EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Best Buy Co. Inc. pages available for free this week:
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Best Buy Co. Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
12 months ended: | Jan 29, 2022 | Jan 30, 2021 | Feb 1, 2020 | Feb 2, 2019 | Feb 3, 2018 | Jan 28, 2017 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | |||||||
Cost of capital2 | |||||||
Invested capital3 | |||||||
Economic profit4 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
Over the examined period, several key financial metrics exhibit notable trends reflecting operational and financial dynamics.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- The NOPAT experienced a decline from 2017 to 2018, dropping from 1602 million US dollars to 1296 million US dollars. Following this dip, there was a consistent increase year-over-year, reaching 2817 million US dollars by 2022. This suggests an overall improvement in operational efficiency and profitability after the initial setback.
- Cost of Capital
- The cost of capital showed fluctuations within a relatively narrow range, starting at 16.08% in 2017, slightly rising to a peak of 17.4% in 2021, before decreasing marginally to 16.98% in 2022. These changes indicate varying capital costs that could have impacted investment decisions and valuation during the years.
- Invested Capital
- The amount of invested capital initially decreased from 6613 million US dollars in 2017 to 5407 million in 2018, then increased substantially, peaking at 9079 million in 2021 before declining to 7721 million in 2022. This pattern reflects adjustments in asset base and capital deployment, possibly in response to strategic initiatives or market conditions.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit exhibited notable variability. It decreased from 538 million US dollars in 2017 to 373 million in 2019, followed by an upward trend culminating in a significant rise to 1506 million in 2022. The sharp increase in economic profit in the last year suggests enhanced value creation and efficient use of invested capital relative to the cost of capital.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowances for uncollectible receivables.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in restructuring accrual.
5 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net earnings.
6 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
7 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
8 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net earnings.
9 Elimination of discontinued operations.
The financial data reveals a consistent upward trend in both the net earnings and the net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) over the examined six-year period. Each year, there is a notable increase compared to the previous period, indicating improving profitability and operational efficiency.
- Net Earnings
-
Starting at $1,228 million in the year ending January 28, 2017, net earnings experienced a decrease in the following year to $1,000 million. However, from 2018 onward, net earnings resumed growth, reaching $1,464 million in 2019, further increasing to $1,541 million in 2020 and $1,798 million in 2021. The most significant growth within the period occurred between 2021 and 2022, with net earnings rising sharply to $2,454 million, marking the highest point in the data set.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
-
NOPAT also demonstrated an overall upward trajectory, beginning at $1,602 million in 2017. It decreased to $1,296 million in 2018, mirroring the decline observed in net earnings. Subsequently, NOPAT increased to $1,580 million in 2019 and continued to grow to $1,799 million in 2020. This positive momentum persisted, with NOPAT reaching $2,197 million in 2021 and further rising to $2,817 million in 2022. The increase in NOPAT in the final year also represents the most substantial annual gain within the timeframe.
In summary, following a temporary dip in 2018, both profitability measures—net earnings and NOPAT—display strong recovery and growth throughout the remaining years. The sustained increase, particularly pronounced in the last two years of the data, signals enhanced profitability and operational success for the company during this period.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).
- Income Tax Expense
- The income tax expense shows considerable fluctuations over the examined periods. It increased substantially from 609 million US dollars in early 2017 to 818 million in 2018, indicating a significant rise. Subsequently, there was a sharp decline to 424 million in 2019, followed by a slight increase to 452 million in 2020. The expense rose again in 2021 to 579 million but stabilized in 2022, with a minor reduction to 574 million. Overall, the trend presents volatility with a notable peak in 2018 and some stabilization towards later years.
- Cash Operating Taxes
- Cash operating taxes followed a somewhat parallel pattern to income tax expense but with distinct variations. Starting at 495 million in 2017, the figure surged to 720 million in 2018, closely mirroring the peak in income tax expense. It then declined sharply to 452 million in 2019 and dipped further to 415 million in 2020, marking the lowest point in the series. A pronounced increase occurred in 2021, reaching the highest value of 642 million, before decreasing again to 579 million in 2022. This pattern indicates a strong correlation with income tax expense, coupled with a more pronounced recovery peak in 2021.
- Comparative Insights
- Both income tax expense and cash operating taxes display significant year-to-year variability, with peaks in 2018 and 2021. The data suggests that while both metrics tend to move in tandem, cash operating taxes exhibit more substantial relative changes, particularly during 2020 to 2021. The decline observed in 2019 and 2020 in both categories could reflect operational or tax policy changes, whereas the rebound in 2021 indicates a possible recovery phase. By 2022, both measures tend to stabilize, remaining close in value compared to earlier years.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of deferred revenue.
5 Addition of restructuring accrual.
6 Addition of equity equivalents to total Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders’ equity.
7 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
8 Subtraction of marketable securities.
The financial data reveals several notable trends in debt, equity, and invested capital over the six-year period from 2017 to 2022.
- Total Reported Debt & Leases
- The total reported debt and leases remained relatively stable throughout the period, fluctuating narrowly around the range of approximately 3,900 to 4,100 million US dollars. There was no significant upward or downward trend, indicating consistent leverage levels over the years.
- Total Shareholders’ Equity
- Shareholders’ equity demonstrated a declining trend overall, starting from 4,709 million US dollars in early 2017 and falling to 3,020 million by early 2022. This decline was not linear; there was a drop between 2017 and 2019, a partial recovery in 2021, and then a further decrease by 2022. The equity fluctuations suggest variability in retained earnings or other comprehensive income components, as well as possible impacts from share repurchases or dividend policies.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital experienced notable fluctuations across the period. It decreased substantially from 6,613 million in 2017 to 5,407 million in 2018, followed by a significant increase to its peak of 9,079 million in 2021. By 2022, there was a reduction but invested capital still remained elevated relative to the 2017 and 2018 levels. These movements indicate shifts in the company’s investments in assets potentially funded through a combination of liabilities and equity, reflecting strategic growth or restructuring activities.
In summary, the company maintained stable debt levels while shareholders’ equity decreased over time. Invested capital showed considerable volatility with a marked increase toward 2021, implying dynamic capital allocation decisions during the period. The divergence between stable debt and declining equity could impact the company’s leverage ratios and financial risk profile, warranting further analysis on profitability and cash flow to assess overall financial health.
Cost of Capital
Best Buy Co. Inc., cost of capital calculations
Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
Total debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
Total: |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Total debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
Total debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
Total: |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Total debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
Total debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
Total: |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Total debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
Total debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
Total: |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Total debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
Total debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 33.70%) | = | ||||||||
Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 33.70%) | = | ||||||||
Total: |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Total debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
Total debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
Total: |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Total debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
Jan 29, 2022 | Jan 30, 2021 | Feb 1, 2020 | Feb 2, 2019 | Feb 3, 2018 | Jan 28, 2017 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
Economic profit1 | |||||||
Invested capital2 | |||||||
Performance Ratio | |||||||
Economic spread ratio3 | |||||||
Benchmarks | |||||||
Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | |||||||
Amazon.com Inc. | |||||||
Home Depot Inc. | |||||||
Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | |||||||
TJX Cos. Inc. |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial data reveals several trends with respect to economic profit, invested capital, and economic spread ratio over the six-year period from January 2017 to January 2022.
- Economic Profit
- The economic profit shows a fluctuating trend. Initially, it decreased from 538 million in January 2017 to 395 million in February 2018, followed by a slight further decline to 373 million in February 2019. Subsequently, there was a significant recovery in February 2020 and January 2021, with values rising to 609 million and 618 million respectively. The most notable increase occurred in January 2022, reaching 1506 million, which represents a substantial improvement compared to previous years.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital exhibited variability throughout the period. After an initial decline from 6613 million in January 2017 to 5407 million in February 2018, the figure rose to 7210 million in February 2019 and continued to increase until January 2021, peaking at 9079 million. However, there was a downward movement in January 2022 with invested capital decreasing to 7721 million. Despite these fluctuations, the general pattern indicates significant growth until early 2021, followed by a contraction in the most recent period.
- Economic Spread Ratio
- The economic spread ratio, reflecting the relationship between economic profit and invested capital, demonstrates a similar fluctuating pattern. It decreased from 8.14% in January 2017 to its lowest point of 5.18% in February 2019. A recovery took place in the following years, rising to 7.96% in February 2020 and slightly declining to 6.8% in January 2021. The most dramatic increase occurred in January 2022, when the ratio jumped to 19.51%, indicating a major improvement in the company's ability to generate returns relative to its invested capital.
Overall, the data highlights a period of initial contraction in economic profit and invested capital, followed by growth and subsequent stabilization in most areas, culminating with a significant improvement in economic profit and economic spread ratio in the latest period. This suggests enhanced efficiency or profitability in the use of invested capital during the last reported year.
Economic Profit Margin
Jan 29, 2022 | Jan 30, 2021 | Feb 1, 2020 | Feb 2, 2019 | Feb 3, 2018 | Jan 28, 2017 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
Economic profit1 | |||||||
Revenue | |||||||
Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue | |||||||
Adjusted revenue | |||||||
Performance Ratio | |||||||
Economic profit margin2 | |||||||
Benchmarks | |||||||
Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | |||||||
Amazon.com Inc. | |||||||
Home Depot Inc. | |||||||
Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | |||||||
TJX Cos. Inc. |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted revenue
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
- Adjusted Revenue
- The adjusted revenue demonstrates a consistent upward trend over the six-year period. Starting at approximately $39.5 billion in early 2017, it increased steadily each year, reaching over $52 billion by early 2022. This indicates ongoing growth in sales or service income, with the most substantial annual increase observed between early 2021 and early 2022.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit experienced fluctuations over the same period. Initially, it declined from $538 million in early 2017 to $373 million in early 2019. Subsequently, it rebounded to $609 million by early 2020 and maintained a slight increase into early 2021. A significant surge is noted by early 2022, where economic profit rises sharply to $1.506 billion, reflecting a notable improvement in profitability efficiency beyond revenue growth.
- Economic Profit Margin
- The economic profit margin follows a pattern similar to economic profit but highlights relative profitability. It declined from 1.36% in early 2017 to a low of 0.87% in early 2019, then recovered to around 1.3% by early 2021. The margin almost doubles to 2.89% in early 2022, implying the company became considerably more efficient at converting revenue into economic profit in the most recent period.
- General Insights
- The data suggests that despite the steady revenue growth, economic profitability faced some challenges between 2017 and 2019 but improved markedly thereafter. The sharp increase in both economic profit and margin in the last year indicates enhanced operational performance or cost management, resulting in stronger value creation. This could signal strategic improvements or favorable market conditions culminating in significantly higher economic returns relative to revenue.