Inventory Disclosure
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).
Total inventory levels experienced a period of contraction between 2014 and 2016, followed by a recovery phase that brought balances back to near-initial levels by the end of 2018. The overall movement suggests a cyclical adjustment in stock management or market demand during this five-year timeframe.
- Finished Goods Trend
- Finished goods constitute the largest component of the inventory profile. A decline was observed from 2014 (US$ 2,919 million) to 2016 (US$ 2,575 million), representing a reduction of approximately 11.8%. This trend reversed in 2017 and 2018, with values increasing to US$ 3,066 million, marking the highest level in the observed period.
- Work-in-Process (WIP) Dynamics
- A significant reduction in work-in-process inventory occurred between 2014 and 2015, where balances dropped from US$ 304 million to US$ 148 million. Following this initial sharp decline, the WIP levels remained relatively stable, fluctuating within a narrow range between US$ 138 million and US$ 154 million through 2018.
- Raw Materials and Supplies
- Raw materials and supplies mirrored the trend seen in finished goods. Balances decreased from US$ 1,294 million in 2014 to a low of US$ 1,080 million in 2016. A subsequent upward trajectory led to a peak of US$ 1,311 million by December 31, 2018.
- Aggregate Inventory Composition
- Total inventory value decreased from US$ 4,517 million in 2014 to US$ 3,809 million in 2016 before rebounding to US$ 4,515 million in 2018. The consistent dominance of finished goods within the total inventory indicates that working capital is primarily tied up in completed products rather than raw materials or semi-finished goods.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjustment to Inventory: Conversion from LIFO to FIFO
LyondellBasell Industries N.V., Financial Data: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).
The conversion of inventory valuation from LIFO to FIFO reveals a consistent undervaluation of assets and equity in the reported financial statements. The discrepancy, representing the LIFO reserve, expanded significantly over the analyzed period, indicating a general upward trend in the cost of inventory layers.
- Inventory Valuation and LIFO Reserve Trends
- Reported inventories exhibited volatility, declining from 4,517 million USD in 2014 to a low of 3,809 million USD in 2016, before rising to 4,515 million USD by 2018. In contrast, adjusted FIFO inventories show a more pronounced increase in value toward the end of the period. The gap between reported and adjusted inventories widened substantially from 270 million USD in 2014 to a peak of 1,194 million USD in 2017, before narrowing to 798 million USD in 2018.
- Impact on Balance Sheet Strength
- The adjustment to FIFO consistently enhances the reported asset and equity positions. Adjusted current assets remained higher than reported current assets throughout the period, with the most significant divergence occurring in 2017, where adjusted assets were 12,932 million USD compared to 11,738 million USD reported. Total assets followed a similar pattern, with adjusted total assets reaching 29,076 million USD by 2018. This upward adjustment is directly reflected in the stockholders' equity, which was higher under the FIFO method in every year, ending at 11,055 million USD in 2018 compared to the reported 10,257 million USD.
- Net Income Fluctuations
- The impact of the inventory conversion on net income is variable, reflecting the relationship between current costs and older inventory layers. In 2014 and 2015, reported net income exceeded adjusted net income, suggesting that LIFO valuation resulted in lower cost of goods sold during those years. This trend reversed between 2016 and 2017, with adjusted net income peaking at 5,574 million USD in 2017, significantly surpassing the reported 4,879 million USD. By 2018, the trend shifted again, with reported net income of 4,688 million USD exceeding the adjusted figure of 4,292 million USD.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Financial Ratios: LIFO vs. FIFO (Summary)
LyondellBasell Industries N.V., Financial Ratios: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).
The comparative analysis of reported and adjusted financial ratios between 2014 and 2018 indicates a consistent divergence resulting from inventory accounting adjustments. The adjustments generally increase the valuation of current assets, which impacts liquidity, efficiency, and solvency metrics across the observed period.
- Liquidity Analysis
- The adjusted current ratio was consistently higher than the reported current ratio from 2014 through 2018. Both metrics followed a similar trajectory, peaking in 2017 at 2.71 (adjusted) and 2.46 (reported), before experiencing a notable decline in 2018 to 2.06 and 1.92, respectively. The positive variance between the two suggests that the adjustment for inventory valuation improves the perceived short-term liquidity position.
- Profitability and Return Metrics
- Net profit margins exhibited fluctuations, with reported margins rising from 9.15% in 2014 to a peak of 14.15% in 2017. Adjusted margins were lower than reported values in 2014 and 2015 but became higher in 2016 and 2017, peaking at 16.16%. Return on Equity (ROE) showed a significant peak in 2015 at 68.34% (reported) and 64.61% (adjusted), followed by a downward trend ending at 45.71% (reported) and 38.82% (adjusted) in 2018. Return on Assets (ROA) remained relatively stable, with the adjusted ROA peaking in 2017 at 20.34%, surpassing the reported peak of 19.67% seen in 2015.
- Efficiency and Financial Leverage
- Total asset turnover decreased from 2014 to 2016, moving from 1.88 (reported) to 1.24 (reported), before a slight recovery by 2018. The adjusted turnover was consistently lower than the reported turnover, as the increase in asset valuation in the denominator reduces the overall ratio. Financial leverage peaked in 2016 at 3.88 (reported) and 3.66 (adjusted). Following this peak, leverage decreased significantly, reaching 2.76 (reported) and 2.63 (adjusted) by 2018, indicating a reduction in the company's reliance on debt relative to its asset base.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Current Ratio
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).
2018 Calculations
1 Current ratio = Current assets ÷ Current liabilities
= 10,566 ÷ 5,513 = 1.92
2 Adjusted current ratio = Adjusted current assets ÷ Current liabilities
= 11,364 ÷ 5,513 = 2.06
The liquidity profile exhibits fluctuation over the five-year period from 2014 to 2018, characterized by a general volatility in current asset levels and a corresponding variance in current ratios. A distinct peak in liquidity occurred in 2017, followed by a notable contraction in 2018.
- Comparison of Reported and Adjusted Assets
- Adjusted current assets consistently exceed reported current assets across all observed years. The most significant divergence occurred in 2017, where adjusted current assets reached US$ 12,932 million against reported assets of US$ 11,738 million. This upward adjustment suggests the inclusion of specific asset valuations or reclassifications that enhance the perceived short-term financial position.
- Analysis of the Adjusted Current Ratio
- The adjusted current ratio maintained a higher value than the reported current ratio throughout the period. The ratio increased from 2.19 in 2014 to a peak of 2.71 in 2017, indicating a strong capacity to cover short-term obligations. However, a downward trend emerged in 2018, with the ratio declining to 2.06.
- Liquidity Trends and Volatility
- A cyclical pattern is observed in the liquidity metrics. After a period of relative stability and a slight dip in 2016, there was a sharp increase in both assets and ratios in 2017. By December 31, 2018, the reported current ratio fell below the 2.0 threshold to 1.92, while the adjusted current ratio remained above 2.0, suggesting that the adjustments provide a buffer in the assessment of short-term solvency.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Net Profit Margin
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).
2018 Calculations
1 Net profit margin = 100 × Net income attributable to the Company shareholders ÷ Sales and other operating revenues
= 100 × 4,688 ÷ 39,004 = 12.02%
2 Adjusted net profit margin = 100 × Adjusted net income attributable to the Company shareholders ÷ Sales and other operating revenues
= 100 × 4,292 ÷ 39,004 = 11.00%
The financial performance from 2014 to 2018 is characterized by a period of sustained growth in profitability margins followed by a significant contraction in the final year.
- Adjusted Net Profit Margin Trend
- A consistent upward trajectory was observed between 2014 and 2017, with the adjusted net profit margin increasing from 8.24% to a peak of 16.16%. This growth indicates a period of enhanced operational efficiency or favorable market conditions. However, this trend reversed sharply in 2018, as the margin declined to 11.00%, marking a decrease of 5.16 percentage points from the previous year's high.
- Adjusted Net Income Correlation
- Adjusted net income mirrored the margin patterns, rising from US$ 3,756 million in 2014 to a peak of US$ 5,574 million in 2017. The subsequent drop to US$ 4,292 million in 2018 correlates with the observed compression in the adjusted net profit margin, suggesting a reduction in the conversion of revenue into adjusted profit.
- Comparative Margin Analysis
- The adjusted net profit margin exhibited greater volatility than the reported net profit margin. While the reported margin fluctuated between 9.15% and 14.15%, the adjusted margin showed a more aggressive ascent to 16.16% in 2017 and a more pronounced decline in 2018. Notably, in 2018, the adjusted net profit margin (11.00%) fell below the reported net profit margin (12.02%), a reversal of the relationship seen in the three preceding years.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Total Asset Turnover
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).
2018 Calculations
1 Total asset turnover = Sales and other operating revenues ÷ Total assets
= 39,004 ÷ 28,278 = 1.38
2 Adjusted total asset turnover = Sales and other operating revenues ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 39,004 ÷ 29,076 = 1.34
The financial data indicates a fluctuating trend in asset utilization and base growth between 2014 and 2018. While total assets experienced a temporary decline in 2015, a consistent upward trajectory was maintained from 2016 through 2018, suggesting an expansion of the company's resource base.
- Adjusted Total Assets
- Adjusted total assets decreased from 24,553 million US$ in 2014 to 22,830 million US$ in 2015. Following this contraction, assets grew steadily, reaching 23,941 million US$ in 2016, 27,400 million US$ in 2017, and peaking at 29,076 million US$ by the end of 2018. This represents a total increase of approximately 18.4% from the 2015 trough to the 2018 year-end.
- Adjusted Total Asset Turnover
- The adjusted total asset turnover ratio exhibited a significant downward trend during the first three years of the period, falling from 1.86 in 2014 to a low of 1.22 in 2016. This decline indicates a reduction in the efficiency with which assets were utilized to generate revenue. However, a recovery phase began in 2017, with the ratio improving to 1.26 and further increasing to 1.34 in 2018.
- Comparative Efficiency Analysis
- A close correlation is observed between reported and adjusted metrics, with adjusted figures consistently mirroring the movements of reported figures. The convergence of increasing total assets and a recovering turnover ratio since 2016 suggests that the company has been successfully scaling its revenue generation in alignment with its growing asset base.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Financial Leverage
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).
2018 Calculations
1 Financial leverage = Total assets ÷ Total Company share of stockholders’ equity
= 28,278 ÷ 10,257 = 2.76
2 Adjusted financial leverage = Adjusted total assets ÷ Adjusted total Company share of stockholders’ equity
= 29,076 ÷ 11,055 = 2.63
The financial position between 2014 and 2018 was characterized by a period of increasing leverage followed by a significant deleveraging phase and balance sheet strengthening. While total assets experienced a slight contraction in 2015, a consistent growth trajectory was established from 2016 through 2018, with adjusted total assets increasing from 23,941 million US$ to 29,076 million US$.
- Stockholders' Equity Trends
- A notable decline in equity occurred between 2014 and 2016, with reported equity falling from 8,314 million US$ to a low of 6,048 million US$. This was followed by a robust recovery starting in 2017, with adjusted equity reaching 11,055 million US$ by the end of 2018, indicating a substantial increase in the company's capital base.
- Financial Leverage Dynamics
- The financial leverage ratio exhibited a cyclical pattern, peaking in 2016 at 3.88 for reported leverage and 3.66 for adjusted leverage. This peak coincided with the period of lowest stockholders' equity. Subsequently, leverage decreased significantly, ending the period at 2.76 reported and 2.63 adjusted, reflecting a reduced reliance on debt relative to equity.
- Adjusted vs. Reported Metrics
- Adjusted figures consistently reflect higher asset and equity values compared to reported figures. This adjustment resulted in an adjusted financial leverage ratio that remained lower than the reported ratio throughout the entire five-year period, suggesting that specific adjustments to the balance sheet items provided a more favorable view of the company's leverage position.
Overall, the data indicates a strategic shift toward a more conservative capital structure after 2016. The combination of growing total assets and a sharp increase in stockholders' equity successfully drove down both reported and adjusted financial leverage to levels lower than those observed at the start of the analyzed period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).
2018 Calculations
1 ROE = 100 × Net income attributable to the Company shareholders ÷ Total Company share of stockholders’ equity
= 100 × 4,688 ÷ 10,257 = 45.71%
2 Adjusted ROE = 100 × Adjusted net income attributable to the Company shareholders ÷ Adjusted total Company share of stockholders’ equity
= 100 × 4,292 ÷ 11,055 = 38.82%
The adjusted return on equity (ROE) exhibited significant volatility between 2014 and 2018, characterized by a sharp increase in the middle of the period followed by a steady decline. After starting at 43.76% in 2014, the adjusted ROE reached a peak of 65.10% in 2016 before retreating to 38.82% by the end of 2018.
- Adjusted Net Income Trends
- Adjusted net income showed a general upward trajectory from 2014 to 2017, rising from US$ 3,756 million to a peak of US$ 5,574 million. However, this growth reversed in 2018, with net income falling to US$ 4,292 million, reflecting a decrease of approximately 23% from the previous year's high.
- Adjusted Stockholders' Equity Shifts
- The equity base experienced two distinct phases. Between 2014 and 2016, adjusted stockholders' equity declined from US$ 8,584 million to US$ 6,547 million. This was followed by a period of substantial expansion, with equity increasing to US$ 10,143 million in 2017 and further climbing to US$ 11,055 million in 2018.
- Drivers of Adjusted ROE Variance
- The surge in adjusted ROE during 2015 and 2016 was driven by a combination of increasing adjusted net income and a reducing equity base, which amplified the return percentage. Conversely, the decline in ROE from 2017 to 2018 resulted from the simultaneous effect of falling net income and a growing equity base, which diluted the overall return on shareholders' investment.
- Comparison Between Reported and Adjusted Metrics
- Adjusted ROE generally tracked the movement of reported ROE, though it remained lower than the reported figure in 2014 and 2018, while closely aligning or slightly trailing it in 2015 through 2017. The convergence and divergence of these figures suggest that non-recurring items had a varying impact on the equity and income components throughout the five-year period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).
2018 Calculations
1 ROA = 100 × Net income attributable to the Company shareholders ÷ Total assets
= 100 × 4,688 ÷ 28,278 = 16.58%
2 Adjusted ROA = 100 × Adjusted net income attributable to the Company shareholders ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 100 × 4,292 ÷ 29,076 = 14.76%
The financial performance from 2014 to 2018 is characterized by a period of asset base expansion and significant volatility in profitability metrics, culminating in a peak of operational efficiency in 2017 followed by a contraction in 2018.
- Adjusted Net Income Trends
- Adjusted net income exhibited a general upward trajectory from 2014 through 2017, rising from 3,756 million US$ to a peak of 5,574 million US$. A subsequent decline occurred in 2018, with income falling to 4,292 million US$, returning to levels similar to those observed in 2015 and 2016.
- Adjusted Total Asset Growth
- Following a decrease in 2015 to 22,830 million US$, adjusted total assets entered a consistent growth phase. Assets expanded annually through 2018, reaching 29,076 million US$, representing a steady increase in the investment base over the final four years of the period.
- Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA) Performance
- The adjusted ROA demonstrated significant fluctuation, increasing from 15.30% in 2014 to a high of 20.34% in 2017. This growth was supported by a disproportionate increase in adjusted net income relative to asset growth during that interval. However, the ratio experienced a sharp decline to 14.76% in 2018, the lowest point in the five-year sequence, as the asset base continued to expand while adjusted net income contracted.
- Comparison of Reported vs. Adjusted Metrics
- Adjusted ROA consistently deviated from reported ROA, although both followed similar directional trends. The divergence indicates that non-recurring or adjusting items had a material impact on the reported profitability relative to the underlying operational performance.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?