AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

Becton, Dickinson & Co. (NYSE:BDX)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since May 5, 2022.

DuPont Analysis: Disaggregation of ROE, ROA, and Net Profit Margin

Microsoft Excel

Two-Component Disaggregation of ROE

Becton, Dickinson & Co., decomposition of ROE

Microsoft Excel
ROE = ROA × Financial Leverage
Sep 30, 2021 8.84% = 3.88% × 2.28
Sep 30, 2020 3.68% = 1.62% × 2.27
Sep 30, 2019 5.85% = 2.38% × 2.46
Sep 30, 2018 1.48% = 0.58% × 2.57
Sep 30, 2017 8.50% = 2.92% × 2.91
Sep 30, 2016 12.79% = 3.81% × 3.35

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30).


The Return on Equity (ROE) exhibited significant volatility between 2016 and 2021, characterized by a sharp decline reaching a trough in 2018 before recovering toward the end of the period. The fluctuations in ROE are a result of the interaction between Return on Assets (ROA) and financial leverage.

Return on Assets (ROA) Trends
ROA demonstrated substantial instability, falling from 3.81% in 2016 to a period low of 0.58% in 2018. Although a recovery occurred by 2021, reaching 3.88%, the erratic nature of this metric indicates that operational efficiency and asset utilization were the primary drivers of the variance in equity returns.
Financial Leverage Dynamics
A consistent downward trend in financial leverage is observed from 2016 to 2020, decreasing from a ratio of 3.35 to 2.27. The leverage ratio stabilized in 2021 at 2.28, suggesting a strategic reduction in the use of debt relative to equity or a systematic deleveraging of the balance sheet over the six-year period.
Analysis of ROE Drivers
The contraction of ROE from 12.79% in 2016 to 1.48% in 2018 was a compounded effect of both collapsing asset returns and decreasing financial leverage. Conversely, the recovery of ROE to 8.84% by 2021 was driven almost exclusively by the improvement in ROA, as the leverage ratio remained significantly lower than its 2016 peak. This suggests that the most recent gains in shareholder returns are derived from improved asset productivity rather than increased financial risk.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Three-Component Disaggregation of ROE

Becton, Dickinson & Co., decomposition of ROE

Microsoft Excel
ROE = Net Profit Margin × Asset Turnover × Financial Leverage
Sep 30, 2021 8.84% = 10.33% × 0.38 × 2.28
Sep 30, 2020 3.68% = 5.11% × 0.32 × 2.27
Sep 30, 2019 5.85% = 7.13% × 0.33 × 2.46
Sep 30, 2018 1.48% = 1.95% × 0.30 × 2.57
Sep 30, 2017 8.50% = 9.10% × 0.32 × 2.91
Sep 30, 2016 12.79% = 7.82% × 0.49 × 3.35

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30).


Return on Equity (ROE) exhibited significant volatility between 2016 and 2021, starting at 12.79% and ending at 8.84%. The most pronounced decline occurred in 2018, when ROE dropped to 1.48%, followed by a gradual recovery through 2021.

Net Profit Margin
Profitability margins served as the primary driver of ROE instability. A severe contraction was observed in 2018, where the margin fell to 1.95% from 9.10% in the prior year. This was followed by a recovery phase, with the margin reaching a period peak of 10.33% by September 30, 2021, indicating a strong rebound in operational profitability.
Asset Turnover
Efficiency in asset utilization declined sharply after 2016, falling from 0.49 to a baseline fluctuating between 0.30 and 0.33. Although a moderate increase to 0.38 was recorded in 2021, the overall trend suggests a sustained decrease in the company's ability to generate revenue per unit of asset compared to 2016 levels.
Financial Leverage
A consistent downward trend in financial leverage is evident, with the ratio decreasing from 3.35 in 2016 to 2.28 in 2021. This systematic reduction indicates a shift toward a more conservative capital structure and a decreased reliance on debt to amplify returns on equity.

The overall trajectory of ROE over the six-year period reflects the combined impact of decreasing financial leverage and lowered asset turnover, which exerted downward pressure on returns. The recovery observed in 2021 was primarily catalyzed by a significant expansion in the net profit margin, which compensated for the diminished leverage and relatively low asset efficiency.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Five-Component Disaggregation of ROE

Becton, Dickinson & Co., decomposition of ROE

Microsoft Excel
ROE = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin × Asset Turnover × Financial Leverage
Sep 30, 2021 8.84% = 0.93 × 0.83 × 13.39% × 0.38 × 2.28
Sep 30, 2020 3.68% = 0.89 × 0.65 × 8.84% × 0.32 × 2.27
Sep 30, 2019 5.85% = 1.05 × 0.65 × 10.50% × 0.33 × 2.46
Sep 30, 2018 1.48% = 0.27 × 0.62 × 11.76% × 0.30 × 2.57
Sep 30, 2017 8.50% = 1.13 × 0.65 × 12.38% × 0.32 × 2.91
Sep 30, 2016 12.79% = 0.91 × 0.73 × 11.71% × 0.49 × 3.35

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30).


The Return on Equity (ROE) exhibited significant volatility between 2016 and 2021, starting at 12.79% and reaching a critical low of 1.48% in 2018 before recovering to 8.84% by the end of the period. This fluctuation is the result of diverging trends across the five components of the DuPont disaggregation.

Tax Burden
A severe anomaly occurred in 2018, where the tax burden ratio dropped precipitously to 0.27. This suggests a substantial one-time tax expense or accounting adjustment that heavily depressed the overall ROE for that fiscal year. Outside of this event, the ratio remained relatively stable, generally fluctuating between 0.89 and 1.13.
Interest Burden
The interest burden remained largely stable for the majority of the period, hovering between 0.62 and 0.73 from 2016 to 2020. A positive shift is observed in 2021, where the ratio increased to 0.83, indicating a reduction in the impact of interest expenses relative to operating income.
EBIT Margin
Operational profitability showed a general decline from 12.38% in 2017 to a trough of 8.84% in 2020. However, a sharp recovery occurred in 2021, with the margin rising to 13.39%, the highest level recorded in the analyzed timeframe, signaling a strong restoration of operating efficiency.
Asset Turnover
Asset utilization efficiency saw a sharp decline between 2016 and 2017, falling from 0.49 to 0.32. The ratio remained essentially flat through 2020, with only a modest improvement to 0.38 noted in 2021, suggesting that asset productivity remained constrained following the initial drop.
Financial Leverage
A consistent downward trend in financial leverage is observed from 2016 to 2020, decreasing from 3.35 to 2.27. This deleveraging process indicates a reduction in the reliance on debt to amplify equity returns, which served as a persistent drag on ROE throughout the five-year period.

In summary, the recovery of ROE in 2021 was primarily propelled by a strong rebound in the EBIT margin and a more favorable interest burden, which mitigated the effects of a long-term decline in financial leverage and subdued asset turnover.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Two-Component Disaggregation of ROA

Becton, Dickinson & Co., decomposition of ROA

Microsoft Excel
ROA = Net Profit Margin × Asset Turnover
Sep 30, 2021 3.88% = 10.33% × 0.38
Sep 30, 2020 1.62% = 5.11% × 0.32
Sep 30, 2019 2.38% = 7.13% × 0.33
Sep 30, 2018 0.58% = 1.95% × 0.30
Sep 30, 2017 2.92% = 9.10% × 0.32
Sep 30, 2016 3.81% = 7.82% × 0.49

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30).


The Return on Assets (ROA) exhibited significant volatility between 2016 and 2021, characterized by a substantial decline in 2018 and a recovery to peak levels by 2021. The two-component disaggregation reveals that these fluctuations were primarily driven by instability in profitability margins rather than shifts in asset utilization efficiency.

Net Profit Margin
The profit margin demonstrated extreme variability, reaching its highest point of 10.33% in 2021. A critical contraction occurred in 2018, where the margin fell to 1.95%, representing the lowest point in the observed period. Following this trough, a recovery trend emerged, with margins rising to 7.13% in 2019, dipping slightly to 5.11% in 2020, and subsequently surging to the period peak in 2021.
Asset Turnover
Asset efficiency experienced a sharp initial decline from 0.49 in 2016 to 0.32 in 2017. Between 2017 and 2020, the turnover ratio remained relatively stagnant, fluctuating within a narrow range between 0.30 and 0.33. A moderate improvement was noted in 2021, as the ratio rose to 0.38, indicating a slight increase in the ability to generate revenue from the asset base.
Return on Assets (ROA) Correlation
The overall ROA trajectory closely mirrored the movements of the net profit margin. The minimum value of 0.58% recorded in 2018 was a direct consequence of the diminished profit margin occurring simultaneously with low asset turnover. The ROA concluded the period at 3.88%, effectively recovering to 2016 levels, supported by the convergence of the highest profit margin in the sequence and an improving asset turnover ratio.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Four-Component Disaggregation of ROA

Becton, Dickinson & Co., decomposition of ROA

Microsoft Excel
ROA = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin × Asset Turnover
Sep 30, 2021 3.88% = 0.93 × 0.83 × 13.39% × 0.38
Sep 30, 2020 1.62% = 0.89 × 0.65 × 8.84% × 0.32
Sep 30, 2019 2.38% = 1.05 × 0.65 × 10.50% × 0.33
Sep 30, 2018 0.58% = 0.27 × 0.62 × 11.76% × 0.30
Sep 30, 2017 2.92% = 1.13 × 0.65 × 12.38% × 0.32
Sep 30, 2016 3.81% = 0.91 × 0.73 × 11.71% × 0.49

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30).


The Return on Assets (ROA) exhibited significant volatility between 2016 and 2021, characterized by a severe contraction in 2018 before recovering to a peak of 3.88% in 2021. The overall trajectory indicates that while the company returned to its 2016 performance levels by the end of the period, the intervening years were marked by inconsistent efficiency and external fiscal pressures.

Tax Burden
A critical anomaly is observed in 2018, where the tax burden ratio dropped sharply to 0.27, coinciding with the lowest ROA of the period. This suggests a significant non-recurring tax expense or adjustment that severely impacted net income. Outside of this event, the ratio remained relatively stable, fluctuating between 0.89 and 1.13.
Interest Burden
The interest burden remained largely stagnant between 2017 and 2020, hovering around 0.62 to 0.65. However, a notable improvement occurred in 2021, with the ratio rising to 0.83, indicating a reduction in the relative impact of interest expenses on operating profits.
EBIT Margin
Operating profitability showed a gradual decline from a peak of 12.38% in 2017 to a low of 8.84% in 2020. This downward trend suggests a period of margin compression. This was reversed sharply in 2021, when the EBIT margin reached its highest point in the analysis period at 13.39%, serving as a primary driver for the recovery in ROA.
Asset Turnover
Asset utilization experienced a sharp decrease after 2016, falling from 0.49 to 0.32 in 2017. For the remainder of the period, the ratio remained range-bound between 0.30 and 0.38. The slight increase to 0.38 in 2021 suggests a modest improvement in the efficiency of asset employment to generate revenue.

The synthesis of these components reveals that the 2018 collapse in ROA was primarily a function of the tax burden rather than operational failure. Conversely, the 2021 recovery was multifaceted, driven by the strongest operating margins in the six-year period, an improved interest burden, and a slight uptick in asset turnover.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Disaggregation of Net Profit Margin

Becton, Dickinson & Co., decomposition of net profit margin ratio

Microsoft Excel
Net Profit Margin = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin
Sep 30, 2021 10.33% = 0.93 × 0.83 × 13.39%
Sep 30, 2020 5.11% = 0.89 × 0.65 × 8.84%
Sep 30, 2019 7.13% = 1.05 × 0.65 × 10.50%
Sep 30, 2018 1.95% = 0.27 × 0.62 × 11.76%
Sep 30, 2017 9.10% = 1.13 × 0.65 × 12.38%
Sep 30, 2016 7.82% = 0.91 × 0.73 × 11.71%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30).


The analysis of the net profit margin disaggregation reveals significant volatility between 2016 and 2021, characterized by a severe contraction in 2018 and a strong recovery by the end of the period. While operating profitability remained relatively resilient for much of the timeframe, the bottom-line performance was heavily influenced by fluctuations in tax burdens and operational efficiency shifts in later years.

Net Profit Margin Trends
The net profit margin experienced a non-linear trajectory, peaking at 10.33% in 2021. A critical anomaly occurred in 2018, where the margin plummeted to 1.95% from 9.10% in the previous year. Following this trough, the margin recovered to 7.13% in 2019 before dipping again to 5.11% in 2020, ultimately reaching its highest point in the observed period by 2021.
Operating Performance (EBIT Margin)
The EBIT margin remained stable between 2016 and 2018, fluctuating slightly around 12%. A gradual decline was observed in 2019 (10.50%) and 2020 (8.84%), suggesting a period of increased operating costs or pricing pressure. However, a significant rebound occurred in 2021, with the margin expanding to 13.39%, indicating a substantial improvement in operational efficiency.
Tax Burden Impact
The tax burden is identified as the primary driver for the 2018 profitability collapse. While the EBIT margin remained healthy at 11.76% in 2018, the tax burden ratio dropped sharply to 0.27, indicating a substantial one-time tax expense or accounting adjustment that eroded the majority of the net income. In subsequent years, the tax burden normalized, fluctuating between 0.89 and 1.05.
Interest Burden Stability
The interest burden remained consistently low and stable, hovering between 0.62 and 0.65 from 2017 through 2020. An upward trend was observed in 2021, where the ratio increased to 0.83, suggesting a reduction in interest expenses relative to earnings or a restructuring of debt obligations.

In summary, the overall profitability profile was primarily destabilized by an isolated tax event in 2018 and operational headwinds in 2020. The 2021 results demonstrate a synchronized improvement across all three drivers—operating margin, interest coverage, and tax efficiency—resulting in the strongest net profit performance of the six-year period.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?