AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

Kimberly-Clark Corp. (NYSE:KMB)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since April 23, 2021.

Analysis of Profitability Ratios

Microsoft Excel

Profitability Ratios (Summary)

Return on Sales

Return on Investment

Kimberly-Clark Corp., profitability ratios

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016
Return on Sales
Gross profit margin 35.64% 32.71% 30.28% 35.89% 36.54%
Operating profit margin 16.95% 16.21% 12.06% 18.07% 18.22%
Net profit margin 12.29% 11.69% 7.63% 12.48% 11.90%
Return on Investment
Return on equity (ROE) 375.72% — — 362.16% —
Return on assets (ROA) 13.42% 14.11% 9.71% 15.04% 14.83%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).


Profitability metrics for the period between 2016 and 2020 exhibit a consistent pattern of volatility characterized by a sharp contraction in 2018 followed by a sustained recovery. The high degree of correlation across gross, operating, and net margins suggests that the 2018 downturn was a systemic event that impacted the cost of goods sold as well as overall operational efficiency.

Profit Margin Analysis
A significant dip is observed across all margin categories in 2018. The gross profit margin declined from 36.54% in 2016 to 30.28% in 2018, before recovering to 35.64% by 2020. This trend is closely mirrored by the operating profit margin, which reached a low of 12.06% in 2018 after maintaining levels above 18% in 2016 and 2017, eventually recovering to 16.95% in 2020. Net profit margins followed a similar trajectory, falling to 7.63% in 2018 from 12.48% in 2017, and returning to 12.29% by the end of the analyzed period.
Return on Assets (ROA)
The return on assets reflects the broader profitability trend, experiencing a notable decline in 2018 to 9.71%, compared to 15.04% in 2017. While ROA recovered to 14.11% in 2019, it saw a slight moderation to 13.42% in 2020, suggesting that while profitability margins returned to near-baseline levels, asset efficiency remained slightly below 2017 peaks.
Return on Equity (ROE)
The return on equity is characterized by exceptionally high percentages, recorded at 362.16% in 2017 and increasing to 375.72% by 2020. Such elevated figures typically indicate a highly leveraged capital structure or a significant reduction in shareholders' equity relative to net income.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Gross Profit Margin

Kimberly-Clark Corp., gross profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Gross profit 6,822 6,035 5,597 6,553 6,651
Net sales 19,140 18,450 18,486 18,259 18,202
Profitability Ratio
Gross profit margin1 35.64% 32.71% 30.28% 35.89% 36.54%
Benchmarks
Gross Profit Margin, Competitors2
Procter & Gamble Co. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).

1 2020 Calculation
Gross profit margin = 100 × Gross profit ÷ Net sales
= 100 × 6,822 ÷ 19,140 = 35.64%

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial performance between 2016 and 2020 is characterized by relatively stable net sales contrasted with significant volatility in gross profit margins, which reached a trough in 2018 before returning to near-baseline levels by 2020.

Net Sales Trends
Net sales exhibited a pattern of stability from 2016 through 2019, maintaining a range between 18.20 billion and 18.49 billion US dollars. A significant increase occurred in 2020, with sales rising to 19.14 billion US dollars, marking the peak revenue for the analyzed period.
Gross Profit Margin Contraction
A notable decline in profitability is observed between 2016 and 2018. The gross profit margin fell from 36.54% to 30.28%. Because this margin compression occurred while net sales were simultaneously increasing, it indicates a substantial rise in the cost of goods sold relative to revenue during this interval.
Profitability Recovery
Following the 2018 low, a consistent recovery trend emerged. Gross profit margins improved to 32.71% in 2019 and further increased to 35.64% by December 31, 2020. This upward trajectory suggests an effective reduction in production costs or an optimized pricing strategy, effectively restoring the margin to levels nearly identical to those seen in 2016.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Operating Profit Margin

Kimberly-Clark Corp., operating profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Operating profit 3,244 2,991 2,229 3,299 3,317
Net sales 19,140 18,450 18,486 18,259 18,202
Profitability Ratio
Operating profit margin1 16.95% 16.21% 12.06% 18.07% 18.22%
Benchmarks
Operating Profit Margin, Competitors2
Procter & Gamble Co. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).

1 2020 Calculation
Operating profit margin = 100 × Operating profit ÷ Net sales
= 100 × 3,244 ÷ 19,140 = 16.95%

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Between 2016 and 2020, the operating profit margin exhibited a volatile trajectory, characterized by a period of initial stability, a sharp contraction in 2018, and a subsequent multi-year recovery phase.

Revenue Trends
Net sales demonstrated consistent, gradual growth over the five-year period, rising from $18,202 million in 2016 to $19,140 million in 2020. This indicates a stable top-line performance with a minor fluctuation in 2019.
Operating Profit Volatility
Operating profit showed significant instability, peaking at $3,317 million in 2016 before experiencing a substantial decline to $2,229 million in 2018. Following this trough, a recovery trend emerged, with operating profit climbing back to $3,244 million by December 31, 2020.
Operating Profit Margin Analysis
The operating profit margin remained stable around 18% during 2016 and 2017 but plummeted to 12.06% in 2018, coinciding with the drop in operating profit. This contraction suggests a period of increased operating expenses or reduced pricing efficiency. Subsequent years showed a steady rebound, with the margin improving to 16.21% in 2019 and 16.95% in 2020, although it did not fully return to the 2016 level of 18.22%.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Net Profit Margin

Kimberly-Clark Corp., net profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net income attributable to Kimberly-Clark Corporation 2,352 2,157 1,410 2,278 2,166
Net sales 19,140 18,450 18,486 18,259 18,202
Profitability Ratio
Net profit margin1 12.29% 11.69% 7.63% 12.48% 11.90%
Benchmarks
Net Profit Margin, Competitors2
Procter & Gamble Co. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).

1 2020 Calculation
Net profit margin = 100 × Net income attributable to Kimberly-Clark Corporation ÷ Net sales
= 100 × 2,352 ÷ 19,140 = 12.29%

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The net profit margin exhibited a volatile yet generally resilient trend between 2016 and 2020. While the majority of the analyzed period saw margins maintaining a range between 11.69% and 12.48%, a significant contraction occurred in 2018, followed by a steady recovery through 2020.

Net Profit Margin Volatility
The net profit margin began at 11.90% in 2016 and reached a peak of 12.48% in 2017. A sharp decline was observed in 2018, where the margin fell to 7.63%, marking the lowest profitability level in the five-year period. A strong recovery ensued in 2019, with the margin returning to 11.69%, and further improving to 12.29% by the end of 2020.
Net Income and Sales Correlation
Net sales demonstrated a consistent upward trajectory, growing from 18,202 million US$ in 2016 to 19,140 million US$ in 2020. However, net income attributable to the corporation did not follow this linear growth. The most notable divergence occurred in 2018, when net sales increased to 18,486 million US$ but net income dropped significantly to 1,410 million US$. This indicates that the compression of the net profit margin in 2018 was driven by an increase in expenses or one-time charges rather than a decline in revenue generation.
Profitability Recovery and Peak
Following the 2018 dip, a recovery phase is evident. By 2020, net income reached its highest level in the period at 2,352 million US$. The simultaneous increase in both net sales and net income in 2020 resulted in a stabilized net profit margin of 12.29%, nearly returning to the peak efficiency observed in 2017.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Return on Equity (ROE)

Kimberly-Clark Corp., ROE calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net income attributable to Kimberly-Clark Corporation 2,352 2,157 1,410 2,278 2,166
Total Kimberly-Clark Corporation stockholders’ equity 626 (33) (287) 629 (102)
Profitability Ratio
ROE1 375.72% — — 362.16% —
Benchmarks
ROE, Competitors2
Procter & Gamble Co. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).

1 2020 Calculation
ROE = 100 × Net income attributable to Kimberly-Clark Corporation ÷ Total Kimberly-Clark Corporation stockholders’ equity
= 100 × 2,352 ÷ 626 = 375.72%

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial performance between 2016 and 2020 is characterized by stable net income generation contrasted with significant volatility and periodic deficits in stockholders' equity. This divergence creates an atypical profile for profitability ratios, specifically the return on equity.

Net Income Trends
Net income remained generally resilient, fluctuating between a low of US$ 1,410 million in 2018 and a peak of US$ 2,352 million in 2020. Despite a notable contraction in 2018, the company demonstrated a consistent ability to return to growth, with earnings in 2020 exceeding 2016 levels by approximately 8.6%.
Stockholders' Equity Volatility
A significant instability is observed in the total stockholders' equity, which shifted between negative and positive values throughout the period. Negative equity balances were recorded in 2016 (-US$ 102 million), 2018 (-US$ 287 million), and 2019 (-US$ 33 million). Positive equity was only maintained in 2017 (US$ 629 million) and 2020 (US$ 626 million), indicating a highly leveraged capital structure or an aggressive treasury stock repurchase strategy.
Return on Equity (ROE) Interpretation
The ROE values for 2017 (362.16%) and 2020 (375.72%) are exceptionally high and do not reflect standard operational efficiency. These figures are the mathematical result of substantial net income being measured against a very small positive equity base. Because equity was negative in other years, the ROE was not calculable or meaningful for those periods, confirming that the ratio in this context is driven by financial leverage rather than organic profitability growth.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Return on Assets (ROA)

Kimberly-Clark Corp., ROA calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net income attributable to Kimberly-Clark Corporation 2,352 2,157 1,410 2,278 2,166
Total assets 17,523 15,283 14,518 15,151 14,602
Profitability Ratio
ROA1 13.42% 14.11% 9.71% 15.04% 14.83%
Benchmarks
ROA, Competitors2
Procter & Gamble Co. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).

1 2020 Calculation
ROA = 100 × Net income attributable to Kimberly-Clark Corporation ÷ Total assets
= 100 × 2,352 ÷ 17,523 = 13.42%

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The Return on Assets (ROA) exhibited significant volatility between 2016 and 2020, characterized by a sharp decline in 2018 followed by a recovery and a subsequent slight contraction in efficiency despite record net earnings.

Net Income Fluctuations
Net income remained relatively stable between 2016 and 2017, followed by a substantial decrease to 1,410 million US$ in 2018. A strong recovery occurred in 2019 and 2020, with the latter year marking the period's highest net income at 2,352 million US$.
Total Asset Growth
The asset base showed a gradual upward trend from 14,602 million US$ in 2016 to 15,283 million US$ in 2019, concluding with a significant increase to 17,523 million US$ in 2020.
Return on Assets Analysis
ROA peaked in 2017 at 15.04% before dropping to a low of 9.71% in 2018, directly correlating with the decrease in net income. While ROA rebounded to 14.11% in 2019, the 2020 figure decreased to 13.42%. This decline occurred because the growth in total assets outpaced the growth in net income, reducing the overall efficiency of asset utilization during the final year of the period.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?