Stock Analysis on Net

Best Buy Co. Inc. (NYSE:BBY)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since December 6, 2022.

Economic Value Added (EVA)

Microsoft Excel

EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.

Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.

Paying user area

The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.

This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.


We accept:

Visa Mastercard American Express Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check American Express SafeKey

Economic Profit

Best Buy Co. Inc., economic profit calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Jan 29, 2022 Jan 30, 2021 Feb 1, 2020 Feb 2, 2019 Feb 3, 2018 Jan 28, 2017
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1
Cost of capital2
Invested capital3
 
Economic profit4

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cost of capital. See details »

3 Invested capital. See details »

4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= × =


The analysis of economic value creation reveals a period of initial volatility followed by a substantial acceleration in economic profit. While operational profitability showed a general upward trajectory after 2018, the interplay between invested capital and the cost of capital created fluctuating returns before reaching a peak in 2022.

Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
A consistent growth pattern is observed from 2018 onwards, with NOPAT rising from 1,296 million USD to 2,817 million USD by 2022. This steady increase indicates a strengthening of core operational performance and an improved ability to generate profit from operations.
Cost of Capital and Invested Capital
The cost of capital remained relatively stable but high, oscillating between a low of 18.45% in 2020 and a peak of 20.74% in 2021. Invested capital experienced a period of expansion from 2018 to 2021, increasing from 5,407 million USD to 9,079 million USD, before contracting to 7,721 million USD in 2022.
Economic Profit Trajectory
Economic profit exhibited a downward trend between 2017 and 2019, hitting a minimum of 146 million USD. Following this trough, a recovery began, culminating in a significant spike to 1,255 million USD in 2022. This surge is attributable to the combination of record-high NOPAT and a reduction in the invested capital base, signaling a substantial increase in the efficiency of capital utilization.


Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)

Best Buy Co. Inc., NOPAT calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Jan 29, 2022 Jan 30, 2021 Feb 1, 2020 Feb 2, 2019 Feb 3, 2018 Jan 28, 2017
Net earnings
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1
Increase (decrease) in allowances for uncollectible receivables2
Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue3
Increase (decrease) in restructuring accrual4
Increase (decrease) in equity equivalents5
Interest expense
Interest expense, operating lease liability6
Adjusted interest expense
Tax benefit of interest expense7
Adjusted interest expense, after taxes8
(Income) loss from discontinued operations, net of tax9
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).

1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »

2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowances for uncollectible receivables.

3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.

4 Addition of increase (decrease) in restructuring accrual.

5 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net earnings.

6 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =

7 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

8 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net earnings.

9 Elimination of discontinued operations.


The financial data reveals a consistent upward trend in both the net earnings and the net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) over the examined six-year period. Each year, there is a notable increase compared to the previous period, indicating improving profitability and operational efficiency.

Net Earnings

Starting at $1,228 million in the year ending January 28, 2017, net earnings experienced a decrease in the following year to $1,000 million. However, from 2018 onward, net earnings resumed growth, reaching $1,464 million in 2019, further increasing to $1,541 million in 2020 and $1,798 million in 2021. The most significant growth within the period occurred between 2021 and 2022, with net earnings rising sharply to $2,454 million, marking the highest point in the data set.

Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)

NOPAT also demonstrated an overall upward trajectory, beginning at $1,602 million in 2017. It decreased to $1,296 million in 2018, mirroring the decline observed in net earnings. Subsequently, NOPAT increased to $1,580 million in 2019 and continued to grow to $1,799 million in 2020. This positive momentum persisted, with NOPAT reaching $2,197 million in 2021 and further rising to $2,817 million in 2022. The increase in NOPAT in the final year also represents the most substantial annual gain within the timeframe.

In summary, following a temporary dip in 2018, both profitability measures—net earnings and NOPAT—display strong recovery and growth throughout the remaining years. The sustained increase, particularly pronounced in the last two years of the data, signals enhanced profitability and operational success for the company during this period.



Cash Operating Taxes

Best Buy Co. Inc., cash operating taxes calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Jan 29, 2022 Jan 30, 2021 Feb 1, 2020 Feb 2, 2019 Feb 3, 2018 Jan 28, 2017
Income tax expense
Less: Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
Add: Tax savings from interest expense
Cash operating taxes

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).


Income Tax Expense
The income tax expense shows considerable fluctuations over the examined periods. It increased substantially from 609 million US dollars in early 2017 to 818 million in 2018, indicating a significant rise. Subsequently, there was a sharp decline to 424 million in 2019, followed by a slight increase to 452 million in 2020. The expense rose again in 2021 to 579 million but stabilized in 2022, with a minor reduction to 574 million. Overall, the trend presents volatility with a notable peak in 2018 and some stabilization towards later years.
Cash Operating Taxes
Cash operating taxes followed a somewhat parallel pattern to income tax expense but with distinct variations. Starting at 495 million in 2017, the figure surged to 720 million in 2018, closely mirroring the peak in income tax expense. It then declined sharply to 452 million in 2019 and dipped further to 415 million in 2020, marking the lowest point in the series. A pronounced increase occurred in 2021, reaching the highest value of 642 million, before decreasing again to 579 million in 2022. This pattern indicates a strong correlation with income tax expense, coupled with a more pronounced recovery peak in 2021.
Comparative Insights
Both income tax expense and cash operating taxes display significant year-to-year variability, with peaks in 2018 and 2021. The data suggests that while both metrics tend to move in tandem, cash operating taxes exhibit more substantial relative changes, particularly during 2020 to 2021. The decline observed in 2019 and 2020 in both categories could reflect operational or tax policy changes, whereas the rebound in 2021 indicates a possible recovery phase. By 2022, both measures tend to stabilize, remaining close in value compared to earlier years.


Invested Capital

Best Buy Co. Inc., invested capital calculation (financing approach)

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Jan 29, 2022 Jan 30, 2021 Feb 1, 2020 Feb 2, 2019 Feb 3, 2018 Jan 28, 2017
Short-term debt
Current portion of long-term debt
Long-term debt, excluding current portion
Operating lease liability1
Total reported debt & leases
Total Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders’ equity
Net deferred tax (assets) liabilities2
Allowances for uncollectible receivables3
Deferred revenue4
Restructuring accrual5
Equity equivalents6
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax7
Adjusted total Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders’ equity
Marketable securities8
Invested capital

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).

1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.

2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »

3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.

4 Addition of deferred revenue.

5 Addition of restructuring accrual.

6 Addition of equity equivalents to total Best Buy Co., Inc. shareholders’ equity.

7 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.

8 Subtraction of marketable securities.


The financial data reveals several notable trends in debt, equity, and invested capital over the six-year period from 2017 to 2022.

Total Reported Debt & Leases
The total reported debt and leases remained relatively stable throughout the period, fluctuating narrowly around the range of approximately 3,900 to 4,100 million US dollars. There was no significant upward or downward trend, indicating consistent leverage levels over the years.
Total Shareholders’ Equity
Shareholders’ equity demonstrated a declining trend overall, starting from 4,709 million US dollars in early 2017 and falling to 3,020 million by early 2022. This decline was not linear; there was a drop between 2017 and 2019, a partial recovery in 2021, and then a further decrease by 2022. The equity fluctuations suggest variability in retained earnings or other comprehensive income components, as well as possible impacts from share repurchases or dividend policies.
Invested Capital
Invested capital experienced notable fluctuations across the period. It decreased substantially from 6,613 million in 2017 to 5,407 million in 2018, followed by a significant increase to its peak of 9,079 million in 2021. By 2022, there was a reduction but invested capital still remained elevated relative to the 2017 and 2018 levels. These movements indicate shifts in the company’s investments in assets potentially funded through a combination of liabilities and equity, reflecting strategic growth or restructuring activities.

In summary, the company maintained stable debt levels while shareholders’ equity decreased over time. Invested capital showed considerable volatility with a marked increase toward 2021, implying dynamic capital allocation decisions during the period. The divergence between stable debt and declining equity could impact the company’s leverage ratios and financial risk profile, warranting further analysis on profitability and cash flow to assess overall financial health.


Cost of Capital

Best Buy Co. Inc., cost of capital calculations

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Total debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Total debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Total debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Total debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Total debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Total debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Total debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Total debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Total debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 33.70%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 33.70%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Total debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Total debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Total debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »


Economic Spread Ratio

Best Buy Co. Inc., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Jan 29, 2022 Jan 30, 2021 Feb 1, 2020 Feb 2, 2019 Feb 3, 2018 Jan 28, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Economic profit1
Invested capital2
Performance Ratio
Economic spread ratio3
Benchmarks
Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4
Amazon.com Inc.
Home Depot Inc.
Lowe’s Cos. Inc.
TJX Cos. Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of economic value added metrics reveals a period of fluctuation in capital efficiency, culminating in a significant expansion of value creation by the end of the observed timeframe.

Economic Spread Ratio Trends
The economic spread ratio experienced a contraction from 5.18% in 2017 to a low of 2.02% in 2019. A recovery was observed in 2020, with the ratio rising to 5.07%, followed by a moderate decline to 3.46% in 2021. The period concluded with a sharp increase to 16.25% in 2022, indicating a substantial widening of the gap between the return on invested capital and the cost of capital.
Economic Profit Performance
Economic profit followed a similar trajectory to the spread ratio, decreasing from 343 million US dollars in 2017 to 146 million US dollars in 2019. After rebounding to 388 million US dollars in 2020 and experiencing a slight dip to 314 million US dollars in 2021, economic profit surged to 1,255 million US dollars in 2022. This final peak represents a significant acceleration in the generation of value above the required return.
Invested Capital Dynamics
Invested capital exhibited inconsistent trends, initially dropping to 5,407 million US dollars in 2018 before increasing steadily to a peak of 9,079 million US dollars in 2021. In 2022, invested capital decreased to 7,721 million US dollars. The correlation between the reduction in invested capital and the simultaneous spike in both economic profit and the spread ratio in 2022 suggests a marked improvement in operational efficiency and capital utilization.

Economic Profit Margin

Best Buy Co. Inc., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Jan 29, 2022 Jan 30, 2021 Feb 1, 2020 Feb 2, 2019 Feb 3, 2018 Jan 28, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Economic profit1
 
Revenue
Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue
Adjusted revenue
Performance Ratio
Economic profit margin2
Benchmarks
Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3
Amazon.com Inc.
Home Depot Inc.
Lowe’s Cos. Inc.
TJX Cos. Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted revenue
= 100 × ÷ =

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of the financial performance between 2017 and 2022 reveals a divergence between steady top-line growth and fluctuating economic value creation. While revenue expanded consistently throughout the period, the ability to generate profit exceeding the cost of capital varied significantly, culminating in a period of exceptional growth in the final year.

Adjusted Revenue Trends
A consistent upward trajectory is evident, with revenue increasing from 39,464 million USD in January 2017 to 52,153 million USD by January 2022. This represents a sustained expansion of the business scale over the six-year period.
Economic Profit Performance
Economic profit exhibited notable volatility. A downward trend was observed from 2017 to 2019, with values falling from 343 million USD to a low of 146 million USD. A recovery followed in 2020, reaching 388 million USD, before a slight contraction to 314 million USD in 2021. The period concluded with a substantial surge to 1,255 million USD in 2022, marking the highest value in the analyzed timeframe.
Economic Profit Margin Dynamics
The economic profit margin mirrored the fluctuations of absolute economic profit. The margin contracted from 0.87% in 2017 to a minimum of 0.34% in 2019, indicating a decline in the efficiency of value creation relative to revenue. Following a recovery to 0.89% in 2020 and a dip to 0.66% in 2021, the margin expanded sharply to 2.41% in 2022. This final increase suggests a significant improvement in the conversion of revenue into economic value above the required return on capital.