Return on capital (ROC) is after tax rate of return on net business assets. ROIC is unaffected by changes in interest rates or company debt and equity structure. It measures business productivity performance.
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
| Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | 2,602) | 2,321) | 1,883) | 2,464) | 2,399) | |
| Invested capital2 | 12,877) | 11,405) | 11,239) | 11,929) | 11,778) | |
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| ROIC3 | 20.21% | 20.35% | 16.75% | 20.66% | 20.37% | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| ROIC, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Procter & Gamble Co. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2020 Calculation
ROIC = 100 × NOPAT ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × 2,602 ÷ 12,877 = 20.21%
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The return on invested capital (ROIC) demonstrated overall stability between 2016 and 2020, consistently hovering around the 20% mark, with the exception of a notable contraction in 2018. This performance indicates a consistent capacity to generate operating profits relative to the capital employed, despite significant fluctuations in net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) and the capital base.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT) Trends
- Operating profitability experienced volatility over the five-year period. After a slight increase in 2017, NOPAT declined sharply to 1,883 million in 2018. However, a strong recovery followed, with profits rising to 2,321 million in 2019 and peaking at 2,602 million in 2020, marking the highest level of operating profit within the observed timeframe.
- Invested Capital Dynamics
- The capital base remained relatively stable from 2016 through 2019, fluctuating between 11,239 million and 11,929 million. A significant expansion in invested capital occurred in 2020, where the figure rose to 12,877 million, representing a substantial increase in the resources deployed to generate returns.
- Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) Analysis
- The ROIC peaked at 20.66% in 2017 before falling to a period low of 16.75% in 2018, a decline directly correlated with the sharp drop in NOPAT. By 2019, the ratio recovered to 20.35%. In 2020, despite the increase in invested capital, the growth in NOPAT was sufficient to maintain the ROIC at a stable 20.21%, suggesting that the additional capital deployment was effectively matched by proportional increases in operating profitability.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Decomposition of ROIC
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).
1 Operating profit margin (OPM). See calculations »
2 Turnover of capital (TO). See calculations »
3 Effective cash tax rate (CTR). See calculations »
The Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) exhibited a general stability between 2016 and 2020, maintaining a baseline of approximately 20%, with the exception of a notable contraction in 2018. The recovery observed in 2019 and 2020 indicates a return to historical performance levels following a period of volatility.
- Operating Profit Margin (OPM)
- A significant fluctuation in profitability is evident, characterized by a sharp decline in 2018 where the margin fell to 13.03% from 18.75% in the previous year. This compression in operating margins served as the primary driver for the reduction in ROIC during the 2018 fiscal year. A gradual recovery followed, with the margin improving to 15.85% in 2019 and further increasing to 17.18% by 2020.
- Turnover of Capital (TO)
- Capital efficiency remained relatively constant throughout the period, with values oscillating within a narrow range between 1.49 and 1.64. Notably, capital turnover reached its peak of 1.64 in 2018, coinciding with the lowest point of operating profitability, suggesting that the decline in ROIC was not attributable to a decrease in asset utilization.
- Effective Cash Tax Rate (1 - CTR)
- A consistent upward trend is observed in the tax efficiency component, rising from 69.50% in 2016 to a peak of 79.36% in 2019 before stabilizing at 79.13% in 2020. This steady increase indicates a reduction in the effective cash tax burden over time, which provided a supportive effect on the overall return on invested capital, partially offsetting the volatility experienced in operating margins.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Operating Profit Margin (OPM)
| Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | 2,602) | 2,321) | 1,883) | 2,464) | 2,399) | |
| Add: Cash operating taxes2 | 686) | 604) | 526) | 960) | 1,053) | |
| Net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT) | 3,289) | 2,925) | 2,408) | 3,424) | 3,451) | |
| Net sales | 19,140) | 18,450) | 18,486) | 18,259) | 18,202) | |
| Profitability Ratio | ||||||
| OPM3 | 17.18% | 15.85% | 13.03% | 18.75% | 18.96% | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| OPM, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Procter & Gamble Co. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cash operating taxes. See details »
3 2020 Calculation
OPM = 100 × NOPBT ÷ Net sales
= 100 × 3,289 ÷ 19,140 = 17.18%
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
An analysis of the financial performance from 2016 to 2020 reveals a period of significant volatility in operating efficiency despite a relatively stable upward trajectory in top-line revenue. While net sales grew modestly over the five-year period, the operating profit margin experienced a sharp contraction in 2018 followed by a consistent recovery phase.
- Net Sales Trends
- Revenue demonstrated steady growth, increasing from US$ 18,202 million in 2016 to US$ 19,140 million by 2020. This indicates a consistent ability to maintain and slightly expand market presence, providing a stable base for operational activities.
- Operating Profit Margin (OPM) Volatility
- The operating profit margin remained stable near 18.8% between 2016 and 2017 before declining precipitously to 13.03% in 2018. This represents the lowest point of operational efficiency in the observed period. However, a recovery trend is evident in the subsequent years, with the margin rising to 15.85% in 2019 and reaching 17.18% by 2020.
- Net Operating Profit Before Taxes (NOPBT) Performance
- NOPBT mirrored the trends seen in the operating margin. After remaining steady at approximately US$ 3.4 billion in 2016 and 2017, NOPBT dropped to US$ 2,408 million in 2018. The subsequent recovery to US$ 3,289 million in 2020 suggests that corrective measures or market improvements successfully restored a significant portion of the lost profitability, although levels remained slightly below the 2016 peak.
In summary, the data indicates a temporary but severe disruption in operating profitability during 2018. The subsequent two-year recovery period demonstrates an improvement in cost management or pricing power, as the company successfully expanded its operating margin while continuing to grow total net sales.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Turnover of Capital (TO)
| Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Net sales | 19,140) | 18,450) | 18,486) | 18,259) | 18,202) | |
| Invested capital1 | 12,877) | 11,405) | 11,239) | 11,929) | 11,778) | |
| Efficiency Ratio | ||||||
| TO2 | 1.49 | 1.62 | 1.64 | 1.53 | 1.55 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| TO, Competitors3 | ||||||
| Procter & Gamble Co. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).
1 Invested capital. See details »
2 2020 Calculation
TO = Net sales ÷ Invested capital
= 19,140 ÷ 12,877 = 1.49
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The capital efficiency of the organization exhibited fluctuations between 2016 and 2020, characterized by a peak in asset productivity in 2018 followed by a notable decline by the end of the period.
- Net Sales Performance
- Revenue remained relatively stable from 2016 through 2019, with minimal annual variance. A significant growth inflection occurred in 2020, with sales reaching 19,140 million USD, the highest level recorded within the analyzed timeframe.
- Invested Capital Trends
- Invested capital demonstrated a period of relative stability and moderate contraction between 2016 and 2019, reaching a minimum of 11,239 million USD in 2018. A substantial increase was observed in 2020, where capital expanded to 12,877 million USD, marking a significant increase in the resource base.
- Turnover of Capital (TO) Analysis
- The turnover ratio peaked at 1.64 in 2018, a result of increased sales coinciding with a reduction in invested capital. Conversely, the ratio declined to its lowest point of 1.49 in 2020. Although net sales increased in 2020, the growth in invested capital outpaced the revenue gains, leading to a reduction in the efficiency with which the company generated sales from its invested capital.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Effective Cash Tax Rate (CTR)
| Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | 2,602) | 2,321) | 1,883) | 2,464) | 2,399) | |
| Add: Cash operating taxes2 | 686) | 604) | 526) | 960) | 1,053) | |
| Net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT) | 3,289) | 2,925) | 2,408) | 3,424) | 3,451) | |
| Tax Rate | ||||||
| CTR3 | 20.87% | 20.64% | 21.82% | 28.03% | 30.50% | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| CTR, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Procter & Gamble Co. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cash operating taxes. See details »
3 2020 Calculation
CTR = 100 × Cash operating taxes ÷ NOPBT
= 100 × 686 ÷ 3,289 = 20.87%
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
Between 2016 and 2020, a significant reduction in the effective cash tax rate (CTR) is observed, coinciding with a period of fluctuation and subsequent recovery in net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT).
- Effective Cash Tax Rate Trend
- The CTR exhibits a consistent downward trajectory, falling from 30.50% in 2016 to 20.87% in 2020. The most pronounced decrease occurred between 2017 and 2018, where the rate dropped from 28.03% to 21.82%. Following this shift, the rate stabilized, remaining between 20.64% and 20.87% during the 2019 and 2020 fiscal years.
- Net Operating Profit Before Taxes (NOPBT) Performance
- Operating profitability remained relatively stable between 2016 and 2017, hovering around 3.4 billion US dollars, before experiencing a sharp contraction to 2.4 billion US dollars in 2018. A recovery trend followed, with NOPBT increasing to 2.9 billion US dollars in 2019 and further rising to 3.3 billion US dollars by the end of 2020.
- Cash Operating Taxes Correlation
- Cash operating taxes declined from 1.05 billion US dollars in 2016 to a minimum of 526 million US dollars in 2018. Although tax payments increased to 604 million US dollars in 2019 and 686 million US dollars in 2020, these increases were disproportionately lower than the recovery in NOPBT. This divergence highlights a structural shift in the tax burden, contributing to a lower effective cash tax rate relative to operating profitability.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?