Economic Value Added (EVA)
EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Kimberly-Clark Corp. pages available for free this week:
- Balance Sheet: Assets
- Common-Size Balance Sheet: Assets
- Analysis of Solvency Ratios
- Enterprise Value to FCFF (EV/FCFF)
- Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
- Present Value of Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE)
- Selected Financial Data since 2005
- Net Profit Margin since 2005
- Price to Operating Profit (P/OP) since 2005
- Analysis of Debt
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Kimberly-Clark Corp. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
Kimberly-Clark Corp., economic profit calculation
US$ in millions
| 12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
| Cost of capital2 | ||||||
| Invested capital3 | ||||||
| Economic profit4 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2020 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- The net operating profit after taxes exhibited fluctuations over the five-year period. There was an initial increase from 2016 to 2017, reaching 2,464 million USD. This was followed by a notable decline in 2018 to 1,883 million USD. Subsequently, the profit recovered, increasing to 2,321 million USD in 2019 and further to 2,602 million USD in 2020, the highest value in the given period.
- Cost of Capital
- The cost of capital remained relatively stable throughout the period, with minor variations between 8.63% and 8.91%. The lowest rate was recorded in 2020 at 8.63%, while the highest was in 2019 at 8.91%. This stability indicates consistent financing conditions over the years.
- Invested Capital
- The invested capital showed some variability but with a general increasing trend. Starting at 11,778 million USD in 2016, it increased slightly in 2017 to 11,929 million USD, then decreased in 2018 to 11,239 million USD. From 2018 onwards, it rose again, reaching 12,877 million USD in 2020, which is the highest level within the timeline.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit demonstrated fluctuations corresponding partially to the trends in NOPAT and invested capital. It increased from 1,358 million USD in 2016 to 1,430 million USD in 2017, then declined sharply to 900 million USD in 2018. Thereafter, it showed recovery to 1,305 million USD in 2019 and further increased to 1,491 million USD in 2020, marking the peak in the period observed.
- Overall Analysis
- The financial indicators reveal a period of variable performance with a downturn in 2018, followed by improvement through 2019 and 2020. The decline in NOPAT and economic profit in 2018 signals a temporary setback, possibly due to operational challenges or market conditions. However, the return to growth in these metrics in subsequent years, alongside a stable and slightly decreasing cost of capital, suggests effective management of invested capital and an overall strengthening financial position by 2020.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Kimberly-Clark Corp., NOPAT calculation
US$ in millions
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in LIFO reserve. See details »
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in restructuring liabilities.
5 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income attributable to Kimberly-Clark Corporation.
6 2020 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
7 2020 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
8 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income attributable to Kimberly-Clark Corporation.
9 2020 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
10 Elimination of after taxes investment income.
The analysis of the annual financial data over the five-year period reveals several notable trends regarding the company's profitability metrics.
- Net Income Attributable to Kimberly-Clark Corporation (US$ in millions)
- Over the period from 2016 to 2020, net income shows some volatility with an overall upward trend. Net income started at 2,166 million USD in 2016, increased to 2,278 million USD in 2017, then experienced a significant decline in 2018 to 1,410 million USD. Following this decline, net income recovered considerably, reaching 2,157 million USD in 2019 and further increasing to 2,352 million USD in 2020. This pattern suggests a temporary setback in 2018, followed by a strong recovery and growth in the subsequent years.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT) (US$ in millions)
- NOPAT exhibits a similar pattern to net income, indicating a correlation between operational efficiency and overall profitability. The values start at 2,399 million USD in 2016, rise slightly in 2017 to 2,464 million USD, then decline sharply in 2018 to 1,883 million USD. From 2018 onwards, NOPAT increased steadily to 2,321 million USD in 2019 and 2,602 million USD in 2020, surpassing the initial levels reported at the start of the period. This trend shows an initial operational challenge in 2018, followed by a robust performance improvement.
Overall, the data indicates that the company faced a period of decreased profitability in 2018, reflected in both net income and NOPAT, likely due to operational or market challenges. However, the subsequent years demonstrated effective recovery strategies and strong financial performance, with profitability exceeding prior peak levels by 2020. The close alignment between net income and NOPAT trends suggests that operational improvements directly influenced the bottom line.
Cash Operating Taxes
Kimberly-Clark Corp., cash operating taxes calculation
US$ in millions
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).
- Provision for income taxes
- The provision for income taxes shows a downward trend from 2016 to 2018, declining from 922 million US dollars to 471 million US dollars. This is followed by an increase in the subsequent years, rising to 576 million US dollars in 2019 and further to 676 million US dollars in 2020. Overall, the provision decreased initially but then experienced a moderate recovery, ending lower in 2020 than the initial 2016 figure.
- Cash operating taxes
- Cash operating taxes exhibit a similar trend to the provision for income taxes, starting at 1,053 million US dollars in 2016 and declining steadily to 526 million US dollars in 2018. From 2018 onward, cash operating taxes increased each year, reaching 604 million US dollars in 2019 and 686 million US dollars in 2020. Although the amounts increased after 2018, the 2020 value remained below the initial 2016 level.
- Overall tax-related trends
- Both provision for income taxes and cash operating taxes show a clear pattern of decline during the period 2016 to 2018, followed by a partial rebound from 2019 to 2020. The recovery phase, however, does not fully restore the tax figures to their peak 2016 levels. This pattern may suggest changes in taxable income, tax planning strategies, or other tax-related factors impacting the reported amounts over time.
Invested Capital
Kimberly-Clark Corp., invested capital calculation (financing approach)
US$ in millions
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of LIFO reserve. See details »
5 Addition of restructuring liabilities.
6 Addition of equity equivalents to total Kimberly-Clark Corporation stockholders’ equity.
7 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
8 Subtraction of construction in progress.
- Debt Levels
- The total reported debt and leases demonstrate relative stability from 2016 through 2019, fluctuating between approximately $7.9 billion and $8.1 billion. There is a notable increase in 2020, where the debt rises to $8.92 billion, indicating an increased leverage or possibly additional financing taken during that year.
- Stockholders' Equity
- Stockholders’ equity shows considerable volatility over the five-year period. The figures reveal negative values in most years, with a drastic decline in 2017 reaching -$287 million. A recovery trend appears afterward with values improving to -$33 million in 2019 and then increasing sharply to $626 million in 2020, suggesting a significant improvement in net assets or changes in accounting treatment or capital structure.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital remains relatively consistent between 2016 and 2019, ranging from $11.2 billion to $11.9 billion. In 2020, there is a marked increase to $12.88 billion, which corresponds with the rise in total debt and equity changes, indicating increased total resources committed to the business. This growth in invested capital may reflect expansion efforts or new investments.
- Overall Trends and Insights
- The data suggest that while debt levels remained steady initially, the company took on more debt in 2020. The stockholders’ equity, although negative for much of the period, shows signs of improvement in the last year, which could reflect enhanced profitability, asset revaluation, or capital restructuring. The rise in invested capital alongside debt and equity changes implies an overall expansion in the financial base of the company during 2020. These trends point to a possible strategic shift or response to external conditions impacting capital structure and financing.
Cost of Capital
Kimberly-Clark Corp., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
Kimberly-Clark Corp., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks
| Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Invested capital2 | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Procter & Gamble Co. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2020 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial data over the five-year period reveals several notable trends in key economic performance indicators.
- Economic Profit
- The economic profit exhibited variability throughout the period. Starting at 1,358 million US dollars in 2016, it increased slightly to 1,430 million in 2017 before declining significantly to 900 million in 2018. Subsequently, it rebounded to 1,305 million in 2019 and further increased to 1,491 million in 2020. The trend indicates some volatility, with a pronounced dip in 2018 followed by a recovery and growth surpassing the initial value by 2020.
- Invested Capital
- The invested capital showed a moderate overall increase from 11,778 million US dollars in 2016 to 12,877 million in 2020. A slight increase was noted from 2016 to 2017, followed by a decrease in 2018. After this decline, the invested capital rose again from 2018 to 2020, reaching its highest level at the end of the period. This pattern suggests periods of both capital divestment and reinvestment.
- Economic Spread Ratio
- The economic spread ratio, expressed as a percentage, generally followed the trend of economic profit with some fluctuations. Beginning at 11.53% in 2016, it rose marginally to 11.99% in 2017, then declined sharply to 8% in 2018. The ratio recovered to 11.44% in 2019 and slightly increased to 11.58% in 2020. This indicates that the company’s return on invested capital relative to its cost of capital was weakest in 2018 but regained strength in the subsequent years.
Economic Profit Margin
Kimberly-Clark Corp., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks
| Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Net sales | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
| Procter & Gamble Co. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2020 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Net sales
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
- Economic Profit
-
Economic profit exhibited variability over the reviewed period. It started at $1,358 million in 2016 and increased to $1,430 million in 2017, indicating an improvement in value generation. However, a significant decline occurred in 2018, with economic profit falling to $900 million. Subsequently, the economic profit recovered, rising to $1,305 million in 2019 and further to $1,491 million in 2020. This pattern suggests a temporary setback in 2018, followed by a return to growth and surpassing the initial levels by the end of the period.
- Net Sales
-
Net sales demonstrated a generally stable to slightly increasing trend throughout the period. Beginning at $18,202 million in 2016, net sales remained relatively flat through 2017 and 2018, with minor fluctuations around the $18,200 million to $18,486 million range. A slight decline occurred in 2019, with sales recorded at $18,450 million. Sales rebounded in 2020 to $19,140 million, marking the highest point during these years. Overall, net sales showed resilience with a modest upward trajectory over five years.
- Economic Profit Margin
-
The economic profit margin reflected a pattern similar to economic profit itself. Starting at 7.46% in 2016, it showed an upward movement to 7.83% in 2017, signifying improved profitability relative to sales. In 2018, the margin dropped sharply to 4.87%, aligning with the decline in economic profit despite stable sales. Thereafter, the margin recovered to 7.07% in 2019 and increased further to 7.79% in 2020, nearing the earlier peak levels. This indicates an overall restoration of profitability ratios after the dip in 2018.
- Overall Insights
-
The data indicates a period of relative stability in net sales accompanied by greater variability in economic profit and its margin. The year 2018 stands out as an anomalous year with a pronounced reduction in economic profit and margin without a corresponding drop in sales, suggesting increased costs or other profitability pressures during that time. The recovery in subsequent years points to effective management actions or improved business conditions driving profitability back to previous highs. The increasing economic profit margin towards the end of the period also suggests enhanced efficiency or value creation relative to sales.