Stock Analysis on Net

General Dynamics Corp. (NYSE:GD)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since October 28, 2020.

Analysis of Long-term (Investment) Activity Ratios
Quarterly Data

Microsoft Excel

Paying user area

The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.

This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.


We accept:

Visa Mastercard American Express Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check American Express SafeKey

Long-term Activity Ratios (Summary)

General Dynamics Corp., long-term (investment) activity ratios (quarterly data)

Microsoft Excel
Sep 27, 2020 Jun 28, 2020 Mar 29, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Sep 29, 2019 Jun 30, 2019 Mar 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Sep 30, 2018 Jul 1, 2018 Apr 1, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Oct 1, 2017 Jul 2, 2017 Apr 2, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Oct 2, 2016 Jul 3, 2016 Apr 3, 2016
Net fixed asset turnover
Total asset turnover
Equity turnover

Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-09-27), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-06-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-03-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-09-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-07-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-04-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-10-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-07-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-04-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-10-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-07-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-04-03).


Net Fixed Asset Turnover
The net fixed asset turnover ratio demonstrates a generally declining trend over the observed periods. Initially, the ratio was stable around 9.0 in 2016, peaking slightly at 9.11 in early 2017. However, it began to decrease gradually throughout 2017 and 2018, reaching its lowest values in mid to late 2020. A brief recovery is observed in early 2019, where the ratio rose above 9.3, but the subsequent trend continued downward. This decline suggests a reduced efficiency in utilizing fixed assets to generate sales over time, particularly evident as the ratio dropped below 8.0 in 2020.
Total Asset Turnover
Total asset turnover exhibits a more pronounced downward trajectory compared to net fixed asset turnover. The ratio started near 0.99 in early 2016 and steadily declined through 2017 and 2018, reaching a low of approximately 0.69 in mid-2018. Following this low point, a modest improvement is seen, with the ratio stabilizing around 0.80 in late 2018 through early 2020. Despite this partial recovery, the ratio declined again in the latter portions of 2020 to around 0.76. This pattern indicates an overall reduction in the company's ability to generate revenue from its total asset base, with fluctuations suggesting potential operational or market challenges impacting asset utilization.
Equity Turnover
Equity turnover maintains relatively higher values compared to total asset turnover but also reveals a gradual weakening trend. Starting at nearly 3.0 in early 2016, the ratio shows fluctuations within a range of approximately 2.6 to 3.1 over the studied timeframe. Notably, a peak occurs at just over 3.1 in late 2018 and early 2019, indicating periods of more effective use of shareholder equity in generating sales. However, subsequent measurements show a slow decline, with the ratio dropping to near 2.6 by late 2020. This suggests a diminishing efficiency in equity utilization for driving revenue, albeit less severe than the decline seen in total asset turnover.
Overall Insights
The trends across all turnover ratios collectively point to a reduced operational efficiency during the period under review. While net fixed asset turnover and equity turnover show intermittent recoveries, the downward pressure persists, especially pronounced in total asset turnover. This could reflect broader challenges such as market conditions, investment decisions, or shifts in asset composition affecting the capacity to generate sales. Close attention to asset management and equity utilization strategies may be warranted to stabilize and enhance these efficiency metrics going forward.

Net Fixed Asset Turnover

General Dynamics Corp., net fixed asset turnover calculation (quarterly data)

Microsoft Excel
Sep 27, 2020 Jun 28, 2020 Mar 29, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Sep 29, 2019 Jun 30, 2019 Mar 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Sep 30, 2018 Jul 1, 2018 Apr 1, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Oct 1, 2017 Jul 2, 2017 Apr 2, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Oct 2, 2016 Jul 3, 2016 Apr 3, 2016
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Revenue
Property, plant and equipment, net
Long-term Activity Ratio
Net fixed asset turnover1
Benchmarks
Net Fixed Asset Turnover, Competitors2
Boeing Co.
Caterpillar Inc.
Eaton Corp. plc
GE Aerospace
Honeywell International Inc.
Lockheed Martin Corp.
RTX Corp.

Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-09-27), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-06-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-03-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-09-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-07-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-04-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-10-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-07-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-04-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-10-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-07-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-04-03).

1 Q3 2020 Calculation
Net fixed asset turnover = (RevenueQ3 2020 + RevenueQ2 2020 + RevenueQ1 2020 + RevenueQ4 2019) ÷ Property, plant and equipment, net
= ( + + + ) ÷ =

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Revenue Trends
Revenue figures exhibit a cyclical pattern with noticeable quarterly fluctuations. From the first quarter of 2016 through the end of 2017, revenue showed moderate variability but maintained a general range between approximately 7,400 and 8,300 million US dollars. Starting in 2018, there was a clear upward trajectory in revenue, culminating in a peak of over 10,700 million US dollars in the final quarter of 2019. However, revenue declined significantly in the first two quarters of 2020, dropping to levels just below 9,000 million US dollars before experiencing a slight recovery by the third quarter of 2020 to around 9,400 million US dollars. This decline in early 2020 may indicate sensitivity to external economic factors affecting business operations.
Property, Plant and Equipment (PP&E), Net
The net value of property, plant, and equipment demonstrates a gradual increasing trend over the analyzed periods. Beginning at approximately 3,440 million US dollars in early 2016, the asset base expanded steadily, reaching nearly 4,860 million US dollars by the third quarter of 2020. This consistent growth indicates ongoing investment in fixed assets, reflecting an expanding operational capacity or modernization efforts. The increase from the beginning to the end of the period is substantial, suggesting a strategic focus on strengthening the physical asset base.
Net Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio
The net fixed asset turnover ratio, which measures how efficiently the company uses its fixed assets to generate revenue, showed a decreasing trend. Early in 2016, the ratio was around 9.0 and remained relatively stable through 2017. However, starting in 2018, the ratio declined steadily from approximately 8.8 down to about 7.9 by late 2020. This decrement indicates that the growth in fixed assets was faster than the growth in revenue, resulting in less efficiency in asset utilization. The declining turnover could suggest overinvestment or lagging revenue gains relative to asset expansion, warranting a review of asset deployment strategies.
Overall Analysis
The data reflects a business experiencing growth in revenue until late 2019 followed by a sharp reduction in early 2020, likely due to external pressures. Simultaneously, fixed asset investments have been rising steadily, potentially supporting future revenue growth. However, diminishing fixed asset turnover suggests that asset efficiency is weakening, signaling a possible misalignment between asset additions and revenue production. Management may need to assess utilization rates and consider optimizing asset allocation to enhance operational efficiency moving forward.

Total Asset Turnover

General Dynamics Corp., total asset turnover calculation (quarterly data)

Microsoft Excel
Sep 27, 2020 Jun 28, 2020 Mar 29, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Sep 29, 2019 Jun 30, 2019 Mar 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Sep 30, 2018 Jul 1, 2018 Apr 1, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Oct 1, 2017 Jul 2, 2017 Apr 2, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Oct 2, 2016 Jul 3, 2016 Apr 3, 2016
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Revenue
Total assets
Long-term Activity Ratio
Total asset turnover1
Benchmarks
Total Asset Turnover, Competitors2
Boeing Co.
Caterpillar Inc.
Eaton Corp. plc
GE Aerospace
Honeywell International Inc.
Lockheed Martin Corp.
RTX Corp.

Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-09-27), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-06-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-03-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-09-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-07-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-04-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-10-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-07-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-04-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-10-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-07-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-04-03).

1 Q3 2020 Calculation
Total asset turnover = (RevenueQ3 2020 + RevenueQ2 2020 + RevenueQ1 2020 + RevenueQ4 2019) ÷ Total assets
= ( + + + ) ÷ =

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial data exhibits several notable trends over the observed periods. Revenue demonstrates a generally upward trajectory with some fluctuations. Initial quarters show revenue hovering around the mid-$7,000 million range, followed by an increase reaching over $10,000 million in late 2018 and 2019. Despite this peak, there are periods of decline, particularly into 2020 where revenue declines slightly but remains relatively robust compared to earlier periods.

Total assets have steadily increased throughout the timeline. Starting from approximately $31,700 million, assets show a consistent upward movement, surging notably around mid-2018 to early 2020, surpassing $50,000 million. This growth in assets suggests investment or acquisition activities over the observed timeframe.

The total asset turnover ratio, which measures revenue generated per unit of assets, shows a declining trend. Early observations reveal ratios near 0.99, indicating nearly one dollar of revenue per dollar of assets. However, this ratio decreases steadily to approximately 0.76 by late 2020, illustrating a reduction in asset utilization efficiency. The decline is more pronounced from 2017 onwards, despite the growth in revenue, implying that asset growth is outpacing revenue growth in recent periods.

Revenue
Shows overall growth from around $7,700 million to a peak exceeding $10,000 million, followed by slight declines in 2020.
Total Assets
Consistently rise from approximately $31,700 million to over $50,000 million, indicating asset accumulation.
Total Asset Turnover
Decreases from near 1.0 to around 0.76, revealing diminishing efficiency in generating revenue from assets.

In summary, while the company has increased its revenue and expanded its asset base substantially, the efficiency with which it uses its assets to generate revenue has declined over time. This could warrant further investigation into asset management effectiveness and the nature of the asset growth to determine if the investments are translating into proportional gains in revenue.


Equity Turnover

General Dynamics Corp., equity turnover calculation (quarterly data)

Microsoft Excel
Sep 27, 2020 Jun 28, 2020 Mar 29, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Sep 29, 2019 Jun 30, 2019 Mar 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Sep 30, 2018 Jul 1, 2018 Apr 1, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Oct 1, 2017 Jul 2, 2017 Apr 2, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Oct 2, 2016 Jul 3, 2016 Apr 3, 2016
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Revenue
Shareholders’ equity
Long-term Activity Ratio
Equity turnover1
Benchmarks
Equity Turnover, Competitors2
Boeing Co.
Caterpillar Inc.
Eaton Corp. plc
GE Aerospace
Honeywell International Inc.
Lockheed Martin Corp.
RTX Corp.

Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-09-27), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-06-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-03-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-09-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-06-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-03-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-07-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-04-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-10-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-07-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-04-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-10-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-07-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-04-03).

1 Q3 2020 Calculation
Equity turnover = (RevenueQ3 2020 + RevenueQ2 2020 + RevenueQ1 2020 + RevenueQ4 2019) ÷ Shareholders’ equity
= ( + + + ) ÷ =

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Revenue Trends
Revenue displayed moderate fluctuations across the reported quarters. Initially, it hovered around the 7,700 million US dollar mark in 2016 with slight increases towards the end of the year, peaking at 8,277 million US dollars in December 2017. In 2018, there was a noticeable upward trajectory, culminating in a high of 10,378 million US dollars in December 2018. This level was generally sustained into early 2019, although some quarters showed a minor decline. The fourth quarter of 2019 marked another peak at 10,773 million US dollars, followed by a decline during the first half of 2020, reaching a low of 8,749 million US dollars in March 2020. There was a partial recovery by the third quarter of 2020 with revenue reaching 9,431 million US dollars. Overall, revenue growth is characterized by periodic peaks around the end of calendar years with some volatility especially evident in 2020.
Shareholders’ Equity Trends
Shareholders’ equity demonstrated a generally upward trend over the reported period. Starting at approximately 10,582 million US dollars in the first quarter of 2016, equities gradually increased through 2017 and 2018, reaching an interim peak of 12,755 million US dollars in September 2018. There was a dip in the fourth quarter of 2018, decreasing to about 11,732 million US dollars, but the equity base resumed its upward momentum thereafter, culminating at 13,577 million US dollars at the end of 2019. The trend continued positively, reaching 14,716 million US dollars by the third quarter of 2020. This steady increase indicates strengthening capital structure and accumulation of retained earnings or other equity increases.
Equity Turnover Ratio Trends
The equity turnover ratio, which measures the efficiency in generating revenue from shareholders’ equity, showed a declining trend in the earlier years, starting at 2.97 in April 2016 and gradually falling to about 2.67 by October 2017. However, the ratio presented a rebound towards the end of 2018, reaching as high as 3.10 in March 2019. Following this, there was a decline again in 2019, dropping below 2.9 by December. In 2020, the ratio continued its modest downward movement, reaching 2.60 by September. Fluctuations in this ratio reflect the interplay between revenue volatility and the steadily increasing equity base, suggesting that while equity has grown consistently, revenue growth has been somewhat more volatile, particularly in recent quarters.
Summary of Insights
The data indicates that while shareholders’ equity has shown consistent growth, revenue has experienced cyclicality with significant peaks towards year ends and instability particularly pronounced in the early 2020 period, likely reflecting external economic pressures. The equity turnover ratio's variation underscores that the company’s ability to generate revenue from equity has diminished slightly over time, especially in 2020, which may point to challenges in operational efficiency or the impact of market conditions. The company’s financial position appears stable with strengthening equity, but revenue volatility and diminishing turnover efficiency suggest areas for strategic focus to enhance overall financial performance going forward.