Adjustment to Net Income (Loss): Mark to Market Available-for-sale Securities
LyondellBasell Industries N.V., adjustment to net income attributable to the Company shareholders
US$ in millions
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).
Between 2014 and 2018, net income attributable to shareholders exhibited moderate fluctuations, remaining within a range of approximately 3.8 billion to 4.9 billion US dollars. A general upward trajectory was observed from 2014 to 2015, followed by a contraction in 2016 and a subsequent peak in 2017, before stabilizing slightly in 2018.
- Net Income Variance Analysis
- The discrepancy between reported net income and adjusted net income is negligible throughout the analyzed period. In 2014 and 2018, the reported and adjusted figures were identical, indicating that no material adjustments were required for those fiscal years.
- Impact of Mark-to-Market Adjustments
- Adjustments related to the mark-to-market valuation of available-for-sale securities had a marginal effect on the overall financial results. In 2015, reported net income exceeded adjusted net income by 5 million US dollars. In 2016, the trend reversed, with adjusted net income exceeding reported net income by 6 million US dollars. In 2017, reported net income was 3 million US dollars higher than the adjusted figure.
- Earnings Stability and Materiality
- The narrow delta between reported and adjusted earnings suggests that non-cash valuation adjustments for securities do not significantly distort the company's profit profile. The volatility observed in the net income figures is driven by operational performance rather than accounting adjustments for available-for-sale securities.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Profitability Ratios: Mark to Market Available-for-sale Securities (Summary)
LyondellBasell Industries N.V., Profitability Ratios: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).
Between 2014 and 2018, profitability metrics exhibited a general upward trajectory in the initial years followed by a period of contraction. A consistent characteristic across all measured ratios is the negligible variance between reported and adjusted figures, indicating that mark-to-market adjustments for available-for-sale securities had a minimal impact on the overall financial performance during this period.
- Net Profit Margin Trends
- The reported net profit margin grew from 9.15% in 2014 to a peak of 14.15% in 2017. This growth indicates an improvement in operational efficiency and cost management over the first four years. However, a contraction occurred in 2018, with the margin declining to 12.02%, suggesting a decrease in profitability per unit of revenue.
- Return on Equity (ROE) Performance
- ROE demonstrated significant volatility and high overall levels. After starting at 50.20% in 2014, the ratio peaked sharply in 2015 at 68.34%. From 2015 onward, a consistent downward trend was observed, with ROE declining to 63.43% in 2016, 54.52% in 2017, and finishing at 45.71% in 2018. This sustained decline suggests a reduction in the efficiency of generating profits from shareholders' equity.
- Return on Assets (ROA) Stability
- ROA remained relatively stable compared to ROE, fluctuating within a narrow band between 16.36% and 19.67%. The highest asset efficiency was achieved in 2015 (19.67%), followed by a dip in 2016 and a partial recovery in 2017. By 2018, the ROA settled at 16.58%, reflecting a consistent ability to utilize assets to generate earnings despite the broader decline in equity returns.
- Comparison of Reported and Adjusted Metrics
- The divergence between reported and adjusted ratios is marginal throughout the five-year period. In most instances, the difference is limited to a few basis points, and in several years, such as 2014 and 2018, the figures are identical. This suggests that non-operational gains or losses related to the mark-to-market valuation of securities were not significant enough to distort the fundamental profitability of the company.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Net Profit Margin
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).
2018 Calculations
1 Net profit margin = 100 × Net income attributable to the Company shareholders ÷ Sales and other operating revenues
= 100 × 4,688 ÷ 39,004 = 12.02%
2 Adjusted net profit margin = 100 × Adjusted net income attributable to the Company shareholders ÷ Sales and other operating revenues
= 100 × 4,688 ÷ 39,004 = 12.02%
The financial performance from 2014 to 2018 is characterized by an initial expansion in profitability followed by a period of relative stability and a subsequent moderation in the final year.
- Adjusted Net Profit Margin Trends
- A significant increase in the adjusted net profit margin is observed between 2014 and 2015, where the ratio rose from 9.15% to 13.66%. This upward trajectory continued, albeit more gradually, reaching a peak of 14.14% in 2017. A contraction occurred in 2018, with the margin declining to 12.02%.
- Net Income Analysis
- Adjusted net income followed a pattern closely aligned with the profit margins. Earnings grew from US$ 4,174 million in 2014 to a peak of US$ 4,876 million in 2017, before receding to US$ 4,688 million in 2018. A temporary dip in adjusted net income was noted in 2016 at US$ 3,842 million, although the corresponding profit margin remained resilient relative to the 2014 baseline.
- Reported versus Adjusted Metrics
- There is a high degree of convergence between reported and adjusted financial figures throughout the analyzed period. The minimal variance between reported net profit margins and adjusted net profit margins indicates that non-recurring items or extraordinary gains and losses had a negligible impact on the overall profitability profile.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).
2018 Calculations
1 ROE = 100 × Net income attributable to the Company shareholders ÷ Total Company share of stockholders’ equity
= 100 × 4,688 ÷ 10,257 = 45.71%
2 Adjusted ROE = 100 × Adjusted net income attributable to the Company shareholders ÷ Total Company share of stockholders’ equity
= 100 × 4,688 ÷ 10,257 = 45.71%
The company experienced fluctuations in adjusted net income between 2014 and 2018, reaching a peak of US$ 4,876 million in 2017. Despite some annual volatility, including a dip to US$ 3,842 million in 2016, the net income figures remained within a relatively stable range over the five-year period.
A distinct trend is observed in the Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE), which climbed from 50.20% in 2014 to a peak of 68.26% in 2015. Following this peak, a consistent downward trajectory occurred, with the Adjusted ROE declining annually to reach 45.71% by December 31, 2018.
- Convergence of Reported and Adjusted Metrics
- There is a high degree of alignment between reported and adjusted figures for both net income and ROE. The minimal variance between these metrics suggests that the company's financial performance was not significantly impacted by one-time extraordinary items or non-recurring adjustments during this period.
- Analysis of ROE Erosion
- A divergence is evident between the trend of net income and the trend of ROE. Although adjusted net income in 2017 was higher than it was in 2015, the Adjusted ROE in 2017 was substantially lower (54.49% compared to 68.26%). This indicates that an increase in the shareholders' equity base occurred more rapidly than the growth in net income, thereby diluting the overall return on equity.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).
2018 Calculations
1 ROA = 100 × Net income attributable to the Company shareholders ÷ Total assets
= 100 × 4,688 ÷ 28,278 = 16.58%
2 Adjusted ROA = 100 × Adjusted net income attributable to the Company shareholders ÷ Total assets
= 100 × 4,688 ÷ 28,278 = 16.58%
The financial performance between 2014 and 2018 is characterized by cyclical fluctuations in both net income and asset efficiency. While profitability remained robust throughout the period, there is no linear growth trend, with performance peaking in the middle of the observation window before experiencing moderate declines.
- Adjusted Net Income Performance
- Adjusted net income attributable to shareholders exhibited volatility, starting at 4,174 million US$ in 2014 and reaching a peak of 4,876 million US$ in 2017. A notable contraction occurred in 2016, where income dropped to 3,842 million US$, representing the lowest point in the five-year sequence. By 2018, income settled at 4,688 million US$, maintaining a level higher than the 2014 baseline despite the preceding volatility.
- Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA) Trends
- The adjusted ROA demonstrates a pattern of instability, peaking in 2015 at 19.65%. This was followed by a significant decline to 16.39% in 2016. A recovery was observed in 2017, with the ratio rising to 18.61%, before descending again to 16.58% in 2018. The fluctuations in ROA suggest that asset utilization efficiency varied in alignment with the broader volatility of net income.
- Comparative Analysis of Reported and Adjusted Metrics
- A high degree of convergence exists between reported and adjusted figures for both net income and ROA. The variance between the two metrics is minimal, often limited to a few basis points or small million-dollar increments. This indicates that non-recurring items, extraordinary gains, or losses had a negligible impact on the overall financial results during this period, rendering the adjusted metrics nearly identical to the reported GAAP figures.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?