EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Kimberly-Clark Corp. pages available for free this week:
- Statement of Comprehensive Income
- Analysis of Long-term (Investment) Activity Ratios
- Common Stock Valuation Ratios
- Price to FCFE (P/FCFE)
- Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
- Dividend Discount Model (DDM)
- Present Value of Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE)
- Return on Equity (ROE) since 2005
- Current Ratio since 2005
- Analysis of Debt
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Kimberly-Clark Corp. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
Cost of capital2 | ||||||
Invested capital3 | ||||||
Economic profit4 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2020 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- The net operating profit after taxes exhibited fluctuations over the five-year period. After a slight increase from 2399 million USD in 2016 to 2464 million USD in 2017, there was a notable decline to 1883 million USD in 2018. Subsequently, the figure recovered in 2019 to 2321 million USD and continued to rise in 2020, reaching the highest value in the period at 2602 million USD. This indicates a general recovery and growth trend after a dip in 2018.
- Cost of Capital
- The cost of capital remained relatively stable throughout the period, fluctuating narrowly between 8.53% and 8.82%. The lowest recorded cost was in 2020 at 8.53%, and the highest was 8.82% in 2019. This consistency suggests stable financing conditions for the company, with slight variations possibly reflecting changes in market or risk perceptions.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital displayed a moderate increasing trend overall. Starting at 11,778 million USD in 2016, the capital base slightly grew to 11,929 million USD in 2017 but then decreased to 11,239 million USD in 2018. After that, it increased again to 11,405 million USD in 2019, with a more substantial rise in 2020 reaching 12,877 million USD. This indicates that after a period of contraction, the company increased its invested capital significantly by 2020.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit followed a trend similar to that of NOPAT, with values beginning at 1370 million USD in 2016 and increasing to 1442 million USD in 2017. It then declined sharply to 911 million USD in 2018 but rebounded in subsequent years to 1316 million USD in 2019 and reaching its peak at 1503 million USD in 2020. This pattern reflects fluctuations in value creation, with a marked dip in 2018 followed by improvements that surpassed earlier results by 2020.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in LIFO reserve. See details »
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in restructuring liabilities.
5 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income attributable to Kimberly-Clark Corporation.
6 2020 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
7 2020 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
8 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income attributable to Kimberly-Clark Corporation.
9 2020 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
10 Elimination of after taxes investment income.
The analysis of the annual financial data over the five-year period reveals several notable trends regarding the company's profitability metrics.
- Net Income Attributable to Kimberly-Clark Corporation (US$ in millions)
- Over the period from 2016 to 2020, net income shows some volatility with an overall upward trend. Net income started at 2,166 million USD in 2016, increased to 2,278 million USD in 2017, then experienced a significant decline in 2018 to 1,410 million USD. Following this decline, net income recovered considerably, reaching 2,157 million USD in 2019 and further increasing to 2,352 million USD in 2020. This pattern suggests a temporary setback in 2018, followed by a strong recovery and growth in the subsequent years.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT) (US$ in millions)
- NOPAT exhibits a similar pattern to net income, indicating a correlation between operational efficiency and overall profitability. The values start at 2,399 million USD in 2016, rise slightly in 2017 to 2,464 million USD, then decline sharply in 2018 to 1,883 million USD. From 2018 onwards, NOPAT increased steadily to 2,321 million USD in 2019 and 2,602 million USD in 2020, surpassing the initial levels reported at the start of the period. This trend shows an initial operational challenge in 2018, followed by a robust performance improvement.
Overall, the data indicates that the company faced a period of decreased profitability in 2018, reflected in both net income and NOPAT, likely due to operational or market challenges. However, the subsequent years demonstrated effective recovery strategies and strong financial performance, with profitability exceeding prior peak levels by 2020. The close alignment between net income and NOPAT trends suggests that operational improvements directly influenced the bottom line.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).
- Provision for income taxes
- The provision for income taxes shows a downward trend from 2016 to 2018, declining from 922 million US dollars to 471 million US dollars. This is followed by an increase in the subsequent years, rising to 576 million US dollars in 2019 and further to 676 million US dollars in 2020. Overall, the provision decreased initially but then experienced a moderate recovery, ending lower in 2020 than the initial 2016 figure.
- Cash operating taxes
- Cash operating taxes exhibit a similar trend to the provision for income taxes, starting at 1,053 million US dollars in 2016 and declining steadily to 526 million US dollars in 2018. From 2018 onward, cash operating taxes increased each year, reaching 604 million US dollars in 2019 and 686 million US dollars in 2020. Although the amounts increased after 2018, the 2020 value remained below the initial 2016 level.
- Overall tax-related trends
- Both provision for income taxes and cash operating taxes show a clear pattern of decline during the period 2016 to 2018, followed by a partial rebound from 2019 to 2020. The recovery phase, however, does not fully restore the tax figures to their peak 2016 levels. This pattern may suggest changes in taxable income, tax planning strategies, or other tax-related factors impacting the reported amounts over time.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of LIFO reserve. See details »
5 Addition of restructuring liabilities.
6 Addition of equity equivalents to total Kimberly-Clark Corporation stockholders’ equity.
7 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
8 Subtraction of construction in progress.
- Debt Levels
- The total reported debt and leases demonstrate relative stability from 2016 through 2019, fluctuating between approximately $7.9 billion and $8.1 billion. There is a notable increase in 2020, where the debt rises to $8.92 billion, indicating an increased leverage or possibly additional financing taken during that year.
- Stockholders' Equity
- Stockholders’ equity shows considerable volatility over the five-year period. The figures reveal negative values in most years, with a drastic decline in 2017 reaching -$287 million. A recovery trend appears afterward with values improving to -$33 million in 2019 and then increasing sharply to $626 million in 2020, suggesting a significant improvement in net assets or changes in accounting treatment or capital structure.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital remains relatively consistent between 2016 and 2019, ranging from $11.2 billion to $11.9 billion. In 2020, there is a marked increase to $12.88 billion, which corresponds with the rise in total debt and equity changes, indicating increased total resources committed to the business. This growth in invested capital may reflect expansion efforts or new investments.
- Overall Trends and Insights
- The data suggest that while debt levels remained steady initially, the company took on more debt in 2020. The stockholders’ equity, although negative for much of the period, shows signs of improvement in the last year, which could reflect enhanced profitability, asset revaluation, or capital restructuring. The rise in invested capital alongside debt and equity changes implies an overall expansion in the financial base of the company during 2020. These trends point to a possible strategic shift or response to external conditions impacting capital structure and financing.
Cost of Capital
Kimberly-Clark Corp., cost of capital calculations
Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
Total: |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
Total: |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
Total: |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
Total: |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
Total: |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
Economic profit1 | ||||||
Invested capital2 | ||||||
Performance Ratio | ||||||
Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
Benchmarks | ||||||
Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
Procter & Gamble Co. |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2020 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
- Economic Profit
- The economic profit experienced fluctuations over the five-year period. It started at 1370 million USD in 2016, increased slightly to 1442 million USD in 2017, then declined sharply to 911 million USD in 2018. Following this dip, it rose again to 1316 million USD in 2019 and further increased to 1503 million USD in 2020, reaching its highest point within the observed timeframe.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital showed a generally stable trend initially, with a slight increase from 11778 million USD in 2016 to 11929 million USD in 2017, followed by a decrease to 11239 million USD in 2018. From 2018 onwards, invested capital gradually increased to 11405 million USD in 2019 and saw a more pronounced rise to 12877 million USD in 2020, the highest value in the period under review.
- Economic Spread Ratio
- The economic spread ratio, expressed as a percentage, mirrored the fluctuations seen in economic profit. It rose marginally from 11.63% in 2016 to 12.09% in 2017, then declined significantly to 8.1% in 2018. This ratio recovered to 11.54% in 2019 and experienced a slight increase to 11.68% in 2020, maintaining relatively strong returns after the 2018 dip.
Economic Profit Margin
Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
Economic profit1 | ||||||
Net sales | ||||||
Performance Ratio | ||||||
Economic profit margin2 | ||||||
Benchmarks | ||||||
Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
Procter & Gamble Co. |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2020 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Net sales
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
- Economic Profit
- The economic profit exhibited fluctuations over the five-year period. It started at 1370 million USD in 2016, increased to 1442 million USD in 2017, then experienced a notable decline to 911 million USD in 2018. Following this decline, economic profit recovered significantly in the subsequent years, rising to 1316 million USD in 2019 and further improving to 1503 million USD in 2020. This suggests a period of volatility with a strong recovery by the end of the observed timeframe.
- Net Sales
- Net sales displayed relatively stable performance throughout the period. Beginning at 18202 million USD in 2016, net sales remained largely consistent with minor fluctuations around the 18,000 million USD mark from 2017 through 2019. By 2020, net sales slightly increased to 19140 million USD, indicating modest growth. Overall, sales figures suggest steady revenue generation with marginal upward movement towards the final year.
- Economic Profit Margin
- The economic profit margin mirrored the pattern of economic profit with some variations. It increased slightly from 7.53% in 2016 to a peak of 7.9% in 2017, then declined substantially to 4.93% in 2018. The margin improved again in 2019 to 7.13%, and further to 7.85% in 2020. This trend reflects a dip in profitability efficiency in 2018 followed by steady recovery, aligning with the overall economic profit changes over the same period.
- General Insights
- The data indicates that while net sales remained relatively stable with modest growth, economic profit and profit margins demonstrated considerable variability, particularly with a downturn in 2018 followed by recovery. This suggests that factors influencing profitability beyond sales volume, such as cost management or operational efficiency, may have impacted economic profit trends. The positive turnaround in 2019 and 2020 points to effective measures taken to restore profitability margins.