AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

HP Inc. (NYSE:HPQ)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since August 29, 2019.

Return on Capital (ROC)

Microsoft Excel

Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)

HP Inc., ROIC calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Oct 31, 2018 Oct 31, 2017 Oct 31, 2016 Oct 31, 2015 Oct 31, 2014 Oct 31, 2013
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 2,027 3,064 2,997 3,947 4,693 4,258
Invested capital2 7,561 9,763 9,027 71,569 65,787 67,461
Performance Ratio
ROIC3 26.81% 31.38% 33.20% 5.51% 7.13% 6.31%
Benchmarks
ROIC, Competitors4
Apple Inc. — — — — — —
Arista Networks Inc. — — — — — —
Cisco Systems Inc. — — — — — —
Dell Technologies Inc. — — — — — —
Lumentum Holdings Inc. — — — — — —
Super Micro Computer Inc. — — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-10-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2018 Calculation
ROIC = 100 × NOPAT ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × 2,027 ÷ 7,561 = 26.81%

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial performance from 2013 to 2018 reveals a significant structural shift in the company's capital efficiency and operating profit profile.

Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
A general downward trend in NOPAT is observed over the six-year period. After reaching a peak of 4,693 million US$ in 2014, NOPAT declined steadily, reaching its lowest point of 2,027 million US$ by October 31, 2018. This indicates a contraction in absolute operating profitability.
Invested Capital
A substantial reduction in the invested capital base occurred between 2015 and 2016. The capital base dropped from 71,569 million US$ in 2015 to 9,027 million US$ in 2016. Following this sharp decrease, the capital base remained relatively low, ending the period at 7,561 million US$ in 2018.
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
ROIC shifted dramatically in correlation with the change in invested capital. From 2013 to 2015, ROIC remained low, fluctuating between 5.51% and 7.13%. Following the contraction of the capital base in 2016, ROIC spiked to 33.20%. While there was a subsequent gradual decline to 26.81% by 2018, the efficiency ratio remained significantly higher than the levels seen prior to 2016.

The analysis indicates that the marked increase in ROIC was driven primarily by a drastic reduction in the denominator (invested capital) rather than growth in the numerator (NOPAT), as operating profits actually declined during the same window of increased capital efficiency.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Decomposition of ROIC

HP Inc., decomposition of ROIC

Microsoft Excel
ROIC = OPM1 × TO2 × 1 – CTR3
Oct 31, 2018 26.81% = 5.84% × 7.76 × 59.18%
Oct 31, 2017 31.38% = 7.04% × 5.35 × 83.35%
Oct 31, 2016 33.20% = 7.87% × 5.34 × 79.06%
Oct 31, 2015 5.51% = 4.75% × 1.45 × 80.04%
Oct 31, 2014 7.13% = 5.74% × 1.69 × 73.58%
Oct 31, 2013 6.31% = 5.53% × 1.66 × 68.88%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-10-31).

1 Operating profit margin (OPM). See calculations »

2 Turnover of capital (TO). See calculations »

3 Effective cash tax rate (CTR). See calculations »


An analysis of the return on invested capital (ROIC) from 2013 to 2018 reveals a profound structural shift in financial performance. While the initial period was characterized by low, single-digit returns, a dramatic escalation occurred in 2016, with ROIC remaining elevated through 2018 despite a gradual contraction in the final two years.

Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
ROIC exhibited a stark inflection point in 2016, rising from 5.51% in 2015 to 33.20%. Following this peak, the metric experienced a moderate decline, settling at 26.81% by October 31, 2018. This overall trajectory indicates a transition from a low-yield capital structure to a high-yield model.
Turnover of Capital (TO)
The primary catalyst for the surge in ROIC was a significant increase in capital turnover. The ratio remained relatively stagnant between 1.45 and 1.69 from 2013 to 2015, then surged to 5.34 in 2016 and peaked at 7.76 in 2018. This trend suggests a substantial improvement in asset efficiency or a significant reduction in the invested capital base relative to revenue.
Operating Profit Margin (OPM)
Operating margins remained relatively stable and modest throughout the period. While a peak of 7.87% was reached in 2016, the margin trended downward to 5.84% by 2018. Because the margins did not experience a proportional increase to the ROIC, it is evident that the growth in returns was driven by capital velocity rather than operational profitability per unit of sale.
Effective Cash Tax Rate (1 – CTR)
The after-tax multiplier showed a general upward trend from 68.88% in 2013 to a peak of 83.35% in 2017, which supported the net return on capital. However, a sharp decline to 59.18% in 2018 acted as a significant headwind, contributing to the reduction in ROIC despite the continued improvement in capital turnover during that same year.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Operating Profit Margin (OPM)

HP Inc., OPM calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Oct 31, 2018 Oct 31, 2017 Oct 31, 2016 Oct 31, 2015 Oct 31, 2014 Oct 31, 2013
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 2,027 3,064 2,997 3,947 4,693 4,258
Add: Cash operating taxes2 1,398 612 794 984 1,685 1,924
Net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT) 3,425 3,676 3,791 4,931 6,378 6,183
 
Net revenue 58,472 52,056 48,238 103,355 111,454 112,298
Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue 167 149 (79) 498 (310) (481)
Adjusted net revenue 58,639 52,205 48,159 103,853 111,144 111,817
Profitability Ratio
OPM3 5.84% 7.04% 7.87% 4.75% 5.74% 5.53%
Benchmarks
OPM, Competitors4
Apple Inc. — — — — — —
Arista Networks Inc. — — — — — —
Cisco Systems Inc. — — — — — —
Dell Technologies Inc. — — — — — —
Lumentum Holdings Inc. — — — — — —
Super Micro Computer Inc. — — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-10-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cash operating taxes. See details »

3 2018 Calculation
OPM = 100 × NOPBT ÷ Adjusted net revenue
= 100 × 3,425 ÷ 58,639 = 5.84%

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


A comprehensive review of the financial performance from 2013 to 2018 reveals a period of significant structural transition and fluctuating profitability. While net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT) exhibited a general downward trajectory over the five-year period, the relationship between revenue and operating margins shifted markedly after 2015.

Revenue and Profitability Trends
Between 2013 and 2015, adjusted net revenue remained relatively stable, maintaining levels above 100 billion USD. During this time, NOPBT peaked in 2014 at 6,378 million USD before beginning a decline. A substantial contraction in adjusted net revenue occurred in 2016, where figures fell to 48,159 million USD, representing a decrease of more than 50% compared to the prior year. Following this drop, revenue showed a gradual recovery, increasing to 58,639 million USD by 2018.
Operating Profit Margin (OPM) Analysis
The operating profit margin displayed significant volatility. From 2013 to 2015, the OPM fluctuated between 4.75% and 5.74%. Notably, the margin peaked at 7.87% in 2016, coinciding with the sharpest decline in adjusted net revenue. This inverse relationship suggests an improvement in operational efficiency or a strategic shift toward higher-margin revenue streams during the restructuring period of 2016.
Recent Performance Trajectory
From 2016 through 2018, a diverging trend is observed between revenue and profitability. While adjusted net revenue grew steadily from 48,159 million USD to 58,639 million USD, NOPBT continued to diminish, ending the period at 3,425 million USD. Consequently, the operating profit margin retreated from its 2016 peak, falling to 7.04% in 2017 and further to 5.84% by October 31, 2018, indicating a compression of operating margins despite the recovery in top-line revenue.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Turnover of Capital (TO)

HP Inc., TO calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Oct 31, 2018 Oct 31, 2017 Oct 31, 2016 Oct 31, 2015 Oct 31, 2014 Oct 31, 2013
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net revenue 58,472 52,056 48,238 103,355 111,454 112,298
Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue 167 149 (79) 498 (310) (481)
Adjusted net revenue 58,639 52,205 48,159 103,853 111,144 111,817
 
Invested capital1 7,561 9,763 9,027 71,569 65,787 67,461
Efficiency Ratio
TO2 7.76 5.35 5.34 1.45 1.69 1.66
Benchmarks
TO, Competitors3
Apple Inc. — — — — — —
Arista Networks Inc. — — — — — —
Cisco Systems Inc. — — — — — —
Dell Technologies Inc. — — — — — —
Lumentum Holdings Inc. — — — — — —
Super Micro Computer Inc. — — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-10-31).

1 Invested capital. See details »

2 2018 Calculation
TO = Adjusted net revenue ÷ Invested capital
= 58,639 ÷ 7,561 = 7.76

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial performance from 2013 to 2018 indicates a fundamental structural shift in the company's operational model. A significant inflection point occurred between 2015 and 2016, characterized by a drastic reduction in the invested capital base, which subsequently transformed the capital efficiency profile of the organization.

Adjusted Net Revenue Trends
Revenue remained stable between 2013 and 2014 at approximately 111 billion before a slight decline in 2015. A sharp contraction was observed in 2016, with revenue dropping to 48.1 billion. Following this decline, a steady recovery trend emerged, with revenue increasing annually to reach 58.6 billion by October 31, 2018.
Invested Capital Evolution
Invested capital was maintained between 65 billion and 71 billion from 2013 to 2015. A precipitous decline occurred in 2016, with capital levels falling to 9.0 billion. This trend toward a leaner capital structure continued through 2018, with invested capital reaching a low of 7.5 billion.
Turnover of Capital (TO) Analysis
The capital turnover ratio remained relatively low and stable between 1.45 and 1.69 during the first three years of the period. The structural reduction in invested capital in 2016 led to a dramatic surge in the TO ratio to 5.34. This upward trend accelerated through 2018, culminating in a ratio of 7.76. This progression demonstrates a significant increase in asset productivity, where a substantially smaller capital base is generating progressively higher levels of revenue.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Effective Cash Tax Rate (CTR)

HP Inc., CTR calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Oct 31, 2018 Oct 31, 2017 Oct 31, 2016 Oct 31, 2015 Oct 31, 2014 Oct 31, 2013
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 2,027 3,064 2,997 3,947 4,693 4,258
Add: Cash operating taxes2 1,398 612 794 984 1,685 1,924
Net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT) 3,425 3,676 3,791 4,931 6,378 6,183
Tax Rate
CTR3 40.82% 16.65% 20.94% 19.96% 26.42% 31.12%
Benchmarks
CTR, Competitors4
Apple Inc. — — — — — —
Arista Networks Inc. — — — — — —
Cisco Systems Inc. — — — — — —
Dell Technologies Inc. — — — — — —
Lumentum Holdings Inc. — — — — — —
Super Micro Computer Inc. — — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-10-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-10-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cash operating taxes. See details »

3 2018 Calculation
CTR = 100 × Cash operating taxes ÷ NOPBT
= 100 × 1,398 ÷ 3,425 = 40.82%

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial period from 2013 to 2018 is characterized by a sustained contraction in operating profitability and significant volatility in cash tax obligations, resulting in a highly unstable effective cash tax rate (CTR).

Net Operating Profit Before Taxes (NOPBT)
A consistent downward trend in operating profitability is observed following a peak in 2014. NOPBT decreased from 6,378 million US$ in 2014 to 3,425 million US$ in 2018, reflecting a steady erosion of the profit base over the latter half of the period.
Cash Operating Taxes
Cash tax payments experienced a prolonged decline between 2013 and 2017, falling from 1,924 million US$ to a minimum of 612 million US$. This trend was abruptly reversed in 2018, when cash taxes surged to 1,398 million US$, marking a sharp increase relative to the preceding three years.
Effective Cash Tax Rate (CTR)
The CTR showed a general compression from 31.12% in 2013 to 16.65% in 2017, suggesting a period of increasing tax efficiency or the application of tax credits. However, the final year of the analysis shows a dramatic spike to 40.82%. This peak is particularly notable because it occurred while NOPBT continued to decline, indicating that the tax burden in 2018 was disproportionately high relative to the operating profit generated during that year.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?