Paying user area
Try for free
Fiserv Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Statement of Comprehensive Income
- Cash Flow Statement
- Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios
- Common Stock Valuation Ratios
- Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)
- Dividend Discount Model (DDM)
- Selected Financial Data since 2005
- Operating Profit Margin since 2005
- Current Ratio since 2005
- Price to Book Value (P/BV) since 2005
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Fiserv Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Free Cash Flow to The Firm (FCFF)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The financial data reveals a positive trajectory in the company's cash flow generation over the five-year period from 2017 to 2021. Both net cash provided by operating activities and free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) demonstrate substantial growth, indicating enhanced operational efficiency and cash management.
- Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
- Starting at $1,483 million in 2017, the net cash from operations showed a steady increase each year, reaching a peak of $4,147 million in 2020. There was a slight decline to $4,034 million in 2021, though the figure remained significantly higher than the initial years. This trend suggests improving core business operations and the ability to generate strong cash inflows from regular activities, with a minor deceleration in the latest year.
- Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF)
- Free cash flow exhibited a similar growth pattern, rising from $1,305 million in 2017 to $3,808 million in 2020. In 2021, FCFF declined somewhat to $3,381 million. The pattern reflects the company's capacity to convert operational cash into free cash flow after accounting for capital expenditures. Despite the recent dip, the FCFF level remains robust, supporting potential investments, debt reduction, or shareholder returns.
Overall, the data points to a strong improvement in cash generation capabilities through 2020, followed by a modest contraction in 2021. The growth in operating cash flow outpaces initial years by nearly threefold, underscoring a significant enhancement in business performance or working capital management. The slight downturn in 2021 warrants monitoring for potential underlying causes but does not negate the positive medium-term trend.
Interest Paid, Net of Tax
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2 2021 Calculation
Interest paid, tax = Interest paid × EITR
= × =
The analysis of the effective income tax rate (EITR) over the period from 2017 to 2021 shows a notable downward trend initially, followed by an upward adjustment in the last observed year. Specifically, the EITR decreased significantly from 31.9% in 2017 to a low point of 16.7% in 2020. Subsequently, it increased to 21.8% in 2021. This pattern suggests that the company may have benefited from tax optimization or policy changes up to 2020, after which tax rates began to rise again, potentially reflecting adjustments in tax regulations or changes in the company’s taxable income structure.
Regarding the interest paid, net of tax, a substantial increase is observed over the five-year span. Starting at US$109 million in 2017, the interest paid more than doubled by 2019 to US$238 million, and then it surged sharply to US$561 million in 2020, more than doubling again from the previous year. In 2021, there was a slight decline to US$507 million, but the amount remained significantly higher than in the years before 2020. This considerable increase in interest expenses may indicate higher debt levels, increased borrowing costs, or refinancing on less favorable terms during this period.
Overall, the trends in tax rates and interest paid reveal shifting financial dynamics, with lower effective tax rates up to 2020 potentially improving net profitability, alongside a growing interest burden that could impact future financial performance and leverage considerations.
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Current
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |
Enterprise value (EV) | |
Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) | |
Valuation Ratio | |
EV/FCFF | |
Benchmarks | |
EV/FCFF, Competitors1 | |
Accenture PLC | |
Adobe Inc. | |
Cadence Design Systems Inc. | |
CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. | |
Fair Isaac Corp. | |
International Business Machines Corp. | |
Intuit Inc. | |
Microsoft Corp. | |
Oracle Corp. | |
Palantir Technologies Inc. | |
Palo Alto Networks Inc. | |
Salesforce Inc. | |
ServiceNow Inc. | |
Synopsys Inc. | |
Workday Inc. | |
EV/FCFF, Sector | |
Software & Services | |
EV/FCFF, Industry | |
Information Technology |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 Click competitor name to see calculations.
If the company EV/FCFF is lower then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/FCFF is higher then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Historical
Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
Enterprise value (EV)1 | ||||||
Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF)2 | ||||||
Valuation Ratio | ||||||
EV/FCFF3 | ||||||
Benchmarks | ||||||
EV/FCFF, Competitors4 | ||||||
Accenture PLC | ||||||
Adobe Inc. | ||||||
Cadence Design Systems Inc. | ||||||
CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. | ||||||
Fair Isaac Corp. | ||||||
International Business Machines Corp. | ||||||
Intuit Inc. | ||||||
Microsoft Corp. | ||||||
Oracle Corp. | ||||||
Palantir Technologies Inc. | ||||||
Palo Alto Networks Inc. | ||||||
Salesforce Inc. | ||||||
ServiceNow Inc. | ||||||
Synopsys Inc. | ||||||
Workday Inc. | ||||||
EV/FCFF, Sector | ||||||
Software & Services | ||||||
EV/FCFF, Industry | ||||||
Information Technology |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
3 2021 Calculation
EV/FCFF = EV ÷ FCFF
= ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
- Enterprise Value (EV)
- The enterprise value exhibited a significant increase from 2017 through 2019, nearly tripling from approximately $33.9 billion to about $96.3 billion. This sharp rise peaked in 2019, after which the value stabilized in 2020 at nearly the same level and then decreased in 2021 to around $83.4 billion. This pattern indicates a period of aggressive valuation growth followed by stabilization and a moderate decline.
- Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF)
- Free cash flow to the firm showed a consistent upward trend throughout the period, starting from $1.3 billion in 2017 and more than doubling by 2021 to approximately $3.4 billion. Notably, the most substantial annual growth occurred between 2019 and 2020, with FCFF rising from about $2.3 billion to $3.8 billion. This suggests improving operational cash generation over time, despite potential external factors influencing valuation.
- EV/FCFF Ratio
- The EV to FCFF ratio fluctuated over the years but showed a notable peak in 2019 at approximately 41.7, indicating a higher valuation relative to cash flow at that time. The ratio decreased significantly in 2020 to about 25.7 and further slightly declined in 2021 to around 24.7. This decline in the ratio suggests either a market correction or improved cash flow generation relative to enterprise value, making the company appear more reasonably valued by the end of the period.
- Overall Analysis
- The data reveals a period of strong enterprise value growth up to 2019, followed by a correction phase. Meanwhile, free cash flow consistently improved, reflecting healthy operational performance. The substantial decrease in the EV/FCFF ratio after 2019 points to a valuation adjustment, possibly aligning market expectations more closely with the underlying cash flow generation capabilities. This indicates an evolution towards more sustainable financial metrics after the peak valuation period.