AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

O’Reilly Automotive Inc. (NASDAQ:ORLY)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since November 8, 2022.

Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios

Microsoft Excel

Short-term Activity Ratios (Summary)

Turnover Ratios

Average No. Days

O’Reilly Automotive Inc., short-term (operating) activity ratios

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Turnover Ratios
Inventory turnover 1.71 1.51 1.38 1.41 1.41
Receivables turnover 48.90 50.52 47.23 49.66 41.52
Payables turnover 1.34 1.32 1.32 1.33 1.33
Working capital turnover — — — — —
Average No. Days
Average inventory processing period 213 242 265 259 258
Add: Average receivable collection period 7 7 8 7 9
Operating cycle 220 249 273 266 267
Less: Average payables payment period 272 277 277 274 274
Cash conversion cycle -52 -28 -4 -8 -7

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


The operational activity ratios indicate a significant improvement in working capital efficiency and liquidity management over the five-year period from 2017 to 2021. A consistent trend toward faster asset turnover and a shortening operating cycle is evident, culminating in a substantially negative cash conversion cycle.

Inventory Management
Inventory turnover exhibited a positive trajectory, rising from 1.41 in 2017 to 1.71 by 2021. This improvement is mirrored in the average inventory processing period, which decreased from 258 days to 213 days. The acceleration in inventory movement suggests enhanced efficiency in stock management and a reduction in the time capital remains tied up in unsold goods.
Receivables and Collections
Receivables turnover remained consistently high, fluctuating between 41.52 and 50.52. Correspondingly, the average receivable collection period was kept extremely short, ranging from 9 days in 2017 to 7 days in 2021. This indicates an aggressive and effective credit collection process, ensuring a rapid conversion of sales into cash.
Payables and Obligations
Payables turnover remained remarkably stable throughout the period, hovering around 1.32 to 1.34. The average payables payment period showed minimal variance, staying between 272 and 277 days. This stability suggests a consistent strategic approach to managing supplier credit and leveraging payment terms.
Operating and Cash Conversion Cycles
The operating cycle, which combines the inventory processing and receivable collection periods, shortened from 267 days in 2017 to 220 days in 2021. Most notably, the cash conversion cycle transitioned from a slightly negative 7 days in 2017 to a deeply negative 52 days in 2021. This trend signifies that the company is increasingly utilizing supplier financing to fund its operations, as it collects cash from customers and turns over inventory significantly faster than it is required to pay its vendors.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Inventory Turnover

O’Reilly Automotive Inc., inventory turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Cost of goods sold, including warehouse and distribution expenses 6,307,614 5,518,801 4,755,294 4,496,462 4,257,043
Inventory 3,686,383 3,653,195 3,454,092 3,193,344 3,009,800
Short-term Activity Ratio
Inventory turnover1 1.71 1.51 1.38 1.41 1.41
Benchmarks
Inventory Turnover, Competitors2
Amazon.com Inc. 8.34 — — — —
Home Depot Inc. 5.25 — — — —
Lowe’s Cos. Inc. 3.71 — — — —
TJX Cos. Inc. 5.66 — — — —
Inventory Turnover, Sector
Consumer Discretionary Distribution & Retail 6.36 — — — —
Inventory Turnover, Industry
Consumer Discretionary 7.06 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Inventory turnover = Cost of goods sold, including warehouse and distribution expenses ÷ Inventory
= 6,307,614 ÷ 3,686,383 = 1.71

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of operating activity from 2017 to 2021 reveals a consistent expansion in both the cost of goods sold and the value of held inventory, though the rates of growth diverged in the latter part of the period. While costs increased steadily throughout the five-year window, inventory growth slowed significantly by 2021, resulting in an overall improvement in inventory turnover efficiency.

Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) Trajectory
A continuous upward trend is observed in the cost of goods sold, including warehouse and distribution expenses. The value increased from 4,257,043 thousand US dollars in 2017 to 6,307,614 thousand US dollars in 2021. The most significant year-over-year growth occurred between 2019 and 2021, reflecting a substantial increase in the volume of goods processed and distributed.
Inventory Level Trends
Inventory levels grew steadily from 2017 through 2020, rising from 3,009,800 thousand US dollars to 3,653,195 thousand US dollars. However, between 2020 and 2021, the growth rate decelerated sharply, with inventory increasing by less than 1%, indicating a period of stabilization in stock holdings despite continuing growth in sales volume.
Inventory Turnover Performance
The inventory turnover ratio remained relatively stagnant between 2017 and 2019, fluctuating slightly between 1.41 and 1.38. A positive shift in operational efficiency is evident starting in 2020, where the ratio rose to 1.51, and continued into 2021, reaching a peak of 1.71. This trend indicates that the company became more effective at cycling through its inventory, reducing the average time goods remained in stock relative to the cost of goods sold.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Receivables Turnover

O’Reilly Automotive Inc., receivables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Sales 13,327,563 11,604,493 10,149,985 9,536,428 8,977,726
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts 272,562 229,679 214,915 192,026 216,251
Short-term Activity Ratio
Receivables turnover1 48.90 50.52 47.23 49.66 41.52
Benchmarks
Receivables Turnover, Competitors2
Amazon.com Inc. 23.26 — — — —
Home Depot Inc. 44.15 — — — —
Lowe’s Cos. Inc. — — — — —
TJX Cos. Inc. 69.69 — — — —
Receivables Turnover, Sector
Consumer Discretionary Distribution & Retail 30.59 — — — —
Receivables Turnover, Industry
Consumer Discretionary 21.17 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Receivables turnover = Sales ÷ Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts
= 13,327,563 ÷ 272,562 = 48.90

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


A consistent upward trend in sales is observed from 2017 to 2021, with revenues increasing from US$ 8.98 billion to US$ 13.33 billion. During the same period, accounts receivable experienced a more moderate increase, rising from US$ 216.25 million in 2017 to US$ 272.56 million in 2021, despite a slight contraction in 2018. The disproportionate growth between sales and receivables indicates a high level of efficiency in converting credit sales into cash.

Receivables Turnover Efficiency
The receivables turnover ratio remained consistently high throughout the five-year period, fluctuating between 41.52 and 50.52. This suggests a highly aggressive collection cycle or a business model characterized by a high proportion of cash transactions relative to credit sales. The ratio peaked in 2020 at 50.52, indicating the highest level of collection efficiency during the analyzed timeframe.
Trend Analysis and Volatility
A significant increase in the turnover ratio occurred between 2017 and 2018, rising from 41.52 to 49.66, which coincides with a decrease in total accounts receivable despite an increase in sales. While slight declines were noted in 2019 and 2021, the ratio remained well above the 2017 baseline, demonstrating a sustained improvement in the management of short-term operating assets.
Working Capital Implications
The stability of the turnover ratio amidst rapid sales growth suggests that the expansion of the business has not compromised the quality of the receivables portfolio. The ability to maintain a turnover ratio near or above 48.00 from 2018 onward reflects a disciplined approach to credit management and minimizes the risk of bad debt allowances impacting the balance sheet.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Payables Turnover

O’Reilly Automotive Inc., payables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Cost of goods sold, including warehouse and distribution expenses 6,307,614 5,518,801 4,755,294 4,496,462 4,257,043
Accounts payable 4,695,312 4,184,662 3,604,722 3,376,403 3,190,029
Short-term Activity Ratio
Payables turnover1 1.34 1.32 1.32 1.33 1.33
Benchmarks
Payables Turnover, Competitors2
Amazon.com Inc. 3.46 — — — —
Home Depot Inc. 7.52 — — — —
Lowe’s Cos. Inc. 5.51 — — — —
TJX Cos. Inc. 5.09 — — — —
Payables Turnover, Sector
Consumer Discretionary Distribution & Retail 4.19 — — — —
Payables Turnover, Industry
Consumer Discretionary 4.67 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Payables turnover = Cost of goods sold, including warehouse and distribution expenses ÷ Accounts payable
= 6,307,614 ÷ 4,695,312 = 1.34

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of the operating activity from 2017 to 2021 reveals a consistent expansion in scale accompanied by a highly stable approach to managing supplier obligations.

Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) Trends
Operating costs, including warehouse and distribution expenses, demonstrated a continuous upward trajectory throughout the five-year period. Values increased from approximately 4.26 billion US dollars in 2017 to 6.31 billion US dollars by 2021, reflecting a substantial increase in the volume of inventory and distribution activity.
Accounts Payable Growth
Concurrent with the rise in cost of goods sold, accounts payable increased steadily from 3.19 billion US dollars in 2017 to 4.70 billion US dollars in 2021. The growth in these liabilities closely tracks the increase in operational expenses, indicating that the company has scaled its trade credit proportional to its business growth.
Payables Turnover Stability
Despite the substantial increase in the absolute values of both costs and payables, the payables turnover ratio remained remarkably constant, fluctuating minimally between 1.32 and 1.34. This stability indicates a disciplined and consistent payment strategy, where the velocity of supplier payments is maintained at a fixed rate regardless of the expansion in business volume.

The uniformity of the turnover ratio suggests a strong and stable relationship with vendors and an effective use of trade credit as a source of short-term financing. The low ratio indicates a prolonged payment cycle, which allows for the preservation of cash flow while supporting significant operational scaling.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Working Capital Turnover

O’Reilly Automotive Inc., working capital turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Current assets 4,504,262 4,499,787 3,833,662 3,543,102 3,397,672
Less: Current liabilities 5,874,615 5,262,417 4,469,427 3,894,020 3,647,366
Working capital (1,370,353) (762,630) (635,765) (350,918) (249,694)
 
Sales 13,327,563 11,604,493 10,149,985 9,536,428 8,977,726
Short-term Activity Ratio
Working capital turnover1 — — — — —
Benchmarks
Working Capital Turnover, Competitors2
Amazon.com Inc. 24.33 — — — —
Home Depot Inc. 24.87 — — — —
Lowe’s Cos. Inc. 24.92 — — — —
TJX Cos. Inc. 6.51 — — — —
Working Capital Turnover, Sector
Consumer Discretionary Distribution & Retail 21.83 — — — —
Working Capital Turnover, Industry
Consumer Discretionary 10.77 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Working capital turnover = Sales ÷ Working capital
= 13,327,563 ÷ -1,370,353 = —

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


A comprehensive review of the financial metrics between 2017 and 2021 reveals a consistent expansion in revenue coupled with a deepening negative working capital position. While sales demonstrated a steady upward trajectory, the growth in current liabilities significantly outpaced the growth of current assets, resulting in an increasingly negative net working capital balance.

Sales Growth Trends
Annual sales experienced uninterrupted growth over the five-year period, rising from approximately 8.98 billion US dollars in 2017 to 13.33 billion US dollars by 2021. This represents a sustained increase in top-line performance and market activity.
Working Capital Dynamics
Working capital remained negative throughout the entire period, starting at -249.69 million US dollars in 2017 and expanding to -1.37 billion US dollars in 2021. This trend indicates an aggressive working capital management strategy where current liabilities are utilized to fund operational growth, effectively leveraging supplier credit to finance the business.
Working Capital Turnover Interpretation
The working capital turnover ratio transitioned from approximately -35.95 in 2017 to -9.72 in 2021. This shift is driven by the fact that the deficit in working capital grew at a faster rate than the growth in sales. The negative ratio reflects a highly efficient cash conversion cycle typical of high-volume retail operations, where inventory is sold and cash is collected before suppliers are paid. However, the trend toward a lower absolute ratio suggests that the company is increasing its reliance on short-term financing relative to its sales volume.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Average Inventory Processing Period

O’Reilly Automotive Inc., average inventory processing period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data
Inventory turnover 1.71 1.51 1.38 1.41 1.41
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average inventory processing period1 213 242 265 259 258
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Inventory Processing Period, Competitors2
Amazon.com Inc. 44 — — — —
Home Depot Inc. 70 — — — —
Lowe’s Cos. Inc. 98 — — — —
TJX Cos. Inc. 65 — — — —
Average Inventory Processing Period, Sector
Consumer Discretionary Distribution & Retail 57 — — — —
Average Inventory Processing Period, Industry
Consumer Discretionary 52 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Average inventory processing period = 365 ÷ Inventory turnover
= 365 ÷ 1.71 = 213

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of inventory activity ratios from 2017 to 2021 reveals a marked improvement in operational efficiency, particularly in the latter half of the observation period. While metrics remained relatively stagnant between 2017 and 2019, a positive shift occurred starting in 2020, culminating in the most efficient inventory management levels of the five-year window by the end of 2021.

Inventory Turnover
The inventory turnover ratio exhibited stability between 2017 and 2018 at 1.41, with a marginal decline to 1.38 in 2019. A growth phase followed, with the ratio increasing to 1.51 in 2020 and reaching a peak of 1.71 in 2021. This upward trajectory indicates an acceleration in the rate at which inventory is sold and replaced.
Average Inventory Processing Period
The average inventory processing period mirrored the turnover trends inversely. After a slight increase from 258 days in 2017 to 265 days in 2019, there was a significant reduction in the time required to move inventory. The period dropped to 242 days in 2020 and further decreased to 213 days by 2021, representing a reduction of 52 days from the 2019 peak.

The inverse correlation between the turnover ratio and the processing period demonstrates a strengthening of inventory control mechanisms. The reduction of the processing period by approximately 19.6% between 2019 and 2021 suggests a heightened ability to convert stock into sales, which typically correlates with reduced holding costs and a diminished risk of inventory obsolescence.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Average Receivable Collection Period

O’Reilly Automotive Inc., average receivable collection period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data
Receivables turnover 48.90 50.52 47.23 49.66 41.52
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average receivable collection period1 7 7 8 7 9
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Receivable Collection Period, Competitors2
Amazon.com Inc. 16 — — — —
Home Depot Inc. 8 — — — —
Lowe’s Cos. Inc. — — — — —
TJX Cos. Inc. 5 — — — —
Average Receivable Collection Period, Sector
Consumer Discretionary Distribution & Retail 12 — — — —
Average Receivable Collection Period, Industry
Consumer Discretionary 17 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Average receivable collection period = 365 ÷ Receivables turnover
= 365 ÷ 48.90 = 7

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of short-term operating activity reveals a high level of efficiency in the management of accounts receivable between 2017 and 2021. The metrics indicate a rapid conversion of credit sales into cash, suggesting a stringent collection policy or a business model characterized by immediate payment terms.

Receivables Turnover
The receivables turnover ratio exhibited an overall upward trend, increasing from 41.52 in 2017 to 48.90 in 2021. The ratio peaked in 2020 at 50.52, demonstrating an acceleration in the frequency with which outstanding receivables were converted into cash over the five-year period.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The average collection period remained consistently low, fluctuating within a narrow range of 7 to 9 days. A decrease from 9 days in 2017 to 7 days in 2018 was followed by a slight increase to 8 days in 2019, before stabilizing at 7 days for both 2020 and 2021. This consistency indicates a highly predictable and efficient cash recovery cycle.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Operating Cycle

O’Reilly Automotive Inc., operating cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks

No. days

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data
Average inventory processing period 213 242 265 259 258
Average receivable collection period 7 7 8 7 9
Short-term Activity Ratio
Operating cycle1 220 249 273 266 267
Benchmarks
Operating Cycle, Competitors2
Amazon.com Inc. 60 — — — —
Home Depot Inc. 78 — — — —
Lowe’s Cos. Inc. — — — — —
TJX Cos. Inc. 70 — — — —
Operating Cycle, Sector
Consumer Discretionary Distribution & Retail 69 — — — —
Operating Cycle, Industry
Consumer Discretionary 69 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Operating cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period
= 213 + 7 = 220

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of the operating activity ratios from 2017 to 2021 reveals a significant improvement in the efficiency of the operating cycle, characterized by a notable reduction in the time required to convert inventory into cash.

Average Inventory Processing Period
A period of relative stability was observed between 2017 and 2019, with the processing period increasing slightly from 258 days to a peak of 265 days. However, a sharp downward trend occurred starting in 2020, with the period falling to 242 days and reaching a five-year low of 213 days by the end of 2021. This contraction suggests enhanced inventory management and a faster turnover of goods.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The collection period remained consistently low and stable throughout the analyzed timeframe, fluctuating minimally between 7 and 9 days. This indicates a highly efficient credit policy and a rapid conversion of receivables into cash, contributing a negligible but stable component to the overall operating cycle.
Operating Cycle
The total operating cycle mirrored the movements of the inventory processing period, as the receivable collection period remained nearly constant. After reaching a maximum of 273 days in 2019, the operating cycle decreased substantially to 220 days by December 31, 2021. This overall reduction of 47 days from the 2019 peak reflects a systemic improvement in short-term operational efficiency.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Average Payables Payment Period

O’Reilly Automotive Inc., average payables payment period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data
Payables turnover 1.34 1.32 1.32 1.33 1.33
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average payables payment period1 272 277 277 274 274
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Payables Payment Period, Competitors2
Amazon.com Inc. 105 — — — —
Home Depot Inc. 49 — — — —
Lowe’s Cos. Inc. 66 — — — —
TJX Cos. Inc. 72 — — — —
Average Payables Payment Period, Sector
Consumer Discretionary Distribution & Retail 87 — — — —
Average Payables Payment Period, Industry
Consumer Discretionary 78 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Average payables payment period = 365 ÷ Payables turnover
= 365 ÷ 1.34 = 272

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of short-term operating activity from 2017 through 2021 reveals a high degree of stability in the management of accounts payable. There is a consistent pattern in how supplier obligations are handled, with minimal volatility observed in both the turnover ratio and the average payment duration over the five-year period.

Payables Turnover
The payables turnover ratio remained nearly constant, fluctuating within a very narrow range between 1.32 and 1.34. The ratio held steady at 1.33 in 2017 and 2018, experienced a marginal decrease to 1.32 in 2019 and 2020, and returned to 1.34 by the end of 2021. This stability indicates a disciplined and predictable relationship between the volume of purchases and the average balance of payables.
Average Payables Payment Period
The average period for settling payables demonstrates similar consistency, ranging from a minimum of 272 days to a maximum of 277 days. The payment period was 274 days in 2017 and 2018, increased slightly to 277 days in 2019 and 2020, and contracted to 272 days in 2021. This suggests that the time taken to discharge obligations to suppliers is maintained at approximately nine months.

The extended duration of the payables payment period suggests a strategic reliance on supplier financing to support operational liquidity. The lack of significant deviation in these metrics over five years indicates a well-established credit arrangement with suppliers and strong bargaining power, allowing the entity to maintain a consistent cash flow cycle by delaying outflows without disrupting the supply chain.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Cash Conversion Cycle

O’Reilly Automotive Inc., cash conversion cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks

No. days

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data
Average inventory processing period 213 242 265 259 258
Average receivable collection period 7 7 8 7 9
Average payables payment period 272 277 277 274 274
Short-term Activity Ratio
Cash conversion cycle1 -52 -28 -4 -8 -7
Benchmarks
Cash Conversion Cycle, Competitors2
Amazon.com Inc. -45 — — — —
Home Depot Inc. 29 — — — —
Lowe’s Cos. Inc. — — — — —
TJX Cos. Inc. -2 — — — —
Cash Conversion Cycle, Sector
Consumer Discretionary Distribution & Retail -18 — — — —
Cash Conversion Cycle, Industry
Consumer Discretionary -9 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Cash conversion cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period – Average payables payment period
= 213 + 7 – 272 = -52

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The operational activity ratios reveal a highly efficient working capital management strategy characterized by a consistently negative cash conversion cycle. This indicates that the organization generates cash from sales before the associated costs of inventory are paid to suppliers, effectively using accounts payable as a primary source of operational financing.

Average Inventory Processing Period
A fluctuating trend is observed in inventory management, with the processing period increasing from 258 days in 2017 to a peak of 265 days in 2019. However, a significant improvement followed, with the period dropping to 242 days in 2020 and further decreasing to 213 days by 2021. This downward trajectory in the latter years suggests enhanced inventory turnover and improved supply chain efficiency.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The collection period remained exceptionally low and stable throughout the five-year period, fluctuating minimally between 7 and 9 days. This consistency reflects a highly efficient credit policy or a business model dominated by immediate payment methods, ensuring a rapid conversion of sales into cash.
Average Payables Payment Period
Payment terms remained remarkably consistent, hovering between 272 and 277 days. The ability to maintain such a long payment period relative to inventory and receivable cycles provides a significant liquidity advantage, allowing the entity to retain cash for extended durations.
Cash Conversion Cycle
The cash conversion cycle exhibits a strong accelerating negative trend. While the cycle was marginally negative between 2017 and 2019 (ranging from -4 to -8 days), it expanded significantly to -28 days in 2020 and reached -52 days by 2021. This expansion is primarily driven by the reduction in the inventory processing period while maintaining a stable and long payables payment period, resulting in a substantial increase in available operational liquidity.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?