EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Best Buy Co. Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Statement of Comprehensive Income
- Common-Size Income Statement
- Analysis of Long-term (Investment) Activity Ratios
- Analysis of Reportable Segments
- Analysis of Geographic Areas
- Common Stock Valuation Ratios
- Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)
- Selected Financial Data since 2005
- Net Profit Margin since 2005
- Operating Profit Margin since 2005
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Best Buy Co. Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Jan 29, 2022 | Jan 30, 2021 | Feb 1, 2020 | Feb 2, 2019 | Feb 3, 2018 | Jan 28, 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | |||||||
| Cost of capital2 | |||||||
| Invested capital3 | |||||||
| Economic profit4 | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
An evaluation of the economic performance from 2017 to 2022 reveals a period of initial volatility followed by a substantial increase in value creation. While the organization faced challenges in the early part of the period, the final year demonstrates a significant surge in economic profit, indicating enhanced capital efficiency.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT exhibited an overall upward trajectory, increasing from 1,602 million US$ in 2017 to 2,817 million US$ in 2022. Despite a temporary contraction in 2018, the subsequent four years showed consistent growth, suggesting a strengthening of core operational profitability.
- Cost of Capital
- The cost of capital remained relatively stable throughout the analyzed timeframe, fluctuating within a narrow band between 18.51% and 20.82%. This stability indicates that the hurdle rate for investments remained consistent, providing a steady benchmark for measuring economic value added.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital displayed a fluctuating pattern, decreasing in 2018 before rising to a peak of 9,079 million US$ in 2021. A notable reduction to 7,721 million US$ occurred in 2022, which, when coupled with rising profits, suggests a transition toward a leaner and more efficient capital structure.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit experienced a decline between 2017 and 2019, reaching a minimum of 141 million US$. After this low point, the metric rebounded, culminating in a sharp increase to 1,249 million US$ in 2022. This dramatic rise in the final year is the result of the widening gap between the NOPAT generated and the cost of the capital employed to produce those earnings.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowances for uncollectible receivables.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in restructuring accrual.
5 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net earnings.
6 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
7 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
8 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net earnings.
9 Elimination of discontinued operations.
The financial data reveals a consistent upward trend in both the net earnings and the net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) over the examined six-year period. Each year, there is a notable increase compared to the previous period, indicating improving profitability and operational efficiency.
- Net Earnings
-
Starting at $1,228 million in the year ending January 28, 2017, net earnings experienced a decrease in the following year to $1,000 million. However, from 2018 onward, net earnings resumed growth, reaching $1,464 million in 2019, further increasing to $1,541 million in 2020 and $1,798 million in 2021. The most significant growth within the period occurred between 2021 and 2022, with net earnings rising sharply to $2,454 million, marking the highest point in the data set.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
-
NOPAT also demonstrated an overall upward trajectory, beginning at $1,602 million in 2017. It decreased to $1,296 million in 2018, mirroring the decline observed in net earnings. Subsequently, NOPAT increased to $1,580 million in 2019 and continued to grow to $1,799 million in 2020. This positive momentum persisted, with NOPAT reaching $2,197 million in 2021 and further rising to $2,817 million in 2022. The increase in NOPAT in the final year also represents the most substantial annual gain within the timeframe.
In summary, following a temporary dip in 2018, both profitability measures—net earnings and NOPAT—display strong recovery and growth throughout the remaining years. The sustained increase, particularly pronounced in the last two years of the data, signals enhanced profitability and operational success for the company during this period.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).
- Income Tax Expense
- The income tax expense shows considerable fluctuations over the examined periods. It increased substantially from 609 million US dollars in early 2017 to 818 million in 2018, indicating a significant rise. Subsequently, there was a sharp decline to 424 million in 2019, followed by a slight increase to 452 million in 2020. The expense rose again in 2021 to 579 million but stabilized in 2022, with a minor reduction to 574 million. Overall, the trend presents volatility with a notable peak in 2018 and some stabilization towards later years.
- Cash Operating Taxes
- Cash operating taxes followed a somewhat parallel pattern to income tax expense but with distinct variations. Starting at 495 million in 2017, the figure surged to 720 million in 2018, closely mirroring the peak in income tax expense. It then declined sharply to 452 million in 2019 and dipped further to 415 million in 2020, marking the lowest point in the series. A pronounced increase occurred in 2021, reaching the highest value of 642 million, before decreasing again to 579 million in 2022. This pattern indicates a strong correlation with income tax expense, coupled with a more pronounced recovery peak in 2021.
- Comparative Insights
- Both income tax expense and cash operating taxes display significant year-to-year variability, with peaks in 2018 and 2021. The data suggests that while both metrics tend to move in tandem, cash operating taxes exhibit more substantial relative changes, particularly during 2020 to 2021. The decline observed in 2019 and 2020 in both categories could reflect operational or tax policy changes, whereas the rebound in 2021 indicates a possible recovery phase. By 2022, both measures tend to stabilize, remaining close in value compared to earlier years.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of deferred revenue.
5 Addition of restructuring accrual.
6 Addition of equity equivalents to total Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders’ equity.
7 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
8 Subtraction of marketable securities.
The financial data reveals several notable trends in debt, equity, and invested capital over the six-year period from 2017 to 2022.
- Total Reported Debt & Leases
- The total reported debt and leases remained relatively stable throughout the period, fluctuating narrowly around the range of approximately 3,900 to 4,100 million US dollars. There was no significant upward or downward trend, indicating consistent leverage levels over the years.
- Total Shareholders’ Equity
- Shareholders’ equity demonstrated a declining trend overall, starting from 4,709 million US dollars in early 2017 and falling to 3,020 million by early 2022. This decline was not linear; there was a drop between 2017 and 2019, a partial recovery in 2021, and then a further decrease by 2022. The equity fluctuations suggest variability in retained earnings or other comprehensive income components, as well as possible impacts from share repurchases or dividend policies.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital experienced notable fluctuations across the period. It decreased substantially from 6,613 million in 2017 to 5,407 million in 2018, followed by a significant increase to its peak of 9,079 million in 2021. By 2022, there was a reduction but invested capital still remained elevated relative to the 2017 and 2018 levels. These movements indicate shifts in the company’s investments in assets potentially funded through a combination of liabilities and equity, reflecting strategic growth or restructuring activities.
In summary, the company maintained stable debt levels while shareholders’ equity decreased over time. Invested capital showed considerable volatility with a marked increase toward 2021, implying dynamic capital allocation decisions during the period. The divergence between stable debt and declining equity could impact the company’s leverage ratios and financial risk profile, warranting further analysis on profitability and cash flow to assess overall financial health.
Cost of Capital
Best Buy Co. Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Total debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Total debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Total debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Total debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Total debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Total debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Total debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Total debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Total debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 33.70%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 33.70%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Total debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Total debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Total debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Jan 29, 2022 | Jan 30, 2021 | Feb 1, 2020 | Feb 2, 2019 | Feb 3, 2018 | Jan 28, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Economic profit1 | |||||||
| Invested capital2 | |||||||
| Performance Ratio | |||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | |||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | |||||||
| Amazon.com Inc. | |||||||
| Home Depot Inc. | |||||||
| Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | |||||||
| TJX Cos. Inc. | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
Between 2017 and 2022, the organization experienced significant volatility in its ability to generate economic value, characterized by a period of contraction followed by a sharp expansion in value creation efficiency.
- Economic Spread Ratio Trends
- The economic spread ratio exhibited a downward trajectory from 5.12% in 2017 to a minimum of 1.95% in 2019. Following this trough, the ratio recovered to 5.00% in 2020 before a slight moderation to 3.38% in 2021. A substantial spike occurred in 2022, where the ratio reached 16.18%, indicating a marked increase in the spread between the return on invested capital and the cost of capital.
- Economic Profit Analysis
- Economic profit followed a pattern consistent with the spread ratio, declining from 338 million USD in 2017 to 141 million USD in 2019. While profit stabilized between 307 million and 383 million USD during 2020 and 2021, a significant surge was recorded in 2022, with economic profit ascending to 1,249 million USD.
- Invested Capital Dynamics
- Invested capital demonstrated a fluctuating trend, decreasing from 6,613 million USD in 2017 to 5,407 million USD in 2018, before entering a growth phase that peaked at 9,079 million USD in 2021. In 2022, invested capital was reduced to 7,721 million USD, which coincided with the peak in both economic profit and the economic spread ratio, suggesting an improvement in capital efficiency.
The convergence of decreasing invested capital and rapidly increasing economic profit in the final period resulted in a dramatic acceleration of the economic spread ratio, signaling a peak in economic value added during the 2022 fiscal year.
Economic Profit Margin
| Jan 29, 2022 | Jan 30, 2021 | Feb 1, 2020 | Feb 2, 2019 | Feb 3, 2018 | Jan 28, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Economic profit1 | |||||||
| Revenue | |||||||
| Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue | |||||||
| Adjusted revenue | |||||||
| Performance Ratio | |||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | |||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | |||||||
| Amazon.com Inc. | |||||||
| Home Depot Inc. | |||||||
| Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | |||||||
| TJX Cos. Inc. | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted revenue
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial trajectory between January 2017 and January 2022 is characterized by consistent revenue expansion contrasted with significant volatility in economic profit and its corresponding margin.
- Adjusted Revenue Trends
- A steady upward trend is observed in adjusted revenue, which grew from 39,464 million US dollars in 2017 to 52,153 million US dollars by 2022. This represents a consistent growth pattern over the six-year period, indicating a sustained increase in the scale of operations.
- Economic Profit Performance
- Economic profit exhibited a cyclical pattern, declining from 338 million US dollars in 2017 to a low of 141 million US dollars in 2019. A recovery occurred in 2020, reaching 383 million US dollars, followed by a slight contraction to 307 million US dollars in 2021. The period concluded with a substantial increase to 1,249 million US dollars in 2022, marking the peak value in the analyzed timeframe.
- Economic Profit Margin Analysis
- The economic profit margin mirrored the volatility of the absolute economic profit. The margin compressed from 0.86% in 2017 to a minimum of 0.33% in 2019. After recovering to 0.88% in 2020 and dipping to 0.65% in 2021, the margin expanded sharply to 2.40% in 2022. This indicates that the surge in economic profit in the final year significantly outpaced the growth in adjusted revenue, reflecting a marked improvement in value creation relative to the cost of capital.