AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

Becton, Dickinson & Co. (NYSE:BDX)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since May 5, 2022.

Analysis of Income Taxes

Microsoft Excel

Income Tax Expense (Benefit)

Becton, Dickinson & Co., income tax expense (benefit), continuing operations

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Sep 30, 2021 Sep 30, 2020 Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016
Federal 102 (50) 235 665 (230) 312
State and local, including Puerto Rico 46 47 41 72 (20) 18
Foreign 290 400 300 387 200 286
Current 438 397 576 1,124 (50) 616
Domestic (286) (184) (566) (201) (64) (441)
Foreign (2) (102) (67) (61) (10) (78)
Deferred (288) (286) (633) (262) (74) (519)
Income tax provision (benefit) 150 111 (57) 862 (124) 97

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30).


The analysis of the income tax position from 2016 through 2021 reveals significant volatility in both current and deferred tax components. The net income tax provision has fluctuated between periods of tax expense and tax benefit, reflecting a non-linear trend in the overall tax burden.

Current Tax Expenses
Current tax obligations exhibit substantial variance over the six-year period. A notable peak occurred in 2018, reaching US$ 1,124 million, which stands in sharp contrast to a tax benefit of US$ 50 million recorded in 2017. Following the 2018 spike, expenses trended downward, stabilizing within a range of US$ 397 million to US$ 438 million during the 2020 and 2021 fiscal years.
Deferred Tax Impact
Deferred taxes consistently provided a benefit throughout the entire observed timeframe, as evidenced by negative values in every reporting year. The most significant deferred tax benefit was recognized in 2019 at US$ 633 million. This persistent pattern suggests a continuous utilization of deferred tax assets or the reversal of deferred tax liabilities to offset current tax obligations.
Net Income Tax Provision
The total income tax provision is characterized by instability, alternating between net expenses and net benefits. The highest net expense was recorded in 2018 at US$ 862 million. Conversely, net tax benefits were realized in 2017 (US$ 124 million) and 2019 (US$ 57 million). In the final two years of the period, the net provision returned to a positive expense, ending at US$ 150 million in 2021.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR)

Becton, Dickinson & Co., effective income tax rate (EITR) reconciliation

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2021 Sep 30, 2020 Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016
Federal statutory tax rate 21.00% 21.00% 21.00% 24.50% 35.00% 35.00%
State and local income taxes, net of federal tax benefit -1.90% -1.90% 0.10% 0.80% -2.60% 1.50%
Foreign income tax at rates other than 21% -8.10% -14.80% -6.60% -11.70% 0.00% 0.00%
Effect of foreign operations -0.10% 19.10% -5.50% 19.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Effect of foreign and Puerto Rico earnings (losses) and foreign tax credits (legacy) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% -40.80% -23.70%
Effect of Research Credits and FDII/Domestic Production Activities -1.60% -5.00% -3.30% -2.80% -2.70% -4.40%
Effect of share-based compensation 0.10% -4.50% -3.90% -6.10% -7.90% 0.00%
Effect of gain on divestitures 0.00% -4.50% -2.00% 1.30% 0.00% 0.00%
Effect of uncertain tax position 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 3.30% 0.00% 0.00%
Effect of valuation allowance release -1.70% 0.00% 0.00% -4.80% 0.00% 0.00%
Effect of application for change in accounting method 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% -4.50% 0.00% 0.00%
Effect of nondeductible compensation 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 1.60% 0.00% 0.00%
Other, net -1.00% 1.90% -0.30% -1.70% 6.30% 0.70%
Effective income tax rate, before U.S. tax legislation 6.70% 11.30% -0.50% 18.90% -12.70% 9.10%
U.S. tax legislation 0.00% 0.00% -4.30% 54.60% 0.00% 0.00%
Effective income tax rate 6.70% 11.30% -4.80% 73.50% -12.70% 9.10%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30).


The Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR) exhibited extreme volatility between 2016 and 2021, fluctuating from a low of -12.70% in 2017 to a peak of 73.50% in 2018. While the federal statutory rate followed a clear downward trajectory and eventually stabilized, the overall EITR was primarily driven by significant one-time legislative adjustments and the transition of foreign earnings treatments.

Statutory and Legislative Impacts
A downward trend in the federal statutory tax rate is observed, moving from 35.00% in 2017 to 21.00% by 2019. The most pronounced anomaly occurred in 2018, where U.S. tax legislation contributed a positive 54.60 percentage points to the EITR, driving the total rate to 73.50%. A subsequent legislative adjustment of -4.30% was recorded in 2019, reflecting the trailing impact of these regulatory changes.
Foreign Tax Dynamics
The analysis reveals a fundamental shift in how foreign earnings influenced the tax rate. In 2016 and 2017, legacy foreign and Puerto Rico earnings provided substantial tax benefits of -23.70% and -40.80%, respectively. Post-2017, these legacy benefits disappeared and were replaced by more volatile components. The effect of foreign operations showed erratic swings, contributing +19.00% in 2018, -5.50% in 2019, and +19.10% in 2020. Concurrently, foreign income tax at rates other than 21% consistently reduced the EITR from 2018 to 2021, with the most significant reduction of -14.80% occurring in 2020.
Operational and Non-Recurring Adjustments
Research credits and FDII/Domestic Production Activities provided a consistent reductive effect on the tax rate, ranging from -1.60% to -5.00% throughout the period. Share-based compensation acted as a significant tax reducer from 2017 through 2020, peaking at -7.90% in 2017 before reaching a neutral 0.10% in 2021. Non-recurring items further impacted the 2018 rate, including a -4.50% adjustment for a change in accounting method and a +3.30% increase due to uncertain tax positions.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Components of Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities

Becton, Dickinson & Co., components of deferred tax assets and liabilities

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2021 Sep 30, 2020 Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016
Compensation and benefits 527 554 513 458 618 720
Loss and credit carryforwards 2,107 1,900 1,327 1,290 1,098 1,101
Product recall and liability reserves 191 241 — — — —
Other 554 501 634 707 531 720
Deferred tax assets, before valuation allowance 3,379 3,196 2,474 2,455 2,247 2,541
Valuation allowance (2,036) (1,820) (1,240) (1,180) (1,031) (997)
Deferred tax assets 1,343 1,376 1,234 1,275 1,216 1,544
Property and equipment (410) (361) (255) (253) (244) (235)
Intangibles (2,160) (2,408) (2,624) (2,948) (1,584) (1,493)
Other (123) (137) (189) (384) (164) (608)
Deferred tax liabilities (2,693) (2,906) (3,068) (3,585) (1,992) (2,336)
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) (1,350) (1,530) (1,834) (2,310) (776) (792)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30).


The net deferred tax position consistently reflects a liability throughout the analyzed period. While the net liability experienced a significant expansion in 2018, a subsequent trend of reduction is observed through 2021, narrowing the net liability from a peak of 2.31 billion to 1.35 billion.

Deferred Tax Asset Growth and Composition
Gross deferred tax assets, before valuation allowances, exhibited a general upward trajectory, increasing from 2.54 billion in 2016 to 3.38 billion in 2021. This growth was primarily driven by loss and credit carryforwards, which rose from 1.10 billion to 2.11 billion. Additionally, product recall and liability reserves emerged as a new component of the asset base starting in 2020, contributing 241 million and 191 million in 2020 and 2021, respectively.
Valuation Allowance Trends
A valuation allowance was consistently applied and increased in correlation with the growth of gross deferred tax assets. The allowance grew from 997 million in 2016 to 2.04 billion in 2021. This suggests a conservative accounting approach regarding the realizability of the tax assets, particularly the expanding loss and credit carryforwards.
Deferred Tax Liability Dynamics
Total deferred tax liabilities peaked in 2018 at 3.59 billion, largely due to a sharp increase in liabilities related to intangibles, which spiked to 2.95 billion in that year. Following 2018, intangible-related liabilities gradually declined to 2.16 billion by 2021. Conversely, liabilities associated with property and equipment showed a steady and uninterrupted increase, rising from 235 million in 2016 to 410 million in 2021.
Net Deferred Tax Position Analysis
The net deferred tax liability remained relatively stable between 2016 and 2017 but widened substantially in 2018. Since 2018, the net position has steadily improved, with the net liability decreasing from 2.31 billion to 1.35 billion by the end of 2021. This improvement results from the combined effect of declining intangible-related liabilities and the growth of gross deferred tax assets.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Adjustments to Financial Statements: Removal of Deferred Taxes

Becton, Dickinson & Co., Financial Data: Reported vs. Adjusted

Becton, Dickinson & Co., adjustments to financial statements

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2021 Sep 30, 2020 Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016
Adjustment to Total Liabilities
Total liabilities (as reported) 30,189 30,248 30,684 32,910 24,786 17,953
Less: Noncurrent deferred tax liabilities, net 1,350 1,530 1,834 2,310 776 792
Total liabilities (adjusted) 28,839 28,718 28,850 30,600 24,010 17,161
Adjustment to Shareholders’ Equity
Shareholders’ equity (as reported) 23,677 23,765 21,081 20,994 12,948 7,633
Less: Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) (1,350) (1,530) (1,834) (2,310) (776) (792)
Shareholders’ equity (adjusted) 25,027 25,295 22,915 23,304 13,724 8,425
Adjustment to Net Income
Net income (as reported) 2,092 874 1,233 311 1,100 976
Add: Deferred income tax expense (benefit) (288) (286) (633) (262) (74) (519)
Net income (adjusted) 1,804 588 600 49 1,026 457

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30).


An analysis of the financial statements from September 30, 2016, to September 30, 2021, reveals a consistent divergence between reported and adjusted figures resulting from the removal of deferred taxes. This adjustment systematically reduces reported liabilities and increases shareholders' equity, while simultaneously reducing reported net income across all observed periods.

Balance Sheet Structural Adjustments
The removal of deferred taxes leads to a reduction in total liabilities and a proportional increase in shareholders' equity. Total liabilities peaked in 2018 at 32,910 million US$, with an adjusted value of 30,600 million US$, representing the largest absolute adjustment in the series. Shareholders' equity exhibited a steady upward trend, growing from a reported 7,633 million US$ in 2016 to 23,677 million US$ in 2021. In every period, adjusted equity exceeded reported equity, indicating that the tax adjustments improve the perceived solvency and net asset position of the entity.
Profitability Impact
Adjusted net income is consistently lower than reported net income, suggesting that the removal of deferred tax accounting eliminates certain non-cash tax benefits or credits recognized in the reported figures. The most significant variance occurred in 2019, where reported net income of 1,233 million US$ was adjusted down to 600 million US$. Despite this reduction, adjusted net income followed the general volatility of the reported figures, reaching its highest point in 2021 at 1,804 million US$.
Temporal Trends in Tax Adjustments
The magnitude of the adjustment to liabilities and equity increased significantly between 2017 and 2018, with the gap widening from 776 million US$ to 2,310 million US$. Following this peak, the adjustment amount gradually declined, reaching 1,350 million US$ by September 30, 2021. This trend suggests a period of significant tax-related balance sheet volatility centered around 2018, followed by a gradual normalization of deferred tax impacts.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Adjusted Financial Ratios: Removal of Deferred Taxes (Summary)

Becton, Dickinson & Co., Financial Ratios: Reported vs. Adjusted

Becton, Dickinson & Co., adjusted financial ratios

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2021 Sep 30, 2020 Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016
Net Profit Margin
Reported net profit margin 10.33% 5.11% 7.13% 1.95% 9.10% 7.82%
Adjusted net profit margin 8.91% 3.44% 3.47% 0.31% 8.48% 3.66%
Financial Leverage
Reported financial leverage 2.28 2.27 2.46 2.57 2.91 3.35
Adjusted financial leverage 2.15 2.14 2.26 2.31 2.75 3.04
Return on Equity (ROE)
Reported ROE 8.84% 3.68% 5.85% 1.48% 8.50% 12.79%
Adjusted ROE 7.21% 2.32% 2.62% 0.21% 7.48% 5.42%
Return on Assets (ROA)
Reported ROA 3.88% 1.62% 2.38% 0.58% 2.92% 3.81%
Adjusted ROA 3.35% 1.09% 1.16% 0.09% 2.72% 1.79%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30).


An analysis of the financial ratios from 2016 to 2021 reveals a consistent discrepancy between reported and adjusted figures, indicating that deferred tax items have a material impact on the presentation of profitability and solvency. Across all metrics, the adjusted values—which remove the effects of deferred taxes—are lower than the reported values, suggesting that deferred tax accounting has generally inflated reported performance and leverage.

Net Profit Margin
Reported net profit margins exhibited significant volatility, falling from 7.82% in 2016 to a low of 1.95% in 2018 before recovering to 10.33% by 2021. The adjusted net profit margin followed a similar trajectory but remained consistently lower, reaching a near-zero low of 0.31% in 2018. The gap between reported and adjusted margins was most pronounced in 2016 and 2020, highlighting periods where deferred tax credits or liabilities significantly impacted the bottom line.
Financial Leverage
A steady downward trend in financial leverage is observed over the six-year period. Reported leverage decreased from 3.35 in 2016 to 2.28 in 2021. Adjusted financial leverage mirrors this deleveraging trend, starting at 3.04 and ending at 2.15. The consistent difference between the two indicates that deferred tax assets or liabilities contribute a steady overhead to the reported capital structure.
Return on Equity (ROE)
Reported ROE showed extreme fluctuations, peaking at 12.79% in 2016 and dropping to 1.48% in 2018. The adjusted ROE provides a more conservative view of shareholder returns, remaining below the reported figures in every period. In 2018, the adjusted ROE fell to 0.21%, nearly eliminating the return on equity for that fiscal year. A recovery trend is noted from 2019 onward, with adjusted ROE reaching 7.21% by 2021.
Return on Assets (ROA)
The impact of deferred tax removal is highly evident in the ROA metrics. Reported ROA fluctuated between a high of 3.88% (2021) and a low of 0.58% (2018). Adjusted ROA was substantially lower throughout the period, particularly in 2018 when it dipped to 0.09%. The convergence of reported and adjusted ROA was most visible in 2021, suggesting that the influence of deferred taxes on asset efficiency was less dominant in the final year of the analysis than in previous periods.

Overall, the removal of deferred taxes results in a more conservative financial profile. The most critical observation is the systemic fragility observed in 2018, where adjusted profitability margins and returns on capital nearly vanished, a fact partially obscured by the reported figures.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Adjusted Net Profit Margin

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2021 Sep 30, 2020 Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016
As Reported
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net income 2,092 874 1,233 311 1,100 976
Revenues 20,248 17,117 17,290 15,983 12,093 12,483
Profitability Ratio
Net profit margin1 10.33% 5.11% 7.13% 1.95% 9.10% 7.82%
Adjusted for Deferred Taxes
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Adjusted net income 1,804 588 600 49 1,026 457
Revenues 20,248 17,117 17,290 15,983 12,093 12,483
Profitability Ratio
Adjusted net profit margin2 8.91% 3.44% 3.47% 0.31% 8.48% 3.66%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30).

2021 Calculations

1 Net profit margin = 100 × Net income ÷ Revenues
= 100 × 2,092 ÷ 20,248 = 10.33%

2 Adjusted net profit margin = 100 × Adjusted net income ÷ Revenues
= 100 × 1,804 ÷ 20,248 = 8.91%


The financial performance from 2016 to 2021 is characterized by significant volatility in profitability metrics, with a notable contraction in 2018 followed by a strong recovery ending in 2021.

Adjusted Net Profit Margin Trends
The adjusted net profit margin exhibited extreme variance, starting at 3.66% in 2016 and rising to 8.48% in 2017. A severe decline occurred in 2018, where the margin fell to a period low of 0.31%. This was followed by a period of relative stability in 2019 and 2020, with margins remaining consistent at 3.47% and 3.44%, respectively, before surging to a peak of 8.91% by September 30, 2021.
Comparison of Reported and Adjusted Performance
A recurring divergence is observed between reported and adjusted net income figures. In 2016, the reported net profit margin of 7.82% significantly exceeded the adjusted margin of 3.66%. However, this gap narrowed considerably in 2017 and 2021, suggesting that in those years, non-recurring items had a smaller relative impact on overall profitability.
Analysis of the 2018 Contraction
The year ending September 30, 2018, represents a critical outlier. Adjusted net income dropped precipitously to 49 million US dollars, resulting in a near-zero adjusted net profit margin of 0.31%. This indicates the presence of substantial one-time adjustments or non-cash charges that heavily offset operating gains during that fiscal year.
Growth and Recovery Trajectory
The period between 2020 and 2021 shows an accelerated upward trajectory. Adjusted net income grew from 588 million US dollars to 1,804 million US dollars, while the adjusted net profit margin more than doubled from 3.44% to 8.91%, indicating a strong expansion in bottom-line efficiency.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Adjusted Financial Leverage

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2021 Sep 30, 2020 Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016
As Reported
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Total assets 53,866 54,012 51,765 53,904 37,734 25,586
Shareholders’ equity 23,677 23,765 21,081 20,994 12,948 7,633
Solvency Ratio
Financial leverage1 2.28 2.27 2.46 2.57 2.91 3.35
Adjusted for Deferred Taxes
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Total assets 53,866 54,012 51,765 53,904 37,734 25,586
Adjusted shareholders’ equity 25,027 25,295 22,915 23,304 13,724 8,425
Solvency Ratio
Adjusted financial leverage2 2.15 2.14 2.26 2.31 2.75 3.04

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30).

2021 Calculations

1 Financial leverage = Total assets ÷ Shareholders’ equity
= 53,866 ÷ 23,677 = 2.28

2 Adjusted financial leverage = Total assets ÷ Adjusted shareholders’ equity
= 53,866 ÷ 25,027 = 2.15


The financial trajectory from 2016 to 2021 indicates a significant strengthening of the equity base and a consistent reduction in financial risk through deleveraging. Both reported and adjusted metrics demonstrate a clear trend toward a more conservative capital structure.

Shareholders' Equity Evolution
Reported shareholders' equity experienced substantial growth, increasing from 7,633 million US$ in 2016 to 23,677 million US$ by 2021. Adjusted shareholders' equity followed a similar upward path, rising from 8,425 million US$ in 2016 to a peak of 25,295 million US$ in 2020, before settling at 25,027 million US$ in 2021. The adjusted equity figures remained consistently higher than the reported figures throughout the period, suggesting positive adjustments to the equity account.
Reported Financial Leverage Trends
A steady decline in reported financial leverage is observed, falling from a ratio of 3.35 in 2016 to 2.28 in 2021. The most significant reductions occurred between 2016 and 2018, after which the ratio began to stabilize, indicating a strategic shift toward reducing the proportion of debt relative to equity.
Adjusted Financial Leverage Analysis
Adjusted financial leverage mirrored the downward trend of the reported ratio but remained consistently lower, starting at 3.04 in 2016 and decreasing to 2.15 by 2021. The lower adjusted leverage ratio implies that the underlying financial risk, when normalized for specific accounting adjustments, is lower than the reported figures suggest.
Comparative Leverage Insight
The convergence of reported and adjusted leverage ratios over time is evident, with the gap narrowing from 0.31 points in 2016 to 0.13 points in 2021. This suggests that while adjustments continue to provide a more favorable view of leverage, the primary driver of the improved ratio is the substantial growth in the company's overall equity base.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE)

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2021 Sep 30, 2020 Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016
As Reported
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net income 2,092 874 1,233 311 1,100 976
Shareholders’ equity 23,677 23,765 21,081 20,994 12,948 7,633
Profitability Ratio
ROE1 8.84% 3.68% 5.85% 1.48% 8.50% 12.79%
Adjusted for Deferred Taxes
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Adjusted net income 1,804 588 600 49 1,026 457
Adjusted shareholders’ equity 25,027 25,295 22,915 23,304 13,724 8,425
Profitability Ratio
Adjusted ROE2 7.21% 2.32% 2.62% 0.21% 7.48% 5.42%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30).

2021 Calculations

1 ROE = 100 × Net income ÷ Shareholders’ equity
= 100 × 2,092 ÷ 23,677 = 8.84%

2 Adjusted ROE = 100 × Adjusted net income ÷ Adjusted shareholders’ equity
= 100 × 1,804 ÷ 25,027 = 7.21%


The financial performance from 2016 to 2021 is characterized by significant volatility in profitability and a substantial, consistent expansion of the equity base. While net income experienced a severe contraction in 2018, it recovered to reach a peak in 2021. Concurrently, shareholders' equity grew steadily, which exerted downward pressure on return on equity ratios despite the recovery in nominal earnings.

Net Income Analysis
Reported net income exhibited extreme fluctuations, dropping from 1,100 million USD in 2017 to 311 million USD in 2018, before climbing to a period high of 2,092 million USD in 2021. Adjusted net income followed a similar trajectory but remained consistently lower than reported figures in most years, most notably in 2018 when it fell to 49 million USD and in 2019 when it was approximately half of the reported amount. This divergence indicates the presence of significant non-recurring items or tax adjustments that negatively impacted the adjusted earnings profile.
Shareholders' Equity Expansion
A strong upward trend is observed in the equity base. Reported shareholders' equity increased from 7,633 million USD in 2016 to 23,677 million USD by 2021, representing more than a threefold increase. Adjusted shareholders' equity consistently tracked above reported equity, peaking at 25,295 million USD in 2020. This aggressive growth in the capital base suggests substantial retained earnings or capital injections over the six-year period.
Return on Equity (ROE) Trends
Both reported and adjusted ROE metrics demonstrate high volatility. Reported ROE declined from 12.79% in 2016 to a low of 1.48% in 2018, before recovering to 8.84% in 2021. Adjusted ROE remained consistently lower than the reported metric, reaching a critical low of 0.21% in 2018. The persistent gap between reported and adjusted ROE reflects the impact of adjustments to both the numerator (net income) and the denominator (equity), with the adjusted figures providing a more conservative view of the company's return on invested capital.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2021 Sep 30, 2020 Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016
As Reported
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Net income 2,092 874 1,233 311 1,100 976
Total assets 53,866 54,012 51,765 53,904 37,734 25,586
Profitability Ratio
ROA1 3.88% 1.62% 2.38% 0.58% 2.92% 3.81%
Adjusted for Deferred Taxes
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Adjusted net income 1,804 588 600 49 1,026 457
Total assets 53,866 54,012 51,765 53,904 37,734 25,586
Profitability Ratio
Adjusted ROA2 3.35% 1.09% 1.16% 0.09% 2.72% 1.79%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30).

2021 Calculations

1 ROA = 100 × Net income ÷ Total assets
= 100 × 2,092 ÷ 53,866 = 3.88%

2 Adjusted ROA = 100 × Adjusted net income ÷ Total assets
= 100 × 1,804 ÷ 53,866 = 3.35%


The financial performance between 2016 and 2021 is characterized by significant volatility in profitability and asset efficiency, marked by a severe contraction in 2018 followed by a strong recovery peaking in 2021.

Net Income Trends
Reported net income experienced a sharp decline in 2018 to US$ 311 million before recovering to a peak of US$ 2,092 million by September 30, 2021. Adjusted net income exhibited even greater volatility, falling to a low of US$ 49 million in 2018, highlighting a substantial gap between reported and adjusted earnings during that specific fiscal year.
Reported Return on Assets (ROA)
Reported ROA fluctuated throughout the period, starting at 3.81% in 2016, dropping to a minimum of 0.58% in 2018, and returning to 3.88% in 2021. This pattern mirrors the trajectory of net income, indicating a direct correlation between bottom-line earnings and the efficiency of asset utilization.
Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)
Adjusted ROA remained consistently lower than reported ROA for most of the analyzed timeframe. The metric reached a critical low of 0.09% in 2018, suggesting that adjusted earnings were nearly neutralized relative to the asset base. A significant rebound occurred in 2021, with adjusted ROA rising to 3.35%, representing a substantial recovery in adjusted asset productivity.
Comparative Analysis of Adjustments
The variance between reported and adjusted metrics is most pronounced in 2018 and 2020, suggesting the presence of significant non-recurring items or tax-related adjustments that weighed heavily on the adjusted figures. By 2021, the gap between reported ROA (3.88%) and adjusted ROA (3.35%) narrowed significantly, indicating a period of stabilized earnings and a reduction in the impact of one-time adjustments.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?