a recovery in 2021. The adjusted ROA declined from its 2018 peak to 7.42% in 2020 before recovering to 9.18% in 2021, indicating that while overall efficiency fluctuated, the core operating assets maintained a stronger return profile than the total reported asset base.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?