Goodwill and Intangible Asset Disclosure
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).
Between 2014 and 2017, the company maintained a relatively stable profile regarding its intangible assets and goodwill, characterized by steady amortization and minimal new additions. However, 2018 marked a significant inflection point, with a substantial increase in both the cost of intangible assets and the carrying value of goodwill, indicating a major business acquisition or combination during that fiscal year.
- Intangible Asset Trends and Composition
- From 2014 to 2017, the composition of intangible assets was dominated by emission allowances and various contracts, both of which remained stable. Software costs showed a consistent downward trend, decreasing from 104 million in 2014 to 64 million by 2018. A structural shift occurred in 2018 with the emergence of new asset categories, specifically customer relationships (300 million), trade names and trademarks (104 million), and know-how (84 million), which were previously absent from the reporting periods.
- Goodwill Analysis
- Goodwill exhibited minimal volatility between 2014 and 2017, fluctuating within a narrow range between 528 million and 570 million. In 2018, goodwill increased sharply to 1,814 million. This represents a growth of approximately 218% over the 2017 balance, serving as the primary driver for the overall increase in the total valuation of goodwill and intangible assets, which rose from 1,138 million to 2,779 million in the same period.
- Amortization and Net Asset Valuation
- Accumulated amortization increased linearly throughout the five-year period, rising from 726 million in 2014 to 1,013 million in 2018. This steady increase resulted in a decline in net intangible assets from 769 million in 2014 to a low of 550 million in 2016. The net valuation recovered slightly in 2017 before jumping to 965 million in 2018, driven by the significant increase in the cost of newly acquired intangible assets which offset the ongoing amortization.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjustments to Financial Statements: Removal of Goodwill
LyondellBasell Industries N.V., Financial Data: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).
An analysis of the financial position reveals a consistent discrepancy between reported and adjusted figures, resulting from the systematic removal of goodwill and intangible assets. This adjustment is applied symmetrically to both the asset base and the total stockholders' equity, ensuring the accounting equation remains balanced while providing a view of the company's tangible financial structure.
- Total Asset Trajectory
- Reported total assets experienced a decline between 2014 and 2015, followed by a period of sustained growth, reaching 28,278 million USD by December 31, 2018. Adjusted total assets mirrored this trend, though they remained consistently lower than reported values, indicating that a portion of the asset growth was driven by intangible valuations.
- Stockholders' Equity Dynamics
- The reported company share of stockholders' equity exhibited significant volatility, contracting from 8,314 million USD in 2014 to a low of 6,048 million USD in 2016, before rebounding to 10,257 million USD by 2018. The adjusted equity figures followed a similar pattern, reflecting the removal of the same intangible values attributed to the asset side of the balance sheet.
- Analysis of Goodwill Adjustment Magnitude
- From 2014 through 2017, the variance between reported and adjusted figures remained relatively stable, fluctuating within a narrow range between 528 million USD and 570 million USD. A significant shift occurred in 2018, where the adjustment expanded sharply to 1,814 million USD. This suggests a substantial increase in the recognized value of goodwill or intangible assets during the final year of the period analyzed.
- Impact on Equity Composition
- The proportion of equity comprised of intangible assets increased markedly over the analyzed period. While the adjustment represented approximately 6.8% of total equity in 2014, it grew to represent approximately 17.6% of total reported equity by 2018, indicating a growing reliance on non-tangible asset valuation within the equity structure.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Financial Ratios: Removal of Goodwill (Summary)
LyondellBasell Industries N.V., Financial Ratios: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).
The analysis of financial ratios from 2014 to 2018 reveals a consistent divergence between reported figures and adjusted figures following the removal of goodwill and intangible assets. The adjusted metrics generally indicate higher operational efficiency and profitability, although they simultaneously reflect a higher degree of financial leverage.
- Total Asset Turnover
- A general decline in asset turnover was observed from 2014 to 2016, followed by a gradual recovery through 2018. Adjusted total asset turnover consistently exceeded reported values across all five years. This indicates that the presence of goodwill artificially lowers the perceived efficiency of asset utilization, with the variance between reported and adjusted ratios expanding from 0.04 in 2014 to 0.09 in 2018.
- Financial Leverage
- Financial leverage peaked in 2016 before declining to its lowest level in 2018. In every period, adjusted financial leverage was higher than reported leverage. The removal of goodwill reduces the total asset base, thereby increasing the leverage ratio and highlighting a higher reliance on debt relative to tangible assets.
- Return on Equity (ROE)
- ROE exhibited significant volatility, peaking in 2015. Adjusted ROE remained consistently higher than reported ROE, with the disparity widening over the analyzed period. By 2018, the adjusted ROE was 9.82 percentage points higher than the reported figure, suggesting that the exclusion of goodwill significantly enhances the perceived return on equity.
- Return on Assets (ROA)
- ROA followed a trajectory similar to ROE, with a peak in 2015. Adjusted ROA figures were marginally higher than reported figures throughout the five-year period. While the impact of goodwill removal is less pronounced for ROA than for ROE, the adjusted figures consistently demonstrate a higher rate of return on the tangible asset base.
Overall, the data indicates that goodwill constitutes a significant portion of the balance sheet that dilutes reported turnover and return ratios. The widening gap between reported and adjusted metrics suggests that the relative influence of intangible assets on the financial profile intensified between 2014 and 2018.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Total Asset Turnover
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).
2018 Calculations
1 Total asset turnover = Sales and other operating revenues ÷ Total assets
= 39,004 ÷ 28,278 = 1.38
2 Adjusted total asset turnover = Sales and other operating revenues ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 39,004 ÷ 26,464 = 1.47
An analysis of asset utilization between 2014 and 2018 reveals a period of initial decline in efficiency followed by a steady recovery. While total assets experienced a contraction in 2015, the subsequent years show a consistent upward trend in the overall asset base.
- Asset Base Evolution
- Reported total assets decreased from 24,283 million USD in 2014 to 22,757 million USD in 2015, before growing to 28,278 million USD by 2018. Adjusted total assets followed a similar trajectory, though the gap between reported and adjusted figures expanded significantly in the final year. Between 2014 and 2017, the difference remained relatively stable, but by December 31, 2018, the variance increased to 1,814 million USD, indicating a substantial increase in the carrying value of goodwill and intangible assets.
- Asset Turnover Performance
- A V-shaped trend is observed in asset turnover ratios. Reported total asset turnover declined from 1.88 in 2014 to a minimum of 1.24 in 2016, subsequently recovering to 1.38 by 2018. The adjusted total asset turnover mirrored this pattern, falling from 1.92 in 2014 to 1.27 in 2016, and rising back to 1.47 by 2018.
- Comparative Analysis of Reported vs. Adjusted Metrics
- The adjusted total asset turnover consistently remained higher than the reported ratio throughout the five-year period. This discrepancy confirms that the exclusion of goodwill and intangible assets results in a more favorable perception of asset efficiency. The margin between the two ratios widened in 2018, coinciding with the increase in non-physical assets, which suggests that the growth in reported assets was driven more by intangibles than by revenue-generating physical capacity.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Financial Leverage
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).
2018 Calculations
1 Financial leverage = Total assets ÷ Total Company share of stockholders’ equity
= 28,278 ÷ 10,257 = 2.76
2 Adjusted financial leverage = Adjusted total assets ÷ Adjusted total Company share of stockholders’ equity
= 26,464 ÷ 8,443 = 3.13
The financial trajectory between 2014 and 2018 is characterized by a general expansion of the asset base and significant fluctuations in equity, resulting in a volatile leverage profile. A consistent gap exists between reported and adjusted values, reflecting the impact of goodwill and intangible assets on the balance sheet calculations.
- Asset and Equity Trends
- Reported total assets grew from 24,283 million USD in 2014 to 28,278 million USD in 2018, despite a temporary contraction in 2015. Adjusted total assets followed a similar upward trend, concluding the period at 26,464 million USD. Stockholders' equity experienced a notable decline between 2014 and 2016, with reported equity falling from 8,314 million USD to 6,048 million USD, before recovering significantly to 10,257 million USD by the end of 2018.
- Financial Leverage Analysis
- Reported financial leverage exhibited a peaking pattern, rising from 2.92 in 2014 to a maximum of 3.88 in 2016, followed by a steady decrease to 2.76 in 2018. This indicates a period of heightened financial risk or increased asset financing mid-period, succeeded by a deleveraging phase.
- Impact of Adjustments on Leverage
- Adjusted financial leverage remained consistently higher than reported leverage across all five years. The adjusted ratio reached its peak in 2016 at 4.15, compared to the reported peak of 3.88. This divergence demonstrates that the removal of goodwill and intangible assets from the asset and equity base increases the perceived leverage, offering a more conservative assessment of the company's financial position. While reported leverage declined between 2017 and 2018, adjusted leverage experienced a slight increase from 3.06 to 3.13 during the same interval.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).
2018 Calculations
1 ROE = 100 × Net income attributable to the Company shareholders ÷ Total Company share of stockholders’ equity
= 100 × 4,688 ÷ 10,257 = 45.71%
2 Adjusted ROE = 100 × Net income attributable to the Company shareholders ÷ Adjusted total Company share of stockholders’ equity
= 100 × 4,688 ÷ 8,443 = 55.53%
Between 2014 and 2018, stockholders' equity and return on equity (ROE) exhibited significant volatility, characterized by a mid-period contraction followed by a substantial recovery in equity levels and a gradual deceleration in ROE performance.
- Stockholders' Equity Trends
- Reported total equity decreased from US$ 8,314 million in 2014 to a low of US$ 6,048 million in 2016, before experiencing a sharp increase to US$ 10,257 million by 2018. Adjusted equity followed a similar trajectory, though the gap between reported and adjusted figures widened considerably in 2018. While the difference remained relatively stable between 2014 and 2017, the variance increased to US$ 1,814 million in 2018, suggesting a significant increase in the impact of goodwill and intangible assets on the balance sheet during the final year of the period.
- Return on Equity (ROE) Dynamics
- Both reported and adjusted ROE peaked in 2015, reaching 68.34% and 74.43%, respectively. Following this peak, a consistent downward trend was observed through 2018. Reported ROE declined to 45.71% by the end of the period, while adjusted ROE settled at 55.53%. This decline in ROE coincided with the increase in total equity from 2016 onward, indicating that the growth in the equity base outpaced the growth in net income.
- Impact of Adjusted Metrics
- Adjusted ROE remained consistently higher than reported ROE throughout the five-year period. The removal of goodwill and intangible assets from the equity calculation effectively reduced the denominator, thereby inflating the return percentage. The divergence between reported and adjusted ROE was most pronounced in 2018, where the adjusted figure exceeded the reported figure by 9.82 percentage points, compared to a narrower difference of 3.67 percentage points in 2014. This indicates that the relative weight of intangible assets became more influential in the financial results over time.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).
2018 Calculations
1 ROA = 100 × Net income attributable to the Company shareholders ÷ Total assets
= 100 × 4,688 ÷ 28,278 = 16.58%
2 Adjusted ROA = 100 × Net income attributable to the Company shareholders ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 100 × 4,688 ÷ 26,464 = 17.71%
A comparative analysis of reported and adjusted financial metrics from 2014 to 2018 reveals a consistent divergence between standard accounting valuations and figures adjusted for goodwill and intangible assets. Total assets exhibited a general upward trajectory after a slight contraction in 2015, with reported assets increasing from 24,283 million USD in 2014 to 28,278 million USD by 2018.
- Asset Base Composition
- A persistent gap exists between reported and adjusted total assets, indicating the presence of significant goodwill and intangible assets. This variance remained relatively stable between 2014 and 2017, fluctuating between 528 million USD and 570 million USD. However, a notable expansion occurred in 2018, where the difference widened to 1,814 million USD, suggesting a substantial increase in intangible asset accumulation or acquisition activity during that period.
- Return on Assets (ROA) Performance
- Both reported and adjusted ROA followed a similar cyclical pattern, peaking in 2015 at 19.67% and 20.14%, respectively, and experiencing a trough in 2016. The adjusted ROA consistently outperformed the reported ROA across all five years. This trend confirms that the exclusion of goodwill and intangible assets from the asset base provides a more favorable view of operational efficiency by reducing the denominator used in the ROA calculation.
- Impact of Asset Adjustments on Profitability Metrics
- The margin between reported and adjusted ROA remained narrow, typically between 0.38% and 0.47%, from 2014 through 2017. In 2018, this margin expanded significantly to 1.13%. This expansion correlates directly with the increased volume of intangible assets recorded in the same year, demonstrating that as the proportion of goodwill and intangibles grows, the disparity between reported and adjusted performance metrics becomes more pronounced.
The observed data suggests that while reported asset growth is positive, a significant portion of the 2018 increase is attributed to non-physical assets. The consistently higher adjusted ROA indicates that the underlying tangible asset base is generating returns at a higher rate than the total reported balance sheet would suggest.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?