Free Cash Flow to The Firm (FCFF)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30).
1, 2 See details »
An analysis of the financial performance from September 30, 2016, through September 30, 2021, reveals a consistent upward trajectory in both operating cash generation and free cash flow to the firm (FCFF). Despite a marginal contraction in 2017, both metrics exhibited sustained growth over the subsequent four years, culminating in a significant peak in 2021.
- Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
- Operating cash flows remained relatively stable between 2016 and 2017, before entering a period of accelerated growth. From 2018 to 2021, net cash provided by operating activities increased from US$ 2,865 million to US$ 4,647 million. The most pronounced expansion occurred between 2020 and 2021, representing a year-over-year increase of approximately 31%.
- Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF)
- FCFF mirrored the trend of operating activities, starting at US$ 2,250 million in 2016 and reaching US$ 3,898 million by 2021. A slight decrease was observed in 2017, where FCFF fell to US$ 2,127 million, but a steady recovery followed. The overall growth in FCFF indicates an improved capacity to generate cash available to all capital providers after accounting for necessary capital expenditures.
- Cash Conversion and Stability
- The relationship between operating cash flow and FCFF remained tight throughout the period, suggesting a disciplined approach to capital reinvestment. FCFF consistently tracked the movements of operating cash flow, maintaining a high conversion rate that underscores the stability and predictability of the firm's cash-generating capabilities over the six-year horizon.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Interest Paid, Net of Tax
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30).
2 2021 Calculation
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized, tax = Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized × EITR
= 474 × 6.70% = 32
3 2021 Calculation
Capitalized interest, tax = Capitalized interest × EITR
= 43 × 6.70% = 3
The financial data indicates a period of significant volatility in both tax obligations and interest expenses between 2016 and 2021, with a notable peak in financing costs occurring in 2018 followed by a gradual decline.
- Net Interest Paid Trends
- Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized and net of tax, experienced a significant increase in 2018, rising to 547 million US dollars from 283 million US dollars in 2017. Following this peak, a consistent downward trend is observed, with expenses decreasing to 520 million in 2019, 457 million in 2020, and 442 million in 2021. This suggests a reduction in the net cost of debt servicing over the latter half of the analyzed period.
- Capitalized Interest Patterns
- Capitalized interest, net of tax, demonstrates a steady upward trajectory from 2017 onwards. After a low of 21 million US dollars in 2017, the values increased incrementally each year, reaching 40 million US dollars by September 30, 2021. This consistent growth indicates an increase in the financing of long-term assets or capital projects during this timeframe.
- Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR) Impact
- The effective income tax rate exhibited extreme volatility, peaking at 35.00% in 2017 before declining to 6.70% by 2021. There is a visible inverse correlation between the tax rate and the net interest paid in 2017, where the highest tax rate coincided with the lowest net interest expense, highlighting the impact of the tax shield on net interest costs. The substantial reduction in EITR from 2019 to 2021 implies that the decrease in net interest paid during those years was driven by a reduction in gross interest obligations rather than tax benefits, as a lower tax rate typically increases the net cost of interest.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Current
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |
| Enterprise value (EV) | 89,222) |
| Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) | 3,898) |
| Valuation Ratio | |
| EV/FCFF | 22.89 |
| Benchmarks | |
| EV/FCFF, Competitors1 | |
| Abbott Laboratories | 23.42 |
| Elevance Health Inc. | 19.97 |
| Intuitive Surgical Inc. | 59.72 |
| Medtronic PLC | 23.12 |
| UnitedHealth Group Inc. | 21.68 |
| EV/FCFF, Sector | |
| Health Care Equipment & Services | 20.77 |
| EV/FCFF, Industry | |
| Health Care | 26.39 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30).
1 Click competitor name to see calculations.
If the company EV/FCFF is lower then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/FCFF is higher then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Historical
| Sep 30, 2021 | Sep 30, 2020 | Sep 30, 2019 | Sep 30, 2018 | Sep 30, 2017 | Sep 30, 2016 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |||||||
| Enterprise value (EV)1 | 84,640) | 80,969) | 89,200) | 85,173) | 55,792) | 45,755) | |
| Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF)2 | 3,898) | 3,224) | 2,928) | 2,551) | 2,127) | 2,250) | |
| Valuation Ratio | |||||||
| EV/FCFF3 | 21.71 | 25.12 | 30.47 | 33.39 | 26.24 | 20.34 | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| EV/FCFF, Competitors4 | |||||||
| Abbott Laboratories | 23.47 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Elevance Health Inc. | 12.74 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Intuitive Surgical Inc. | 56.01 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Medtronic PLC | 33.84 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| UnitedHealth Group Inc. | 22.21 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| EV/FCFF, Sector | |||||||
| Health Care Equipment & Services | 23.51 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| EV/FCFF, Industry | |||||||
| Health Care | 17.80 | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30).
3 2021 Calculation
EV/FCFF = EV ÷ FCFF
= 84,640 ÷ 3,898 = 21.71
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The Enterprise Value to Free Cash Flow to the Firm (EV/FCFF) ratio demonstrates a cyclical pattern over the six-year period, characterized by an initial expansion followed by a sustained contraction. While the valuation multiple peaked in 2018, the subsequent decline indicates a strengthening alignment between the company's market valuation and its actual cash generation capabilities.
- Enterprise Value (EV) Trends
- A significant increase in enterprise value is observed between 2016 and 2019, rising from 45,755 million USD to a peak of 89,200 million USD. The most substantial growth occurred between 2017 and 2018, where the value increased by approximately 52.4%. Following this peak, the enterprise value experienced a slight correction and stabilization, ending the period at 84,640 million USD in 2021.
- Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF) Performance
- Free cash flow to the firm exhibited consistent growth from 2017 onward. After a slight dip in 2017 to 2,127 million USD, FCFF grew steadily each year, reaching 3,898 million USD by September 30, 2021. This represents an overall increase of approximately 73% from the 2016 baseline, signaling a robust improvement in the company's ability to generate cash available to all capital providers.
- EV/FCFF Ratio Analysis
- The EV/FCFF ratio rose from 20.34 in 2016 to a high of 33.39 in 2018, reflecting a period where enterprise value grew at a pace significantly exceeding cash flow growth. From 2019 to 2021, the ratio entered a downward trend, decreasing to 21.71. This compression was driven by the combination of stabilizing enterprise values and the continuous expansion of FCFF, suggesting that the company's valuation became more fundamentally supported by its cash flow performance toward the end of the analyzed period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?