AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

Kimberly-Clark Corp. (NYSE:KMB)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since April 23, 2021.

Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)

Microsoft Excel

Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA)

Kimberly-Clark Corp., EBITDA calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016
Net income attributable to Kimberly-Clark Corporation 2,352 2,157 1,410 2,278 2,166
Add: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest 44 40 35 41 53
Add: Income tax expense 676 576 471 776 922
Earnings before tax (EBT) 3,072 2,773 1,916 3,095 3,141
Add: Interest expense 252 261 263 318 319
Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) 3,324 3,034 2,179 3,413 3,460
Add: Depreciation and amortization 796 917 882 724 705
Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) 4,120 3,951 3,061 4,137 4,165

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).


The financial performance from 2016 to 2020 is characterized by a significant V-shaped trend, marked by a sharp contraction in 2018 followed by a consistent recovery through 2020. This pattern is evident across all primary earnings metrics, including EBITDA, EBIT, EBT, and net income.

EBITDA Performance and Volatility
EBITDA remained relatively stable between 2016 and 2017, with values of $4,165 million and $4,137 million, respectively. A substantial decline occurred in 2018, where EBITDA fell to a five-year low of $3,061 million, representing a decrease of approximately 25.8% from the previous year. A robust recovery followed, with EBITDA rising to $3,951 million in 2019 and reaching $4,120 million by December 31, 2020, nearly returning to 2016 levels.
Operational Profitability Correlation
A high degree of correlation is observed between EBITDA and Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT). Both metrics experienced simultaneous declines in 2018 and mirrored the subsequent recovery. The gap between EBITDA and EBIT—representing depreciation and amortization—remained relatively consistent, though it peaked in 2019 at $917 million, suggesting a period of higher non-cash expenses during the recovery phase.
Earnings Conversion and Net Income
The transition from operational earnings to net income reflects the same volatility observed in EBITDA. Net income reached its lowest point in 2018 at $1,410 million. Notably, by 2020, net income grew to $2,352 million, which is the highest value recorded in the five-year period. This indicates that the recovery in operational cash flow not only restored previous levels but resulted in a net profitability peak that exceeded the 2016 baseline.
Tax and Interest Impact
The variance between EBIT and Earnings Before Tax (EBT) remained narrow throughout the period, indicating a stable interest expense environment. The recovery in EBT from $1,916 million in 2018 to $3,072 million in 2020 aligns closely with the trajectory of operational earnings, confirming that the overall financial trend was driven primarily by operational performance rather than financing or tax adjustments.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Current

Kimberly-Clark Corp., current EV/EBITDA calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Enterprise value (EV) 52,882
Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) 4,120
Valuation Ratio
EV/EBITDA 12.84
Benchmarks
EV/EBITDA, Competitors1
Procter & Gamble Co. 16.21

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).

1 Click competitor name to see calculations.

If the company EV/EBITDA is lower then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/EBITDA is higher then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.


Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Historical

Kimberly-Clark Corp., historical EV/EBITDA calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Enterprise value (EV)1 52,998 57,004 46,202 46,232 50,665
Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)2 4,120 3,951 3,061 4,137 4,165
Valuation Ratio
EV/EBITDA3 12.86 14.43 15.09 11.18 12.16
Benchmarks
EV/EBITDA, Competitors4
Procter & Gamble Co. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).

1 See details »

2 See details »

3 2020 Calculation
EV/EBITDA = EV ÷ EBITDA
= 52,998 ÷ 4,120 = 12.86

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Between 2016 and 2020, the valuation multiples for Kimberly-Clark Corp exhibited notable volatility, characterized by a significant spike in 2018 followed by a period of gradual normalization. The Enterprise Value fluctuated throughout the five-year window, starting at 50,665 million USD in 2016, experiencing a decline through 2018, peaking at 57,004 million USD in 2019, and concluding the period at 52,998 million USD in 2020.

EBITDA Performance Trends
Operational earnings remained relatively consistent between 2016 and 2017, exceeding 4.1 billion USD. A substantial contraction was observed in 2018, where EBITDA fell to 3,061 million USD, representing the lowest operational performance in the sequence. This was followed by a recovery phase in 2019 and 2020, with EBITDA returning to 4,120 million USD by the end of 2020, effectively restoring earnings to levels seen at the start of the analysis period.
EV/EBITDA Ratio Analysis
The EV/EBITDA ratio began at 12.16 in 2016 and decreased to 11.18 in 2017. A sharp increase to 15.09 occurred in 2018; this expansion was primarily driven by the deterioration of EBITDA rather than an increase in Enterprise Value. Subsequently, the ratio trended downward, reaching 14.43 in 2019 and 12.86 in 2020, indicating a convergence back toward the company's historical valuation baseline.
Valuation and Earnings Correlation
A divergence between market valuation and operational earnings is evident during the 2018-2019 period. While 2018 saw the ratio peak due to earnings compression, 2019 saw the Enterprise Value reach its highest point despite EBITDA still being below 2016 levels. The reduction of the ratio to 12.86 in 2020 suggests a realignment where the Enterprise Value adjusted downward as EBITDA stabilized.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?