Inventory Disclosure
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).
Total inventory levels exhibit a general upward trajectory over the five-year period, increasing from 1,679 million US$ in 2016 to 1,903 million US$ in 2020. This growth is primarily driven by a steady rise in finished goods and a significant increase in raw materials toward the end of the period, despite minor fluctuations in other inventory categories.
- Finished Goods Analysis
- Finished goods constitute the largest portion of the inventory portfolio. A consistent increase is observed from 1,030 million US$ in 2016 to 1,202 million US$ in 2020. This sustained growth suggests an expansion in production volume or a strategic increase in safety stock to meet market demand.
- Raw Materials and Work in Process
- Raw materials demonstrated volatility, rising from 329 million US$ in 2016 to a peak of 394 million US$ in 2020, with a notable temporary decline in 2019. Work in process remained relatively stable between 2016 and 2019, before experiencing a decline to 189 million US$ in 2020, indicating a potential shift in production efficiency or cycle times.
- Supplies and Other Inventories
- Inventories for supplies and other items showed a general downward trend after 2017. Following a peak of 303 million US$ in 2017, this category decreased to 263 million US$ by 2020, suggesting improved management of indirect materials or reduced operational requirements.
- Inventory Valuation Methods
- The valuation gap between FIFO (or weighted-average) and LIFO costs fluctuated over the period. The excess of FIFO/weighted-average cost over LIFO cost peaked at 191 million US$ in 2018 before narrowing to 145 million US$ in 2020. This reduction in the LIFO reserve suggests a convergence between the historical cost and the current replacement cost of inventory items toward the end of the analysis period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjustment to Inventory: Conversion from LIFO to FIFO
Kimberly-Clark Corp., Financial Data: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).
An analysis of the financial position between 2016 and 2020 reveals a consistent variance between reported figures and adjusted figures resulting from the conversion of inventory valuation from the Last-In, First-Out (LIFO) method to the First-In, First-Out (FIFO) method. This conversion leads to a systemic increase in the valuation of inventories, current assets, total assets, and stockholders' equity across the entire five-year period.
- Inventory and Asset Valuation Trends
- Reported inventories exhibited a general upward trend, increasing from 1,679 million USD in 2016 to 1,903 million USD in 2020. The adjusted inventories remained consistently higher, reaching 2,048 million USD by 2020. This positive variance, known as the LIFO reserve, peaked in 2018 at 191 million USD before narrowing to 145 million USD in 2020. Consequently, adjusted current assets and adjusted total assets are consistently higher than their reported counterparts, mirroring the valuation increase in inventory.
- Impact on Stockholders' Equity
- The conversion to FIFO significantly alters the equity profile of the organization. Reported stockholders' equity fluctuated substantially, recording negative values in 2016, 2018, and 2019. The adjusted equity figures, which incorporate the LIFO reserve, provide a stronger capital position. For instance, in 2016, reported equity of negative 102 million USD was adjusted upward to 61 million USD. While adjusted equity also dipped into negative territory in 2018 (negative 96 million USD), the overall trend shows that the FIFO adjustment mitigates the appearance of equity deficits.
- Net Income Variance
- The relationship between reported and adjusted net income is less linear than the asset adjustments, as it reflects the change in the LIFO reserve over each specific year rather than a cumulative balance. In 2016, adjusted net income was lower than reported net income, suggesting a decrease in the LIFO reserve or a LIFO liquidation that artificially inflated reported profits. Conversely, in 2018, adjusted net income was higher than reported net income, indicating that the LIFO method increased the cost of goods sold relative to FIFO during that period.
- Overall Balance Sheet Expansion
- A significant expansion in the balance sheet is observed in 2020, where reported total assets rose from 15,283 million USD in 2019 to 17,523 million USD. This growth is reflected in both reported and adjusted figures, though the adjusted total assets remain the primary metric for comparing the organization's value on a FIFO basis, ending the period at 17,668 million USD.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Financial Ratios: LIFO vs. FIFO (Summary)
Kimberly-Clark Corp., Financial Ratios: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).
The comparison between reported LIFO-based ratios and adjusted FIFO-based ratios reveals consistent discrepancies in liquidity, efficiency, and capital structure metrics over the 2016–2020 period.
- Liquidity Position
- The adjusted current ratio is consistently higher than the reported current ratio in every year analyzed. This indicates that the LIFO reserve increases the valuation of current assets, thereby presenting a more favorable liquidity profile when adjusted to FIFO. Both metrics followed a similar trajectory, declining from 2017 to a low in 2019 before recovering in 2020.
- Profitability and Returns
- Net profit margins show negligible variance between reported and adjusted figures, with both metrics experiencing a sharp decline in 2018 before recovering in 2019. Return on Assets (ROA) similarly maintains a tight correlation, although reported ROA is marginally higher than adjusted ROA. This suggests that the LIFO reserve has a minimal impact on net income relative to the total asset base.
- Operational Efficiency
- A gradual downward trend is observed in total asset turnover from 2018 through 2020. The adjusted total asset turnover is consistently lower than the reported ratio. This inverse relationship occurs because the FIFO adjustment increases the denominator (total assets), thereby reducing the efficiency ratio.
- Financial Leverage and Equity Returns
- Significant volatility and divergence are evident in financial leverage and Return on Equity (ROE). The adjusted ROE and leverage figures show extreme fluctuations, particularly in 2016 and 2019, compared to the reported values. This suggests that the LIFO reserve represents a substantial portion of the company's equity, and adjustments to FIFO significantly alter the equity base, leading to magnified returns and leverage ratios.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Current Ratio
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).
2020 Calculations
1 Current ratio = Current assets ÷ Current liabilities
= 5,174 ÷ 6,443 = 0.80
2 Adjusted current ratio = Adjusted current assets ÷ Current liabilities
= 5,319 ÷ 6,443 = 0.83
The financial data indicates a period of relative stability in current asset levels between 2016 and 2020, characterized by minor fluctuations and a consistent variance between reported and adjusted valuations.
- Current Asset Trends
- Reported current assets reached a peak in 2017 at 5,211 million US$ before experiencing a contraction in 2018. A gradual recovery followed, with assets increasing to 5,174 million US$ by the end of 2020. Adjusted current assets followed a nearly identical trajectory, remaining consistently higher than reported figures; these peaked at 5,387 million US$ in 2017 and concluded the period at 5,319 million US$ in 2020.
- Liquidity Ratio Performance
- The reported current ratio exhibited a downward trend from a high of 0.89 in 2017 to a low of 0.73 in 2019, before rebounding to 0.80 in 2020. This pattern is mirrored in the adjusted current ratio, which decreased from 0.92 in 2017 to 0.75 in 2019, subsequently rising to 0.83 in 2020. Throughout the observed five-year period, both ratios remained below 1.0, indicating that current liabilities consistently exceeded current assets.
- Analysis of Adjusted Metrics
- A consistent positive variance is observed between reported and adjusted metrics. The adjusted current ratio remains higher than the reported ratio in every year analyzed, typically by a margin of 0.03 to 0.08 points. This suggests that the adjustments applied to the current assets provide a marginally more favorable view of the short-term liquidity position, although these adjustments do not alter the overall downward-then-upward trend or the fundamental reality of the ratios remaining below the 1.0 threshold.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Net Profit Margin
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).
2020 Calculations
1 Net profit margin = 100 × Net income attributable to Kimberly-Clark Corporation ÷ Net sales
= 100 × 2,352 ÷ 19,140 = 12.29%
2 Adjusted net profit margin = 100 × Adjusted net income attributable to Kimberly-Clark Corporation ÷ Net sales
= 100 × 2,342 ÷ 19,140 = 12.24%
The adjusted net profit margin exhibited a volatile but recovering trend between 2016 and 2020. After a period of stability and slight growth in the initial years, a sharp contraction occurred in 2018, followed by a consistent recovery to levels nearly matching previous peaks.
- Adjusted Net Profit Margin Trend
- The adjusted net profit margin increased from 11.79% in 2016 to 12.55% in 2017. A significant decline followed in 2018, where the margin dropped to 7.71%, representing the lowest point in the observed five-year period. Subsequently, the margin recovered to 11.50% in 2019 and reached 12.24% by the end of 2020.
- Comparison of Reported and Adjusted Metrics
- A close correlation is observed between reported and adjusted net profit margins. The variance between the two metrics remained minimal throughout the period, indicating that non-GAAP adjustments did not materially alter the perceived profitability profile or the overall trend of the company's margins.
- Net Income Correlation
- The fluctuations in the net profit margin are directly mirrored by the adjusted net income figures. The dip in 2018, where adjusted net income fell to 1,425 million USD, aligns with the margin contraction to 7.71%. The subsequent recovery in adjusted net income, peaking at 2,342 million USD in 2020, corresponds with the return of the adjusted net profit margin to 12.24%.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Total Asset Turnover
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).
2020 Calculations
1 Total asset turnover = Net sales ÷ Total assets
= 19,140 ÷ 17,523 = 1.09
2 Adjusted total asset turnover = Net sales ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 19,140 ÷ 17,668 = 1.08
The analysis of total asset utilization from 2016 to 2020 reveals a general decline in operational efficiency, characterized by a growing asset base and a corresponding decrease in the turnover ratio.
- Adjusted Total Asset Growth
- Adjusted total assets experienced an overall increase over the period, rising from 14,765 million US dollars in 2016 to 17,668 million US dollars by 2020. While a minor contraction was noted in 2018, a significant expansion occurred between 2019 and 2020, where assets grew by approximately 14%.
- Adjusted Total Asset Turnover Trend
- The adjusted total asset turnover ratio exhibited fluctuations throughout the period. After starting at 1.23 in 2016 and dipping to 1.19 in 2017, the ratio peaked at 1.26 in 2018. However, a steady decline followed, with the ratio dropping to 1.20 in 2019 and reaching a five-year low of 1.08 in 2020.
- Correlation Between Asset Expansion and Efficiency
- An inverse relationship is observed between the scale of the asset base and the turnover efficiency toward the end of the period. The sharp increase in adjusted total assets in 2020 coincides with the lowest recorded adjusted total asset turnover ratio, indicating that the growth in assets outpaced the corresponding growth in revenue generation.
- Comparison of Reported and Adjusted Metrics
- A consistent variance is maintained between reported and adjusted figures across all years. The adjusted total asset turnover remains marginally lower than the reported total asset turnover, suggesting a stable and consistent adjustment factor applied to the asset base throughout the five-year window.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Financial Leverage
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).
2020 Calculations
1 Financial leverage = Total assets ÷ Total Kimberly-Clark Corporation stockholders’ equity
= 17,523 ÷ 626 = 27.99
2 Adjusted financial leverage = Adjusted total assets ÷ Adjusted total Kimberly-Clark Corporation stockholders’ equity
= 17,668 ÷ 771 = 22.92
The capital structure exhibits significant volatility between 2016 and 2020, characterized by fluctuating equity levels and a corresponding impact on financial leverage. While total assets showed a steady upward trajectory, culminating in a peak of 17.668 billion USD in adjusted total assets by the end of 2020, stockholders' equity remained unstable, frequently shifting between positive and negative values.
- Asset Growth Trends
- Adjusted total assets increased from 14.765 billion USD in 2016 to 17.668 billion USD in 2020. This represents a general expansion of the asset base, with the most significant growth occurring between 2019 and 2020, where assets grew by approximately 2.23 billion USD.
- Equity Volatility
- Adjusted stockholders' equity demonstrated extreme variance over the five-year period. The value peaked at 805 million USD in 2017 before declining to a negative 96 million USD in 2018. A recovery followed, with equity reaching 771 million USD by the end of 2020, indicating a highly fluid equity base.
- Adjusted Financial Leverage
- The adjusted financial leverage ratio reflects the sensitivity of the capital structure to the aforementioned equity fluctuations. Extreme peaks were recorded in 2016 at 242.05 and in 2019 at 126.54, which occurred during periods when adjusted equity was near zero or negative. In contrast, the ratio moderated significantly to 19.04 in 2017 and 22.92 in 2020, corresponding with periods of strengthened equity positions.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).
2020 Calculations
1 ROE = 100 × Net income attributable to Kimberly-Clark Corporation ÷ Total Kimberly-Clark Corporation stockholders’ equity
= 100 × 2,352 ÷ 626 = 375.72%
2 Adjusted ROE = 100 × Adjusted net income attributable to Kimberly-Clark Corporation ÷ Adjusted total Kimberly-Clark Corporation stockholders’ equity
= 100 × 2,342 ÷ 771 = 303.76%
The analysis of financial performance between 2016 and 2020 reveals significant volatility in the Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE). This volatility is primarily driven by substantial fluctuations in the stockholders' equity base rather than instability in net income, which remained relatively consistent over the period.
- Adjusted Net Income Trends
- Adjusted net income demonstrated a general resilience, starting at 2,146 million US$ in 2016 and ending at a peak of 2,342 million US$ in 2020. A temporary contraction was observed in 2018, where adjusted net income dropped to 1,425 million US$, representing the lowest point in the five-year period before returning to growth in 2019 and 2020.
- Adjusted Stockholders' Equity Fluctuations
- The equity base exhibited extreme instability, characterized by sharp increases and periods of negative value. Adjusted equity rose from 61 million US$ in 2016 to 805 million US$ in 2017, before swinging to a negative value of -96 million US$ in 2018. A recovery followed, with equity reaching 122 million US$ in 2019 and increasing significantly to 771 million US$ by 2020.
- Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE) Analysis
- The Adjusted ROE reached extreme levels in 2016 (3,518.03%) and 2019 (1,738.52%). These outliers are mathematically attributable to a very small equity denominator relative to the generated net income. Conversely, as the equity base expanded in 2017 and 2020, the Adjusted ROE normalized to 284.60% and 303.76%, respectively. The absence of an Adjusted ROE value in 2018 coincides with the period of negative adjusted stockholders' equity, rendering the ratio not meaningful for that period.
Overall, the data suggests a highly leveraged capital structure where small changes in equity lead to disproportionate swings in ROE. The convergence of rising adjusted net income and a strengthening equity base by 2020 indicates a shift toward a more stable, albeit still high, return on equity profile.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).
2020 Calculations
1 ROA = 100 × Net income attributable to Kimberly-Clark Corporation ÷ Total assets
= 100 × 2,352 ÷ 17,523 = 13.42%
2 Adjusted ROA = 100 × Adjusted net income attributable to Kimberly-Clark Corporation ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 100 × 2,342 ÷ 17,668 = 13.26%
The analysis of Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA) from 2016 to 2020 reveals a period of moderate volatility followed by a significant expansion of the asset base. The performance is characterized by a sharp decline in efficiency during 2018, followed by a recovery and a subsequent divergence between net income growth and asset growth in 2020.
- Adjusted Net Income Trends
- Adjusted net income demonstrated a fluctuating trend over the five-year period. After increasing from US$ 2,146 million in 2016 to US$ 2,291 million in 2017, there was a significant contraction in 2018, with income falling to US$ 1,425 million. A strong recovery followed, with adjusted net income rising to US$ 2,121 million in 2019 and reaching a five-year peak of US$ 2,342 million in 2020.
- Adjusted Total Assets Evolution
- The adjusted asset base remained relatively stable between 2016 and 2019, fluctuating between US$ 14,709 million and US$ 15,438 million. A substantial upward shift occurred in 2020, where adjusted total assets increased to US$ 17,668 million, representing a significant expansion of the balance sheet compared to previous years.
- Adjusted ROA Analysis
- Adjusted ROA peaked at 14.95% in 2017 before dropping sharply to 9.69% in 2018, mirroring the decline in adjusted net income. While the ratio improved to 13.74% in 2019, it declined slightly to 13.26% in 2020. This decline in 2020 is noteworthy as it occurred despite the highest adjusted net income in the period, indicating that the growth in total assets outpaced the growth in earnings, thereby diluting the overall return on assets.
- Comparison of Reported and Adjusted Metrics
- A consistent pattern is observed where adjusted ROA remains marginally lower than reported ROA across all analyzed years. This indicates that the adjustments applied to the financial statements consistently result in a slightly more conservative view of asset productivity compared to the reported figures.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?