EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Best Buy Co. Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
- Cash Flow Statement
- Analysis of Reportable Segments
- Analysis of Geographic Areas
- Common Stock Valuation Ratios
- Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
- Selected Financial Data since 2005
- Net Profit Margin since 2005
- Return on Equity (ROE) since 2005
- Price to Book Value (P/BV) since 2005
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Best Buy Co. Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Jan 29, 2022 | Jan 30, 2021 | Feb 1, 2020 | Feb 2, 2019 | Feb 3, 2018 | Jan 28, 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | |||||||
| Cost of capital2 | |||||||
| Invested capital3 | |||||||
| Economic profit4 | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The period between January 28, 2017, and January 29, 2022, demonstrates fluctuating financial performance as measured by economic profit. Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) exhibited an initial decline, followed by a substantial increase towards the end of the observed timeframe. The cost of capital remained relatively stable, with a slight increase in the earlier years before decreasing and then stabilizing. Invested capital showed an overall increasing trend, though with some year-over-year variation. Consequently, economic profit mirrored the NOPAT trend, initially decreasing, then increasing significantly in later years.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT decreased from US$1,602 million in 2017 to US$1,296 million in 2018, representing a decline of approximately 19.1%. It then recovered to US$1,580 million in 2019 and continued to grow, reaching US$1,799 million in 2020. Further growth was observed in 2021, with NOPAT reaching US$2,197 million, and culminating in a significant increase to US$2,817 million in 2022. This indicates improving operational efficiency and profitability over the latter part of the period.
- Cost of Capital
- The cost of capital began at 19.20% in 2017 and increased to 19.99% in 2018 and 20.07% in 2019. A decrease to 18.60% was observed in 2020, followed by an increase to 20.93% in 2021. It then slightly decreased to 20.41% in 2022. These fluctuations suggest changes in the perceived risk associated with the company’s investments and financing.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital decreased from US$6,613 million in 2017 to US$5,407 million in 2018. It then increased to US$7,210 million in 2019 and US$7,649 million in 2020. A substantial increase was seen in 2021, reaching US$9,079 million, before decreasing to US$7,721 million in 2022. This suggests strategic capital allocation and potential investment activities, followed by a possible capital restructuring or divestment in the final year.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit decreased from US$332 million in 2017 to US$215 million in 2018, and further to US$133 million in 2019. A significant recovery occurred in 2020, with economic profit reaching US$375 million. This trend continued in 2021 with US$297 million, and culminated in a substantial increase to US$1,241 million in 2022. The substantial increase in economic profit in 2022 indicates that the company generated returns exceeding its cost of capital by a significant margin.
The observed trends suggest a period of initial challenges followed by substantial improvement in value creation. The significant increase in economic profit in 2022, driven by increased NOPAT, indicates successful strategic initiatives and efficient capital allocation. The fluctuations in invested capital warrant further investigation to understand the underlying drivers of these changes.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowances for uncollectible receivables.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in restructuring accrual.
5 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net earnings.
6 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
7 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
8 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net earnings.
9 Elimination of discontinued operations.
The financial data reveals a consistent upward trend in both the net earnings and the net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) over the examined six-year period. Each year, there is a notable increase compared to the previous period, indicating improving profitability and operational efficiency.
- Net Earnings
-
Starting at $1,228 million in the year ending January 28, 2017, net earnings experienced a decrease in the following year to $1,000 million. However, from 2018 onward, net earnings resumed growth, reaching $1,464 million in 2019, further increasing to $1,541 million in 2020 and $1,798 million in 2021. The most significant growth within the period occurred between 2021 and 2022, with net earnings rising sharply to $2,454 million, marking the highest point in the data set.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
-
NOPAT also demonstrated an overall upward trajectory, beginning at $1,602 million in 2017. It decreased to $1,296 million in 2018, mirroring the decline observed in net earnings. Subsequently, NOPAT increased to $1,580 million in 2019 and continued to grow to $1,799 million in 2020. This positive momentum persisted, with NOPAT reaching $2,197 million in 2021 and further rising to $2,817 million in 2022. The increase in NOPAT in the final year also represents the most substantial annual gain within the timeframe.
In summary, following a temporary dip in 2018, both profitability measures—net earnings and NOPAT—display strong recovery and growth throughout the remaining years. The sustained increase, particularly pronounced in the last two years of the data, signals enhanced profitability and operational success for the company during this period.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).
- Income Tax Expense
- The income tax expense shows considerable fluctuations over the examined periods. It increased substantially from 609 million US dollars in early 2017 to 818 million in 2018, indicating a significant rise. Subsequently, there was a sharp decline to 424 million in 2019, followed by a slight increase to 452 million in 2020. The expense rose again in 2021 to 579 million but stabilized in 2022, with a minor reduction to 574 million. Overall, the trend presents volatility with a notable peak in 2018 and some stabilization towards later years.
- Cash Operating Taxes
- Cash operating taxes followed a somewhat parallel pattern to income tax expense but with distinct variations. Starting at 495 million in 2017, the figure surged to 720 million in 2018, closely mirroring the peak in income tax expense. It then declined sharply to 452 million in 2019 and dipped further to 415 million in 2020, marking the lowest point in the series. A pronounced increase occurred in 2021, reaching the highest value of 642 million, before decreasing again to 579 million in 2022. This pattern indicates a strong correlation with income tax expense, coupled with a more pronounced recovery peak in 2021.
- Comparative Insights
- Both income tax expense and cash operating taxes display significant year-to-year variability, with peaks in 2018 and 2021. The data suggests that while both metrics tend to move in tandem, cash operating taxes exhibit more substantial relative changes, particularly during 2020 to 2021. The decline observed in 2019 and 2020 in both categories could reflect operational or tax policy changes, whereas the rebound in 2021 indicates a possible recovery phase. By 2022, both measures tend to stabilize, remaining close in value compared to earlier years.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of deferred revenue.
5 Addition of restructuring accrual.
6 Addition of equity equivalents to total Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders’ equity.
7 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
8 Subtraction of marketable securities.
The financial data reveals several notable trends in debt, equity, and invested capital over the six-year period from 2017 to 2022.
- Total Reported Debt & Leases
- The total reported debt and leases remained relatively stable throughout the period, fluctuating narrowly around the range of approximately 3,900 to 4,100 million US dollars. There was no significant upward or downward trend, indicating consistent leverage levels over the years.
- Total Shareholders’ Equity
- Shareholders’ equity demonstrated a declining trend overall, starting from 4,709 million US dollars in early 2017 and falling to 3,020 million by early 2022. This decline was not linear; there was a drop between 2017 and 2019, a partial recovery in 2021, and then a further decrease by 2022. The equity fluctuations suggest variability in retained earnings or other comprehensive income components, as well as possible impacts from share repurchases or dividend policies.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital experienced notable fluctuations across the period. It decreased substantially from 6,613 million in 2017 to 5,407 million in 2018, followed by a significant increase to its peak of 9,079 million in 2021. By 2022, there was a reduction but invested capital still remained elevated relative to the 2017 and 2018 levels. These movements indicate shifts in the company’s investments in assets potentially funded through a combination of liabilities and equity, reflecting strategic growth or restructuring activities.
In summary, the company maintained stable debt levels while shareholders’ equity decreased over time. Invested capital showed considerable volatility with a marked increase toward 2021, implying dynamic capital allocation decisions during the period. The divergence between stable debt and declining equity could impact the company’s leverage ratios and financial risk profile, warranting further analysis on profitability and cash flow to assess overall financial health.
Cost of Capital
Best Buy Co. Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Total debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Total debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Total debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Total debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Total debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Total debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Total debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Total debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Total debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 33.70%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 33.70%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Total debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Total debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Total debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Jan 29, 2022 | Jan 30, 2021 | Feb 1, 2020 | Feb 2, 2019 | Feb 3, 2018 | Jan 28, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Economic profit1 | |||||||
| Invested capital2 | |||||||
| Performance Ratio | |||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | |||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | |||||||
| Amazon.com Inc. | |||||||
| Home Depot Inc. | |||||||
| Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | |||||||
| TJX Cos. Inc. | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The period between January 28, 2017, and January 29, 2022, demonstrates fluctuating performance in economic profit and invested capital, resulting in a variable economic spread ratio. Overall, the economic spread ratio exhibits considerable volatility, with a significant increase in the most recent year analyzed.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit began at US$332 million in 2017, decreased to US$215 million in 2018, and continued to decline to US$133 million in 2019. A substantial recovery was observed in 2020, with economic profit reaching US$375 million. This positive trend continued into 2021 with a value of US$297 million, culminating in a marked increase to US$1,241 million in 2022.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital decreased from US$6,613 million in 2017 to US$5,407 million in 2018. An increase to US$7,210 million was noted in 2019, followed by a further rise to US$7,649 million in 2020. Invested capital peaked at US$9,079 million in 2021 before decreasing to US$7,721 million in 2022.
- Economic Spread Ratio
- The economic spread ratio began at 5.02% in 2017, declining to 3.97% in 2018 and further to 1.85% in 2019. A recovery to 4.91% occurred in 2020, followed by a decrease to 3.27% in 2021. A substantial increase was observed in 2022, with the ratio reaching 16.08%. This significant rise suggests a considerable improvement in the return generated relative to the capital invested in that year. The ratio’s volatility indicates a changing relationship between economic profit and invested capital over the analyzed period.
The substantial increase in the economic spread ratio in 2022, coupled with the highest economic profit recorded during the period, warrants further investigation to understand the drivers behind this performance. The fluctuations in invested capital suggest potential shifts in capital allocation strategies or operational requirements.
Economic Profit Margin
| Jan 29, 2022 | Jan 30, 2021 | Feb 1, 2020 | Feb 2, 2019 | Feb 3, 2018 | Jan 28, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Economic profit1 | |||||||
| Revenue | |||||||
| Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue | |||||||
| Adjusted revenue | |||||||
| Performance Ratio | |||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | |||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | |||||||
| Amazon.com Inc. | |||||||
| Home Depot Inc. | |||||||
| Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | |||||||
| TJX Cos. Inc. | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted revenue
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic profit margin exhibited considerable fluctuation over the observed period. Initial values decreased before a substantial increase in the most recent year. Economic profit itself demonstrated a similar pattern of initial decline followed by significant growth.
- Economic Profit Margin Trend
- The economic profit margin began at 0.84% in January 2017 and decreased to a low of 0.31% in February 2019. A subsequent recovery commenced, reaching 0.86% in February 2020 and 0.63% in January 2021. The most significant increase occurred between January 2021 and January 2022, with the margin rising sharply to 2.38%. This indicates a substantial improvement in the generation of economic profit relative to revenue in the latest period.
- Relationship to Adjusted Revenue
- While adjusted revenue consistently increased throughout the period, the economic profit margin did not follow a directly proportional trend. Revenue grew from US$39,464 million in January 2017 to US$52,153 million in January 2022. However, the economic profit margin’s fluctuations suggest that factors beyond revenue growth, such as cost of capital management and operational efficiency, significantly impacted the company’s ability to generate economic profit.
- Economic Profit Performance
- Economic profit mirrored the margin’s trend, declining from US$332 million in January 2017 to US$133 million in February 2019. It then increased to US$375 million in February 2020 and US$297 million in January 2021, culminating in a substantial rise to US$1,241 million in January 2022. This demonstrates a strong positive correlation between the economic profit margin and the absolute economic profit generated.
The substantial increase in both economic profit and the economic profit margin in the most recent year suggests improved profitability and efficient capital utilization. Further investigation into the drivers behind this improvement would be beneficial.