Decomposing ROE involves expressing net income divided by shareholders’ equity as the product of component ratios.
Paying user area
Try for free
Kimberly-Clark Corp. pages available for free this week:
- Balance Sheet: Assets
- Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
- Common-Size Income Statement
- Common-Size Balance Sheet: Assets
- Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)
- Operating Profit Margin since 2005
- Return on Equity (ROE) since 2005
- Total Asset Turnover since 2005
- Price to Earnings (P/E) since 2005
- Analysis of Debt
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Kimberly-Clark Corp. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Two-Component Disaggregation of ROE
Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-03-31).
The data reveals several noteworthy trends in the financial performance and structure over the periods analyzed.
- Return on Assets (ROA)
- The ROA values, available starting from December 31, 2016, exhibit a generally fluctuating trend with some cyclical tendencies. Initially, ROA remained strong in the range of approximately 14% to 15% through the end of 2017. However, beginning in 2018, there is a notable downward movement, reaching a low near 9.7% by December 31, 2018. Subsequently, ROA recovers steadily from early 2019 through the end of 2020, peaking slightly above 15% in mid-2020 before declining again towards 13% in the first quarter of 2021. The pattern suggests periods of volatility but overall maintains a moderate to strong level of asset profitability over the later years.
- Financial Leverage
- Financial leverage ratios display substantial volatility and inconsistent availability of data. Early periods, from March to September 2016, show very high leverage ratios, with a marked decline by December 2016. In 2017, values fluctuate considerably, with some quarters showing extremely high leverage (over 100), while others drop below 30. Data gaps prevent continuous trend observation, but from mid-2020 onwards, leverage appears to stabilize at more moderate levels between 27 and 60. This variability indicates shifting capital structures, possibly due to debt repayment or new financing activities.
- Return on Equity (ROE)
- The ROE figures, sparse and available only for certain quarters primarily in 2016-2017 and 2020-2021, reveal extremely high values in 2017, with peaks exceeding 2000%, which is an outlier and may be due to data irregularities or unusual one-time events. Later values in 2020-2021 remain elevated but are significantly lower than the earlier spikes, generally ranging between roughly 375% and 950%. This suggests periods of intense equity profitability, though the extraordinary magnitudes highlight potential anomalies or the impact of highly leveraged returns during those intervals.
Overall, the financial metrics paint a picture of a company experiencing significant fluctuations in leverage and profitability. ROA indicates relatively stable operational returns over assets, albeit with some declines and recoveries. Financial leverage shows considerable instability, implying changes in the company's financing approach. ROE data suggests episodes of unusually high equity returns, likely tied to specific events or accounting circumstances. Continuous monitoring and further investigation into the causes of these fluctuations would be advisable to attain a clearer understanding of the underlying financial dynamics.
Three-Component Disaggregation of ROE
Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-03-31).
- Net Profit Margin
- The net profit margin shows a generally positive trend from the end of 2016 through early 2021. Starting at 11.9% in March 2017, it fluctuates slightly but remains above 9% through 2018. A dip is observed toward the end of 2018, bottoming at 7.63% in December 2018, followed by a recovery and upward movement reaching a peak of 13.58% in September 2020. The margin then slightly declines but remains stable above 12% at the beginning of 2021. This indicates consistent profitability with some variation linked potentially to operational or market conditions.
- Asset Turnover
- Asset turnover maintains a rather stable pattern around the 1.2 to 1.3 range from the first observable data point in early 2017 through March 2021. A slight decreasing trend is noted starting mid-2019, with values gradually declining from approximately 1.27 to 1.09 by September 2020, before a minor increase to 1.1 in March 2021. This subtle decrease suggests a small decline in the company's efficiency in utilizing its assets to generate revenue over time.
- Financial Leverage
- Financial leverage figures exhibit considerable volatility throughout the periods reported. Initial values are high early in 2016, peaking at 147.75 in June 2017 before experiencing sharp declines to lower levels around 20-30 by late 2017 and early 2018, where data is missing. Subsequent readings from 2019 to 2021 reflect moderate leverage ratios fluctuating between approximately 27.99 and 60.35. The overall pattern indicates periods of heavy reliance on debt or fixed financial structure, followed by efforts to reduce leverage, enhancing financial stability in recent years.
- Return on Equity (ROE)
- Return on equity demonstrates extremely high and fluctuating values during the periods recorded, with peaks reaching over 2100% in June 2017 and remaining elevated through several quarters. These extraordinarily high ROE values suggest either an unusual capital structure or significant anomalies in the data, possibly influenced by low equity base or non-recurring items. The trend shows some decline after the mid-2017 peak but remains substantially high above typical industry averages, indicating potentially high profitability relative to shareholder equity, albeit with notable volatility.
Five-Component Disaggregation of ROE
Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-03-31).
- Tax Burden
- The tax burden ratio remained stable around 0.7 between March 2016 and December 2016. Starting from March 2017, it showed a gradual increase, peaking at approximately 0.79 by March 2020, before slightly declining to 0.78 in March 2021. This suggests a steadily increasing proportion of earnings retained after taxes over the observed period.
- Interest Burden
- The interest burden ratio maintained a consistent level ranging between 0.89 and 0.93 from March 2016 through March 2021. Minor fluctuations were observed, but overall the ratio indicates a stable cost structure related to interest expenses relative to earnings.
- EBIT Margin
- The EBIT margin exhibited a declining trend from about 18.7% in late 2016 to a low of approximately 11.6% by December 2018. Following this trough, the margin recovered to around 17% by late 2020 and early 2021. This trajectory reflects an initial compression in operating profitability followed by a phase of improvement.
- Asset Turnover
- Asset turnover began at 1.25 in early 2016 and gradually decreased to a low near 1.09 in late 2020, with a slight recovery to 1.10 by March 2021. This signals a moderate decline in the efficiency with which assets are used to generate sales over the period.
- Financial Leverage
- Financial leverage ratios showed significant volatility, with initial high values exceeding 100 in early 2016, followed by reductions to levels below 30 during 2017 and again between 2019 and 2020. Towards the end of the period, leverage oscillated between approximately 27.99 and 60.35, indicating fluctuating reliance on debt financing.
- Return on Equity (ROE)
- ROE demonstrated extreme volatility, with extraordinarily high values recorded in early periods such as above 1600% in mid-2016 and peaking over 2100% later that year. These values declined substantially to below 400% by late 2019 but increased again to over 950% by early 2020. Despite the large magnitudes, the pattern suggests significant variations in profitability relative to equity, likely influenced by underlying changes in leverage and operational efficiency.
Two-Component Disaggregation of ROA
Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-03-31).
- Net Profit Margin
- The net profit margin exhibits a generally stable trend with some fluctuations over the period analyzed. Starting from March 31, 2017, where the margin was 11.9%, it saw minor decreases reaching a low of 7.63% by December 31, 2018. After this trough, the margin gradually increased once again, peaking at 13.58% by September 30, 2020, before slightly declining to around 12.06% by March 31, 2021. Overall, the margin shows a pattern of recovery following a dip during late 2018.
- Asset Turnover
- The asset turnover ratio remained relatively consistent between 1.09 and 1.27 throughout the periods reported. It started near 1.25 in early 2017, with a slight downward trend observed from mid-2019 onward, falling from 1.21 to a low of 1.09 by September 30, 2020. A marginal recovery to 1.1 by March 31, 2021, suggests some stabilization. The ratio indicates moderate efficiency in utilizing assets to generate sales but points to a slight decline in asset productivity towards the end of the period.
- Return on Assets (ROA)
- Return on assets followed a trajectory resembling that of the net profit margin, starting at 14.83% on March 31, 2017, then declining to 9.71% by December 31, 2018. Subsequently, ROA increased steadily, reaching a peak of 15.82% in September 2020, before decreasing to 13.21% by March 2021. This trend suggests a period of reduced asset profitability followed by an improvement, implying enhanced earnings performance relative to asset base during the latter periods.
Four-Component Disaggregation of ROA
Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-03-31).
The analysis of the financial ratios over the observed quarters reveals several notable trends in the company's profitability and operational efficiency.
- Tax Burden
- The tax burden ratio, available from the first quarter of 2017 onwards, shows a gradual increase from 0.70 in March 2017 to a peak of approximately 0.79 by the end of 2019 and through 2020, indicating a rising proportion of earnings retained after tax. This suggests a potentially more favorable tax environment or improved tax management over time, stabilizing around 0.78 to 0.79 in the latest periods.
- Interest Burden
- The interest burden ratio remains relatively stable throughout the observed period, fluctuating narrowly between 0.88 and 0.93. This stability indicates consistent interest expenses relative to earnings before interest and taxes, reflecting steady debt management and cost of financing.
- EBIT Margin
- The EBIT margin demonstrates a downward trend starting at approximately 18.7% in early 2017, declining significantly to a low near 11.6% by December 2018. Subsequently, the margin recovers steadily, reaching levels above 17% by mid-2020, before a slight dip towards early 2021. This pattern suggests an initial compression in operating profitability possibly due to increased costs or pricing pressures, followed by operational improvements or cost control measures enhancing earnings efficiency.
- Asset Turnover
- Asset turnover ratios exhibit a mild declining trend over the period. Beginning near 1.25 in early 2017, the ratio decreases progressively to around 1.09 by September 2020, before a minor uptick to 1.10 in March 2021. This decline signals a reduction in efficiency in using assets to generate revenue, possibly due to increased asset base or slower sales growth relative to assets.
- Return on Assets (ROA)
- ROA follows a trajectory similar to EBIT margin, initially decreasing from around 14.8% in early 2017 to approximately 9.7% by the end of 2018, then recovering to near 15.8% in mid-2020. This recovery aligns with improvements in EBIT margin, indicating that profitability gains have translated into higher returns on the asset base. The slight decrease towards early 2021 may reflect emerging challenges or a normalization after the recovery.
Overall, the data suggests a period of initial profitability and operational efficiency contraction around 2018, followed by a phase of gradual recovery towards 2020. While profitability metrics improved, asset utilization efficiency has experienced a modest decline, indicating possible opportunities for enhanced asset management.
Disaggregation of Net Profit Margin
Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-03-31).
- Tax Burden
- The tax burden ratio has demonstrated a gradual increase over the observed periods, beginning around 0.70 in early 2017 and rising to approximately 0.78 by the first quarter of 2021. This indicates a slight improvement in the proportion of earnings retained after taxes, suggesting effective tax management or changes in tax liabilities.
- Interest Burden
- The interest burden ratio remained relatively stable throughout the timeframe, fluctuating narrowly between 0.88 and 0.93. This consistency implies that the company maintained a steady interest expense relative to earnings before interest and taxes, without significant increases or decreases in debt servicing costs.
- EBIT Margin
- The EBIT margin showed a declining trend from the first quarter of 2017 through the end of 2018, dropping from around 18.7% to a low near 11.6%. However, starting in 2019, there was a recovery trend with the EBIT margin increasing to over 17% by mid-2020. This pattern suggests operational challenges initially, followed by improved operational efficiency or revenue growth in later periods.
- Net Profit Margin
- The net profit margin followed a similar trajectory to the EBIT margin. After peaking around 12.5% in early 2017, it declined steadily to approximately 7.6% by late 2018. From 2019 onward, the margin improved significantly, reaching levels above 12% in 2020 and early 2021. This recovery indicates an increase in overall profitability, potentially aided by better cost control, operational improvements, or favorable market conditions.