Stock Analysis on Net
Stock Analysis on Net

Becton, Dickinson & Co. (NYSE:BDX)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since May 5, 2022.

DuPont Analysis: Disaggregation of ROE, ROA, and Net Profit Margin

Microsoft Excel

Two-Component Disaggregation of ROE

Becton, Dickinson & Co., decomposition of ROE

Microsoft Excel
ROE = ROA × Financial Leverage
Sep 30, 2021 8.84% = 3.88% × 2.28
Sep 30, 2020 3.68% = 1.62% × 2.27
Sep 30, 2019 5.85% = 2.38% × 2.46
Sep 30, 2018 1.48% = 0.58% × 2.57
Sep 30, 2017 8.50% = 2.92% × 2.91
Sep 30, 2016 12.79% = 3.81% × 3.35

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30).


The return on equity (ROE) exhibited significant volatility between 2016 and 2021, characterized by a precipitous decline reaching a trough in 2018 before experiencing a staggered recovery. The fluctuations in ROE are the result of simultaneous changes in operational efficiency, as measured by return on assets (ROA), and a consistent reduction in the company's financial gearing.

Return on Assets (ROA)
The ROA demonstrated a volatile trajectory, falling from 3.81% in 2016 to a low of 0.58% in 2018. This sharp contraction indicates a period of diminished asset productivity or a significant impact on net income during that fiscal year. Following the 2018 low, the ROA showed signs of recovery, fluctuating between 1.62% and 2.38% before returning to its 2016 levels with a peak of 3.88% in 2021.
Financial Leverage
A consistent downward trend in financial leverage is observed from 2016 through 2020, decreasing from a ratio of 3.35 to 2.27. This indicates a strategic reduction in the use of debt to finance assets, resulting in a more conservative capital structure. This deleveraging trend stabilized in 2021, with the ratio remaining nearly flat at 2.28.
Two-Component Synthesis of ROE
The analysis reveals that the decline in ROE was driven by both operational and structural factors. While the volatility in ROA provided the primary momentum for the fluctuations in ROE, the steady reduction in financial leverage acted as a drag on the equity return. For example, despite the ROA in 2021 (3.88%) being slightly higher than in 2016 (3.81%), the ROE in 2021 (8.84%) remained significantly lower than the 2016 level (12.79%) due to the lower leverage ratio (2.28 versus 3.35). This demonstrates that the company's current ROE is less dependent on financial engineering and more reliant on underlying asset performance than it was at the start of the period.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Three-Component Disaggregation of ROE

Becton, Dickinson & Co., decomposition of ROE

Microsoft Excel
ROE = Net Profit Margin × Asset Turnover × Financial Leverage
Sep 30, 2021 8.84% = 10.33% × 0.38 × 2.28
Sep 30, 2020 3.68% = 5.11% × 0.32 × 2.27
Sep 30, 2019 5.85% = 7.13% × 0.33 × 2.46
Sep 30, 2018 1.48% = 1.95% × 0.30 × 2.57
Sep 30, 2017 8.50% = 9.10% × 0.32 × 2.91
Sep 30, 2016 12.79% = 7.82% × 0.49 × 3.35

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30).


The Return on Equity (ROE) exhibited significant volatility between 2016 and 2021, characterized by a substantial decline in the middle of the period followed by a recovery toward the end. This fluctuation is primarily attributed to instability in net profit margins and a consistent reduction in financial leverage.

Net Profit Margin
Profitability served as the primary driver of ROE volatility. A sharp contraction occurred in 2018, where the margin fell to 1.95% from 9.10% in 2017, correlating with the period's lowest ROE. A subsequent recovery trend is observed, with margins expanding to reach a peak of 10.33% by September 30, 2021.
Asset Turnover
Operational efficiency experienced a notable decline after 2016, dropping from 0.49 to 0.32 in 2017. Following this initial decrease, the turnover ratio remained relatively stagnant, fluctuating within a narrow range between 0.30 and 0.38, indicating that asset utilization remained largely consistent during the latter five years of the analysis.
Financial Leverage
A steady and continuous downward trend in financial leverage is evident, decreasing from 3.35 in 2016 to 2.28 in 2021. This systemic deleveraging indicates a shift toward a more conservative capital structure, which reduced the magnification effect on equity returns and contributed to the overall decline in ROE despite improvements in profit margins.

The analysis indicates that the recovery in ROE to 8.84% in 2021 was driven almost exclusively by the expansion of net profit margins, as this improvement had to offset both a persistent lack of growth in asset turnover and a significant reduction in financial leverage.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Five-Component Disaggregation of ROE

Becton, Dickinson & Co., decomposition of ROE

Microsoft Excel
ROE = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin × Asset Turnover × Financial Leverage
Sep 30, 2021 8.84% = 0.93 × 0.83 × 13.39% × 0.38 × 2.28
Sep 30, 2020 3.68% = 0.89 × 0.65 × 8.84% × 0.32 × 2.27
Sep 30, 2019 5.85% = 1.05 × 0.65 × 10.50% × 0.33 × 2.46
Sep 30, 2018 1.48% = 0.27 × 0.62 × 11.76% × 0.30 × 2.57
Sep 30, 2017 8.50% = 1.13 × 0.65 × 12.38% × 0.32 × 2.91
Sep 30, 2016 12.79% = 0.91 × 0.73 × 11.71% × 0.49 × 3.35

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30).


Return on Equity (ROE) exhibited significant volatility over the observed six-year period, starting at 12.79% in 2016, plummeting to a low of 1.48% in 2018, and recovering to 8.84% by 2021. This trajectory suggests that the company's ability to generate shareholder returns was heavily impacted by non-operational factors and a strategic shift in capital structure.

Operational Profitability and Asset Efficiency
The EBIT margin demonstrated a period of instability, declining from 11.71% in 2016 to a trough of 8.84% in 2020, before rebounding strongly to 13.39% in 2021. Asset turnover remained consistently low, ranging from 0.30 to 0.49, indicating that the company relies more on margin expansion than on asset velocity to drive profitability.
Financial Leverage
A consistent downward trend in financial leverage is evident, decreasing from 3.35 in 2016 to 2.28 in 2021. This sustained deleveraging indicates a reduction in the use of debt to amplify returns, which served as a constant headwind to the overall ROE throughout the period.
Tax and Interest Burdens
The tax burden experienced a severe anomaly in 2018, dropping to 0.27, which served as a primary catalyst for the collapse in ROE during that fiscal year. Outside of this event, the tax burden remained relatively stable. The interest burden remained largely stagnant between 0.62 and 0.65 from 2017 to 2020, before improving to 0.83 in 2021, suggesting a reduction in the relative cost of debt servicing.

The recovery of ROE in 2021 was fundamentally driven by the expansion of the EBIT margin and an improved interest burden, which compensated for the reduced financial leverage and the low asset turnover ratio.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Two-Component Disaggregation of ROA

Becton, Dickinson & Co., decomposition of ROA

Microsoft Excel
ROA = Net Profit Margin × Asset Turnover
Sep 30, 2021 3.88% = 10.33% × 0.38
Sep 30, 2020 1.62% = 5.11% × 0.32
Sep 30, 2019 2.38% = 7.13% × 0.33
Sep 30, 2018 0.58% = 1.95% × 0.30
Sep 30, 2017 2.92% = 9.10% × 0.32
Sep 30, 2016 3.81% = 7.82% × 0.49

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30).


The return on assets (ROA) exhibited significant volatility between 2016 and 2021, characterized by a severe contraction in 2018 followed by a multi-year recovery. The fluctuations in overall asset profitability were primarily driven by instability in net profit margins rather than changes in asset utilization.

Net Profit Margin
Profitability demonstrated substantial variability throughout the period. After an initial increase to 9.10% in 2017, the margin experienced a sharp decline to 1.95% in 2018. Following this trough, margins recovered to 7.13% in 2019, dipped slightly to 5.11% in 2020, and eventually reached a period peak of 10.33% in 2021.
Asset Turnover
Asset efficiency saw a notable decrease from 0.49 in 2016 to 0.32 in 2017. For the subsequent three years, the turnover ratio remained relatively stagnant, oscillating within a narrow range between 0.30 and 0.33. A modest recovery to 0.38 was observed in 2021, although this remained below the 2016 baseline.
Return on Assets (ROA)
The ROA trend closely mirrors the volatility of the net profit margin. The decline from 3.81% in 2016 to a low of 0.58% in 2018 was the result of a simultaneous drop in asset turnover and a collapse in profit margins. The recovery to 3.88% by 2021 was supported by the combined effect of the highest recorded net profit margin in the period and a slight uptick in asset turnover.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Four-Component Disaggregation of ROA

Becton, Dickinson & Co., decomposition of ROA

Microsoft Excel
ROA = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin × Asset Turnover
Sep 30, 2021 3.88% = 0.93 × 0.83 × 13.39% × 0.38
Sep 30, 2020 1.62% = 0.89 × 0.65 × 8.84% × 0.32
Sep 30, 2019 2.38% = 1.05 × 0.65 × 10.50% × 0.33
Sep 30, 2018 0.58% = 0.27 × 0.62 × 11.76% × 0.30
Sep 30, 2017 2.92% = 1.13 × 0.65 × 12.38% × 0.32
Sep 30, 2016 3.81% = 0.91 × 0.73 × 11.71% × 0.49

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30).


The Return on Assets (ROA) exhibited significant volatility between 2016 and 2021, characterized by a severe contraction in 2018 followed by a gradual recovery, culminating in a peak of 3.88% in 2021. The fluctuations in overall profitability were primarily driven by erratic tax burdens and variations in operating margins, while asset efficiency remained relatively stagnant.

Tax Burden
Extreme volatility is observed in the tax burden, most notably in 2018 when the ratio fell sharply to 0.27. This decline served as the primary catalyst for the substantial decrease in ROA during that period. The ratio subsequently stabilized, returning to a range between 0.89 and 1.05 from 2019 through 2021.
Interest Burden
The interest burden remained relatively consistent between 2016 and 2020, fluctuating within a narrow range of 0.62 to 0.73. A notable improvement occurred in 2021, where the ratio increased to 0.83, indicating that a higher proportion of operating income was retained after meeting interest obligations.
EBIT Margin
Operating profitability was stable between 11.71% and 12.38% from 2016 to 2018. A downward trend followed in 2019 and 2020, with the margin reaching a low of 8.84% before a strong recovery to 13.39% in 2021, the highest level recorded in the analyzed timeframe.
Asset Turnover
A general decline in asset utilization efficiency is evident. Following a peak of 0.49 in 2016, the ratio dropped and remained stagnant between 0.30 and 0.33 for several years. Although a slight increase to 0.38 was observed in 2021, the efficiency of asset employment remains significantly lower than the 2016 baseline.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Disaggregation of Net Profit Margin

Becton, Dickinson & Co., decomposition of net profit margin ratio

Microsoft Excel
Net Profit Margin = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin
Sep 30, 2021 10.33% = 0.93 × 0.83 × 13.39%
Sep 30, 2020 5.11% = 0.89 × 0.65 × 8.84%
Sep 30, 2019 7.13% = 1.05 × 0.65 × 10.50%
Sep 30, 2018 1.95% = 0.27 × 0.62 × 11.76%
Sep 30, 2017 9.10% = 1.13 × 0.65 × 12.38%
Sep 30, 2016 7.82% = 0.91 × 0.73 × 11.71%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30).


The analysis of the net profit margin from 2016 to 2021 reveals significant volatility, characterized by a severe contraction in 2018 followed by a recovery that peaked in 2021. While the net profit margin fluctuated between a low of 1.95% and a high of 10.33%, the underlying drivers indicate that this variance was predominantly influenced by tax-related anomalies rather than operational instability.

EBIT Margin
Operating profitability remained relatively resilient for much of the period. The margin shifted from 11.71% in 2016 to a peak of 13.39% in 2021. A notable decline occurred in 2020, where the margin dropped to 8.84%, suggesting a temporary compression in operating efficiency or an increase in operating expenses during that fiscal year. However, the subsequent rebound to 13.39% in 2021 indicates a strong recovery in core operational performance.
Tax Burden
The tax burden ratio exhibits the highest degree of volatility and serves as the primary driver for the fluctuations in net profit. A critical anomaly is observed in 2018, where the ratio plummeted to 0.27, coinciding with the sharpest decline in the net profit margin. This suggests a substantial one-time tax expense or a significant change in tax liabilities during that year. Conversely, ratios exceeding 1.00 in 2017 and 2019 indicate periods of tax benefits or credits that artificially bolstered the net profit margin.
Interest Burden
The interest burden remained remarkably stable between 2017 and 2020, hovering between 0.62 and 0.65, which implies a consistent relationship between operating income and interest obligations. A positive shift is noted in 2021, where the ratio increased to 0.83, indicating a reduction in the relative impact of interest expenses on earnings before taxes.
Net Profit Margin Integration
The disaggregation demonstrates that the net profit margin's trajectory was decoupled from operating performance in 2018; despite a stable EBIT margin of 11.76%, the net profit margin collapsed to 1.95% due to the tax burden. By 2021, a convergence of the highest observed EBIT margin, an improved interest burden, and a normalized tax burden resulted in the period's maximum net profit margin of 10.33%.

AI Ask an analyst for more