EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.

Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.

Economic Profit
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Cash Operating Taxes
Invested Capital
Cost of Capital
Economic Spread Ratio
Economic Profit Margin

HP Inc., economic profit calculation

US$ in millions

12 months ended:	Oct 31, 2018	Oct 31, 2017	Oct 31, 2016	Oct 31, 2015	Oct 31, 2014	Oct 31, 2013
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)¹	2,027)	3,064)	2,997)	3,947)	4,693)	4,258)
Cost of capital²	22.57%	21.56%	21.11%	13.39%	20.88%	18.89%
Invested capital³	7,561)	9,763)	9,027)	71,569)	65,787)	67,461)

Economic profit⁴	320)	959)	1,092)	(5,636)	(9,041)	(8,485)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-10-31).

¹ NOPAT. See details »

² Cost of capital. See details »

³ Invested capital. See details »

⁴ 2018 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= 2,027 – 22.57% × 7,561 = 320

The financial performance over the analyzed six-year period is characterized by a transition from significant economic value destruction to marginal value creation. Although operational profitability declined over time, a drastic reduction in the invested capital base enabled a shift toward positive economic profit starting in 2016.

Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT): A downward trend in operational profitability is observed. After reaching a peak of US$ 4,693 million in 2014, NOPAT declined steadily, ending at US$ 2,027 million in 2018. This represents a contraction in the absolute earnings available to cover the cost of capital.
Invested Capital: A substantial structural shift occurred between 2015 and 2016, during which invested capital dropped from US$ 71,569 million to US$ 9,027 million. This sharp contraction suggests a significant divestiture or restructuring of the asset base, which fundamentally altered the company's economic profit calculation by reducing the capital charge.
Cost of Capital: The cost of capital exhibited volatility, reaching a minimum of 13.39% in 2015 before entering a period of consistent increase, peaking at 22.57% in 2018. The rising cost of capital indicates an increasing hurdle rate for investments, adding pressure to maintain positive economic value.
Economic Profit: Economic profit was deeply negative between 2013 and 2015, with the largest deficit of US$ -9,041 million occurring in 2014. A pivot to positive economic profit was achieved in 2016 at US$ 1,092 million, primarily driven by the reduction in invested capital rather than an increase in NOPAT. However, this positive trend deteriorated in subsequent years, falling to US$ 320 million by 2018 due to the combined effects of diminishing operational profits and a rising cost of capital.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Download chart

HP Inc., NOPAT calculation

US$ in millions

12 months ended:	Oct 31, 2018	Oct 31, 2017	Oct 31, 2016	Oct 31, 2015	Oct 31, 2014	Oct 31, 2013
Net earnings	5,327)	2,526)	2,496)	4,554)	5,013)	5,113)
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)¹	(3,654)	239)	403)	(701)	(33)	(410)
Increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts²	28)	(6)	27)	(43)	(100)	(132)
Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue³	167)	149)	(79)	498)	(310)	(481)
Increase (decrease) in product warranty liabilities⁴	17)	(82)	(204)	(248)	(75)	(139)
Increase (decrease) in restructuring plans, accrued balance⁵	(49)	50)	(5)	(309)	(3)	90)
Increase (decrease) in equity equivalents⁶	(3,491)	350)	142)	(803)	(521)	(1,072)
Interest expense on borrowings	312)	309)	273)	327)	344)	426)
Interest expense, operating lease liability⁷	58)	46)	42)	103)	102)	106)
Adjusted interest expense on borrowings	370)	355)	315)	430)	446)	532)
Tax benefit of interest expense on borrowings⁸	(86)	(124)	(110)	(151)	(156)	(186)
Adjusted interest expense on borrowings, after taxes⁹	284)	230)	205)	280)	290)	345)
(Gain) loss on marketable securities	(5)	—)	—)	—)	(1)	(49)
Interest income	(116)	(66)	(24)	(129)	(136)	(148)
Investment income, before taxes	(121)	(66)	(24)	(129)	(137)	(197)
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income¹⁰	28)	23)	8)	45)	48)	69)
Investment income, after taxes¹¹	(93)	(43)	(16)	(84)	(89)	(128)
(Income) loss from discontinued operations, net of tax¹²	—)	—)	170)	—)	—)	—)
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)	2,027)	3,064)	2,997)	3,947)	4,693)	4,258)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-10-31).

¹ Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »

² Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts.

³ Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.

⁴ Addition of increase (decrease) in product warranty liabilities.

⁵ Addition of increase (decrease) in restructuring plans, accrued balance.

⁶ Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net earnings.

⁷ 2018 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= 1,260 × 4.60% = 58

⁸ 2018 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense on borrowings = Adjusted interest expense on borrowings × Statutory income tax rate
= 370 × 23.30% = 86

⁹ Addition of after taxes interest expense to net earnings.

¹⁰ 2018 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= 121 × 23.30% = 28

¹¹ Elimination of after taxes investment income.

¹² Elimination of discontinued operations.

Net earnings: Net earnings displayed a downward trend from 2013 through 2016, decreasing from 5,113 million US dollars in 2013 to a low of 2,496 million US dollars in 2016. This was followed by a period of relative stability with a slight increase to 2,526 million US dollars in 2017. In 2018, net earnings sharply rebounded to 5,327 million US dollars, surpassing the 2013 figure.
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT): NOPAT witnessed a decline during the same initial period, dropping from 4,258 million US dollars in 2013 to 2,997 million US dollars in 2016. There was a modest recovery in 2017, reaching 3,064 million US dollars. However, contrary to net earnings, NOPAT decreased significantly in 2018 to 2,027 million US dollars, marking the lowest value in the observed range.
Overall Analysis: The data reveals diverging trends between net earnings and NOPAT in 2018. While net earnings showed a strong recovery, more than doubling relative to the previous year, NOPAT declined sharply, indicating potential changes in operational efficiency, tax effects, or non-operating income components affecting the profitability metrics differently. The earlier period from 2013 to 2016 demonstrates a consistent decline in both metrics, possibly pointing to operational challenges or adverse market conditions during those years.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Download chart

HP Inc., cash operating taxes calculation

US$ in millions

12 months ended:	Oct 31, 2018	Oct 31, 2017	Oct 31, 2016	Oct 31, 2015	Oct 31, 2014	Oct 31, 2013
Provision for (benefit from) taxes on earnings	(2,314)	750)	1,095)	178)	1,544)	1,397)
Less: Deferred income tax expense (benefit)	(3,654)	239)	403)	(701)	(33)	(410)
Add: Tax savings from interest expense on borrowings	86)	124)	110)	151)	156)	186)
Less: Tax imposed on investment income	28)	23)	8)	45)	48)	69)
Cash operating taxes	1,398)	612)	794)	984)	1,685)	1,924)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-10-31).

Provision for (benefit from) taxes on earnings: The provision for taxes on earnings exhibits significant volatility over the observed period. Starting at $1,397 million in 2013, it increased to $1,544 million in 2014, followed by a sharp decline to $178 million in 2015. In 2016, the amount rose again to $1,095 million, then decreased to $750 million in 2017, before turning into a substantial tax benefit of -$2,314 million in 2018. This fluctuation indicates variability in the company's taxable income or changes in tax strategy and tax regulations over the years.
Cash operating taxes: Cash operating taxes show a general downward trend from 2013 to 2017, decreasing from $1,924 million to $612 million. However, there is a notable rebound in 2018 with an increase to $1,398 million. This trend suggests a gradual reduction in actual cash tax payments over the first five years, possibly due to tax planning or changes in profitability, followed by a significant rise in the final year, which could reflect an increase in taxable cash flows or changes in tax payments timing or policies.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Download chart

HP Inc., invested capital calculation (financing approach)

US$ in millions

	Oct 31, 2018	Oct 31, 2017	Oct 31, 2016	Oct 31, 2015	Oct 31, 2014	Oct 31, 2013
Notes payable and short-term borrowings	1,463)	1,072)	78)	2,885)	3,486)	5,979)
Long-term debt, excluding current portion	4,524)	6,747)	6,758)	21,780)	16,039)	16,608)
Operating lease liability¹	1,260)	1,036)	901)	2,461)	2,681)	2,606)
Total reported debt & leases	7,247)	8,855)	7,737)	27,126)	22,206)	25,193)
Total HP stockholders’ equity (deficit)	(639)	(3,408)	(3,889)	27,768)	26,731)	27,269)
Net deferred tax (assets) liabilities²	(2,331)	1,068)	862)	(2,650)	(2,086)	(2,196)
Allowance for doubtful accounts³	129)	101)	107)	189)	232)	332)
Deferred revenue⁴	2,100)	1,933)	1,784)	10,572)	10,074)	10,384)
Product warranty liabilities⁵	915)	898)	980)	1,708)	1,956)	2,031)
Restructuring plans, accrued balance⁶	59)	108)	58)	805)	1,114)	1,117)
Equity equivalents⁷	872)	4,108)	3,791)	10,624)	11,290)	11,668)
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax⁸	845)	1,418)	1,438)	6,302)	5,881)	3,778)
Non-controlling interests	—)	—)	—)	383)	396)	387)
Adjusted total HP stockholders’ equity (deficit)	1,078)	2,118)	1,340)	45,077)	44,298)	43,102)
Available-for-sale investments⁹	(764)	(1,210)	(50)	(634)	(717)	(834)
Invested capital	7,561)	9,763)	9,027)	71,569)	65,787)	67,461)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-10-31).

¹ Addition of capitalized operating leases.

² Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »

³ Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.

⁴ Addition of deferred revenue.

⁵ Addition of product warranty liabilities.

⁶ Addition of restructuring plans, accrued balance.

⁷ Addition of equity equivalents to total HP stockholders’ equity (deficit).

⁸ Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.

⁹ Subtraction of available-for-sale investments.

Total reported debt & leases: The total reported debt and leases exhibited a fluctuating pattern over the analyzed period. Starting at 25,193 million US dollars in 2013, the figure decreased to 22,206 million in 2014, followed by an increase to 27,126 million in 2015. Subsequently, there was a sharp decline to 7,737 million in 2016, with minor increases to 8,855 million in 2017 and a decrease again to 7,247 million in 2018. This indicates a significant reduction in debt levels from 2015 onwards, possibly reflecting a strategic deleveraging or asset restructuring effort.
Total HP stockholders’ equity (deficit): Stockholders’ equity showed stability and slight growth from 27,269 million in 2013 to 27,768 million in 2015. However, from 2016 onwards, the equity balance turned negative, indicating a deficit position of -3,889 million in 2016. This deficit slightly improved but remained negative at -3,408 million in 2017 and -639 million in 2018. The transition to negative equity suggests significant losses or charges affecting retained earnings or valuation adjustments during this period.
Invested capital: Invested capital remained relatively stable and showed a mild upward trend from 67,461 million in 2013 to 71,569 million in 2015. Beginning in 2016, there was a sharp and substantial drop to 9,027 million followed by a slight increase to 9,763 million in 2017 and a decrease again to 7,561 million in 2018. The dramatic decline post-2015 aligns with reduced debt levels and negative equity, possibly reflecting a divestiture of significant assets or a fundamental change in capital structure.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Download chart

HP Inc., cost of capital calculations

Oct 31, 2018

	Capital (fair value)¹	Weights					Cost of capital
Equity²	34,627)	34,627)	÷	41,888)	=	0.83	0.83	×	26.57%	=	21.96%
Short- and long-term debt³	6,000)	6,000)	÷	41,888)	=	0.14	0.14	×	4.60% × (1 – 23.30%)	=	0.51%
Operating lease liability⁴	1,260)	1,260)	÷	41,888)	=	0.03	0.03	×	4.60% × (1 – 23.30%)	=	0.11%
Total:	41,888)					1.00					22.57%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-10-31).

¹ US$ in millions

² Equity. See details »

³ Short- and long-term debt. See details »

⁴ Operating lease liability. See details »

Oct 31, 2017

	Capital (fair value)¹	Weights					Cost of capital
Equity²	34,122)	34,122)	÷	43,258)	=	0.79	0.79	×	26.57%	=	20.96%
Short- and long-term debt³	8,100)	8,100)	÷	43,258)	=	0.19	0.19	×	4.40% × (1 – 35.00%)	=	0.54%
Operating lease liability⁴	1,036)	1,036)	÷	43,258)	=	0.02	0.02	×	4.40% × (1 – 35.00%)	=	0.07%
Total:	43,258)					1.00					21.56%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-10-31).

¹ US$ in millions

² Equity. See details »

³ Short- and long-term debt. See details »

⁴ Operating lease liability. See details »

Oct 31, 2016

	Capital (fair value)¹	Weights					Cost of capital
Equity²	26,452)	26,452)	÷	34,452)	=	0.77	0.77	×	26.57%	=	20.40%
Short- and long-term debt³	7,100)	7,100)	÷	34,452)	=	0.21	0.21	×	4.69% × (1 – 35.00%)	=	0.63%
Operating lease liability⁴	901)	901)	÷	34,452)	=	0.03	0.03	×	4.69% × (1 – 35.00%)	=	0.08%
Total:	34,452)					1.00					21.11%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-10-31).

¹ US$ in millions

² Equity. See details »

³ Short- and long-term debt. See details »

⁴ Operating lease liability. See details »

Oct 31, 2015

	Capital (fair value)¹	Weights					Cost of capital
Equity²	21,968)	21,968)	÷	49,129)	=	0.45	0.45	×	26.57%	=	11.88%
Short- and long-term debt³	24,700)	24,700)	÷	49,129)	=	0.50	0.50	×	4.20% × (1 – 35.00%)	=	1.37%
Operating lease liability⁴	2,461)	2,461)	÷	49,129)	=	0.05	0.05	×	4.20% × (1 – 35.00%)	=	0.14%
Total:	49,129)					1.00					13.39%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-10-31).

¹ US$ in millions

² Equity. See details »

³ Short- and long-term debt. See details »

⁴ Operating lease liability. See details »

Oct 31, 2014

	Capital (fair value)¹	Weights					Cost of capital
Equity²	73,033)	73,033)	÷	95,614)	=	0.76	0.76	×	26.57%	=	20.29%
Short- and long-term debt³	19,900)	19,900)	÷	95,614)	=	0.21	0.21	×	3.79% × (1 – 35.00%)	=	0.51%
Operating lease liability⁴	2,681)	2,681)	÷	95,614)	=	0.03	0.03	×	3.79% × (1 – 35.00%)	=	0.07%
Total:	95,614)					1.00					20.88%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2014-10-31).

¹ US$ in millions

² Equity. See details »

³ Short- and long-term debt. See details »

⁴ Operating lease liability. See details »

Oct 31, 2013

	Capital (fair value)¹	Weights					Cost of capital
Equity²	53,579)	53,579)	÷	78,885)	=	0.68	0.68	×	26.57%	=	18.05%
Short- and long-term debt³	22,700)	22,700)	÷	78,885)	=	0.29	0.29	×	4.05% × (1 – 35.00%)	=	0.76%
Operating lease liability⁴	2,606)	2,606)	÷	78,885)	=	0.03	0.03	×	4.05% × (1 – 35.00%)	=	0.09%
Total:	78,885)					1.00					18.89%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2013-10-31).

¹ US$ in millions

² Equity. See details »

³ Short- and long-term debt. See details »

⁴ Operating lease liability. See details »

HP Inc., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks

	Oct 31, 2018	Oct 31, 2017	Oct 31, 2016	Oct 31, 2015	Oct 31, 2014	Oct 31, 2013
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Economic profit¹	320)	959)	1,092)	(5,636)	(9,041)	(8,485)
Invested capital²	7,561)	9,763)	9,027)	71,569)	65,787)	67,461)
Performance Ratio
Economic spread ratio³	4.23%	9.82%	12.10%	-7.87%	-13.74%	-12.58%
Benchmarks
Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors⁴
Apple Inc.	—	—	—	—	—	—
Arista Networks Inc.	—	—	—	—	—	—
Cisco Systems Inc.	—	—	—	—	—	—
Dell Technologies Inc.	—	—	—	—	—	—
Lumentum Holdings Inc.	—	—	—	—	—	—
Super Micro Computer Inc.	—	—	—	—	—	—

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-10-31).

¹ Economic profit. See details »

² Invested capital. See details »

³ 2018 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × 320 ÷ 7,561 = 4.23%

⁴ Click competitor name to see calculations.

The financial data indicates a significant transition in value creation from 2013 to 2018, characterized by an initial period of value destruction followed by a recovery and a subsequent gradual decline in efficiency.

Economic Profit Trends: Economic profit exhibited a volatile trajectory, beginning with substantial negative values of -8,485 million USD in 2013 and peaking at a loss of -9,041 million USD in 2014. A recovery phase began in 2015, culminating in a pivot to positive economic profit in 2016, which reached 1,092 million USD. However, this positive momentum decelerated in the following years, with profit declining to 959 million USD in 2017 and further dropping to 320 million USD by 2018.
Invested Capital Dynamics: A stark contraction in invested capital is observed between 2015 and 2016. Capital levels remained relatively stable between 65,787 million USD and 71,569 million USD from 2013 to 2015, before plummeting to 9,027 million USD in 2016. This drastic reduction in the capital base persisted through 2018, where invested capital reached a period low of 7,561 million USD.
Economic Spread Ratio Analysis: The economic spread ratio mirrors the volatility of economic profit but highlights the impact of the capital base reduction. The ratio reached its lowest point in 2014 at -13.74%, indicating significant value destruction. The shift to a positive spread of 12.10% in 2016 suggests a successful realignment of returns relative to the cost of capital, heavily influenced by the reduced invested capital. Following this peak, the ratio entered a consistent downward trend, falling to 9.82% in 2017 and ending at 4.23% in 2018, signaling a diminishing margin of economic value creation.

Overall, the analysis reveals a corporate turnaround in 2016 that shifted the organization from negative to positive economic spread. However, the downward trajectory of both economic profit and the spread ratio from 2016 to 2018 suggests a reduction in the effectiveness of capital utilization in the latter part of the period.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Download chart

HP Inc., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

	Oct 31, 2018	Oct 31, 2017	Oct 31, 2016	Oct 31, 2015	Oct 31, 2014	Oct 31, 2013
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Economic profit¹	320)	959)	1,092)	(5,636)	(9,041)	(8,485)

Net revenue	58,472)	52,056)	48,238)	103,355)	111,454)	112,298)
Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue	167)	149)	(79)	498)	(310)	(481)
Adjusted net revenue	58,639)	52,205)	48,159)	103,853)	111,144)	111,817)
Performance Ratio
Economic profit margin²	0.55%	1.84%	2.27%	-5.43%	-8.13%	-7.59%
Benchmarks
Economic Profit Margin, Competitors³
Apple Inc.	—	—	—	—	—	—
Arista Networks Inc.	—	—	—	—	—	—
Cisco Systems Inc.	—	—	—	—	—	—
Dell Technologies Inc.	—	—	—	—	—	—
Lumentum Holdings Inc.	—	—	—	—	—	—
Super Micro Computer Inc.	—	—	—	—	—	—

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-10-31).

¹ Economic profit. See details »

² 2018 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted net revenue
= 100 × 320 ÷ 58,639 = 0.55%

³ Click competitor name to see calculations.

The analysis of economic value added reveals a significant structural transition between 2013 and 2018, characterized by a shift from consistent value destruction to the generation of positive economic profit.

Economic Profit Trends: From 2013 to 2015, economic profit remained negative, reaching a trough of -9,041 million US dollars in 2014. A pivotal recovery occurred in 2016, when the figure transitioned to a positive 1,092 million US dollars. However, this positive trajectory decelerated in subsequent years, with economic profit declining to 959 million US dollars in 2017 and further decreasing to 320 million US dollars by 2018.
Adjusted Net Revenue Analysis: Adjusted net revenue remained relatively stable between 2013 and 2015, consistently exceeding 100,000 million US dollars. A sharp contraction was observed in 2016, where revenue fell to 48,159 million US dollars, indicating a major structural change or reorganization. Following this period, a gradual recovery in revenue occurred, climbing to 58,639 million US dollars by 2018.
Economic Profit Margin Dynamics: The economic profit margin mirrored the trend of absolute economic profit. The margin reached its lowest point of -8.13% in 2014 before improving to -5.43% in 2015. Following the transition to positive economic profit in 2016, the margin peaked at 2.27%. A subsequent downward trend was observed, with the margin contracting to 1.84% in 2017 and reaching 0.55% in 2018.

In summary, although the entity successfully reversed the trend of negative economic profit by 2016, the subsequent decline in both absolute economic profit and the profit margin indicates a diminishing capacity to generate returns exceeding the cost of capital toward the end of the analyzed period.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Download chart

HP Inc. (NYSE:HPQ)

Economic Value Added (EVA)

Economic Profit

Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)

Cash Operating Taxes

Invested Capital

Cost of Capital

Economic Spread Ratio

Economic Profit Margin